1 BIORESEARCH MONITORING AND IN VITRO DIAGNOSTICS SYBIL WELLSTOOD, PH.D. OFFICE OF COMPLIANCE DIVISION OF BIORESEARCH MONITORING.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Role of the IRB An Institutional Review Board (IRB) is a review committee established to help protect the rights and welfare of human research subjects.
Advertisements

What FDA Looks for When Inspecting IRBs and Sponsors Marian J. Serge Nurse Consultant Division of Bioresearch Monitoring Office of Compliance Center for.
(Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act) and
Investigational Device Exemption (IDE) Overview for IRBs
Investigational Device Exemptions 21 CFR Part 812
Overview of FDA Device Regulations
Gerald Treiman, IRB Chair John Stillman, IRB Director Maureen Brinkman, IRB Administrator Ann Johnson, IRB Administrator.
Common Mistakes & Audits 05/21/2014. Summary of audit findings by category.
SOP Melody Lin, Ph.D. Deputy Director, Office for Human Research Protections Director, International Activities Santiago, Chile August.
UTHSC IRB Donna Hollaway, RN, CCRC 11/30/2011 Authority to Audit 45 CFR (e) An IRB shall conduct continuing review of research covered by this.
Methods of Administration MOA Element 7 Monitoring and Compliance.
1 Developed by: U-MIC To start the presentation, click on this button in the lower right corner of your screen. The presentation will begin after the.
Administrative Review Requirements September 17, 2014.
510k Submission Overview Myraqa, Inc. August 22, 2012.
What’s New in the FDA’s Pharmaceutical Inspectorate and Risk Based Systems Inspection Rick Perlman Chair Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Division ASQ.
CUMC IRB Investigator Meeting Human Subjects Research Non-Compliance September 15, 2005.
Vernon D. Toelle, Ph.D. Team Leader Pre-Market Compliance and Administrative Actions Team (BIMO Team) Overview of CVM Bioresearch Monitoring.
U.S. Food and Drug Administration Notice: Archived Document The content in this document is provided on the FDA’s website for reference purposes only.
Good Clinical Practices and FDA Inspections
MAGI's Clinical Trial Agreements, Budgets & Regulatory Conference FDA Inspections of Investigator Sites Paul Below Clinical Research Consultant P. Below.
Session 6: Data Integrity and Inspection of e-Clinical Computerized Systems May 15, 2011 | Beijing, China Kim Nitahara Principal Consultant and CEO META.
Investigational New Drug Application 21 CFR Part 312 A Review for OCRA US RAC Study Group September 2005 Ginger Clasby, MS Promedica International
+ Medical Devices Approval Process. + Objectives Define a medical device Be familiar with the classification system for medical devices Understand the.
Basic Principles of FDA Medical Device Regulation and How FDA Might Have Handled the Recent PIP Crisis British Institute of International and Comparative.
FDA Regulatory Requirements and FDA’s Bioresearch Monitoring (BIMO) Program Constance Lewin, M.D., M.P.H. Associate Director for Human Subject Protection.
Regulatory Update Ellen Leinfuss SVP, Life Sciences.
Ensuring Quality in Medical Device Clinical Trials
Human Subjects Overview.
Center for Veterinary Medicine (CVM) RECALLS.  21 CFR 7.40 provides guidance on the policy, procedures, and industry responsibilities for recalls. 
Carolyn Hommel Good Clinical Practice Program FDA February 25, 2004
Top 10 Medical Device Citations
Elements of Clinical Trial Quality Assurance Regulatory Coordinator –SCTR SUCCESS Center QA Monitor – NIDA Clinical Trials Network Stephanie Gentilin,
MATTHEW MATKOVICH MINE EQUIPMENT COMPLIANCE SPECIALIST QUALITY ASSURANCE & MATERIALS TESTING DIVISION MSHA – APPROVAL & CERTIFICATION CENTER 30CFR, PART.
Preparing the IRB and Investigators for an External Audit/Site Visit
Device Clinical Trials and More… Michael E. Marcarelli, PharmD Director, Division of Bioresearch Monitoring Office of Compliance Center for Devices and.
Monitoring, Audits, and Inspection Oh my! Rachel Sheppard Regulatory Director, OCRSS.
Investigational New Drug Application (IND)
Common Audit Findings UTHSC Institutional Review Board (IRB)
Michelle Groy Johnson Quality Improvement Officer Research Integrity Office Tough Love: Understanding the Purpose and Processes of Quality Assurance.
1 FDA/CDRH Office of In Vitro Diagnostic Devices The Pre-IDE Process Sousan S. Altaie, Ph.D. Scientific Policy Advisor OIVD.
Monitoring IRB Monitoring of Clinical Trials. Types of Monitoring Internally Internally Externally Externally.
1 CONSENSUS STANDARDS OIVD WORKSHOP April 22-23, 2003 Rockville MD Ginette Y. Michaud, M.D. OIVD.
PATRICIA KERBY, MPA HUMAN SUBJECTIONS PROTECTION COMPLIANCE OFFICER OFFICE OF RESEARCH COMPLIANCE What are the FDA’s expectations in 2010?
1 Investigating Fraud & Abuse Violations in Medical Research Janet Rehnquist, Esq. Venable LLP th Street, NW Washington, DC
Overview of Gene Therapy Surveillance Inspections Joseph P Salewski, Chief Bioresearch Monitoring Branch CBER.
FDA Regulation of Pharmaceuticals and Devices. Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of the Commissioner Center.
Copyright FDA Inspections: Where Do Things Go Wrong? Diana Naser RN, MS, CCRP Executive Director Clinical Research Administration Clinical Research.
Module C FDA Regulations Regulatory Documents Patricia E. Koziol 1Module C Final Version 10-apr-2010.
UPCOMING CHANGES TO IN-VITRO DIAGNOSTICS (IVDs) AND LABORATORY DEVELOPED TESTS (LDTs) REGULATIONS Moj Eram, PhD November 5, 2015.
Office of Human Research Protection Georgia Health Sciences University.
FDA job description  Regulates about 25% of all consumer purchases  Mission summary: protect and advance public health  Products: food, cosmetics, drugs,
Patrick Herbison Quality Improvement Specialist Division of Human Subjects Protection DHSP Quality Improvement Activities Including Site Audits, Consent.
BIORESEARCH MONITORING & IN VITRO DIAGNOSTIC DEVICES Presented by Jean Toth-Allen, Ph.D. Biophysicist/Consumer Safety Officer Division of Bioresearch Monitoring.
Non-compliance with Human Subjects Research Regulations J. Bruce Smith, MD, CIP November 2014 Continuing Education for IRB Members.
The TJU Human Research Protection Program (HRPP) Part II, Conflict of Interest and IRB Noncompliance J. Bruce Smith, MD, CIP.
CONDUCTING COMPLIANCE ASSESSMENTS Allen Ditch Director Corporate Quality Bristol Myers Squibb Medical Research Summit March 6, 2003.
FDA Facility Evaluation Douglas Stearn Deputy Director for Policy and Analysis Office of Compliance Center for Drug Evaluation and Research.
Compliance Update Allergenic Products Advisory Committee Meeting March 15, 2002 Teddi Lopez DCM/OCBQ Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research.
Device regulations USA Dr Phil Warner. USA Regulations MEDICAL DEVICES Food, Drug & Cosmetics Act Medical Device Amendments of 1976 (and other things)
GCP (GOOD CLINICAL PRACTISE)
FSMA TRAINING Industry Recall Readiness BEST PRACTICES.
FDA’s IDE Decisions and Communications
How to Put Together an IDE Application
How to Handle FDA Audits
The Current PMA Requirements
To start the presentation, click on this button in the lower right corner of your screen. The presentation will begin after the screen changes and you.
Linda M. Chatwin, Esq. RAC Business Manager, UL LLC
Administrative Review Requirements
Quality Assurance in Clinical Trials
Presentation transcript:

1 BIORESEARCH MONITORING AND IN VITRO DIAGNOSTICS SYBIL WELLSTOOD, PH.D. OFFICE OF COMPLIANCE DIVISION OF BIORESEARCH MONITORING

2 OBJECTIVES PROVIDE OVERVIEW OF THE CDRH BIORESEARCH MONITORING PROGRAM (BIMO) -What it is -What we do -Who we are DISCUSS HOW THE BIMO PROGRAM APPLIES TO IN VITRO DIAGNOSTIC (IVD) STUDIES CONDUCTED UNDER 510(K) PREMARKET NOTIFICATIONS

3 BIORESEARCH MONITORING PROGRAM (BIMO)  COMPREHENSIVE AGENCY-WIDE COMPLIANCE PROGRAM TO MONITOR FDA-REGULATED RESEARCH -Inspections -Data Audits

4 RESEARCH SUBJECT TO FDA’s BIMO PROGRAM Research Conducted for Submission to FDA to Support Applications for Research or Marketing Permits: Clinical Studies-Humans (Safety & Effectiveness) PreClinical, Nonclinical Laboratory Studies- Analytical tests, Animals (Safety)

5 BIMO MISSION VERIFY QUALITY AND INTEGRITY OF DATA/INFORMATION SUBMITTED IN RESEARCH OR MARKETING APPLICATIONS INCLUDING 510(k)s. PROTECT THE RIGHTS AND WELFARE OF HUMAN RESEARCH SUBJECTS PARTICIPATING IN FDA-REGULATED STUDIES.

6 WHO WE ARE  OFFICE OF COMPLIANCE DIVISION OF BIORESEARCH MONITORING Program Enforcement Branch I Program Enforcement Branch II IVDs

7 WHAT WE DO DEVELOP AND ISSUE INSPECTION ASSIGNMENTS TO FDA FIELD OFFICES EVALUATE AND CLASSIFY ESTABLISHMENT INSPECTION REPORTS (EIRS) INITIATE FOLLOW-UP REGULATORY ACTIONS AND CORRESPONDENCE

8 WHO WE INSPECT SPONSORS-INCLUDING IVD MANUFACTURERS MONITORS, CLINICAL RESEARCH ORGANIZATIONS CLINICAL INVESTIGATORS INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARDS NONCLINICAL LABORATORIES TOTAL BIMO INSPECTIONS IN FY 2003

9 21 CFR (c)(3) EXEMPTS DIAGNOSTICS SUBMITTED AS 510(K)S FROM REQUIRING AN INVESTIGATIONAL DEVICE EXEMPTION (IDE) TO CONDUCT STUDIES.

10 FDA EXPECTATIONS FOR IDE EXEMPT STUDIES MUST FOLLOW GOOD RESEARCH PRACTICES. SUBMIT VALID SCIENTIFIC DATA TO DEMONSTRATE SAFETY AND EFFECTIVENESS. MEET REQUIREMENTS IN 21 CFR PARTS 50 AND 56 FOR HUMAN SUBJECT PROTECTION WHEN APPLICABLE. LABEL PRODUCT “FOR RESEARCH/INVESTIGATIONAL USE ONLY.”

11 HUMAN SUBJECT PROTECTION 21 CFR PARTS 50 & 56 APPLY TO ALL STUDIES SUPPORTING RESEARCH OR MARKETING PERMITS FOR FDA-REGULATED PRODUCTS INVOLVING HUMAN SUBJECTS OR THEIR SPECIMENS

12 HUMAN SUBJECT 21 CFR 812.3(p) A HUMAN WHO PARTICIPATES IN AN INVESTIGATION EITHER AS AN INDIVIDUAL ON WHOM, OR ON WHOSE SPECIMEN, AN INVESTIGATIONAL DEVICE IS USED OR USED AS A CONTROL.

13 21 CFR PARTS 50/56 REQUIREMENTS IRB REVIEW/APPROVAL OF STUDIES INFORMED CONSENT -Must contain all required elements in 21 CFR

14 BIMO IVD 510(k) INSPECTIONS REQUESTED BY OIVDS- DATA APPEAR SUSPICIOUS, FRAUDULANT, UNREALISTIC  INVESTIGATE VALID COMPLAINTS/ WHISLEBLOWER ALLEGATIONS  FOLLOW UP ON PREVIOUS INSPECTIONS INVOLVING SERIOUS NONCOMPLIANCE ISSUES f

15 BIMO IVD 510(K) INSPECTIONS Directed-Submission Based Monitor compliance (Human subject protection) Assess data quality Verify accuracy of data submitted in application For Cause-Problem or Complaint Based focus on special issues/problems compliance follow-up often include interviews May include sworn affidavits

16 BIMO INSPECTION PROCESS Telephone call-short notice FDA investigator shows credentials Investigator issues a written notice of inspection to most responsible person (FDA-482) Investigator discusses the general nature of the inspection

17 During the inspection….. Facilities tour. Ongoing discussion of inspectional proceedings and findings; no surprises at conclusion. Collect records to substantiate observations/facts. May collect sworn affidavits.

18 Concluding the inspection… Summary discussion of findings. Investigator may issue Form FDA- 483-a written report of the objectionable conditions observed reflecting deviations from regulations. Deviations from guidelines do not appear on the Form FDA-483, but may be included in the discussion.

19 FDA 483s and responding… If issued, respond verbally during the final discussion (investigator will include response in EIR). Send a written response to District Office and Center contact. You may opt to do both (most do today).

20 RESPONDING TO 483 ITEMS Explain any special circumstances regarding observations.  Describe specific actions taken or planned that will correct and prevent future deviations.

21 ESTABLISHMENT INSPECTION REPORT (EIR) Prepared by the Investigator or team of Investigators performing the inspection following every inspection. -details inspection and findings. -includes exhibits to document findings. -provides a preliminary classification. EIRs for BIMO inspections sent to assigning Centers for review and final classification. Assigning Centers issue post-inspectional correspondence and initiate follow up actions. Only available by FOIA.

22 EIR INSPECTION CLASSIFICATIONS NAI – NO ACTION INDICATED No objectionable conditions or practices. VAI – VOLUNTARY ACTION INDICATED Objectionable conditions; not at threshold to take or recommend administrative or regulatory action.  OAI – OFFICIAL ACTION INDICATED Serious or numerous objectionable conditions found. Regulatory actions recommended.

23 POST INSPECTIONAL REGULATORY ACTIONS Correspondence- Warning Letter Re-inspection Informal conference 3rd party validation Study/data rejection Disqualification (CIs) Injunction Revoke marketing permit Terminate research permit Prosecution Civil Penalties Application integrity policy(AIP)invoked

24 APPLICATION INTEGRITY POLICY (AIP)  ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION USED WHEN THERE IS EVIDENCE THAT SUBMISSIONS CONTAIN FALSE, MISLEADING, OR UNRELIABLE INFORMATION. PATTERN OR PRACTICE OF WRONGFUL ACTS.

25 AIP CONSEQUENCES STOPS REVIEW OF ALL SPONSOR’S APPLICATIONS CURRENTLY UNDER REVIEW. STOPS REVIEW OF ANY NEW SUBMISSIONS.

26 FDA’s ACTIONS Issue AIP letter to applicant Suspends review of in-house and future applications

27 APPLICANT’S RESPONSIBILITIES  Conduct internal review independent outside consultant Submit corrective action plan (CAP)

28 FDA FOLLOW UP Review CAP Inspect to verify internal audit completed and CAP implemented Headquarters reviews EIR Letter to applicant of findings --Remove AIP; continue review

29 FDA FOLLOW UP REQUEST VOLUNTARY WITHDRAWAL OF PENDING APPLICATIONS.  RESCIND CLEARANCE/APPROVAL MARKETED PRODUCTS; REMOVE FROM MARKET.

30 SUMMARY The FDA BIMO programs audit and inspect clinical research and research data to assure: -- the reliability/integrity of research data submitted in marketing/research permits. --assures that human subject protections are in place. Oversight includes studies for diagnostics submitted as 510(k)s.

31

32 DIVISION OF BIORESEARCH MONITORING Internet Home Page Address: comp/bimo.html