May 8, 2009 SERPM65 Subarea Model-Corradino 1 SERPM65 Highway-Only Subarea Modeling Process Southeast Florida FSUTMS Users Group Meeting Ft. Lauderdale,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
THURSTON REGION MULTIMODAL TRAVEL DEMAND FORECASTING MODEL IMPLEMENTATION IN EMME/2 - Presentation at the 15th International EMME/2 Users Group Conference.
Advertisements

SE Florida FSUTMS Users Group Meeting FDOT Systems Planning Office
Feedback Loops Guy Rousseau Atlanta Regional Commission.
TRAVEL DEMAND FORECASTING FOR THE OLYMPIC GAMES ATHENS 2004 ATTIKO METRO S.A. Anna Anastasaki.
Tuesday, April 14, 2015 Southeast Florida Status of Model Developments Model Coordinators D4: Min-Tang Li D6: Phil Steinmiller.
Jeannie Wu, Planner Sep  Background  Model Review  Model Function  Model Structure  Transportation System  Model Interface  Model Output.
Madison County Travel Demand Model Challenges and Innovations Diane B. Zimmerman, PE.
FOCUS MODEL OVERVIEW CLASS TWO Denver Regional Council of Governments June 30, 2011.
Status of the SEMCOG E6 Travel Model SEMCOG TMIP Peer Review Panel Meeting December 12, 2011 presented by Liyang Feng, SEMCOG Thomas Rossi, Cambridge Systematics.
Intercity Person, Passenger Car and Truck Travel Patterns Daily Highway Volumes on State Highways and Interstates Ability to Evaluate Major Changes in.
13 th TRB Planning Applications Conference Reno, Nevada The Corradino Group, Inc. May 12, th TRB Planning Applications Conference Reno, Nevada.
GEOG 111 & 211A Transportation Planning Traffic Assignment.
Junction Modelling in a Strategic Transport Model Wee Liang Lim Henry Le Land Transport Authority, Singapore.
Session 11: Model Calibration, Validation, and Reasonableness Checks
CE 2710 Transportation Engineering
GEOG 111/211A Transportation Planning Trip Distribution Additional suggested reading: Chapter 5 of Ortuzar & Willumsen, third edition November 2004.
Amar Sarvepalli. 500 projects in 6-8 weeks Need VMT, VHT and More.
Milton-Madison Bi-State Travel Demand Model Rob Bostrom Planning Application Conference Houston, Texas May 19, 2009.
FOCUS MODEL OVERVIEW CLASS FIVE Denver Regional Council of Governments July27, 2011.
Source: NHI course on Travel Demand Forecasting (152054A) Session 10 Traffic (Trip) Assignment Trip Generation Trip Distribution Transit Estimation & Mode.
Travel Demand Modeling At NCTCOG Presentation For IOWA TMIP Peer Review March 30 – April 1, 2004.
The Impact of Convergence Criteria on Equilibrium Assignment Yongqiang Wu, Huiwei Shen, and Terry Corkery Florida Department of Transportation 11 th Conference.
TPB Models Development Status Report Presentation to the Travel Forecasting Subcommittee Ron Milone National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board.
BALTIMORE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL MODEL ENHANCEMENTS FOR THE RED LINE PROJECT AMPO TRAVEL MODEL WORK GROUP March 20, 2006.
Calculating Transportation System User Benefits: Interface Challenges between EMME/2 and Summit Principle Author: Jennifer John Senior Transportation Planner.
Increasing Precision in Highway Volume through Adjustment of Stopping Criteria in Traffic Assignment and Number of Feedbacks Behruz Paschai, Kathy Yu,
4-1 Model Input Dollar Value  Dollar value of time  Accident costs  Fuel costs  Emission costs.
TRANSIMS Version 5 Application Concepts January 20, 2011 David Roden – AECOM.
How to Put “Best Practice” into Traffic Assignment Practice Ken Cervenka Federal Transit Administration TRB National Transportation.
Montgomery County Travel Forecasting Model Validation — Status Report — Status Report Presented To: TPB Travel Forecasting Subcommittee By: Montgomery.
NTERFACING THE MORPC REGIONAL MODEL WITH DYNAMIC TRAFFIC SIMULATION INTERFACING THE MORPC REGIONAL MODEL WITH DYNAMIC TRAFFIC SIMULATION David Roden (AECOM)
Travel Demand Modeling Experience Bellevue-Kirkland-Redmond Travel Demand Modeling Experience Jin Ren, P.E. City of Bellevue, Washington, USA October 19,
Current State of FSUTMS Practice Presented to Model Task Force November 9, 2009 Terry Corkery FDOT Systems Planning Office.
David B. Roden, Senior Consulting Manager Analysis of Transportation Projects in Northern Virginia TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference.
SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY San Francisco DTA Model: Working Model Calibration Part 1: Process Greg Erhardt Dan Tischler Neema Nassir.
February 8, 2008 SERPM65 vs. SERPM6-Corradino 1 SERPM-6.5 & SERPM-6: Differences & Future Directions Southeast Florida FSUTMS Users Group Meeting Ft. Lauderdale,
Using GIS Networks to Represent Model Networks May 19, 2009 Hoyt Davis & Chunyu Lu Gannett Fleming, Inc.
Integrated Travel Demand Model Challenges and Successes Tim Padgett, P.E., Kimley-Horn Scott Thomson, P.E., KYTC Saleem Salameh, Ph.D., P.E., KYOVA IPC.
How Does Your Model Measure Up Presented at TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference by Phil Shapiro Frank Spielberg VHB May, 2007.
Comparison of an ABTM and a 4-Step Model as a Tool for Transportation Planning TRB Transportation Planning Application Conference May 8, 2007.
1 FSUTMS-Voyager: Transit Standards within Evolving FSUTMS Summary Presentation Florida Model Task Force Tampa, Florida December 13 th, slides.
Source: NHI course on Travel Demand Forecasting (152054A) Session 11: Model Calibration, Validation, and Reasonableness Checks.
Presented to MTF Transit Committee presented by David Schmitt, AICP November 20, 2008 FSUTMS Transit Model Application.
FSUTMS Model Status and Standardization Florida Model Task Force Meeting Tampa, FL December 13, 2006 Developments and Future Directions.
December 12, 2006 Florida Model Task Force CORRADINO 1 Treasure Coast Southeast Florida Regional Planning Models In Cube Voyager.
Presented to Time of Day Panel presented by Krishnan Viswanathan, Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Jason Lemp, Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Thomas Rossi, Cambridge.
11th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference CORRADINO May 9, Validation of Speeds and Volumes in a Large Regional Model Southeast.
Jack is currently performing travel demand model forecasting for Florida’s Turnpike. Specifically he works on toll road project forecasting to produce.
Estimating Volumes for I-95 HOT Lanes in Virginia Prepared for: 2009 Planning Applications Conference Houston, TX May 18, 2009 Prepared by: Kenneth D.
Emme Modeller Applications Puget Sound Regional Council’s Model Conversion via Emme Modeller 22 nd International Emme Users’ Conference September 15-16,
Interstate 95 Managed Lanes PD&E Study (95 Express) Project Development and Environment Study SE FSUTMS Users Group The Corradino Group November 2, 2007.
Incorporating Time of Day Modeling into FSUTMS – Phase II Time of Day (Peak Spreading) Model Presentation to FDOT SPO 23 March 2011 Heinrich McBean.
Semi-Automated Approach to Develop Focus Area Forecasts from a Statewide Model 12th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference May 17-21,
Application of Accelerated User Equilibrium Traffic Assignments Howard Slavin Jonathan Brandon Andres Rabinowicz Srinivasan Sundaram Caliper Corporation.
Travel Demand Forecasting: Traffic Assignment CE331 Transportation Engineering.
Presented to Toll Modeling Panel presented by Krishnan Viswanathan, Cambridge Systematics, Inc.. September 16, 2010 Time of Day in FSUTMS.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to Florida Model Task Force Model Advancement Committee presented by Robert G. Schiffer, AICP Thomas.
Peter Vovsha, Robert Donnelly, Surabhi Gupta pb
Network Attributes Calculator
Transportation Planning Applications Conference Sheldon Harrison
Leta F. Huntsinger, PhD, PE Senior Technical Principal, WSP
WIFI Data Collection and the Effectiveness of Various Survey Expansion Techniques- A Case Study on I-95 Corridor in Palm Beach County, FL Presented to.
Auto Ownership Model For Southeast Florida Models Southeast Florida FSUTMS Users Group Meeting Ft. Lauderdale, FL May 16, 2008 Corradino.
Johnson City MPO Travel Demand Model
Ventura County Traffic Model (VCTM) VCTC Update
Network Development and Zone Definition
Trip Distribution Review and Recommendations
Jim Lam, Caliper Corporation Guoxiong Huang, SCAG Mark Bradley, BB&C
Ohio Traffic Forecasting Manual
Presentation transcript:

May 8, 2009 SERPM65 Subarea Model-Corradino 1 SERPM65 Highway-Only Subarea Modeling Process Southeast Florida FSUTMS Users Group Meeting Ft. Lauderdale, FL

2May 8, 2009SERPM65 Subarea - Corradino PART I: Presentation on  SERPM65 HO Subarea Model Process and Options  Selected Results and Comparison

3May 8, 2009SERPM65 Subarea - Corradino SERPM-65 Coverage Palm Beach, Broward and Miami-Dade Counties 2005 Population: 5.4 million 5.4 million 2005 Households: 2.0 million 2.0 million 4,284 TAZs (internal+dummy+ext ) (internal+dummy+ext )

4May 8, 2009SERPM65 Subarea - Corradino SERPM65 Models 1.Time-of-Day Model FULL (with Transit) – S65TODMDL/MS65TODMDL 2.24-Hour FULL – SERPM65MDL 3.24-Hour Highway-Only – S65HO24HMDL A.FULL Model B.Highway-Only (HO) Model 4.24-Hour Highway-Only Subarea – S65Subarea A.User Defined (Focused) area B.Broward C.Palm Beach D.Miami-Dade E.All region TAZ level F.Full Model G.All region District level

5May 8, 2009SERPM65 Subarea - Corradino SERPM65 Model Options 1.Time-of-Day Model FULL (with Transit) – S65TODMDL/MS65TODMDL 2.24-Hour FULL – SERPM65MDL 3.24-Hour Highway-Only – S65HO24HMDL A.FULL Model B.Highway-Only (HO) Model 4.24-Hour Highway-Only Subarea – S65Subarea A.User Defined (Focused) area B.Broward C.Palm Beach D.Miami-Dade E.All region TAZ level F.Full Model G.All region District level

6May 8, 2009SERPM65 Subarea - Corradino SERPM65 HO & Subarea Models CV Keys 3.24-Hour Highway-Only – S65HO24HMDL A.FULL Model B.Highway-Only (HO) Model 4.24-Hour Highway-Only Subarea – S65Subarea A.User Defined (Focused) area B.Broward C.Palm Beach D.Miami-Dade E.All region TAZ level F.Full Model G.All region District level Use CV Key: {HighwayOnlyRun}, [0,1] Use CV Keys:  {HighwayOnlyRun}, [0,1]  {SubRegion}, [AL,BO,PB,MD,xx]  {UserDefinedSubArea}, [0,1]

7May 8, 2009SERPM65 Subarea - Corradino Highway-Only Model (S65HO24HMDL) Run Options

8May 8, 2009SERPM65 Subarea - Corradino Subarea Model (S65Subarea) Run Options

9May 8, 2009SERPM65 Subarea - Corradino Subarea Concept: TAZ vs. District

10May 8, 2009SERPM65 Subarea - Corradino Example Subarea Network

11May 8, 2009SERPM65 Subarea - Corradino Model Runtime

12May 8, 2009SERPM65 Subarea - Corradino SERPM65 – Model Flow 1.Setup controls and file names 2.External – EE by period 3.Trip Gen – LSGEN by auto ownership and TOD 4.Highway – Includes speed and capacity calculators 5.Distribution – Includes equilibration (FEEDBACK) of peak period highway speeds 6.Transit Nets – PT  Trnbuild and connectors, paths, skims and fares 7.Mode Choice 8.Transit Assignment by access path and TOD 9.Highway Trip Tables – Combines trip tables for assignment – 24H & TOD 10.Highway Assignment – 24 Hour & by TOD (use most computer time) 11.Highway Evaluation – HEVAL and RMSE by TOD and county & User selected subarea

13May 8, 2009SERPM65 Subarea - Corradino HTTAB Trips Comparisons

14May 8, 2009SERPM65 Subarea - Corradino HTTAB Trips Comparisons (contd.)

15May 8, 2009SERPM65 Subarea - Corradino SERPM65 – Highway Assignment Follows multi-user class link constrained equilibrium assignment methodologies ( with selected node penalties ) For TOD Version AM Peak (Warm-up & Final) AM Peak (Warm-up & Final) Off-Peak (Warm-up & Final) Off-Peak (Warm-up & Final) PM Peak (Warm-up & Final) PM Peak (Warm-up & Final) Composite 24 Hours (add preceding) Composite 24 Hours (add preceding) For 24-Hour Version (Includes HO & Subarea) 24-Hour Assignment (Warm-up & Final) 24-Hour Assignment (Warm-up & Final) AM peak pre-assignment (Warm-up & Final) inside feedback loop

16May 8, 2009SERPM65 Subarea - Corradino Full Model - RMSE & Volume/Count Ratios

17May 8, 2009SERPM65 Subarea - Corradino HO Model - RMSE & Volume/Count Ratios

18May 8, 2009SERPM65 Subarea - Corradino Subarea Model - RMSE & Volume/Count Ratios

19May 8, 2009SERPM65 Subarea - Corradino A Few Differences on Model Processes Full Model: Trips for HH with autos distributed using highway skims, while 0- auto HH use transit skims. Full Model: Trips for HH with autos distributed using highway skims, while 0- auto HH use transit skims. HO/Subarea Model: All HH Trips are distributed using highway skims. HO/Subarea Model: All HH Trips are distributed using highway skims. Full Model: Separate motorized and mode choice analysis of Zero, one and two-or-more HH autos for the HB (HBW & HBNW) trips. Full Model: Separate motorized and mode choice analysis of Zero, one and two-or-more HH autos for the HB (HBW & HBNW) trips. HO/Subarea Model: No separate motorized and mode choice analysis of Zero, one and two-or-more HH autos for the HB (HBW & HBNW) trips. HO/Subarea Model: No separate motorized and mode choice analysis of Zero, one and two-or-more HH autos for the HB (HBW & HBNW) trips. Full/HO Model: Trip matrices are at individual TAZ levels. Full/HO Model: Trip matrices are at individual TAZ levels. Subarea Model: Trip matrices are aggregated at district levels outside focused region. Subarea Model: Trip matrices are aggregated at district levels outside focused region.  Less/Sparse centroid connectors outside focused region of the Subarea network used in assignment.  HO/Subarea model uses same default transit splits for each IJ pairs.

20May 8, 2009SERPM65 Subarea - Corradino Full Model - Overall 2005 Ave Volume, VMT, VHT & Speed

21May 8, 2009SERPM65 Subarea - Corradino HO Model - Overall 2005 Ave Volume, VMT, VHT & Speed

22May 8, 2009SERPM65 Subarea - Corradino Subarea Model - Overall 2005 Ave Volume, VMT, VHT & Speed

23May 8, 2009SERPM65 Subarea - Corradino Overall 2030 Ave Volume, VMT, VHT & Speed

24May 8, 2009SERPM65 Subarea - Corradino User-Defined Sub-area Network Instructions Two New Network Attributes: Detail (Node attribute) DetailNet (Link attribute)

25May 8, 2009SERPM65 Subarea - Corradino User-Defined Sub-area Network Instructions (Contd.)

26May 8, 2009SERPM65 Subarea - Corradino New Input Files – Users need to check/update (if necessary) DLEVEL_XX.DBF (a value of “0” or “1” means that aggregation “is not” or “is” at district level. XX = AL, xx, PB, BO, MD File location: {DATADIR} SADISTS_XX.DBF (specify subarea district/CenterTAZ) XX = AL, xx, PB, BO, MD File location: {DATADIR}

27May 8, 2009SERPM65 Subarea - Corradino Other New Input Files PROFILE-PKHO.MAS (same as PROFILE.MAS) File location: {DATADIR} folder PROFILE-OPHO.MAS Only difference is in &DEFMS (Default Regional Mode Splits) parameters. The peak and off-peak values of HBW, HBO and NHB are swapped in columns (1-3 and 4-6)  NLOGIT-PKHO.SYN (same as NLOGIT.SYN) File location: {DATADIR}\transit folder File location: {DATADIR}\transit folder  NLOGIT-OPHO.SYN File location: {DATADIR}\transit folder File location: {DATADIR}\transit folder The peak and off-peak parameters of HBW, HBO and NHB are swapped in columns (1-3 and 4-6)

28May 8, 2009SERPM65 Subarea - Corradino PART II: Subarea CV Voyager Model Demonstration & Q/A & Discussion