Spring Training: Accessing Common Core through the CA Math Framework March 19, 2015 Hilary Dito & Pam Tyson.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Professional Development on the Instructional Shift of Focus Lets Focus on Focus.
Advertisements

Professional Development Module Common Core Math Shift: Focus Grade 6.
Common Core State Standards for Mathematics: Coherence Grade 7 Overview.
Common Core State Standards for Mathematics: Coherence
Common Core State Standards for Mathematics: Coherence Grade 8 Overview.
Kindergarten Instructional Shifts-Focus. Why Common Core? Initiated by the National Governors Association (NGA) and Council of Chief State School Officers.
Transition to CCSS Math What it means and what are the expectations for learning? Middle School Parent Meeting March 26, 2014.
Common Core State Standards
MARCH 2012 Common Core State Standards for Mathematics: Implications for Grades K-12.
Common Core State Standards What’s It All About? Karen Kennedy, Ed.D. Mathematics Consultant.
© 2012 Common Core, Inc. All rights reserved. commoncore.org NYS COMMON CORE MATHEMATICS CURRICULUM A Story of Ratios Examining Module 1 for Grades 6 –
Arkansas Department of Education-CCSS
Overview © 2011 California County Superintendents Educational Services Association Mathematics General Overview 1.
1 Common Core Lite Mathematics Brought to you by….
CAIM Inservice: November 15, Focus: 2-3 topics focused on deeply in each grade. 2.Coherence: Concepts logically connected from one grade to.
Common Core State Standards—Mathematics Introduction/Overview 1 Cathy Carroll
Rigorous Curriculum Design Showcase
CC Math 6: Ratios & Proportions Unit 1. Purpose Standards Ratio and Proportion Learning Progression Lesson Agenda Getting Ready for the Lesson (Resources.
Algebra 1 - Functions: Interpret & Building Functions Unit 5
Unit 1 Focusing on the Major Work of the Levels Produced under U.S. Department of Education Contract No. ED-VAE-13-C-0066, with StandardsWork, Inc. and.
ADAPTED FROM A WORKSHOP PREPARED FOR THE RHODE ISLAND DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION BY KRISTINA SPARFVEN The Rigors of Ratio and Proportional Reasoning in the.
Module 2: Content and Curriculum, K-8 Mathematics.
College and Career Readiness Mathematics at Middle School Poway Unified School District 2014.
Overview 1 © 2011 California County Superintendents Educational Services Association Mathematics General Overview.
K–8 Session 3: Exploring the Domain Progressions in Grades K–8 Module 1: A Closer Look at the Common Core State Standards for Mathematics.
2010 New Math Standards. Mathematical Practices 1. Attend to precision 2. Construct viable arguments and critique the reasoning of others 3. Make sense.
Middle School Liaison Meeting
Math Foundational Services SHIFT 1: Focus October 9, 2014 Cindy Dollman & Joe Delinski The PROE Center.
GV Middle School Mathematics Mrs. Susan Iocco December 10, 2014.
Mathematics Standards and Model Curriculum Targeted Professional Development Meeting Presenter Name: Bonny Buffington Date: February 13, 2012.
The Common Core State Standards for Mathematics Transitioning to the Common Core.
Three Shifts of the Alaska Mathematics Standards.
Background Information The CCSSM were a result of a state-led initiative in June 2009 by the Council of Chief State School Officers and the National Governor’s.
Standards for Mathematics Standards for Mathematical Practice Apply across all grade levels Describe habits of mind of a mathematically proficient student.
How to read the grade level standards Standards Clusters Domains define what students should understand and be able to do. are groups of related standards.
EALR 2: Problem Solving EALR 3: Reasoning EALR 4: Communication EALR 5: Connections Component 5.3: Relate mathematical concepts and procedures to real-world.
The Common Core State Standards emphasize coherence at each grade level – making connections across content and between content and mathematical practices.
Making Sense Of The New Standards K-12 Alliance Staff Developer Training January 25, 2013.
1 Grade-Level Standards  K-8 grade-by-grade standards organized by domain  9-12 high school standards organized by conceptual categories Common Core.
Are We Ready to Implement the Common Core Standards in Mathematics ? Katy White based on a presentation by DR. WESLEY BIRD
A CLOSER LOOK AT THE CCSS FOR MATHEMATICS COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS PRESENTED BY: BEATRIZ ALDAY.
COMMON CORE MATH OVERVIEW. CCSS-M for Mathematical Practice (The How To) 1. Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them 2. Reason abstractly.
Standards Development Process College and career readiness standards developed in summer 2009 Based on the college and career readiness standards, K-12.
Common Core Standards Madison City Schools Math Leadership Team.
Section 2 Systems of Professional Learning Module 2 Grades 6-12: Focus on Content Standards.
Introduction to the K-8 mathematics standards in Washington State Seattle University September, 2015 Dr. Mark Roddy - Seattle University.
6-12 Mathematics 1 © CCSESA, California, All rights reserved Mathematics Teacher Overview.
Understanding the Common Core State Standards March 2012 These slides were taken from: and I have deleted.
Module 1: A Closer Look at the Common Core State Standards for Mathematics High School Session 3: Exploring Standard Progressions across High School Courses.
Mathematics Shifts and Integration of Initiatives Common Core State Standards Session 2 K-5 Mathematics.
Module 1 What is Common Core?. Goals Develop an understanding of Common Core Standards and the PA commitment  English Language Arts  Mathematics Explore.
Deep Dive into the Math Shifts Understanding Focus and Coherence in the Common Core State Standards for Mathematics.
COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS (CCSS) OVERVIEW The Shifts: What they are and why they are important.
High School Session 1: Exploring the Critical Areas Module 1: A Closer Look at the Common Core State Standards for Mathematics.
6.RP - Understand ratio concepts and use ratio reasoning to solve problems. 1. Understand the concept of a ratio and use ratio language to describe a.
2010 Arizona Mathematics Standards (Common Core).
Overview Dr Kwaku Adu-Gyamfi Stefanie Smith. 2  Work with your group  Who did you work with?  What did you learn about them?  Their knowledge of.
Day 2 Summer 2011 Algebraic Reasoning Institute 1.
April 14, Welcome  Internet Connect to CLIU CO; passkey: cliu1 Keystone Commons ○
Joint Council April 6,  Standards for Mathematical Practice  Standards for Mathematical Content  PA Standards & CCSSM.
COMMON CORE STANDARDS C OLLEGE - AND C AREER - READINESS S TANDARDS North East Florida Educational ConsortiumFall 2011 F LORIDA ’ S P LAN FOR I MPLEMENTATION.
COMMON CORE STANDARDS C OLLEGE - AND C AREER - READINESS S TANDARDS North East Florida Educational ConsortiumFall 2011 F LORIDA ’ S P LAN FOR I MPLEMENTATION.
Module 1: Standards.  Explain the concept of a ratio  Use ratio language to describe a relationship between two quantities Example: The ratio of girls.
Mathematics Curriculum Evaluation Toolkit Transitioning to the Common Core May 16, 2014 Pam Tyson & Hilary Dito.
LITCHFIELD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT MATH CURRICULUM
Jeanette Grisham March 28, 2012
What to Look for Mathematics Grade 6
Cumberland County Schools Mathematics Common Core
Connecticut Core Standards for Mathematics
Presentation transcript:

Spring Training: Accessing Common Core through the CA Math Framework March 19, 2015 Hilary Dito & Pam Tyson

Workshop Goals To examine the Common Core State Standards through the lens of the CA Mathematics Framework at a specific grade level To understand the major focus of a grade level To explore how the Mathematics Framework supports learning for all students

Introductions Icebreaker Activity – On a post-it, write one Learning experience that you have had around the CCSS-M

Discuss with Your Group 1.Math is math – there is nothing new in the CCSS-M 2.Why are we doing all of this crazy stuff – let’s just get to the answer 3.CCSS-M is more focused that previous sets of standards 4.CCSS-M is watered down – too simplified

Overview of the Day’s Topics Introduction to Each Other and the Mathematics Framework Critical Areas of Instruction in Secondary Mathematics Walk Through – A Grade Level Chapter – Non-Grade Level Chapters – The Appendices Taking This Information Back to Your Schools

Purpose of the Framework The Mathematics Framework for California Public Schools: Kindergarten Through Grade Twelve is meant to guide teachers in curriculum development and instruction to ensure that all students meet exceed the CA CCSSM (p. 8)

Chapter One Introduction Guiding Principles for Mathematics Programs in CA 1.Learning Mathematical Ideas should be explored in ways that stimulate curiosity, create enjoyment of mathematics and develop depth of understanding. 2.Teaching An effective mathematics program is based on a carefully designed set of content standards that are clear, specific, focused and articulated over time as a coherent sequence. 3.Technology Technology is an essential tool that should be used strategically in mathematics education. 4.Equity All students should have a high-quality mathematics program that prepares them for college and careers. 5.Assessment Assessment of student learning in mathematics should take many forms to inform instruction and learning.

Chapter 2: Overview of Standards Chapters The standards call for learning mathematics content in the context of real-world situations, using mathematics to solve problems, and developing “habits of mind” that foster mastery of mathematics content as well as mathematical understanding (p. 9).

Standards are Based on Three Major Principles 1.Conceptual understanding 2.Procedural skill and fluency 3.Ability to apply math to solve problems

K-8 Areas To Understand Deeply GradeKey Areas of Focus in Mathematics K-2 Place value, addition and subtraction – concepts, skills, and problem solving 3-5 Multiplication and division of whole numbers and fractions – concepts, skills, and problem solving 6 Ratios and proportional reasoning; early expressions and equations 7 Ratios and proportional reasoning; arithmetic of rational numbers 8 Linear algebra Two Other Cross Grade Table in Framework Chapter 2 provide Exemplar Standards Emphazing Understanding and Areas of Fluency

Standards Page(s) Domain Standard Cluster

Content Domains Grades K - 12

HS Math Standards vs. Courses High schools standards are organized by conceptual themes (not by grade level or course title). The Framework outlines the Courses – Algebra or Course 1 – Geometry or Course 2 – Algebra or Course 3 – Precalculus – Statistics and Probability – Calculus – Advanced Placement Statistics and Probability

17 Common Core State Standards for Mathematics Grade-Level Content Standards – K-8 grade-by-grade standards organized by domain – 9-12 high school standards organized by conceptual categories Standards for Mathematical Practice – Describe mathematical “habits of mind” – Standards for mathematical proficiency: reasoning, problem solving, modeling, decision making, and engagement – Connect with content standards in each grade Standards of Mathematical Practice Two Types of Math Standards Across All Grades

Mathematical Practices are cross- cutting. They relate to the content standards at ALL grade-levels Standards of Mathematical Practice

Overview of A Grade-Level Chapter Critical Areas of Instruction Grade Content: Cluster-Level Emphases Connecting Mathematical Practices & Content Grade Learning by Domain – Tables – Example Problems – Tips for Teaching Essential Learnings for the Next Grade Standards for the Grade

Break

THROUGH A GRADE LEVEL

Focus Read pages 1-3 of the Grade Eight chapter of the Framework What are the implications for classroom instruction? Share one insight with a partner

Focus WHAT STUDENTS LEARN IN GRADE EIGHT Grade Eight Critical Areas of Instruction In grade eight, instructional time should focus on three critical areas: (1) formulating and reasoning about expressions and equations, including modeling and association in bivariate data with a linear equation, and solving linear equations and systems of linear equations; (2) grasping the concept of a function and using functions to describe quantitative relationships; (3) analyzing two-and three- dimensional space and figures using distance, angle, similarity, and congruence and understanding and applying the Pythagorean Theorem. Students also work toward fluency with solving simple sets of two equations with two unknowns by inspection.

Focus

8 th Grade Mathematics

8 th Grade Mathematics – from PARCC Framework Turn to the Content Standards Pages in the framework chapter (Grade 8: pages 39-42) Highlight the Major Clusters green How do the supporting clusters and the additional clusters reinforce the major clusters?

Compare the Cluster-Level Emphasis of other grades Read the cluster-level emphasis for – 2 nd Grade – 11 th Grade How do the supporting clusters and the additional clusters reinforce the major clusters? How does grade 2 support the work in subsequent grades? grade 8 support the work in previous grades and subsequent grades?

2nd Grade Mathematics from PARCC Framework

Coherence “Some of the connections in the standards knit topics together at a single grade level. Most connections are vertical, as the standards support a progression of increasing knowledge, skill, and sophistication across the grades.” CDE Mathematics Framework, Overview Chapter, page 3

Coherence CDE Mathematics Framework, Overview Chapter, page 3 “Some of the connections in the standards knit topics together at a single grade level. Most connections are vertical, as the standards support a progression of increasing knowledge, skill, and sophistication across the grades.”

Coherence: A LEARNING TRAJECTORY ● Understand the concept of a unit rate a/b associated with a ratio a:b with b ≠ 0, and use rate language in the context of a ratio relationship. For example, “This recipe has a ratio of 3 cups of flour to 4 cups of sugar, so there is 3/4 cup of flour for each cup of sugar.” “We paid $75 for 15 hamburgers, which is a rate of $5 per hamburger.” ( 6.RP.2 ▲ ) ● Use ratio and rate reasoning to solve real-world and mathematical problems, e.g., by reasoning about tables of equivalent ratios, tape diagrams, double number line diagrams, or equations. ( 6.RP.3a,b ▲) o a. Make tables of equivalent ratios relating quantities with whole number measurements, find missing values in the tables, and plot the pairs of values on the coordinate plane. Use tables to compare ratios. o b. Solve unit rate problems including those involving unit pricing and constant speed. For example, if it took 7 hours to mow 4 lawns, then at that rate, how many lawns could be mowed in 35 hours? At what rate were lawns being mowed? ● Recognize and represent proportional relationships between quantities. ( 7.RP.2 ▲) ● Understand the connections between proportional relationships, lines, and linear equations. ( 8.EE.5 ▲) 6.RP.2 ▲ & 6.RP. 3a,b▲ 7.RP.2▲8.EE.5▲

8.EE.5 Graph proportional relationships, interpreting the unit rate as the slope of the graph. Compare two different proportional relationships represented in two different ways. Graph the cost versus the number of pounds of almonds. The number of pounds of almonds should be on the horizontal axis and the cost of the almonds on the vertical axis. Use the graph to find the cost of 1 pound of almonds. Explain how you got your answer. Example: Almonds (pounds) Cost (dollars)

8.EE.5 Graph proportional relationships, interpreting the unit rate as the slope of the graph. Compare two different proportional relationships represented in two different ways. Classroom Connections The concept of slope can be approached in its simplest form with directly proportional quantities. =, equivalently, =, where is a constant known as the constant of proportionality. In the case of almonds, the in an equation would represent the unit cost of almonds. Connecting to the Standards for Mathematical Practice MP.1 Students are encouraged to attack the entire problem and make sense in each step required. MP.4 Students are modeling a very simple real-life cost situation.