Needs Assessment: Conducting, Completing and Aligning with the Budget November 9, 2015 Deborah Walker, ESE Worcester Public Schools: Gregg Barres, Manager.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Building Our Future: One Community, One School, One Child at a Time Goals of the Special Administrative Board St. Louis Public Schools October 14, 2008.
Advertisements

Coordinating Equitable Services for Private Schools Christine T. Miller Red Clay Consolidated School District December 7, 2010 DSU – Martin Luther King.
Do Now: Decide if the following activities are allowable with TIIA funds Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 1 Activity Revising.
“Leading for educational excellence and equity. Every day for every one.” Accountability 2.0 and the World’s Best Workforce—What Does it Mean? World’s.
STIMULUS AND STATE FISCAL STABILIZATION BOROUGH ASSEMBLY MEETING AUGUST 20, 2009 NANCY WAGNER, FNSBSD SUPERINTENDENT TRACI GATEWOOD, GRANTS AND SPECIAL.
Campus Improvement Plans
CONSOLIDATED PROGRAM REVIEW COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR TITLE I, PART C, MIGRANT EDUCATION PROGRAM MEP STATE CONFERENCE AUGUST 2013.
Delta Sierra Middle School Napa/Solano County Office of Education School Assistance and Intervention Team Monitoring Report #8 – July 2008 Mary Camezon,
Grant Maintenance for New Title I Directors Title I Technical Assistance & Networking Session October 17, 2013.
1 Executive Summary Title I Delivery Model Title I Personnel Changes for English Language Arts Instructional Coaches Intervention Teachers.
 Reading School Committee January 23,
Do Now: Matching Game  Match the numbers from Column A to the clues in Column B to learn fun facts about Title IIA Massachusetts Department of Elementary.
Preparing for Title IIA Monitoring Review (FY14) February 24, 2015 Office of Educator Effectiveness Aviva Baff Isadora Choute Cynthia Mompoint Deborah.
Webinar #1 The Webinar will begin shortly. Please make sure your phone is muted. (*6 to Mute, #6 to Unmute) 7/3/20151.
Financial and Programmatic Monitoring ESEA/Act 807 ACSIP Arkansas Department of Education Division of Academic Accountability.
Designing and Implementing An Effective Schoolwide Program
Wisconsin Statewide Title I Network CESA #1 and the Wisconsin DPI
1 EEC Board Policy and Research Committee October 2, 2013 State Advisory Council (SAC) Sustainability for Early Childhood Systems Building.
S chool I mprovement P lan A Living Document of School Growth.
Title II-A Webinar Series: Professional Development Planning Teresa A. Burgess Coordinator Title II-A Idaho State Department of Education
Los Angeles County Office of Education Division for School Improvement School Site Council (SSC) Training September 9 th 2008 Anna Carrasco From presentation.
Local Early Childhood Advisory Councils Orientation Meeting October 1, 2012 Local Early Childhood Advisory Councils Orientation: 5 Step Process Valerie.
Title I Schoolwide Program The Planning Year An Overview Thursday, September 20, 2012.
Shrewsbury Public Schools Fiscal Year 2013 Administrative Budget Recommendation March 14, 2012.
Indistar Summit – Coaching with Indistar February 2012 Presenters: Yvonne Holloman, Ph.D. Associate Director, Office of School Improvement Michael Hill.
FewSomeAll. Multi-Tiered System of Supports A Comprehensive Framework for Implementing the California Common Core State Standards Professional Learning.
Committee of Practitioners ESEA Flexibility Waiver Review June 25, 2014.
Maryland’s Journey— Focus Schools Where We’ve Been, Where We Are, and Where We’re Going Presented by: Maria E. Lamb, Director Nola Cromer, Specialist Program.
Module IV: Implementing and Monitoring the LEA Plan Systemic Local Educational Agency (LEA) Plan Development.
Title I Administration Made Easier Fall Title I Statewide Conference November 5, 2014.
Campus Improvement Plans Northwest ISD Presentation to the Board of Trustees October 14, 2013.
Las Cruces Public Schools Principal Evaluation Overview Stan Rounds Superintendent Stan Rounds Superintendent.
- 0 - Collaborative Inquiry via Professional Learning Communities MSDF Impact Assessment.
© 2014, Florida Department of Education. All Rights Reserved. Bureau of Federal Educational Programs Updates _________________________________.
CESA 10 April, Must consult with private schools to assess, address, and evaluate the needs of private school students and educators 2. Must.
Reform Model for Change Board of Education presentation by Superintendent: Dr. Kimberly Tooley.
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services Last Revised 8/15/2011.
1 Strategic Plan Review. 2 Process Planning and Evaluation Committee will be discussing 2 directions per meeting. October meeting- Finance and Governance.
Federal Support for World-Class Schools Gwinnett County Public Schools 4/18/13.
Presented by: Jan Stanley, State Title I Director Office of Assessment and Accountability June 10, 2008 Monitoring For Results.
2 Louisiana Believes Objective: The Department is providing districts increased support in preparation for the school year. As districts plan for.
Title I, IDEA Part B and IDEA Part C September 2, 2009 American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Use of Funds Guidance 1.
Los Angeles Unified School District Local District G Principals Meeting.
District Action Plan Strategic Planning for Student Success Board Meeting March 24, 2015 Dr. Rodney Thompson, Superintendent.
Welcome to today’s Webinar: Tier III Schools in Improvement We will begin at 9:00 AM.
Rowland Unified School District District Local Education Agency (LEA)Plan Update Principals Meeting November 16, 2015.
School Accreditation School Improvement Planning.
Presented By WVDE Title I Staff June 10, Fiscal Issues Maintain an updated inventory list, including the following information: description of.
Spending/ Fiscal Allowable Expenses Equitable Services Needs Assessment Potluck
Moving Title IA School Plans into Indistar ESEA Odyssey Summer 2015 Presented by Melinda Bessner Oregon Department of Education.
School Development Implementation and Monitoring “Building a Learning Community”
Confidential 1 Regional Achievement Center 3 Essex and Hudson Counties School Improvement Plan April 2013.
Indiana University Kokomo Strategic Enrollment Management Consultation Final Report Bob Bontrager December 8, 2007.
Brentwood Elementary Title One Annual Parent Meeting September 20, :00 PM.
1 Introduction Overview This annotated PowerPoint is designed to help communicate about your instructional priorities. Note: The facts and data here are.
21 st CCLC APR System Webinar Tanya Morin Gary Sumnicht Alison Wineberg April 25 and 26, 2016.
The Day in the Life of OFPSI staff By: Dr. Shawnrell Blackwell Director of Federal Programs & School Improvement (OFPSI) Petersburg City Public Schools.
Dear School District Administrator, This PowerPoint presentation is intended to help initiate and facilitate community engagement in budget planning during.
A lens to ensure each student successfully completes their educational program in Prince Rupert with a sense of hope, purpose, and control.
Preparing for Title IIA Monitoring Review (FY15) November 9, 2015 Deborah Walker Meagan Steiner David LeBlanc.
Annual Title I Parent Orientation Meeting
Title IIA: Essentials Plus
Local Control Accountability Plan LCAP
DESE Educator Evaluation System for Superintendents
Local Control Accountability Plan LCAP
FY19 Federal Grant Monitoring: Titles I, II, IV
PRESENTATION GUIDE Dear School District Administrator,
Joann Hooper Patty Rooks Paulette Richmond Gary Wenzel
ANNUAL TITLE I MEETING NOBLE ACADEMY COLUMBUS.
Response to Intervention in Illinois
Presentation transcript:

Needs Assessment: Conducting, Completing and Aligning with the Budget November 9, 2015 Deborah Walker, ESE Worcester Public Schools: Gregg Barres, Manager of Grant Resources Anna L. Griffin, Grant Writer/Developer

Today’s Agenda  Needs Assessment Overview  Needs Assessment Requirements  Worcester Public School’s Needs Assessment Process  Title IIA Resources  Questions 2

Needs Assessment  The District Needs Assessment (NA):  The NA should be conducted prior to the start of the current fiscal year, based on district data, including educator evaluation data  Federal regulations state that teachers, paraprofessionals, principals, other relevant school personnel, and parents need to collaborate during the NA 3

Needs Assessment Cont. 4  All activities, including dates, which are part of the NA, must be documented and kept on file  The NA concludes by identifying district-wide priority needs  Prior to determining Title IIA funding for the priority needs, confirm if activities are allowable (consult the TIIA Quick Reference Guide)

Worcester Public Schools Title II-A Grant Development November 9, 2015 Gregg Bares, Manager of Grant Resources Anna L. Griffin, Grant Writer/Developer 5

 The Professional Learning Team, under the coordination of the district’s academic leadership conducted the FY 15 professional development Needs Assessment that forms the basis for our Title IIA grant proposal.  Marco C. Rodrigues, Ed.D., Chief Academic Officer (CAO) oversees the district’s educational leadership team (DELTA), consisting of the managers who are responsible for the implementation of the district’s academic initiatives.  The DELTA team includes the CAO, Quadrant Managers, Manager of Special Education and Intervention Services, Manager of English Language Learners and Student Support Services, Manager of Professional Learning, Early Childhood Coordinator, Communication and School Support Coordinator, Director of Career and Technical Education, and Manager of Grant Resources. This team meets regularly to coordinate initiatives and assess school and district progress. 6 Worcester Public Schools Title II Needs Assessment

7 Worcester Compass

Activity/StakeholdersWhen/Frequency (1) Every spring all departments and each school is required to undergo an assessment and improvement process. This process involves parents and teachers. It is communicated through an annual accountability plan that sets forth improvement goals, linkage to strategic goals background analysis, key measures of success, approach (methodology), deployment (activities), and data collection requirements. Information from these plans were analyzed as part of our needs assessment. Work starts in the May and June of the school year for data collection and initial reporting of findings. Plans are worked on the subsequent months, with “end of year” reflections for schools due in mid-September. Final revisions to the plans for schools are due in late October. (2) Our needs assessment is informed by the work of the Professional Development Council. The council meets on a regular basis. Starting in September and ongoing. 8 Needs Assessment Activities and Timeline

Activity/StakeholdersWhen/Frequency (3) In April/May of each year, staff surveys are also used to collect data from teachers and para-professionals. The survey asks about both professional development and instructional practices. Late April through early May surveys are sent out. Results are compiled and readied by early August for review. (4) Evaluation of professional development opportunities are ongoing and are conducted after each professional development session. Professional development sessions are held continuously throughout the year. All activities are organized and include sign-in sheets, agendas and evaluation afterward in order to assist with the orderly evaluation of all of our efforts. These materials collected and reviewed continuously with results being compiled and reported to the Professional Learning team. 9 Needs Assessment Activities and Timeline

10 Assess Academic Return on Investment Think of program and services as "investments”. Distinguish between smarter investments and weaker ones. $ spent Number of students helped Learning Gain Academic Return on Investment = (Learning Gain) * (# of Students Helped) Total $ Spent

WPS Seven Point Financial Plan Uses Instructional Compass as its model 1.Long Term Budget Planning 2.Annual Budget Review: scrutiny and prioritization 3.Transparent Budget Process: frequent presentations 4.Quarterly Financial Planning 5.Supplemental & Sustainable Programs 6.Cap Administrative Spending 7.Target on New Revenues: instruction, safety, operations 11 Budget Priorities and Alignment

Zero-Based Budgeting  Bottom-up approach  Principals actively engaged  Built on district goals rather than history  Has resulted in millions in cost savings 12 Annual Budget Development Process

 School Resource Allocation Meetings  Community Engagement  Public Hearings All are used to develop budget recommendations for the School Committee 13 Annual Budget Development Process

 Grant Needs Assessment is part of the overall district improvement strategy and Worcester Compass  The grant budget is aligned to the overall district budget, which is also driven by the Worcester Compass  Questions? 14 Summary

Title IIA Resources  Title IIA web page:  Federal Non-Regulatory Title IIA Guidance  Federal Non-Regulatory Guidance on Equitable Services for Private Schools  Materials from today will be posted soon, including all presentations and the Title IIA Quick Reference Guide  Title IIA Grant Application Materials:

Questions 16