Presented at the 7th Annual CMAS Conference, Chapel Hill, NC, October 6-8, 2008 Identifying Optimal Temporal Scale for the Correlation of AOD and Ground.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Quantification of Spatially Distributed Errors of Precipitation Rates and Types from the TRMM Precipitation Radar 2A25 (the latest successive V6 and V7)
Advertisements

Tim Smyth and Jamie Shutler Assessment of analysis and forecast skill Assessment using satellite data.
Introduction Air stagnation is a meteorological condition when the same air mass remains over an area for several days to a week. Light winds during air.
Monitoring forage production with MODIS data for farmers' decision making Gonzalo Grigera, Martín Oesterheld and Fernando Pacín IFEVA, Facultad de Agronomía,
Halûk Özkaynak US EPA, Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, RTP, NC Presented at the CMAS Special Symposium on Air.
U.S. EPA Office of Research & Development October 30, 2013 Prakash V. Bhave, Mary K. McCabe, Valerie C. Garcia Atmospheric Modeling & Analysis Division.
1 Surface nitrogen dioxide concentrations inferred from Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) rd GEOS-Chem USERS ` MEETING, Harvard University.
1 Econometric Load Forecasting Peak and Energy Forecast 06/14/2005 Econometric Load Forecasting Peak and Energy Forecast 06/14/2005.
Satellite Applications in the Monitoring and Modeling of Atmospheric Aerosols Yang Liu, Ph.D. 11/18/ nd Suomi NPP Applications Workshop Huntsville,
Satellite Remote Sensing of Surface Air Quality
High-resolution global CO 2 emissions from fossil fuel inventories for 1992 to 2010 using integrated in-situ and remotely sensed data in a fossil fuel.
Jenny Stocker, Christina Hood, David Carruthers, Martin Seaton, Kate Johnson, Jimmy Fung The Development and Evaluation of an Automated System for Nesting.
1 Satellite Remote Sensing of Particulate Matter Air Quality ARSET Applied Remote Sensing Education and Training A project of NASA Applied Sciences Pawan.
1 Satellite Remote Sensing of Particulate Matter Air Quality ARSET Applied Remote Sensing Education and Training A project of NASA Applied Sciences Pawan.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Using Advanced Satellite Products to Better Understand I&M Data within the Context of the Larger.
Application of Satellite Data to Particulate, Smoke and Dust Monitoring Spring 2015 ARSET - AQ Applied Remote Sensing Education and Training – Air Quality.
The University of Mississippi Geoinformatics Center NASA RPC – March, Evaluation for the Integration of a Virtual Evapotranspiration Sensor Based.
CMAS Conference, October 16 – 18, 2006 The work presented here was performed by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation with partial.
Chapter 4: How Satellite Data Complement Ground-Based Monitor Data 3:15 – 3:45.
A Statistical Comparison of Weather Stations in Carberry, Manitoba, Canada.
Developing a High Spatial Resolution Aerosol Optical Depth Product Using MODIS Data to Evaluate Aerosol During Large Wildfire Events STI-5701 Jennifer.
Land Processes Group, NASA Marshall Space Flight Center, Huntsville, AL Response of Atmospheric Model Predictions at Different Grid Resolutions Maudood.
Sensitivity of top-down correction of 2004 black carbon emissions inventory in the United States to rural-sites versus urban-sites observational networks.
TEMPLATE DESIGN © Assessing the Potential of the AIRS Retrieved Surface Temperature for 6-Hour Average Temperature Forecast.
1 AOD to PM2.5 to AQC – An excel sheet exercise ARSET Applied Remote Sensing Education and Training A project of NASA Applied Sciences Pawan Gupta Salt.
1 Satellite Remote Sensing of Particulate Matter Air Quality ARSET Applied Remote Sensing Education and Training A project of NASA Applied Sciences Pawan.
EFFICIENT CHARACTERIZATION OF UNCERTAINTY IN CONTROL STRATEGY IMPACT PREDICTIONS EFFICIENT CHARACTERIZATION OF UNCERTAINTY IN CONTROL STRATEGY IMPACT PREDICTIONS.
1 Using Hemispheric-CMAQ to Provide Initial and Boundary Conditions for Regional Modeling Joshua S. Fu 1, Xinyi Dong 1, Kan Huang 1, and Carey Jang 2 1.
CMAS special session Oct 13, 2010 Air pollution exposure estimation: 1.what’s been done? 2.what’s wrong with that? 3.what can be done? 4.how and what to.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Using Advanced Satellite Products to Better Understand I&M Data within the Context of the Larger.
Impacts of Biomass Burning Emissions on Air Quality and Public Health in the United States Daniel Tong $, Rohit Mathur +, George Pouliot +, Kenneth Schere.
1 Neil Wheeler, Kenneth Craig, and Clinton MacDonald Sonoma Technology, Inc. Petaluma, California Presented at the Sixth Annual Community Modeling and.
Calculation of excess influenza mortality for small geographic regions Al Ozonoff, Jacqueline Ashba, Paola Sebastiani Boston University School of Public.
Combining CMORPH with Gauge Analysis over
The climate and climate variability of the wind power resource in the Great Lakes region of the United States Sharon Zhong 1 *, Xiuping Li 1, Xindi Bian.
8th annual CMAS conference, Chapel Hill, October 19-21, 2009 Eurasia Institute of Earth Sciences / ITU IMPACTS OF ISTANBUL EMISSIONS ON REGIONAL AIR QUALITY:
May 24, Improving Air Quality Mapping by Adding NASA Satellite Data.
1 Satellite Remote Sensing of Particulate Matter Air Quality ARSET Applied Remote SEnsing Training A project of NASA Applied Sciences Pawan Gupta Satellite.
Co-location Satellite, Model, and Ground Data Arif Albayrak GES-DISC NASA.
17 TH BMRC MODELLING WORKSHOP – OCTOBER Harvey Stern 17 th BMRC Modelling Workshop, Bureau of Meteorology, Melbourne, 6 October, Generating.
William G. Benjey* Physical Scientist NOAA Air Resources Laboratory Atmospheric Sciences Modeling Division Research Triangle Park, NC Fifth Annual CMAS.
C. Hogrefe 1,2, W. Hao 2, E.E. Zalewsky 2, J.-Y. Ku 2, B. Lynn 3, C. Rosenzweig 4, M. Schultz 5, S. Rast 6, M. Newchurch 7, L. Wang 7, P.L. Kinney 8, and.
Validation of OMI NO 2 data using ground-based spectrometric NO 2 measurements at Zvenigorod, Russia A.N. Gruzdev and A.S. Elokhov A.M. Obukhov Institute.
1 AOD to PM2.5 to AQC – An excel sheet exercise ARSET Applied Remote Sensing Education and Training A project of NASA Applied Sciences Pawan Gupta NASA.
GOING FROM 12-KM TO 250-M RESOLUTION Josephine Bates 1, Audrey Flak 2, Howard Chang 2, Heather Holmes 3, David Lavoue 1, Mitchel Klein 2, Matthew Strickland.
©2003 Thomson/South-Western 1 Chapter 17 – Quantitative Business Forecasting Slides prepared by Jeff Heyl, Lincoln University ©2003 South-Western/Thomson.
Psychology 202a Advanced Psychological Statistics October 22, 2015.
Technical Details of Network Assessment Methodology: Concentration Estimation Uncertainty Area of Station Sampling Zone Population in Station Sampling.
Evaluation of CMAQ Driven by Downscaled Historical Meteorological Fields Karl Seltzer 1, Chris Nolte 2, Tanya Spero 2, Wyat Appel 2, Jia Xing 2 14th Annual.
INTEGRATING SATELLITE AND MONITORING DATA TO RETROSPECTIVELY ESTIMATE MONTHLY PM 2.5 CONCENTRATIONS IN THE EASTERN U.S. Christopher J. Paciorek 1 and Yang.
A Summary of the NASA Lightning Nitrogen Oxides Model (LNOM) And Recent Results 10 th Annual CMAS Conference, Chapel Hill, NC October 24-26, 2011 William.
An Integrated Fire, Smoke and Air Quality Data & Tools Network Stefan Falke and Rudolf Husar Center for Air Pollution Impact and Trend Analysis Washington.
MODIS Atmosphere Products: The Importance of Record Quality and Length in Quantifying Trends and Correlations S. Platnick 1, N. Amarasinghe 1,2, P. Hubanks.
Chiara Badaloni Roma, 15 Oct EXPOSURE TO TRAFFIC AIR POLLUTION IN A CASE-CONTROL STUDY OF CHILDHOOD LEUKAEMIA.
Assessment on Phytoplankton Quantity in Coastal Area by Using Remote Sensing Data RI Songgun Marine Environment Monitoring and Forecasting Division State.
Global Air Pollution Inferred from Satellite Remote Sensing Randall Martin, Dalhousie and Harvard-Smithsonian with contributions from Aaron van Donkelaar,
Incorporating Satellite Time-Series data into Modeling Watson Gregg NASA/GSFC/Global Modeling and Assimilation Office Topics: Models, Satellite, and In.
Exposure Prediction and Measurement Error in Air Pollution and Health Studies Lianne Sheppard Adam A. Szpiro, Sun-Young Kim University of Washington CMAS.
7. Air Quality Modeling Laboratory: individual processes Field: system observations Numerical Models: Enable description of complex, interacting, often.
Daiwen Kang 1, Rohit Mathur 2, S. Trivikrama Rao 2 1 Science and Technology Corporation 2 Atmospheric Sciences Modeling Division ARL/NOAA NERL/U.S. EPA.
of Temperature in the San Francisco Bay Area
Daytime variations of AOD and PM2
INVERSE BUILDING MODELING
of Temperature in the San Francisco Bay Area
Presentation by: Dan Goldberg1
Estimating PM2.5 using MODIS and GOES aerosol optical depth retrievals in IDEA Hai Zhang , Raymond M. Hoff1 , Shobha Kondragunta2.
Air Quality Assessment and Management
Modeling spatially-dependent, non-stationary bias in GEOS-CHEM
REGIONAL AND LOCAL-SCALE EVALUATION OF 2002 MM5 METEOROLOGICAL FIELDS FOR VARIOUS AIR QUALITY MODELING APPLICATIONS Pat Dolwick*, U.S. EPA, RTP, NC, USA.
Evaluation of Models-3 CMAQ Annual Simulation Brian Eder, Shaocai Yu, Robin Dennis, Alice Gilliland, Steve Howard,
Presentation transcript:

Presented at the 7th Annual CMAS Conference, Chapel Hill, NC, October 6-8, 2008 Identifying Optimal Temporal Scale for the Correlation of AOD and Ground Measurements of PM 2.5 to Improve the Model Performance in a Real-time Air Quality Estimation System Hui Li a, Fazlay Faruque a,Worth Williams a, Mohammand Al- Hamdan b, Jeffrey Luvall b a University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Mississippi b NASA Marshall Space Flight Center, Huntsville, Alabama 35812

Presented at the 7th Annual CMAS Conference, Chapel Hill, NC, October 6-8, 2008 Introduction NASA founded project on developing an DSS for asthma surveillance, intervention, and prevention NASA founded project on developing an DSS for asthma surveillance, intervention, and prevention Real-Time PM 2.5 Estimation System: 3 components Real-Time PM 2.5 Estimation System: 3 components Originally developed NASA Marshall Space Flight Center (MSFC) Originally developed NASA Marshall Space Flight Center (MSFC) –AOD-PM 2.5 linear regression models –A Surface Model to Interpolate AOD-derived and ground PM 2.5 to continue surfaces –Approach to integrate the above two interpolated surfaces into a final output surface based on the weight (90% for ground surface via 10% for AOD-derived surface)

Presented at the 7th Annual CMAS Conference, Chapel Hill, NC, October 6-8, 2008 Introduction: continue MODIS AOD shows great promise in improving estimate of PM 2.5 MODIS AOD shows great promise in improving estimate of PM 2.5 –Gupta et al., 2006; Kumar et al., 2007 Challenging on using satellite data in a real-time pollution system Challenging on using satellite data in a real-time pollution system –Affected by many factors –Vary widely in different regions and different seasons

Presented at the 7th Annual CMAS Conference, Chapel Hill, NC, October 6-8, 2008 AOD-PM2.5 Relationship in 2004 AOD-PM2.5 Relationship in 2005

Presented at the 7th Annual CMAS Conference, Chapel Hill, NC, October 6-8, 2008 Introduction: continue Two major aspects worth consideration in a real-time air quality system Two major aspects worth consideration in a real-time air quality system –Approach to integrate satellite data with ground data for the pollution estimation –Identification of an optimal temporal scale for calculating the correlations of AOD and ground data

Presented at the 7th Annual CMAS Conference, Chapel Hill, NC, October 6-8, 2008 Goal Goal: identify the optimal temporal scale on determining AOD-PM 2.5 correlation coefficients to improve PM 2.5 estimation using satellite AOD data Goal: identify the optimal temporal scale on determining AOD-PM 2.5 correlation coefficients to improve PM 2.5 estimation using satellite AOD data 08/12/08 Calculated date 08/10/08 Within the last 3 days

Presented at the 7th Annual CMAS Conference, Chapel Hill, NC, October 6-8, 2008 Model domain and monitoring stations

Presented at the 7th Annual CMAS Conference, Chapel Hill, NC, October 6-8, 2008 Methodology Five different temporal scales on utilizing satellite data and evaluating their impact on the model performance Five different temporal scales on utilizing satellite data and evaluating their impact on the model performance –Within the last 3 days –Within the last 10 days –Within the last 30 days –Within the last 90 days –Time period with the highest correlation in a year Statistics for performance evaluation Statistics for performance evaluation –Mean Bias (MB) –Normalized Mean Bias (NMB) –Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) –Normalized Mean Error (MNE) –Index of Agreement (IOA)

Presented at the 7th Annual CMAS Conference, Chapel Hill, NC, October 6-8, 2008 AOD sample data Within a radius of 0.9 degree inside a station Within a radius of 0.9 degree inside a station Pixel Point Station Range of a station AOD=(AOD1+AOD2+AOD3)/3

Presented at the 7th Annual CMAS Conference, Chapel Hill, NC, October 6-8, 2008

Distribution of R-Squared values across different temporal scales in 2004 and 2005

Presented at the 7th Annual CMAS Conference, Chapel Hill, NC, October 6-8, 2008 Discussion Impact of Data Integration on the Model Performance Impact of Data Integration on the Model Performance –Model performance show only slight difference among the five selected temporal scales for the correlation of AOD and ground data –The weight of satellite data should be dependent on their relationship with ground data Optimal Temporal Scale for the Correlation of AOD and Ground data Optimal Temporal Scale for the Correlation of AOD and Ground data –The optimal temporal scale: within the latest 30 days suggests that it might be a good strategy to build AOD-PM 2.5 regression models on a monthly basis –The conclusion might not be able to apply to other areas considering different atmosphere conditions Areas to Improve Areas to Improve –Incorporate others factors to determine the optimal temporal scale using satellite data

Presented at the 7th Annual CMAS Conference, Chapel Hill, NC, October 6-8, 2008 Conclusion The best optimal temporal scale is not the last 3 or 10 days in the solution The best optimal temporal scale is not the last 3 or 10 days in the solution The temporal scale of the latest 30 days displays the best model performance The temporal scale of the latest 30 days displays the best model performance This conclusion does not consider the confounding impact of weather conditions This conclusion does not consider the confounding impact of weather conditions

Presented at the 7th Annual CMAS Conference, Chapel Hill, NC, October 6-8, 2008 Acknowledge Funding Agency Funding Agency –NASA Stennis Space Flight Center

Presented at the 7th Annual CMAS Conference, Chapel Hill, NC, October 6-8, 2008 Questions or Comments?