Doc.: IEEE P802.15-01/304r0 Submission July 2001 S.Sugaya, K.Takamura, M.Akahane, Sony CorporationSlide 1 Project: IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
IEEE mag Submission Amarjeet Kumar, Procubed Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE s Submission January 2015 Mineo Takai, Space-Time EngineeringSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal.
Doc.: IEEE e Submission f TG November 2009 Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
Doc.: IEEE /348r0 Submission July, 2004 Tadahiko Maeda, Oki Electric Industry Co,. Ltd.Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless.
Doc.: IEEE /0136r0 Submission March 2006 Abbie Mathew, NewLANS Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks Submission.
Doc.: IEEE /xxxr0 Submission Phil Jamieson November 2002 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission.
Doc.: IEEE /368r0 Submission September 2003 Ranta et al., Discussion on UWB MAC for mobile devices Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless.
Doc.: IEEE Submission Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Drafting of IEEE e.
July 2004 Jay Bain, Fearn Consulting doc.: IEEE /0379r0 Submission Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)
Doc.: IEEE Submission November 2012 Sunggeun Jin (ETRI)Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
Doc.: IEEE Submission doc. : IEEE March 2009 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
Doc.: IEEE g TG4g Presentation May 2010 Yaoxian Fu, SIMIT Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
Doc.: IEEE Submission November 2003, Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission.
Doc.: IEEE d Submission September 2014 Keiji Akiyama (Sony Corporation)Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal.
Doc: IEEE Submission April 2015 Hernandez,Li,Dotlić,Miura (NICT)Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal.
Doc.: b Submission Mar Song-Lin Young[Sharp Labs.] Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
Doc.: IEEE Submission September 2013 Li, Hernandez, Dotlic, Miura, NICT Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless.
Doc.: IEEE /115r0 Submission February 2001 Mark Schrader, Eastman Kodak Co.Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area.
Doc.: IEEE /115r1 Submission February 2001 Mark Schrader, Eastman Kodak Co.Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area.
Doc.: IEEE /315r1 Submission July 2001 Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title:
March 2013 doc.: IEEE m Submission 1 (ETRI) Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission.
Submission November 2015 Slide 1Li Qiang, Huawei Technologies Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission.
Doc.: IEEE Submission, Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Communicating.
Doc.: IEEE g TG4g Presentation Jan 2010 C.S. Sum1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)‏
Doc.: IEEE /250r0 Submission, Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: IEEE :
Doc.: IEEE Submission ETRI May 2015 Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission.
Doc.: IEEE /yyyr0 Submission Aug 2001 Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title:
Doc.: IEEE g Submission March 2010 Kuor Hsin Chang, Monique Brown (Elster Solutions, M.B. Brown Consulting) Project: IEEE P
Doc.: IEEE /440r2 Submission, Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: IEEE :
Submission doc.: IEEE /0339r0 Jul 2004 Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title:
Doc.: IEEE e Submission July 2009 Andy Summers, Skip Ashton, EmberSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal.
Doc: IEEE Submission April 2015 Hernandez,Li,Dotlić,Miura (NICT)Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal.
Source: Dr. William Shvodian Company: XtremeSpectrum
Project: IEEE Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Proposals for adding a version number and for the treatment.
Project: IEEE Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Proposals for adding a frame version number and for the.
Submission Title: [Resolution on comment #20,22 and 30]
Submission Title: [Add name of submission]
Address: Kitashinagawa Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo Japan
June 2006 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Proposed Scenarios for Usage Model Document.
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
May 2018 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Considerations on general MAC frame] Date Submitted:
Address: Kitashinagawa Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo Japan
Submission Title: [Proposals for MAC Issues]
<May,2009> doc.: IEEE <doc .....> <July 2009>
<month year> doc.: IEEE /119 September, 2003
Submission Title: [Comment Resolutions for #345, #347, #348, and #349]
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Improved Delayed ACK response Frame for.
< November, 2011 > Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [More Low Energy Mechanism Details]
Submission Title: [Resolution on comment #20,22 and 30]
8 July 2008 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [MAC Access Priorities] Date Submitted: [8.
doc.: IEEE /XXXr0 Sep 19, 2007 June 2009
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
Date Submitted: September 10, 2001
Submission Title: [One-to-many and many-to-many peering procedures]
May 2018 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Considerations on general MAC frame] Date Submitted:
Submission Title: [Comment Resolutions for #345, #347, #348, and #349]
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
Address: Kitashinagawa Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo Japan
4 May 2019 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Issues with Beacon-Mode SuperFrame Structure.
Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Synchronization Between Channels Towards.
doc.: IEEE <01/xxxr0>
July 2004 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Modified Delayed (Dly) Acknowledgement for.
Date Submitted: September 17, 2001
Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [15.4j Coordinator Switching] Date Submitted:
September 2008 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Suggested TG3c PAR Changes] Date Submitted:
Source: [Chunhui Zhu] Company [Samsung]
August, 2008 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Improve the latency between GTS request.
Presentation transcript:

doc.: IEEE P /304r0 Submission July 2001 S.Sugaya, K.Takamura, M.Akahane, Sony CorporationSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: IEEE : A proposal to add geographical coverage based criteria to Coordinator selection as well as to clarify the usage of “Des-mode” and Coordinator handover. Date Submitted: July 03, 2001 Source: Shig Sugaya, Kaz Takamura, Masa Akahane Company: Sony Corporation Address: Kitashinagawa Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo Japan Voice: , FAX: Re: [ P /D0.4, P /259r0] Abstract: This proposal presents modified comparison order of fields and Coordinator selection frame body that provide an accessible Device count for geographical coverage based Coordinator selection. Purpose: To provide an improvement to the current version of the MAC Notice:This document has been prepared to assist the IEEE P It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein. Release:The contributor acknowledges and accepts that these viewgraphs becomes the property of IEEE and may be made publicly available by P802.15, however, the substance of the subject matter contained in the viewgraphs remains the property of Sony Corporation.

doc.: IEEE P /304r0 Submission July 2001 S.Sugaya, K.Takamura, M.Akahane, Sony CorporationSlide 2 Outline “Des-mode” concept and utilization Geographical coverage based Coordinator selection scheme

doc.: IEEE P /304r0 Submission July 2001 S.Sugaya, K.Takamura, M.Akahane, Sony CorporationSlide 3 “Des-mode” To set “Des-mode” means to entitle the highest priority to be a Coordinator –This priority is effective when Coordinator selection process is started for: Piconet initializationYES Handover???

doc.: IEEE P /304r0 Submission July 2001 S.Sugaya, K.Takamura, M.Akahane, Sony CorporationSlide 4 Concerns on Coordinator Handover Expected handover opportunities –At the time user sets “Des-mode” –When Coordinator disappears Problems on handover –No guarantee to keep the same coverage before handover –Need extra computation and status management Select alternate candidates every time the topology of piconet is changed –When a Device joins/leaves the piconet Coordinator handover makes life complicated

doc.: IEEE P /304r0 Submission July 2001 S.Sugaya, K.Takamura, M.Akahane, Sony CorporationSlide 5 Basic Concept on Piconet Simplicity is the goal of Wireless PAN –Piconet is defined by the coverage of Coordinator –When Coordinator leaves, the piconet should be “adjourn” If Coordinator need to be changed, 1) Set “Des-mode” to the new Device 2) Reset the piconet No need to define “handover” anymore We propose “Des-mode” is effective only when initialization

doc.: IEEE P /304r0 Submission July 2001 S.Sugaya, K.Takamura, M.Akahane, Sony CorporationSlide 6 Issue –A Device located at the fringe area of the piconet may become the Coordinator if the Device has the highest capability Demand –Geographical coverage should also be one of the selection criteria Decision Criteria –A Device which has the largest number of accessible Devices becomes Coordinator Good Selection Bad Selection Ideal Piconet Unexpected Piconet Devices out of reach Ideal Coordinator Inappropriate Coordinator Geographical coverage based selection

doc.: IEEE P /304r0 Submission July 2001 S.Sugaya, K.Takamura, M.Akahane, Sony CorporationSlide 7 Inquiry Command Inquiry Command consists of Inquiry Request and Inquiry Response Alternate Coordinators send Inquiry Request to all Devices All Devices that could receive Inquiry Request send Inquiry Response to the Alternate Coordinator Alternate Coordinator sums up the total number of Inquiry Responses Inquiry Res Inquiry Request Inquiry Res Accessible Device Count = 4 CS Frame Broadcast Device ADevice BDevice DDevice EDevice C Alternate Coordinator

doc.: IEEE P /304r0 Submission July 2001 S.Sugaya, K.Takamura, M.Akahane, Sony CorporationSlide 8 Recommended Comparison Order Order InformationNotes 1Designated mode bit in capability fieldCoordinator designation is preferred 2SEC bitSEC=1 is preferred 3Battery/AC PowerAC Power preferred 4PS bitPS=1 is preferred 5Accessible Device CountHigh value is preferred 6MAX GTS SlotsHigh value is preferred 7Repeater MemoryHigh value is preferred 8Device IDHigh value is preferred Draft 0.4, Table 59 Comparison order of fields in AC-announcement command Based on 01/259r0

doc.: IEEE P /304r0 Submission July 2001 S.Sugaya, K.Takamura, M.Akahane, Sony CorporationSlide 9 Inquiry Frame Type Value Frame type description 0000 Beacon 0001 Coordinator Selection (CS) 0010 Association request 0011 Association response 0100 Disassociation request 0101 Immediate Acknowledgement (ACK) 0110 Command 0111 Stream-Data 1000 Inquiry Reserved OctetsField 1 Action Type -- 0:Alternate coordinator announcement -- 1:Alternate coordinator pull out -- 2:New coordinator announcement -- 3:Inquiry :Reserved 1Reserved 2Capability 1Total External Connections 1Active External Connections 1Total System Memory 1Avail System Memory 1Maximum PHY Transmit Power 1Max PHY Rate 6Device ID 2CS Timeout Figure 6 -- Coordinator selection frame body Table Valid Frame type values Based on P /D0.4 or

doc.: IEEE P /304r0 Submission July 2001 S.Sugaya, K.Takamura, M.Akahane, Sony CorporationSlide 10 Coordinator Selection Frame Body OctetsField 1Action Type 1Reserved 2Capability 1Accessible Device Count 1Total External Connections 1Active External Connections 1Total System Memory 1Avail System Memory 1Maximum PHY Transmit Power 1Max PHY Rate 6Device ID 2CS Timeout Figure 6 -- Coordinator selection frame body

doc.: IEEE P /304r0 Submission July 2001 S.Sugaya, K.Takamura, M.Akahane, Sony CorporationSlide 11 Coordinator Selection Process Geographical coverage based selection starts if the higher comparison criteria could not reach the decision Every Alternate Coordinator sends Inquiry Request and counts the total number of Inquiry Responses and stores it in Coordinator Selection Frame respectively Alternate Coordinators exchange Coordinator Selection Frame and pull out if self-number is smaller Parameter Comparison (Order 1-4) The First AC Broadcasts CS-frame Other AC Broadcasting CS-frame Inquiry Process Winning AC Broadcasts CS-frame Other AC Broadcasting CS-frame Parameter Comparison (Order 5-8) Winning AC Broadcasts Coordinator Announcement First Beacon Transmission Time Coordinator selection process outline

doc.: IEEE P /304r0 Submission July 2001 S.Sugaya, K.Takamura, M.Akahane, Sony CorporationSlide 12 Required Modification Add “Accessible Devices Count” to the comparison order of fields Add “Accessible Devices Count Field” to Coordinator selection frame body Define “Inquiry Command”

doc.: IEEE P /304r0 Submission July 2001 S.Sugaya, K.Takamura, M.Akahane, Sony CorporationSlide 13 Conclusions When Coordinator need to be changed, reset the piconet and start Coordinator selection process –“Des-mode” becomes enable when piconet is initialized Geographical coverage is added in the criteria of Coordinator selection mechanism –The number of accessible Devices is counted by Alternate Coordinators in order to decide the best location among them