LIGO-G030394-00-Z Detector Characterization Summary - 2003.8.21K. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Summary of the Detector Characterization Sessions Keith.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
11/12/2003LIGO Document G Z1 Data reduction for S3 I Leonor (UOregon), P Charlton (CIT), S Anderson (CIT), K Bayer (MIT), M Foster (PSU), S Grunewald.
Advertisements

Ian Bird LCG Project Leader LHCC + C-RSG review. 2 Review of WLCG  To be held Feb 16 at CERN  LHCC Reviewers:  Amber Boehnlein  Chris.
LIGO-G Z 23 October 2002NSF Review of LIGO Laboratory1 The Penn State LIGO Data Analysis Center Lee Samuel Finn Penn State.
LIGO-G W Lessons Learned From E7 at LIGO Hanford Observatory Fred Raab Daniel Sigg.
LIGO-G Z Camp orientation / overview K. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Introduction and Overview Keith Riles (University of Michigan)
LIGO-G Z Camp orientation / overview K. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Orientation and Overview Keith Riles (University of Michigan)
LIGO-G Z Detector Characterization Summary K. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Summary of Detector Characterization Sessions Keith.
LIGO- GXXXXXX-XX-X Advanced LIGO Data & Computing Material for the breakout session NSF review of the Advanced LIGO proposal Albert Lazzarini Caltech,
Development and Quality Plans
LONGER SCHOOL DAY PARAMETERS & PLANNING TEMPLATE Longer School Day Design Parameters and Planning Template Tuesday, December 13, :30 – 10:30 AM.
LIGO-G E ITR 2003 DMT Sub-Project John G. Zweizig LIGO/Caltech Argonne, May 10, 2004.
Report From Joint Run Planning Committee R. Passaquieti & F. Raab - LSC / VIRGO Collaboration Meeting rd July 2007 – LIGO-G Z.
LIGO-G Z Detector Characterization Summary K. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Summary of Detector Characterization Activities Keith.
PROJECT RESOURCES AND RISKS By Catherine Cowper. AVAILABLE RESOURCES When doing a project there are various resources that need to be made available for.
LIGO-G DM. Landry – Amaldi5 July 9, 2003 Laser Interferometer Gravitational Wave Observatory Monitoring LIGO Data During the S2 Science Run Michael.
Patrick R Brady University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
LSC General Meeting LIGO Scientific Collaboration - University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee 1 UWM Data Analysis Facility LSC General Meeting, August.
LIGO-G Z Detector Characterization Summary K. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Summary of the Detector Characterization Sessions Keith.
LIGO-G Z Detector Characterization NeedsK. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Detector Characterization Needs Keith Riles (University of Michigan)
LIGO-G9900XX-00-M ITR 2003 DMT Sub-Project John G. Zweizig LIGO/Caltech.
LIGO-G Z Detector Characterization SummaryK. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Summary of Detector Characterization Sessions Keith Riles (University.
LIGO-G Z LIGO Scientific Collaboration1 Welcome to the L-V Meeting Status of the LSC Dave Reitze University of Florida.
Leadership Training Program Labor. Labor Team supports and assists management teams to: Understand and manage their labor budget. Identify labor hours.
19 Aug 2003, LSC Hannover G Z1 State of the LSC Peter Saulson Syracuse University.
LIGO-G M Planning and Implementation Strategy for Advanced LIGO Gary Sanders LSC Meeting Hanford, August 14, 2001.
CERN Physics Database Services and Plans Maria Girone, CERN-IT
LIGO-G Z Detchar Introduction (8/16/06)K. Riles - University of Michigan 1 StrainBandsMon and SixtyHertzMon Keith Riles (University of Michigan)
LIGO-G D Global Diagnostics and Detector Characterization 9 th Marcel Grossmann Meeting Daniel Sigg, LIGO Hanford Observatory.
1 Proposed Control Room Figures of Merit for Pulsar Sensitivity Keith Riles (University of Michigan) LIGO Scientific Collaboration Meeting LIGO Livingston.
SAGE meeting Socorro, May 22-23, 2007 EVLA Science Operations: the Array Science Center Claire Chandler NRAO/Socorro.
LIGO-G M Organization and Budget Gary Sanders NSF Operations Review Caltech, February 26, 2001.
LIGO- G Z August 16, 2006August 2006 LSC Meeting - DetChar 1 Spectral Line Working Group Report Keith Thorne, Chair.
Tech Day Intro July Peter Kunszt News and Updates.
PA Standards Review 2008 Standard 7c – Disabilities Standard 7c – Disabilities.
LIGO-G Z LIGO at the start of continuous observation Prospects and Challenges Albert Lazzarini LIGO Scientific Collaboration Presentation at NSF.
LIGO-G D LSC Meeting Nov An Early Glimpse at the S3 Run Stan Whitcomb (LIGO–Caltech) LIGO Scientific Collaboration Meeting LIGO Hanford.
LIGO-G Z Detector Characterization Summary K. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Summary of Detector Characterization Sessions Keith.
S5 BNS Inspiral Update Duncan Brown Caltech LIGO-G Z.
Jan 12, 2009LIGO-G Z1 DMT and NDS2 John Zweizig LIGO/Caltech Ligo PAC, Caltech, Jan 12, 2009.
LoboTime Meeting Agenda Plans for Moving Forward LoboTime Agents Plans Known Issues Support Q&A.
© 2010 Pittsburgh Supercomputing Center Pittsburgh Supercomputing Center RP Update July 1, 2010 Bob Stock Associate Director
State of LSC Data Analysis and Software LSC Meeting LIGO Hanford Observatory November 11 th, 2003 Kent Blackburn, Stuart Anderson, Albert Lazzarini LIGO.
11/12/2003LIGO-G Z1 Data reduction for S3 P Charlton (CIT), I Leonor (UOregon), S Anderson (CIT), K Bayer (MIT), M Foster (PSU), S Grunewald (AEI),
LSC Meeting LIGO Scientific Collaboration - University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee 1 Software Coordinator Report Alan Wiseman LIGO-G Z.
1 Planning notes from August 2005 Burst Group Face-to-Face Meeting LHO, August 18, 2005 Peter Shawhan, scribe LIGO-G Z.
LSC Meeting LIGO Scientific Collaboration - University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee 1 LSC Software and Other Things Alan Wiseman University of Wisconsin.
LIGO-G M LIGO Status Gary Sanders GWIC Meeting Perth July 2001.
LIGO-G Z DMT Status for UL Analysis K. Riles - University of Michigan 1 DMT Monitors -- Status Update for Upper Limits Analysis.
LIGO-G Z Detector Characterization Issues K. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Detector Characterization Issues -- S2 Analysis & S3 Planning.
Strategic ManagementSession 271 Session 27: Work session on StratPlan All teams have scheduled a BOD time; if you want to shift to an open time slot, send.
LIGO-G Z Detector Characterization SummaryK. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Summary of Detector Characterization Sessions Keith Riles (University.
LIGO-G Z Detector Characterization Issues K. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Introduction to Detector Characterization Sessions Keith.
Canvas Migration Overview OSU Faculty Senate October 2014.
LIGO-G ZRai Weiss LSC Session on Scientific Monitoring March 21, 2006 Committee formed by Peter Saulson to: Consider the value and effectiveness.
LIGO-G Z Detector Characterization Software Tools K. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Introduction to Detector Characterization Sessions.
Publishing Services Bureau Web Communications Services Tips for managing the publication process Communications Workshop October 23, 2003.
LIGO-G Z Detector Characterization SummaryK. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Summary of Detector Characterization Sessions Keith Riles (University.
LIGO-G Z1 Using Condor for Large Scale Data Analysis within the LIGO Scientific Collaboration Duncan Brown California Institute of Technology.
LIGO-G Z Introd. to Detect. Charact. Sessions K. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Introduction to the Detector Characterization.
LIGO-G Z Detector Characterization Summary K. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Summary of the Detector Characterization Sessions Keith.
LIGO-G Z Report on the S2 RunK. Riles / S. Whitcomb 1 Report on the S2 Run Keith Riles (University of Michigan) Stan Whitcomb (LIGO–Caltech)
Planning Session. ATLAS(-CMS) End-to-End Demo Kaushik De is the Demo Czar Need to put team together Atlfast production jobs –Atlfast may be unstable over.
LIGO-G Z Detector Characterization SummaryK. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Summary of Detector Characterization Sessions Keith Riles (University.
1 InspiralMon Duncan Brown California Institute of Technology LIGO-G Z.
All The future of DC work. GEO DC workshop June Restructuring of DC and Detector Work for many reasons the DC work was not very efficient in the.
Report on the S2 Run Keith Riles (University of Michigan)
Stan Whitcomb LSC meeting Livingston 21 March 2005
The Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory
Status of LIGO Patrick J. Sutton LIGO-Caltech
Planning for the S4 Run Keith Riles (University of Michigan)
Presentation transcript:

LIGO-G Z Detector Characterization Summary K. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Summary of the Detector Characterization Sessions Keith Riles (University of Michigan) Daniel Sigg (LIGO–LHO) LIGO Scientific Collaboration Meeting Hannover University August 21, 2003

LIGO-G Z Detector Characterization Summary K. Riles - University of Michigan 2 S2 Analysis S2 investigation teams very active / productive  Many reports at this meeting Much improved communication with search groups  Quite effective glitch collaboration with burst / inspiral groups Data quality repository seems to be serving its purpose In general, things seem to be working better than for S1

LIGO-G Z Detector Characterization Summary K. Riles - University of Michigan 3 S2 Analysis BUT… Investigations / reports taking longer than hoped Delays tolerable only because search groups held up by finalization of S1 analyses Can’t assume this pattern will hold for S3 Need to be quicker for S3 (more later)

LIGO-G Z Detector Characterization Summary K. Riles - University of Michigan 4 Looking ahead to S3 - Schedule Mini-E-runs (single-site 6-hour evening runs): Sat Sept 13 at Hanford and Sat Sept 20 at Livingston Hardware/software freeze  ~Oct 1 – Start routine running of DMT monitors  Figures of merit once again prominently displayed Maxi-E-run: (1-week final shakedown at both sites): Fri Oct 17 (evening) – Fri Oct 24 (early morning) Tinkering to fix / improve hardware / software Fri Oct 24 – Thur Oct 30 Science Run S3 Fri Oct 31 – Mon Jan 5 (+ 1 month?)

LIGO-G Z Detector Characterization Summary K. Riles - University of Michigan 5 Looking ahead to S3 - Scimons Plan for S3 same as for S2: 24/7 shift staffing at both sites – 1 expert Three 8-hour shifts / day Training slots available for new persons But should have larger pool of experts now »More equitable burden on groups Allocation based once again on FTE counts »Please send updated FTE counts to Irena Will solicit request for group constraints / preferences with prompt response requested »Will accommodate requests within reason and where possible

LIGO-G Z Detector Characterization Summary K. Riles - University of Michigan 6 Looking ahead to S3 – Feedback Devoting one week to maxi-E-run to shake down software and to evaluate detector performance Cannot use “tinkering week” well without that evaluation: DMT diagnostics S3 investigations Search group quick-looks Be Prepared!

LIGO-G Z Detector Characterization Summary K. Riles - University of Michigan 7 One more issue- DMT evolution As reported Tuesday, new ITR proposal approved with funding for 2.25 FTE’s to assist in DMT infrastructure development ( PSU, MIT, UWM ) We are now discussing how best to make use of this new resource, but tentative strawman plan: Support linux porting of DMT with auto-installation tools Support “gridification”, i.e., automated remote submission of jobs and i/o handling at tier 2 centers (good progress PSU) Support small number of linux nodes at each observatory with immediate access to recent full data

LIGO-G Z Detector Characterization Summary K. Riles - University of Michigan 8 One more issue- DMT evolution More input requested: What else would you like to see in gridified DMT system? Examples: »Full support of GDS tree (DTT & other existing tools) »New graphical tools »Other new infrastructure that could help at the sites? »What do search groups want?

LIGO-G Z Detector Characterization Summary K. Riles - University of Michigan 9 Presentations in DC Sessions Can’t do justice to all of these in this brief summary Agenda Lots of interesting talks!