Which Patients for Subcutaneous Immunotherapy? Harold S. Nelson. MD Professor of Medicine National Jewish Heath University of Colorado Denver School of.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Palumbo A et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 536.
Advertisements

Why immunotherapy fails ? Stephen Durham Imperial College and Royal Brompton Hospital, London UK.
Allergen Immunotherapy: From Shots to Tablets Susan Waserman MSc MDCM FRCPC Professor of Medicine Division of Clinical Allergy and Immunology Life and.
Clinical Observation of Montelukast as a Partner Agent for Complementary Therapy.
Dr Narayana pradeep Consultant Pulmonologist Carewell hospital KasaragodKERALA.
A L L E R G Y A N D A S T H M A M I S E R Y E N DE N D It’s worth a shot!
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)
Use of Multiple Allergen Mixes in Immunotherapy Harold S. Nelson, MD Professor of Medicine National Jewish Health University of Colorado Denver School.
What’s new in Atopic Eczema Dr. Simon Dawe Consultant Dermatologist West Hertfordshire NHS trust.
1 Environmental Exposure Units for Phase 3 Studies Ronald L. Rabin, MD Chief, Laboratory of Immunobiochemistry Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research.
T-cell Immunoregulation and the Response to Immunotherapy Harold S. Nelson. MD Professor of Medicine National Jewish Health and University of Colorado.
Allergy Symptom Response Following Conversion from Injection Immunotherapy to Sublingual Immunotherapy CDR Timothy Clenney, MD, MPH Naval Medical Center.
RESPIT™ Regionally-specific immunotherapy Standardized allergen extracts defined by geographic region Inclusion based on – Aerobiology – Allergenicity.
Anti-IgE in Asthma and Other Allergic Diseases Harold S. Nelson. MD Professor of Medicine National Jewish Health And University of Colorado School of Medicine.
SLIT: dealing with trouble, doing it right. Giovanni B Pajno MD Professor of Pediatrics Department of Pediatrics – Allergy Unit University of Messina Italy.
Rush and Cluster Immunotherapy Harold S. Nelson, MD Professor of Medicine National Jewish Health University of Colorado Health Science Center Denver, Colorado.
EVALUATION OF THREE ALLERGEN SPECIFIC IMMUNOTHERAPY METHODS Standard Injection RUSH Injection Sublingual Abstract# 54 Richard Herrscher M.D. FACAAI Clinical.
CLINICAL EFFICACY TESTING for NASAL DRUGS Mary M. Fanning, M.D., Ph.D. Associate Director for Medical Affairs Office of Generic Drugs, FDA June 4, 1999.
SLIT and Atopic Dermatitis George F. Kroker, MD ©2008 Allergychoices, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
A Phase 3 Prospective, Randomized, International Study (MMY-3021) Comparing Subcutaneous and Intravenous Administration of Bortezomib in Patients with.
Cost Effectiveness of Allergy Care. Asthma Patients Cared for by Allergists Have: Fewer emergency care visits Fewer hospitalizations Reduced length of.
SUBLINGUAL IMMUNOTHERAPY Giovanni Passalacqua Allergy & Respiratory Diseases Dept.Internal Medicine- University of Genoa ITALY.
Monotherapy for the polysensitized patient Noel Rodriguez-Perez, MD Professor of pediatrics State University of Tamaulipas, Mexico.
CDER / FDA1 Clinical Study Options for locally acting nasal suspension products Robert J. Meyer, MD Director, Div. Of Pulmonary and Allergy Drug Products.
Immunotherapy SCIT/SLIT
Joint Non-Prescription Drugs and Pediatric Advisory Committee Meeting October 18-19, 2007 Considerations for Extrapolation of Efficacy from Adults to Children.
Linda Rogers and Joan Reibman Curr Opin Pulm Med. (2012) January Vol. 18 Stepping down asthma treatment: how and when Journal club R4. Yoo,
Sublingual immunotherapy in allergic conjuctivitis with house dust and dust mite allergies DR VIPUL SHAH.
Immunotherapy for Allergic Rhinitis
Meta-analysis of Effectiveness of First-Line Smoking Cessation Pharmacotherapies 6 Months After Quitting Medication Estimated OR (95% CI) Est. abstinence.
Sublingual Immunotherapy
Management of Food Allergies: Beyond avoidance, what does the future hold? Stanley Fineman, MD, MBA Adjunct Associate Professor, Department of Pediatrics.
A L L E R G Y A N D A S T H M A M I S E R Y
The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice
Fadhel Saleh 1, Rabab A. Hussain 2, Fadheela A. Saleh 2
ALLERGEN SPECIFIC IMMUNOTHERAPY: EFFICACY & NEW DEVELOPMENTS
HATSJOE Study Symptomatic treatment of pollen-related allergic rhinoconjunctivitis in children: a randomized controlled trial.
Efficacy and safety of birch pollen immunotherapy for local allergic rhinitis  Andrzej Bożek, MD, PhD, Krzysztof Kołodziejczyk, MD, PhD, Jerzy Jarząb,
Treatment effect of sublingual immunotherapy tablets and pharmacotherapies for seasonal and perennial allergic rhinitis: Pooled analyses  Stephen R. Durham,
SQ-standardized sublingual grass immunotherapy: Confirmation of disease modification 2 years after 3 years of treatment in a randomized trial  Stephen.
Practical aspects Of SLIT
Clinical Developments in Allergen Immunotherapy
Treatment effect of sublingual immunotherapy tablets and pharmacotherapies for seasonal and perennial allergic rhinitis: Pooled analyses  Stephen R. Durham,
Optimal dose, efficacy, and safety of once-daily sublingual immunotherapy with a 5– grass pollen tablet for seasonal allergic rhinitis  Alain Didier, MD,
Efficacy of subcutaneous and sublingual immunotherapy with grass allergens for seasonal allergic rhinitis: A meta-analysis–based comparison  Danilo Di.
Safety and efficacy of immunotherapy with the recombinant B-cell epitope–based grass pollen vaccine BM32  Verena Niederberger, MD, Angela Neubauer, PhD,
Network Meta-analysis Shows Commercialized Subcutaneous and Sublingual Grass Products Have Comparable Efficacy  Harold Nelson, MD, Shannon Cartier, MSc,
Advances in Peanut Allergen Immunotherapy
SQ-standardized sublingual grass immunotherapy: Confirmation of disease modification 2 years after 3 years of treatment in a randomized trial  Stephen.
T lymphocytes in asthma: Bronchial versus peripheral responses
Response to sublingual immunotherapy with grass pollen extract: Monotherapy versus combination in a multiallergen extract  Sheila M. Amar, MD, Ronald.
Intralymphatic immunotherapy with 2 concomitant allergens, birch and grass: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial  Laila Hellkvist, MD,
1 Verstovsek S et al. Proc ASH 2012;Abstract Cervantes F et al.
House Dust Mite Respiratory Allergy: An Overview of Current Therapeutic Strategies  Moisés A. Calderón, MD, PhD, Jörg Kleine-Tebbe, MD, Allan Linneberg,
Short-term subcutaneous grass pollen immunotherapy under the umbrella of anti–IL-4: A randomized controlled trial  Adam M. Chaker, MD, Mohamed H. Shamji,
Legends in allergy: Philip S. Norman and Lawrence M
Efficacy of house dust mite sublingual immunotherapy tablet in North American adolescents and adults in a randomized, placebo-controlled trial  Hendrik.
The efficacy and safety of omalizumab in pediatric allergic asthma
Sublingual immunotherapy with once-daily grass allergen tablets: A randomized controlled trial in seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis  Stephen R. Durham,
Efficacy and safety of sublingual tablets of house dust mite allergen extracts in adults with allergic rhinitis  Karl-Christian Bergmann, MD, Pascal Demoly,
Local allergic rhinitis: Allergen tolerance and immunologic changes after preseasonal immunotherapy with grass pollen  Carmen Rondón, MD, PhD, Natalia.
Sublingual grass allergen tablet immunotherapy provides sustained clinical benefit with progressive immunologic changes over 2 years  Ronald Dahl, MD,
Long-term clinical efficacy in grass pollen–induced rhinoconjunctivitis after treatment with SQ-standardized grass allergy immunotherapy tablet  Stephen.
Sustained 3-year efficacy of pre- and coseasonal 5-grass-pollen sublingual immunotherapy tablets in patients with grass pollen–induced rhinoconjunctivitis 
Efficacy of 2 months of allergen-specific immunotherapy with Bet v 1–derived contiguous overlapping peptides in patients with allergic rhinoconjunctivitis:
The correlation between allergic rhinitis and sleep disturbance
Amb a 1–immunostimulatory oligodeoxynucleotide conjugate immunotherapy decreases the nasal inflammatory response  Meri K Tulic, PhD, Pierre-Olivier Fiset,
Subcutaneous and sublingual immunotherapy for seasonal allergic rhinitis: A systematic review and indirect comparison  Janine Dretzke, MSc, Angela Meadows,
Presentation transcript:

Which Patients for Subcutaneous Immunotherapy? Harold S. Nelson. MD Professor of Medicine National Jewish Heath University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine Denver, Colorado, USA

Which Patients for Immunotherapy?  Appropriate clinical manifestations.  Demonstrated IgE-mediated sensitivity to relevant aeroallergen(s)  Significant exposure to the relevant allergen(s)  Availability of high quality extract for the relevant allergen(s).  Asthma, if present, adequately controlled.

Present Status of Immunotherapy with Inhalant Allergens:  Common to SCIT & SLIT  Effective in allergic rhinitis, allergic asthma and selected patients with atopic dermatitis  Defined mechanisms  Demonstrated prevention of: - New sensitization in monosensitized subjects - Progression from rhinitis to asthma  Established duration required for: Persistence of efficacy after stopping  Therefore should not be limited to those failing symptomatic treatment.

SCIT versus SLIT Advantages of Each  Favoring SLIT: - Relative safety in subjects with allergic rhinitis and controlled asthma. - Home administration  Favoring SCIT: - Optimal dosing has been determined for many allergens - Efficacy of treatment with mixes of multiple unrelated allergens verified. - Efficacy, at least in the first year, may be greater.

Effective Doses in Double-Blind Studies (Major Allergen) Allergen ExtractMajor AllergenEffective DosesLess or Ineffective doses RagweedAmb a 14 to 24 mcg0.6 & 2 mcg TimothyPhl p 515 to 20 mcg2 mcg D pteronyssinusDer p 17 & 12 mcg0.7 mcg D farinaeDer f 110 mcgNot determined CatFel d mcg0.6 & 3.0 mcg DogCan f 115 mcg0.6 & 3.0 mcg BirchBet v & 12 mcgNot determined AlternariaAlt a 11.6 & 8 mcgNot determined

Studies of the Use of ≥ 2 Allergens in Immunotherapy Reviewed English & non-English literature :  4 studies with 2-allergen mixes (SCIT & SLIT): Results > placebo and = to single allergen when reported.  6 studies with > 2 allergen mixes (all SCIT): 4 showed clinical efficacy (2 asthma, 2 rhinitis. 2 failed to show clinical efficacy. HS Nelson. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2009;123:763-0

Evidence for Effectiveness of Immunotherapy Employing Multiple Allergens Johnstone included all allergens to which the child was skin test positive. He demonstrated a dose dependent improvement in asthma. Pediatrics 1968;l42: Lowell & Franklin removed or reduced only ragweed in patients’ multi-allergen mixture and demonstrated increased symptoms during the ragweed pollen season. N. Engl J Med1965;273:675-9; JAMA 1967;201:915-7 Reid added only grass or placebo to multiple allergen mixes and showed significant reduction in asthma symptoms during the grass pollen season. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1986;78:

The Value of Hyposensitization Therapy for Bronchial Asthma in Children - A 14-year Study  “Free of Asthma” After 4 years - placebo and lowest dose 18% - 1/5,000 w/v 58% - 1/250 w/v 81%  “Free of Asthma” at end of study (age 16 yr) - placebo and lowest dose 22% - 1/5,000 w/v 66% - 1/250 w/v 78% DE Johnstone, A Dutton Pediatrics 1968l42:

Evidence for Effectiveness of Immunotherapy Employing Multiple Allergens Johnstone included all allergens to which the child was skin test positive. He demonstrated a dose dependent improvement in asthma. Pediatrics 1968;l42: Lowell & Franklin removed or reduced only ragweed in patients’ multi-allergen mixture and demonstrated increased symptoms during the ragweed pollen season. N. Engl J Med1965;273:675-9; JAMA 1967;201:915-7 Reid added only grass or placebo to multiple allergen mixes and showed significant reduction in asthma symptoms during the grass pollen season. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1986;78:

Effectiveness and Specificity of Ragweed Immunotherapy ******* Aug.Sept.Oct. treateduntreatedmedianmean 1963 Total Score Lowell & Franklin NEJM 1965

Evidence for Effectiveness of Immunotherapy Employing Multiple Allergens Johnstone included all allergens to which the child was skin test positive. He demonstrated a dose dependent improvement in asthma. Pediatrics 1968;l42: Lowell & Franklin removed or reduced only ragweed in patients’ multi-allergen mixture and demonstrated increased symptoms during the ragweed pollen season. N. Engl J Med1965;273:675-9; JAMA 1967;201:915-7 Reid added only grass or placebo to multiple allergen mixes and showed significant reduction in asthma symptoms during the grass pollen season. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1986;78:

ASTHMA MEAN SMS Grass treated Non-grass treated RHINITIS MEAN SMS Grass treated Non-grass treated COUNTS/cm 2 Grass pollen count APRILMAYJUNE MONTHS 5 Response to Grass Subcutaneous I.T. P < 0.05 P = 0.11 MJ Reid, et al. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1986;78: N = 9

Sheila M. Amar, MD, Ronald J. Harbeck, PhD, Michael Sills, BS, Lori J. Silveira, MS, Holly O’Brien, RN, Harold S. Nelson, MD National Jewish Health, J Allergy Clin Immunol 2009;121:

 Single-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled  SLIT for 10 months, 56 subjects randomized to 3 arms - SLIT with timothy pollen extract alone (17 mcg Phl p 5 daily) - SLIT with same dose of timothy extract + 9 additional pollen extracts - SLIT placebo

TM Group, Allergen Extract Amount Timothy1.0 mL Diluent9.0 mL Caramelized Sugar Placebo GroupAmount Diluent10 mL Caramelized Sugar *Amount added to 10 ml vial for 1 month of treatment *CMD : Timothy approximately 30x SCIT dose (17 mcg Phl p 5 qday), other allergens 15-20x SCIT dose MAT Group, Allergen ExtractAmount Timothy1.0 mL Maple, Box-Elder1.0 mL Ash, White1.0 mL Juniper, Western1.0 mL Elm, American1.0 mL Cottonwood, Common1.0 mL Firebush (Kochia)1.0 mL Ragweed, Western1.0 mL Sagebrush, Common1.0 mL Russian Thistle1.0 mL

Multi-allergen Sublingual Immunotherapy: Results  Only 3 “ of rain fell in Denver the first 6 months of 2008  Accordingly there was little grass pollen, few symptoms and no difference in symptom scores or medication use among the three treatment groups.  There were, however, significant differences in several clinically relevant outcomes.

p=0.03

p=0.001 p=0.04

p=0.005

Evidence for Effectiveness of Immunotherapy Employing Multiple Allergens: Conclusions  Four studies support the clinical effectiveness of subcutaneous immunotherapy employing multiple allergens.  The only study of multiple allergen sublingual immunotherapy raises questions regarding its effectiveness.

SYMPTOM SCORE POLLEN COUNT Treated Untreated Pollen Count AUGUSTSEPTEMBER OCTOBER 1971 Norman & Lichtenstein JACI 1978;61:370 Pre-seasonal Immunotherapy

Sublingual Immunotherapy for allergic Rhinitis: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis  21 trials involving 959 patients were included, all were DBPC parallel design.  Overall standard mean reduction in - Symptoms (p = 0.002) - Medications: (p = )  Insufficient data to analyze for dose. DR Wilson, M Torres Lima, SR Durham Allergy 2005;60:4-12

Sublingual immunotherapy for allergic rhinitis: systematic review and meta- analysis. DR Wilson, M Torres Lima, SR Durham. Allergy 2005:60:4-12. SMD -0.43

Symptom scores Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007; (1):CD SMD Allergen Injection Immunotherapy for Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis Calderon MA, Alves B, Jacobson M, Hurwitz B, Sheikh A, Durham S

Clinical Efficacy of Sublingual and Subcutaneous Birch Pollen Allergen-Specific Immunotherapy: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled,Double-Blind, Double-Dummy Study  Subcutaneous maintenance dose contained 3.28 mg Bet v 1 once monthly.  Sublingual maintenance dose contained 49.2 mg Bet v 1 every other day (cumulative dose 225 times SC).  5 cases of grade 3 or 4 systemic reactions in the s.c. group, two treated with adrenalin. No grade 3 or 4 reactions with SLIC MS Khinchi, et al. Allergy 2004;59:45-53

SLIT versus SCIT Treatment SymptomsMedication* Placebo SLIT SCIT-.75No change SLIT & SCIT significantly better than placebo, no difference between active treatments. * Pollen counts higher second year MS Khinchi, et al. Allergy 2004;59:45-53

SLIT vs SCIT Comparative Study First Treatment Season SCIT SLIT Placebo Symptom ScoresMedication Scores The hatched areas indicate the daily birch pollen count. The rectangles indicate the defined pollen season. Khinchi MS, et al. Allergy. 2004;59: Mean Weekly Rhinoconjunctivitis Symptom and Medication Scores

Considerations Favoring the Use of Subcutaneous Rather Than Sublingual Immunotherapy  Well-defined effective and ineffective doses have been determined for more allergens.  Multiple-allergen mixes have been shown to be effective in multiple studies.  Where comparisons are available, they suggest greater efficacy for SCIT, at least in the first year.