1 Using Wiki technology to support student engagement: Lessons from the trenches Source: Computers & Education 52 (2009) 141 – 146 Author: Melissa Cole Speaker: Cheng-Yee Lee

2 Introduction  Wiki editable website that is created incrementally by visitors working collaboratively Visitor A Page a Page b Page c … … Visitor B Visitor C create view edit Wiki

3 Introduction  Objective of this paper Trying to integrated wiki in teaching process Some favorite characteristics for constructivist learning  A fail research

4 Procedure  Participant 75 undergraduate students in a information system course  Pedagogy Lectures and seminars occurring on alternate weeks Presentation of material now included support for Wiki use Some exam questions are derived from wiki

5 Procedure  Obtain data in the following survey Questionnaire to understand use of the wiki Interview to gain understanding of attitudes to the wiki Questionnaire to understand familiarity with social networking technologies 2007/112007/ /01

6 Result  zero posts to the wiki after 5 weeks 51 response had visited but had not posted anything in the whole semester

7 Result

8  Students ’ comments on wiki navigation and browsing aren ’ t the easiest of tools there aren ’ t any useful guidelines or tips that could be used I did try posting once but it would not let me upload it

9 Result

10 Conclusion  “ If you build it they will use it ” Not always in this case Pedagogy need to be modified Training is needed even students are familiar with other similar technology

11 Comment  Technology acceptance model External variable Perceive usefulness Perceive Ease of use Intention of use Actual use

12 Comment  Their perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use are low.  They do not make student concentrate on wiki, too

13 Comment  Rienties, B., Tempelaar, D., Bossche, P. V. D., Gijselaers, W., Segers, M. (2009), The role of academic motivation in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, Computers in Human Behavior 25, 1195 – 1206 A similar paper with different pedagogy model This paper is trying to inspect factors that influence student ’ s behavior in computer-supported collaborative learning The outcome is success

14 Comment  Research method and result of Rienties et. al. (2009) 100 participants Asking them solve 6 tasks during the whole semester The discussion have to be on the forum Produce 2307 messages

15 Comment  But such Web 2.0 application on education are almost Problem-Based Learning Pedagogy model may be limited

16 Comment  Perceived ease of use and usefulness affect intention of use Equally influence procrastination?  Relationship between procrastination and intention of use?

17 Comment  Research question The better the system, the lower procrastination tendency that user has? The more user satisfies, the lower procrastination tendency that user has? Is motivation factors more powerful than TAM factors in predicting procrastination tendency?

18 Comment AMS Self-efficacy Perceived ease of use Perceived usefulness Task value Intention of use Procrastination

19 Comment  Procedure Questionnaire survey Ask them preview chapter 2 via the e- learning system, and held a exam at next week Embed questionnaires with exam answer sheet

20 Comment AMS Self-efficacy Perceived ease of use Perceived usefulness Task value Intention of use Procrastination Original TAM paper MSLQ Vallerand, 1992 你認為今天的第 2 章預習考 對你的重要程度是 ? 1/ 看完第 2 章的日期 - 考試日 期