University of Turin Department of Economics MODELLING HOUSEHOLD CHOICES OF DWELLING AND LOCAL PUBLIC SERVICES: A Behavioural Simulation of the Effects.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Customer & Buyer Behaviour Stage 6 Business Studies.
Advertisements

Lecture XXIII.  In general there are two kinds of hypotheses: one concerns the form of the probability distribution (i.e. is the random variable normally.
Significance Tests Hypothesis - Statement Regarding a Characteristic of a Variable or set of variables. Corresponds to population(s) –Majority of registered.
Chapter 13: Taxation and Efficiency Econ 330: Public Finance Dr
Chapter 6 Urban Land Rent.
CONCEPTS of VALUE. FACTORS OF VALUE UTILITY –THE ABILITY OF A PRODUCT TO SATISFY HUMAN WANTS. RELATES TO THE DAMAND SIDE OF THE MARKET. SCARCITY –THE.
ELM Part 2- Economic models Manuela Samek
Evaluating Alternative Representations of the Choice Set In Models of Labour Supply Rolf Aaberge, Ugo Colombino and Tom Wennemo Workshop on Discrete Choice.
A microeconometric model for analysing efficiency and distributional effects of tax reforms Evidence from Italy and Norway Rolf Aaberge (Research Department,
Lecture Presentation Software to accompany Investment Analysis and Portfolio Management Seventh Edition by Frank K. Reilly & Keith C. Brown Chapter.
Chapter 3 Assessing Economic Conditions. Learning Objectives  Identify the macroeconomic factors that affect business performance.  Explain how market.
CHAPTER 6 THE SOCIAL DISCOUNT RATE. DOES THE CHOICE OF DISCOUNT RATE MATTER? Yes – choice of rate can affect policy choices. Generally, low discount rates.
Who Wants to be an Economist? Part II Disclaimer: questions in the exam will not have this kind of multiple choice format. The type of exercises in the.
Sample size computations Petter Mostad
The value of time paradox Kees van GoeverdenDelft University of Technology BIVEC-GIBET Research Day 2009.
Who Wants to be an Economist? Notice: questions in the exam will not have this kind of multiple choice format. The type of exercises in the exam will.
Using ranking and DCE data to value health states on the QALY scale using conventional and Bayesian methods Theresa Cain.
Lecture 14-2 Multinomial logit (Maddala Ch 12.2)
BCOR 1020 Business Statistics
Chapter 6 Measuring the price level
Expected Utility, Mean-Variance and Risk Aversion Lecture VII.
TOPICS 1. FINANCIAL DECISIONS, INVESTMENT DECISIONS AND DIVIDEND DECISIONS 2. FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT PROCESS 3.PROFIT MAXIMIZATION AND WEALTH MAXIMIZATION.
Econ 231: Natural Resources and Environmental Economics SCHOOL OF APPLIED ECONOMICS.
CONSUMPTION CAPITAL: THEORETICAL MODEL AND EMPIRICAL ESTIMATION Victoria M. Ateca Amestoy Universidad de Málaga & IESA - CSIC EHU-UPV, June 2005.
Estimation and Confidence Intervals
Basic Economic Concepts. OBJECTIVE: The student will become familiar with the following items: Economic Fundamentals –Scarcity –Choices –Basis of Benefits.
BF 320: Investment & Portfolio Management M.Mukwena.
University of Turin Frisch Centre - Oslo Slutsky elasticities when the utility is random John K. Dagsvik Statistics Norway and the Frisch Centre,
Lecture Presentation Software to accompany Investment Analysis and Portfolio Management Seventh Edition by Frank K. Reilly & Keith C. Brown Chapter 7.
Chapter 16 Income Taxation
On visible choice set and scope sensitivity: - Dealing with the impact of study design on the scope sensitivity Improving the Practice of Benefit Transfer:
Post-Katrina New Orleans: Inequality and Schooling S. Barbieri – J. Edwards Tulane University New Orleans Political Economy Workshop Tulane University.
EM 4103 Urban Planning II Lecture 9: Overview on Models in Planning and Use in Retail Planning.
Chapter 3 Arbitrage and Financial Decision Making
Economics Economics is the study of how people choose to allocate scarce resources to produce goods and services and how they choose to distribute those.
The Goods Market Lecture 11 – academic year 2013/14 Introduction to Economics Fabio Landini.
Tutorial 1 Introduction to Economics 1. LEARNING OUTCOMES The term “economy” 2. Difference between microeconomics and macroeconomics; 3.The three basic.
Lecture 1 Basic Economic Analysis. The Economic Framework For our purposes two basic sets of agents: –Consumers –Firms Both consumers and firms live within.
CHAPTER 3 NATIONAL INCOME: WHERE IT COMES FROM AND WHERE IT GOES ECN 2003 MACROECONOMICS 1 Assoc. Prof. Yeşim Kuştepeli.
Conflicting NPV and IRR ranking The ranking of alternative proposal and the decision regarding selection of a proposal on the basis of NPV and IRR may.
Poverty and Social Impact Analysis: a User’s Guide – Economic tools Nairobi, 6-8 th December 2006.
Confidence intervals and hypothesis testing Petter Mostad
Chapter McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2008 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Risk and Capital Budgeting 13.
The Microsimulation Approach to Policy Evaluation B. Essama-Nssah The World Bank DEC Course on Poverty and Inequality Analysis Module 7: Evaluating the.
Warm up questions – 1/28/2014 What are some economic decisions you made in the last 24 hours? (ie. time, money) What were some alternatives that you were.
Population ageing and future tax burdens An integrated micro-macro analysis of possible taxation policy changes R Aaberge, Statistics Norway U Colombino,
Designing Optimal Taxes with a Microeconometric Model of Labour Supply Evidence from Norway Rolf Aaberge, Statistics Norway and CHILD Ugo Colombino, Univ.
We estimate a microeconometric model of household labor supply which features: simultaneous treatment of spouses’ decisions exact representation of complex.
Behavioural and Welfare Effects of Basic Income Schemes Ugo Colombino (Department of Economics and CHILD-CCA ) and M. Locatelli, E. Narazani, I. Shima.
Social Evaluation of Alternative Basic Income Schemes in Italy R. Aaberge (Statistics Norway, Oslo) U. Colombino (Department of Economics, Torino) S. Strøm.
Consumer Decision Making Frederick University 2014.
1 Chapter 4 Prof. Dr. Mohamed I. Migdad Professor in Economics 2015.
Distribution of income. Direct and Indirect Taxation Direct taxes are paid directly to the tax authority by the taxpayer: –Personal income taxes: on all.
Chapter 7 An Introduction to Portfolio Management.
By R. Gambacorta and A. Neri Bank of Italy - Statistical Analysis Directorate Wealth and its returns: economic inequality in Italy, The Bank.
1 Essential Question: Explain the difference between trade-offs and opportunity cost and identify what a production possibility curve is and what is can.
Designing Optimal Taxes with a Microeconometric Model of Labour Supply Evidence from Norway Rolf Aaberge, Ugo Colombino and Tom Wennemo WPEG Conference,
Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization Presented by: Kuan Chen.
Jordy van Meerkerk, Gusta Renes & Geert Ridder (University of Southern California) 1 Greening the Dutch car fleet The role of the differentiated sales.
Unit 2 Glossary. Macroeconomics The study of issues that effect economies as a whole.
Lecture by: Jacinto F. Fabiosa Fall 2005 Demand. 2 A household’s quantity demanded of a good –Specific amount household would choose to buy over some.
An Empirical Framework for Large-Scale Policy Analysis, with an Application to School Finance Reform in Michigan Maria Marta Ferreyra Tepper School.
Behavioural Microsimulation and Policy Analysis
TOPIC 3.1 CAPITAL MARKET THEORY
A Logit model of brand choice calibrated on scanner data
INTRODUCTION TO MICROECONOMICS
More about Posterior Distributions
The Simple Linear Regression Model: Specification and Estimation
Role of the state.
Poverty and Social Impact Analysis: a User’s Guide – Economic tools
Presentation transcript:

University of Turin Department of Economics MODELLING HOUSEHOLD CHOICES OF DWELLING AND LOCAL PUBLIC SERVICES: A Behavioural Simulation of the Effects of Fiscal Decentralization. Ugo Colombino Marilena Locatelli

University of Turin Department of Economics 2  To estimate a micro-econometric model of residential choice and simulate the effects of alternative systems of fiscal decentralisation upon public finance and household behaviour and welfare. Purpose

University of Turin Department of Economics 3 The Model  Derived from the discrete choice approach proposed by McFadden (1978).  Applied to a sample of Italian chief towns of district.  The choice is assumed to depend on personal characteristics, income, structural and environmental characteristics of the dwelling and of the town, local taxes and local expenditure on services and public goods.

University of Turin Department of Economics 4 The model (cont.)  We assume that the consumer faces a residential location decision among the alternatives belonging to the opportunity set  For consumer h, the alternative produces a utility flow  The consumer h chooses the alternative j if

University of Turin Department of Economics 5 The model (cont.)  Under the assumption that the are i.i.d. type III Extreme Value, it is well-known that the probability that household h chooses alternative turns out to have the multinomial logit form.

University of Turin Department of Economics 6 The model (cont.)  We estimate (and simulate) the model under two different specification of the price function that differ as to the assumptions on returns to scale.  If we assume constant returns to scale:  If we assume decreasing return to scale:

University of Turin Department of Economics 7 The model (cont.) DADA DBDB Supply function with constant return of scale

University of Turin Department of Economics 8 The model (cont.) DADA DBDB Supply function with decreasing return of scale

University of Turin Department of Economics 9 A Behavioural Simulation of Fiscal Decentralization  The total expenditure for local services is kept constant, but it is re-distributed among the different locations, i.e. towns, in such a way that the local expenditures of each town represent the same proportion of the (national) income taxes paid by the households living in that town (the way each town distributes expenditures for local services is not changed).

University of Turin Department of Economics 10

University of Turin Department of Economics 11

University of Turin Department of Economics 12

University of Turin Department of Economics 13

University of Turin Department of Economics 14 A Behavioural Simulation of Fiscal Decentralization  For each household we compute the expected maximum utility before and after the reform:

University of Turin Department of Economics 15 Equivalent variation (EV)  The equivalent variation, is a measure of the amount of money necessary to maintain the same level of households’ utility facing under two different fiscal decentralization regimes, which is implicitly defined as:

University of Turin Department of Economics 16 Efficiency and Equality Effects of the Reform  We compute the iso-elastic social welfare function

University of Turin Department of Economics 17

University of Turin Department of Economics 18

University of Turin Department of Economics 19

University of Turin Department of Economics 20

University of Turin Department of Economics 21

University of Turin Department of Economics 22

University of Turin Department of Economics 23

University of Turin Department of Economics 24

University of Turin Department of Economics 25

University of Turin Department of Economics 26

University of Turin Department of Economics 27

University of Turin Department of Economics 28 Conclusions  Results support the hypothesis that dwelling quality, location and local public services affect residential choice decisions, giving a quantitative measure of their relevance.  Since residential choice decisions of individual households are affected by the actions of local government, in a decentralised system, the local government, through its expenditure and tax decisions, can influence the socio-economic composition of its population and consequently the size of its tax base.

University of Turin Department of Economics 29 Conclusions (cont.)  the reform is efficient, since the overall mean value of EV is positive but it produces different disequalizing effect depending on the chosen specification.  In specification A, the reform is disequalizing only for the highest value of the inequality aversion parameter, whereas in B it is always strongly disequalizing.