Welcome to Fantasyland: Comparing Approaches to Land Area Measurement in Household Surveys Sydney Gourlay Survey Specialist Living Standards Measurement.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
World Bank Conference on Land and Poverty March 23-27, 2014.
Advertisements

Climate Change and Food Security: Research on Adaptation in Ethiopia Salvatore Di Falco University of Geneva Switzerland
Challenges to Surveys Non-response error –Falling response rates over time Sample coverage –Those without landline telephones excluded –Growing.
Integrating a Gender Perspective into Time Use Statistics.
Seasonality in Calorie Consumption: Evidence from Mozambique. Channing Arndt, Mikkel Barslund, Jose Sulemane Support from the African Economic Research.
Frank Yu Australian Bureau of Statistics Unstructured Data 1.
GEOG Introductory GIS for the Social Sciences 15 September 2014 Neil Hanlon.
Poverty and Income Distribution in Ethiopia: By Abebe Shimeles, PhD.
Palestinian Central Bureau of Statistics (PCBS) Palestine Poverty Maps 2009 March
Geo-referenced and Agricultural Productivity Data in Household Surveys: LSMS Practices and Methodological Research Alberto Zezza Surveys and Methods Development.
OECD Short-Term Economic Statistics Working PartyJune Analysis of revisions for short-term economic statistics Richard McKenzie OECD OECD Short.
TENURE INSECURITY AND PROPERTY INVESTMENTS OF SMALLHOLDERS IN RURAL AND URBAN MOZAMBIQUE: EVIDENCE FROM TWO BASELINE SURVEYS Raul Pitoro, Songqing Jin,
How Much Do Women in Africa Contribute to Agriculture? Luc Christiaensen, Talip Kilic, Amparo Palacios-López, AGRICULTURE IN AFRICA TELLING FACTS FROM.
UNECE Workshop on Confidentiality Manchester, December 2007 Comparing Fully and Partially Synthetic Data Sets for Statistical Disclosure Control.
Living Standards Measurement Study- Integrated Surveys on Agriculture: Innovations Built on Tradition Innovations In Survey Design for Policy PREM week.
1 WORLD TOURISM ORGANIZATION (UNWTO) MEASURING TOURISM EXPENDITURE: A UNWTO PROPOSAL SESRIC-UNWTO WORKSHOP ON TOURISM STATISTICS AND THE ELABORATION OF.
Data Quality Issues-Chapter 10
Determining Sample Size
Copyright 2010, The World Bank Group. All Rights Reserved. Agricultural Census Sampling Frames and Sampling Section A 1.
Copyright 2010, The World Bank Group. All Rights Reserved. Integrating Agriculture into National Statistical Systems Section A 1.
Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys Survey Design Workshop Sampling: Overview MICS Survey Design Workshop.
Does Formative Feedback Help or Hinder Students? An Empirical Investigation 2015 DEE Conference Carlos Cortinhas, University of Exeter.
How has internal migration in Albania affected the receipt of transfers from family and friends? Florian Tomini Maastricht Graduate School of Governance.
Land Modules in Household Surveys: Assessing the Gaps, Charting a Way Forward TALIP KILIC Research Economist Living Standards Measurement Study Team Poverty.
16th ICABR Conference - 128th EAAE Seminar
Understanding and Predicting Graded Search Satisfaction Tang Yuk Yu 1.
1 By; L.M. Gambamala - Senior Statistician, National Bureau of Statistics, Tanzania PLANNING, EXECUTION AND ANALYSIS OF AGRICULTURAL CENSUSES – A TANZANIA.
1 Exploiting Multisensor Spectral Data to Improve Crop Residue Cover Estimates for Management of Agricultural Water Quality Magda S. Galloza 1, Melba M.
A Strategy for Prioritising Non-response Follow-up to Reduce Costs Without Reducing Output Quality Gareth James Methodology Directorate UK Office for National.
Ameet Morjaria NSF-AERC-IGC Workshop Mombasa, 4 th Dec 2010 Comments on: “Adoption and Impact of Conservation Agriculture in Central Ethiopia: Application.
AP Stat Review Descriptive Statistics Grab Bag Probability
Bureau of Economic Research, University of Dhaka The Role of Credit in Food Production, Food Security & Dietary Diversity in Bangladesh Authors Dr. Sayema.
TECHNICAL MEETING ON THE USE OF GPS IN THE AGRICULTURAL SURVEYS IN AFRICA, November West Shoa area frame project – experiences in using of.
The Who: Experimental Evidence on the Effect of Respondent Selection on Collecting Individual Disaggregated Asset Ownership Information Living Standards.
Identifying Sources of Error: the 2007 Classification Error Survey for the US Census of Agriculture Jaki McCarthy and Denise Abreu USDA’s National Agricultural.
A discussion of Comparing register and survey wealth data ( F. Johansson and A. Klevmarken) & The Impact of Methodological Decisions around Imputation.
Synthesis of the main conclusions and recomandations Group 1.
Network Effects & Welfare Culture Marianne Bertrand, Erzo Luttmer, and Sendhil Mullainathan Oct. 29, 2004.
Validity of Fatigue Recall Ratings Mark P. Jensen, Ph.D. ASCPRO Steering Committee Meeting, October 2007.
BOT / GEOG / GEOL 4111 / Field data collection Visiting and characterizing representative sites Used for classification (training data), information.
Spillover Effects of Large- Scale Commercial Farms in Ethiopia Daniel Ali, Klaus Deininger and Anthony Harris (World Bank – DECAR)
FAO of the United Nations, Rome, Italy
Advanced Residual Analysis Techniques for Model Selection A.Murari 1, D.Mazon 2, J.Vega 3, P.Gaudio 4, M.Gelfusa 4, A.Grognu 5, I.Lupelli 4, M.Odstrcil.
International Health Policy Program -Thailand International Health Policy Program (IHPP), Thailand 13 March 2013 Post Enumeration Survey (PES) of the household.
Establishing Comparable Poverty Estimates in Serbia (and elsewhere…) Jill Luoto January 25, 2007 Western Balkans Poverty Analysis Course: World Bank.
Growth Diagnostics in Practice Applied Inclusive Growth Analytics Course June 29, 2009 Susanna Lundstrom, PRMED.
Analysis of the results of the experiences conducted by FAO in the use of GPS for crop area measurement Elisabetta Carfagna
1 CDRI Research Workshop 29 January Related Project  Poverty Dynamic Studies (PDS), funded by the World Bank Objective of the project: Identify.
Improving the Use and Usability of Survey Data: the LSMS Experience Gero Carletto DEC Data Group The World Bank.
Common Pitfalls in Randomized Evaluations Jenny C. Aker Tufts University.
MEASURING HOUSEHOLD LABOR ON TANZANIAN FARMS Presented by Amparo Palacios-Lopez Co-authors: Vellore Arthi, Kathleen Beegle.
Nagraj Rao Statistician Asian Development Bank CROP CUTTING: AN INTRODUCTION.
Income Convergence in South Africa: Fact or Measurement Error? Tobias Lechtenfeld & Asmus Zoch.
Assessing the Impact of Informality on Wages in Tanzania: Is There a Penalty for Women? Pablo Suárez Robles (University Paris-Est Créteil) 1.
Formalizing Rural Land Rights in West Africa: Early Evidence from a Randomized Impact Evaluation in Benin Markus Goldstein* Kenneth Houngbedji + Florence.
Nagraj Rao Statistician Asian Development Bank CROP CUTTING: AN INTRODUCTION.
REVISITING THE FARM SIZE PRODUCTIVITY RELATIONSHIP: NEW EVIDENCE FROM SUB-SAHARA AFRICAN COUNTRIES PASQUALE LUCIO SCANDIZZO AND SARA SAVASTANO UNIVERSITY.
Class Six Turn In: Chapter 15: 30, 32, 38, 44, 48, 50 Chapter 17: 28, 38, 44 For Class Seven: Chapter 18: 32, 34, 36 Chapter 19: 26, 34, 44 Quiz 3 Read.
Sydney Gourlay Survey Specialist World Bank Conference on Land and Poverty Washington, DC – March 14, 2016 Advancing Survey Design.
Better Household Survey Data for Better Development Policies
Impact of agricultural innovation adoption: a meta-analysis
Cassava Production Measurement and Variety Identification in Household Surveys: Results from a Randomized Survey Experiment in Malawi HEATHER MOYLAN Survey.
Does inclusion of large farms reverse the farm-size productivity relationship? Evidence from Ethiopia Sinafikeh Gemessa, Daniel A. Ali, Klaus Deininger.
The treatment of uncertainty in the results
Sharmina Ahmed, PhD student
Scope for Decentralization of Land Administration in Africa: Evidence from Local Administrative Data in Mozambique Raul Pitoro Michigan State University,
MEASURING HOUSEHOLD LABOR ON TANZANIAN FARMS
The Role of Road Infrastructure in Agricultural Production
Ghent University, Belgium
Presentation transcript:

Welcome to Fantasyland: Comparing Approaches to Land Area Measurement in Household Surveys Sydney Gourlay Survey Specialist Living Standards Measurement Study Living Standards Measurement Study Team Development Research Group, The World Bank 2015 World Bank Conference on Land and Poverty

Motivation & Key Questions Land area is critical in: – Measuring yields – Land distribution – Titling schemes – Anything agriculture… Gaps in literature: – How do measurement methodologies stack-up? Is GPS as accurate as the gold- standard? – What characteristics influence measurement accuracy? – How does the measurement methodology employed influence analytical outcomes?

Measuring Land Area: Methodological Options Farmer self-reported estimate PROS - Inexpensive - Less missingness CONS - Subjective - Complicated by traditional units -Potential ulterior motives Compass and rope (aka traversing) PROS -Traditional gold standard for accuracy - Eliminates subjectivity CONS - Time/labor intensive (leading to higher costs) - Requires travel to plot GPS PROS - Significantly quicker than traversing with advantages of objective measurement CONS - Questions of accuracy on small plots (?) - Requires travel to plot Remote Sensing (?) PROS - Potential to eliminate plot visits CONS - Resolution limitations - Feasibility of boundary identification

LSMS Methodological Validation Program (MVP) UK Aid-funded project: Improving Measurement of Agricultural Productivity through Methodological Validation and Research To date, 3 highly-supervised methodological studies on land area measurement: Ethiopia Tanzania Nigeria

Methodological Validation Experiments Land and Soil Experimental Research (LASER) Improving the Measurement of Cassava Productivity Area Measurement Validation LocationEthiopiaZanzibar, TanzaniaNigeria Components: Land Area; Soil Testing; Crop Cutting Land Area; Production Diaries; Crop Cutting Land Area Partnerships: World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF), Central Statistical Agency Ministry of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Office of the Chief Government Statistician National Bureau of Statistics Fieldwork CompleteMarch 2014July 2014May Ethiopia 1945 Tanzania 494 Nigeria 4237 Total Plots with GPS and Compass & Rope These studies included farmer self-reported estimate, GPS, and compass & rope measurement

ElevationRainfallAEZ 85 EAs 12 HH Each LASER - Ethiopia

Methodologies tested: Land area Traversing (i.e. compass-and-rope) GPS measurement Farmer self-reported area Cassava production Crop-cutting with balance scales Crop diaries with enumerator visits twice a week Crop diaries with telephone calls twice a week Farmer self-reported harvest (12-month recall) Farmer self-reported harvest (6-month recall) Cassava Productivity – Zanzibar, Tanzania

Scope of (Preliminary) Analysis Comparison of competing measurements: – Bias: Difference between two measurements (in acres) For example: GPS - CR – Absolute Value of Bias For example: |GPS – CR| – Relative Bias: Difference between two measurements (in terms of %) For example: (GPS- CR)/CR * 100% – Absolute Value of Relative Bias Analysis of systematic measurement error between measurements via OLS regression Determinants of “High Bias” plots

Comparison of Measurements: Subjective vs Objective (1) SR estimates are sensitive to respondent characteristics, including the tendency to round off numbers:

Comparison of Measurements: Subjective vs Objective (2) SR vs CR Acres Level (CR) EthiopiaTanzaniaNigeria NSRCRBias Mean Bias / Mean CRNSRCRBias Mean Bias / Mean CRNSRCRBias Mean Bias / Mean CR 1 (< 0.05 acres) % % (< 0.15 acres) % % % 3 (< 0.35 acres) % % % 4 (< 0.75 acres) % % % 5 (< 1.25 acres) % % % 6 (>= 1.25 acres) % % % Total % % % Pooled data reveals self-reported estimates are over-estimated by 51% on average (over CR measurement)

Comparison of Measurements: Subjective vs Objective (3) Ethiopia Tanzania Nigeria

Comparison of Measurements: Objective vs Objective (1) GPS vs CR Means; Acres Level (CR) Ethiopia TanzaniaNigeria GPSCRBias Mean Bias / Mean CRGPSCRBias Mean Bias / Mean CRGPSCRBias Mean Bias / Mean CR 1 (< 0.05 acres) % % (< 0.15 acres) % % % 3 (< 0.35 acres) % % % 4 (< 0.75 acres) % % % 5 (< 1.25 acres) % % % 6 (>= 1.25 acres) % % % Total % % % Pooled data reveals GPS measurements are over-stated by 1% on average (over CR measurement)

Comparison of Measurements: Objective vs Objective (2) Correlation between GPS and CR measurements: (pooled data)

Comparison of Measurements: Objective vs Objective (3) Despite high correlation of GPS and CR measurements, evidence of “high bias” or problem plots exists: High bias plots are generally: smaller than average, have a higher closing error (suggesting bias is at least partially attributable to CR), and have a more complex shape (proxied by perimeter:area ratio).

Comparison of Measurements: Objective vs Objective (4) We attempt to explain the discrepancy between GPS and CR by: Y i =L i +C i +S i +SAT i +T i +W i +e i - Y is one of the four measures of bias, -L is the measure of the plot taken using CR, -C is the closing error of the CR measure, -S is a vector of proxies for the shape of the plot, -SAT is the number of satellites the GPS device had acquired, -T is a vector of dummy variables related to tree canopy cover, -W is a vector of dummy variables related to weather conditions, and -e is a random error.

Comparison of Measurements: Objective vs Objective (5) The small difference is difficult to capture, but: Heavy tree cover & cloudy conditions slightly increase absolute value of percent deviation between measurements (in Ethiopia and Tanzania) Perimeter : Area ratio is statistically significant in all countries, suggesting that in plots with more complex shapes the absolute value of percent bias is higher. Plot area is the most significant factor…

Bias (acres)| Bias (acres)|Relative Bias (%)| Relative Bias (%) |

Comparison of Measurements: Objective vs Objective (7) Ethiopia: – GPS = 13.7 minutes – CR = 56.8 minutes Tanzania: – GPS = 7.4 minutes – CR = 29.3 minutes

Final Thoughts Lower limit to GPS use not yet clearly defined (But lower than most literature alludes to) GPS + SR – When GPS measurements are missing, impute them using the self-reported area estimates a la Kilic et al: Kilic, Zezza, Carletto, and Savastano. “Missing(ness) in Action: Selectivity Bias in GPS-Based Land Area Measurements.” World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No

Welcome to Fantasyland: Comparing Approaches to Land Area Measurement in Household Surveys Sydney Gourlay Survey Specialist Living Standards Measurement Study Living Standards Measurement Study Team Development Research Group, The World Bank 2015 World Bank Conference on Land and Poverty