Investigational Devices and Humanitarian Use Devices June 2007.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Role of the IRB An Institutional Review Board (IRB) is a review committee established to help protect the rights and welfare of human research subjects.
Advertisements

What FDA Looks for When Inspecting IRBs and Sponsors Marian J. Serge Nurse Consultant Division of Bioresearch Monitoring Office of Compliance Center for.
Investigational Device Exemption (IDE) Overview for IRBs
Susan Burner Bankowski, M.S., J.D. Chair, OHSU IRB
Investigational Device Exemptions (IDE) CFR Title 21, Part 812
The Radioactive Drug Research Committee Approval Process for Tracer Use Anthony F. Shields, M.D., Ph.D. Karmanos Cancer Institute Wayne State University.
Protocol Deviations : Identification, Responses and Solutions The Office of Human Subjects Research’s Compliance Monitoring Program Educational Seminars:
The Consent Process: It’s More Than Just a Form A “10 Minute Training” Brought to you by Cyndi Long, MS, RD, CCRC CU Sports Medicine.
IRB Review of Device Research and Other Clinical Uses of Devices
Single Use Expanded Access IND/IDE: FDA and IRB Requirements Before and After Use IRB Webinar October 9,2014.
IRB Determinations 1. AAHRPP Site Visit Results Site visitors observed a real commitment to human subject protections Investigator and research staff.
Pharmacists Responsibilities in Clinical Studies Mike R Sather, PhD Crystal L Harris, PharmD February 26, 2004.
John Naim, PhD Director Clinical Trials Research Unit
IRB-Investigator/ Research Coordinator Mtg. “CUMC’s New Progressive Policy For Adverse Event Reporting” April 13, 2004 George Gasparis Andrew Wit, Ph.D.
Columbia University IRB IRB 101 September 21, 2005 George Gasparis, Executive Director, CU IRB Asst. V.P. and Sr. Asst. Dean for Research Ethics.
CUMC IRB Investigator Meeting Special IND/IDE Considerations: Emergency Use of Investigational Product Compassionate Use & Emergency Research July 21,
Human Research Protection Program Training: Post-Approval Event Reporting March 26, 2008 Lisa Voss, MPH, CIP Assistant Director, QIU Human Research Protection.
IRB Basics Helen Panageas New York University School of Medicine Institutional Review Board Portion of slides courtesy of Suzanne M. Smith, University.
Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy 1 Brookhaven National Laboratory Protocol Compliance Monitoring Darcy Mallon May 7, 2009.
Is this Research? Exempt? Expedited?
Institutional Review Board (IRB) Human Subject Research Office (HSRO) University of Miami and Affiliated Institutions.
Federalwide Assurance Presentation for IRB Members.
Device Research Presented by Marian Serge, R.N.. Goals Identify devices Recognize difference between significant risk (SR) and non- significant risk (NSR)
Adverse Events, Unanticipated Problems, Protocol Deviations & other Safety Information Which Form 4 to Use?
International Research & Research Involving Children K. Lynn Cates, MD Assistant Chief Research & Development Officer Office of Research & Development.
Regulatory Considerations for Investigational Assays: Planning for Success Elizabeth Mansfield, PhD OIVD/FDA “Next-Generation DNA Sequencing as a Tool.
New Adverse Event Reporting Policy Effective September 1, 2007.
Regulatory criteria for approval Bob Craig, July 2007.
Investigational New Drug Application (IND)
EMORY INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD VERSION Unanticipated Problems, Protocol Deviations and Non-Compliance.
Help us Help you: IRB Policy Updates Susan Bankowski, MS, JD IRB Chair.
When do I need an IND ? FDA Guidance for Industry – Investigation New Drug Applications (INDs) - Determining Whether Human Research Studies Can Be Conducted.
Medical Devices IRB Determination IRB Member Continuing Education.
Investigational Drugs in the hospital. + What is Investigational Drug? Investigational or experimental drugs are new drugs that have not yet been approved.
University of Miami Office of Research Compliance Assessment Lynn E. Smith, JD, CIM, CIP Johanna Stamates, RN, BA, CCRC With assistance from Elizabeth.
 The IRB application  The Review Process  Summary of Protocol  Appendixes  Informed Consent  Recruiting materials  Research Instruments  Other.
H I P A A T R A I N I N G Self Directed Module 7 Research Disclosures For Data Custodians START Click to begin…
Humanitarian Use Devices September 23, 2011 Theodore Stevens, MS, RAC Office of Cellular, Tissue and Gene Therapies Center for Biologics Evaluation and.
The Institutional Review Board: A Community College Toolkit Dr. Geri J Anderson.
1 Denise K. Thwing, MAS, RN, CCRA March 31, 2010 Version: Final 31-Mar-2010.
UC DAVIS OFFICE OF RESEARCH Overview of Good Clinical Practices (GCP) Investigator and Study Team Responsibilities Miles McFann IRB Administration Training.
Marian University is sponsored by the Sisters of St. Francis, Oldenburg. Human Subjects Research and the Marian University Institutional Review Board (IRB)
Welcome New IRB Members! Today we will discuss: Your Role in the IRB: What to Know The IRB Review Process Resources Human Research Protections.
The NCI Central IRB Initiative Jacquelyn L. Goldberg, J.D. VA IRB Chair Training April 8, 2004.
HRPP Policies & Forms Chapter Two Created/Revised for AAHRPP June 1, 2007.
Regulatory requirements: children, assent, and consent waivers and waiver of documentation Bob Craig, 2007.
Welcome New IRB Member! This brief presentation covers: Your Role in the IRB: What to Know The IRB Review Process Resources Human Research Protections.
Conducting Research at Lincoln IRB/HRPP Policies, Procedures & Good Clinical Practices B Kanna MD, MPH, FACP Associate Program Director of Internal Medicine.
HUD and Emergent Use Walter Kraft. Device Classification Significant risk – Often involve an invasive procedure for implantation or use – Requires IDE.
INVESTIGATOR RESPONSIBILITIES C. Karen Jeans, MSN COACH Project Analyst.
Drug Development and IND Process GC 690 Walter Kraft, MD.
EXCEPTION FROM INFORMED CONSENT IN CPR DEVICE TRIALS: PROTECTION OF PATIENTS’ RIGHTS Circulatory System Devices Panel Meeting September 21, 2004 Elisa.
Session 2 IRB Training  What is the Principal Investigator’s role in Human Subject Research?  What is the role of the Investigator’s staff in Human Subject.
Responsibilities of Sponsor, Investigator and Monitor
Dartmouth Human Research Protection Program (HRPP) Data Safety Monitoring and Reporting requirements Brown Bag Series: Noon / First Tuesday of the Month.
Conditional IRB Approval
COCE Institutional Review Board Academic Spotlight
Responsibilities of Sponsor, Investigator and Monitor
IRB reporting updates.
FDA’s IDE Decisions and Communications
How to Put Together an IDE Application
To start the presentation, click on this button in the lower right corner of your screen. The presentation will begin after the screen changes and you.
Adverse Event Reporting: Trials and Tribulations
Navigating Non-Compliance
To start the presentation, click on this button in the lower right corner of your screen. The presentation will begin after the screen changes and you.
Streamlining IRB Procedures for Expanded Access
Opening an IND: Investigator Perspective
TRTO (Translational Research Trials Office)
Protocol Approval Criteria
Research with Human Subjects
Presentation transcript:

Investigational Devices and Humanitarian Use Devices June 2007

Investigational device Any healthcare product that does not achieve its primary intended purpose by chemical action or by being metabolized.

Devices Investigational Device Exemption (IDE) – A FDA approved investigational device exemption permits a device to be shipped lawfully for the purpose of conducting investigations

Significant Risk (SR) Device Study – A study of a device that presents a potential for serious risk to the health, safety, or welfare of a participant

Non-significant Risk (NSR) Device Study A study of a device that does not meet the definition of a SR device and does not present a potential for serious risk to the health, safety, or welfare of participants

Devices – Investigator responsibilities (Document 53) The investigator must provide the IRB with: –All available information regarding the use of the device, including IDE #, if applicable. –When IDE is required, PI must complete FDA ’ s Investigator agreement form and send copy. –All correspondence from the sponsor and/or FDA regarding if SR or NSR

Investigator responsibilities –Sponsor ’ s report of prior investigation –Notify sponsor of the SR decision of the IRB –Describe the ingredients, properties, etc of device. –Complete informed consent forms –Maintain all case report forms –Be accountable for storage, dispensing, tracking, and oversight of device –Submit continuing reviews, adverse events, or unanticipated problems, and clinical outcomes of each participant, if known.

Device – PI responsibility –Notify IRB of any amendments, unanticipated device effects, serious adverse events, or unanticipated problems. Notify IRB of study closure Return all unused products per sponsor ’ s instructions Submit final report within three months of termination or completion of study.

IRB responsibilities Both SR and NSR studies must go to full board for initial review and approval. –Must determine if SR or NSR (regardless of sponsor ’ s determination) –Once determination made, IRB decides whether to approve the study. –Approval based on same criteria as any other FDA regulated study

IRB responsibilities IRB will determine whether investigator is knowledgeable about regulatory requirements and may require PI (and staff) to attend training sessions designed and conducted by the QA specialist. This is particularly true if WVU or an individual assumes the sponsor function.

Exemptions from IDE requirements A device can be exempt from IDE requirements – a claim for exemption must reference the exemption category

Exemptions from IDE (see 21 CRF §812.2(c)) In order to be exempt in this category, the device must: –Be noninvasive –Not require an invasive sampling procedure that presents significant risk –Not by design or intention introduce energy into a subject –Not be used as a diagnostic procedure without confirmation of the diagnosis by an established product or procedure

Another exemption category (21 CFR §812(c)(4)) To qualify under this category, the device must not be for the purpose of determining safety and effectiveness and must not put subjects at risk. It must be limited to: –Consumer preference testing –Testing of a modification; or –Testing of a combination of two or more devices in commercial distribution.

Advertising or recruitment Must not include the term “ new treatment ” without explaining that the IDE is “ investigational, meaning non- FDA approved ” Must not include the promise of “ free medical treatment ”

Informed consent and additional requirements Informed consent with IDEs must meet requirements of the IRB policies and procedures. –There must be no claims of safety or superiority over other devices. –Must be a statement that the IDE is “ investigational ”, that is non-FDA approved. –The FDA must have access to subject ’ s medical records. –The participant must know that the IDE is experimental and benefits are unproven.

Informed consent and additional requirements Any unanticipated adverse device effect to participants or other must be reported to the IRB no later than 10 working days after the PI learns of the event.

Humanitarian Use Devices Humanitarian Use Device (HUD)- a device that is intended to be used in fewer than 4,000 individual in the United States per year. Humanitarian Use Device Exemption (HDE)- an FDA approval for a physician to use a HUD in clinical treatment or as the subject of a clinical investigation.

IRB responsibilities An HDE must be issued by the FDA in order for a HUD to be used in treatment, diagnosis, or research at WVU –The IRB approval must verify that the use of the HUD is congruent with current labeling of the device and does not exceed the scope of the FDA indication. –The IRB may impose more stringent restrictions, if it feels they are necessary

IRB requirements (HUD) The initial review must be full-board (IRB may determine that expedited review at subsequent continuing reviews is adequate) The IRB will not require informed consent since the use is not considered research. The IRB, however, requires that the patient be informed of the use by a cover letter. The IRB will establish that the investigator and research team are trained; it not the IRB will require that PI and research team receive training on regulatory requirements for HUD by QA specialist.

IRB responsibilities At the present time, the IRB is requiring that a continuing protocol must be submitted at three-month intervals. The continuing request must discuss: – the number of times the HUD has been used; – any problems associated with its use –any information received from the sponsor or the FDA concerning the use of the HUD at other sites.

IRB responsibilities The report must also provide a chronological listing of all uses A copy of the hospital consent that indicates this is for an HUD A copy of the note in the patient ’ s chart stating that the patient received the cover letter.

HUD – Investigator’s responsibilities The physician must use the HUD only in accordance with the labeling of the device and in the designated population of FDA approval. Only the holder of the HDE agreement with the FDA must use the HUD

PI responsibilities Must report any unanticipated problems or any information that the HUD contributed to the death or serious injury of a patient to the FDA and the IRB promptly. Report any FDA actions to the IRB Report any modifications to HUD or its clinical use to the IRB Notify the patient(s) of any new information concerning the use and safety of the HUD

PI responsibilities Prepare a cover letter to be given to patients receiving a HUD –Explain a HUD and what that means –List all risks and procedures associated with the use of the HUD –Inform the patient that the device is approved only for certain uses and that the patient meets the conditions of its intended use. –Inform the patient that the costs will be charged to the patient or the patient ’ s insurance

Emergency use of FDA regulated devices The use of an investigational device with a human subject in an immediate serious life-threatening situation in which no standard acceptable treatment is available and in which there is not sufficient time to obtain IRB approval.

Procedure If it is anticipated that a device might be used in an emergency use situation, and there is sufficient time, the physician should provide sufficient information to the IRB so that it could determine if the anticipated use meets the FDA regulatory requirements.

Procedure However, emergency use usually takes place without time for IRB review. The physician should: Obtain concurrence of IRB Chair if time permits. Obtain informed consent from the patient or legal representative, if possible. Obtain independent assessment by an uninvolved physician. Obtain institutional clearance

Procedure after use: Should notify the holder of the IDE or HDE. The use must be reported to the IRB within 5 working days. Information on use and patient ’ s condition to the holder of the IDE or HDE, who will make a report to the FDA.