Assistive Technology: Making it Real! Brian W. Wojcik, MS. Ed, ATP SEAT Center Illinois State University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Brian W. Wojcik, Ed.D., ATP SEAT Center Illinois State University.
Advertisements

Curriculum Planning Planning based on needs building contextual meanings for teachers, children, and parents.
Evaluation of Special Education Teachers
An Important Element of Marzano’s Domain 1: Addressing Content Robert Marzano, The Art and Science of Teaching, 2007 Martha Gough, PHS Reading Coach Professional.
F I N MEETING Family Involvement Network January 22, 2009.
5. Monitoring and Analysis of TA Progress  Check on the process and progress of the technical assistance provided according to standards set and offer.
The Para-Educator in the Regular Education Classroom
Young Leader Training Module B By the end of tonight you will be able to- Understand the role of a Leader Recognise different Leadership Styles To be.
Understanding Special Education services SPECIAL EDUCATION REFERRAL PROCESS.
Evaluate the market research methods used by a selected organisation
Teachers’ views of the challenges and solutions of their work: including children identified as at-risk and disabled Sallee Beneke University of Illinois.
Brian W. Wojcik, Ed.D., ATP SEAT Center Illinois State University.
Ethical Decision-Making Process Identify Action, Decision, or Behavior to be Taken Articulate all dimensions of proposed Action, decision, or behavior.
Pathfinder Associates 1 Assistive Technology Considerations in the Vocational Evaluation Process.
Assistive Technology: Making it Real! Brian W. Wojcik, Ed.D., ATP SEAT Center Illinois State University.
PART V: ORGANIZATIONS AS CONSUMERS. Slide 7-9 Organizational Purchase Process Steps in the Organizational Decision Process  Problem Recognition  Information.
Master Calendar The Digital Bridge Trust Fund Act November 1, 2000.
Factors in B2B Buying Behavior Process Stages; see diagram below Players: roles in “Buying Center” gatekeepers, users, influencers, deciders, purchasers.
Becoming a Standards - based District Created by Illinois State Board of Education Content Specialists.
Brian W. Wojcik, Ed.D., ATP SEAT Center Illinois State University.
A Model for Developing AT Competencies for Education Professionals Brian W. Wojcik George R. Peterson-Karlan H Phillips Parette SEAT Center, Illinois State.
Assistive Technology: Making it Real! Brian W. Wojcik, MS. Ed, ATP SEAT Center Illinois State University.
Higher Physical Education
EXAMPLE 1 Graph a rational function (m < n) Graph y =. State the domain and range. 6 x SOLUTION The degree of the numerator, 0, is less than the.
Problem Solving.  Critical Thinking enables a person to solve problems and make decisions. Therefore - Problem solving and decision making are practical.
HOW TO STATE A PROBLEM Enhancing Faculty Participation Enhancing Faculty Participation.
Monitoring AT Efficacy Brian W. Wojcik, MS. Ed., ATP SEAT Center Illinois State University.
Jpschools.org Please sign in WELCOME TO INFINITE CAMPUS INSTRUCTION.
Chapter 11 Referring and Evaluating for Special Education.
Training February 27 th Trifecta Teaching Highly Effective Teaching and Learning Classroom management Instructional Practices.
5.4 Complex Numbers. Let’s see… Can you find the square root of a number? A. E.D. C.B.
Cover  Three pamphlets Access to items/activities Access to peer/teacher attention Escape from tasks/activities  Primary and Secondary.
Developing personal and team effectiveness using IT
CHAPTER 6 Finding and using documentary and organisational evidence.
Unit 1 Review Standards 1-8. Standard 1: Describe subsets of real numbers.
Inverse Laplace Transforms (ILT)
School-Wide Positive Behavioral Interventions & Supports: New Team Training Evaluation Day 2.
Assistive Technology: Making it Real! Brian W. Wojcik, Ed.D., ATP SEAT Center Illinois State University.
Ultrasound in the Family Medicine Clerkship Rachel S. Brown, MD Assistant Professor Brian D. Keisler, MD Assistant Professor Department of Family and Preventive.
Teacher Roles and Responsibilities in the IEP Process Amanda Strong Hilsmier EDUC 559.
PHYSICAL AGGRESSION PBIS at LES. Definition Statistics at Lincoln Plans of action Steps for Implementing Overall Goal.
MGT 350 Week 4 DQ 2 What are the steps for effective management of a decision implementation plan? How should managers monitor the progress of decision.
WIGOS Data Quality Monitoring System (WDQMS)
Physical and behavioral
Individual Thinking Time
Monitoring Implementation and Sustainability
Response to Intervention Webquest for Teachers
nth Roots and Rational Exponents
Training and Development
Islamic University of Gaza Faculty of Nursing
Welcome to Geometry! Welcome to Geometry! Learning Target:
Assessing Risk in Sport
Section 1.2 Linear Equations and Rational Equations
Equations with Radicals
مهارات التدريس الفعال.
Reflecting on your school tiers
Section 1.2 Linear Equations and Rational Equations
Chapter 12: Automation and Human Performance
Assessing Risk in Sport
Standards Solution, LLC
Behavioral Assessment: Initial Considerations
Go To How did it start Who is using it
Go To How did it start Who is using it
Expert evaluation network
A Renewable Energy Operational Guide for Electric Services
A Presentation by Michael A. Elliott, PhD
Helping Teachers Change to More Appropriate Practice
IDENTIFY PROBLEM EVALUATE PLAN ACTION ACT.
Presentation transcript:

Assistive Technology: Making it Real! Brian W. Wojcik, MS. Ed, ATP SEAT Center Illinois State University

The AT Questions Is AT needed? (Consideration) Is AT needed? (Consideration) Is the Chosen AT appropriate? (Consideration) Is the Chosen AT appropriate? (Consideration) Is AT still working over time and is it still needed? (Implementation and Evaluation) Is AT still working over time and is it still needed? (Implementation and Evaluation) Are there any side effects? (Implementation and Evaluation) Are there any side effects? (Implementation and Evaluation)

Is AT Working? Is AT Needed? Side Effects? What do we monitor? What do we monitor? How often do we monitor? How often do we monitor? Behavior Common Denominator

Performance on Task Time Implementation and Evaluation

Performance on Task Time Implementation and Evaluation

Performance on Task Time Implementation and Evaluation

Performance on Task Time Implementation and Evaluation

Performance on Task Time Implementation and Evaluation