SHMS FEA Review Prepared for: Jefferson Lab Prepared by: AMSEC LLC.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
James Kingman, MEng Graduate1 Konstantinos Tsavdaridis, Lecturer1
Advertisements

1 Application and Analysis of Helical Piers in Frozen Ground He Liu, Ph.D., P.E. Daniel Schubert, P.E. Hannele Zubeck, Ph.D., P.E. Sean Baginski.
Reinforced Concrete Flexural Members
Tutorial 1 Default Cee section in bending Objective To introduce the conventional finite strip method and gain a rudimentary understanding of how to perform.
Bending Moments A bending moment exists in a structural element when an external force is applied to the element so that the element bends (or wishes to.
Chp.12 Cont. – Examples to design Footings
ANSYS Fatigue Analysis
MASTERS PROJECT FALL 2014 DAN FLAVIN 29 SEPTEMBER Springfield Rifle Bolt Analysis.
CTC 422 Design of Steel Structures
The National Crash Analysis Center The George Washington University Un-Constrained Models Comparison For Elastic Roof – Production Roof – Strong Pillars.
Seismic Performance of Dissipative Devices Martin Williams University of Oxford Japan-Europe Workshop on Seismic Risk Bristol, July 2004.
M.E. 462 Capstone Design I.U.P.U.I. Spring 2007 Bishop Steering: 1970 Lotus Europa Front Axle Re-design Aaron Emmons Phil Palmer Brad Holtsclaw Adam Spindler.
GLAST LAT ProjectDOE/NASA Mechanical Systems Peer Review, March 27, 2003 Document: LAT-PR-0XXXX Section 7.1 Stress Analysis 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope:
Tutorial 2 SSMA Cee in Compression: 600S F y = 50ksi Objective To model a typical Cee stud in compression and determine the elastic critical local.
Column Design ( ) MAE 316 – Strength of Mechanical Components
Failure Theories Why do parts fail? What kind of stresses?
The problem to be solved is specified in a) the physical domain and b) the discretized domain used by FEA Governing principle law :
Structure Analysis of 6061-T651 Aluminum Bridge Team Blackboard Mechanical Engineering University of Rochester Team Blackboard Department of Mechanical.
CM 197 Mechanics of Materials Chap 14: Stresses in Beams
Andrew Sarawit Professor Teoman Peköz Sponsored by: Rack Manufacturers Institute American Iron and Steel Institute C ORNELL U NIVERSITY School of Civil.
THEORIES OF FAILURE THEORIES OF FAILURE FOR DUCTILE MATERIALS
The IPM GROUP Farmington Hills, Michigan. Contact us Beni Dror Hills Tech Drive Farmington Hills, MI Tel: , Fax:
© 2011 Autodesk Freely licensed for use by educational institutions. Reuse and changes require a note indicating that content has been modified from the.
Fatigue in Concrete Structures Raquib Ahsan, Ph.D. Professor Department of Civil Engineering BUET.
Team Wrecked Week 9 Deliverables: Engineering Analysis.
1 ME 323 Final Lecture – April 2011 Additional Topics.
Multiple Coil Lift Calculation. Purposes of the Study  To investigate the stress distribution in the MCWF and the lifting device.  To make sure mounting.
Basic Structural Theory. BASIC STRUCTURAL THEORY TECHNICAL STANDARDS BRANCH INTRODUCTION TO BRIDGES TRANSPORTATION Slide 2 Beams Different member types.
Chapter 4 - Flexure. Lecture Goals Structures Basic Concepts Rectangular Beams.
FOOTINGS. FOOTINGS Introduction Footings are structural elements that transmit column or wall loads to the underlying soil below the structure. Footings.
LAT-TD GLAST LAT Project 1x4 Grid Lift Fixture Weld Analysis September 19, 2003 Youssef Ismail.
LBNL CCD Packaging “Yale Mount” Mechanical Analysis Dan Cheng LBNL.
NSTXU-CALC TF Flex Joint and TF Bundle Stub
AAE450 Spring 2009 Finite Element Analysis (FEA) for Orbital Transfer Vehicle (OTV) Tim Rebold STRC [Tim Rebold] [STRC] [1]
05/04/05 FEM Analysis of PA 44 Engine Mount PIPER SEMINOLE –PA-44 TWIN ENGINE AIRCRAFT.
© 2011 Autodesk Freely licensed for use by educational institutions. Reuse and changes require a note indicating that content has been modified from the.
Design Stress & Fatigue
Failure Criteria and stress concentration
Imran Ahmed Tony Martinelli Rob Ramer Pete Rogers.
Dump Heating temperature (Revision 2, part 2) Ang Lee April 7,
Structural Curriculum for Construction Management and Architecture Students 1 Prepared by: Ajay Shanker, Ph.D., P.E. Associate Professor Rinker School.
1 MC Assembly over the VV FPA Station 3 FDR Review July 13, 2007 T. Brown.
Two loading Conditions
S. Lassiter, P. Brindza, M. Fowler, E. Sun - Jefferson Lab G. Markham - NovaTech, B. Wands - Fermi Lab Abstract—Jefferson Laboratory is developing a set.
Tutorial 1 Default Cee section in bending Objective To introduce CUFSM and the finite strip method and gain a rudimentary understanding of how to perform.
FEM Analysis of the Stage3 Support Frame H.M. Fan March 14, 2007.
EC3 VERIFICATION SCIAENG® EC3 VERIFICATION SCIAENG® SPECIAL THANKS TO ALL INVOLVED D. ALVAREZ FEITO J.C. BATISTA LOPES C. BAULT O. BELTRAMELLO A.CATINACCIO.
Bicycle Wrench Analysis
Design of Bracing Connections in Concentrically Braced Frames
Structural Integrity UNDERSTAND STRUCTURAL STRENGTH OF LOAD BEARING COMPONENTS IN MECHANICAL SYSTEM.
TORSION OF A SHAFT WITH A SHOULDER FILLET
Lagouge TARTIBU KWANDA Mechanical Engineering
2K Cold Box Structural Analysis
Introduction Bridge members must be able to carry the loads applied to them. This presentation considers: how loads are applied to members how bridge.
INTRODUCTION & PROBLEM STATEMENT
Machine Design: An Overview
2K Cold Box Structure Analysis
Tilt N’ Store Design Analysis
CENF - LBNF cryostat Relevant safety codes
A. Boopathiraja, graduate student of Department 403
Contents Introduction Identification of the knowledge gap
Stress Analysis of Universal Tilt Kit Attachment Points
Tutorial 2 SSMA Cee in Compression: 600S Fy = 50ksi Objective
Tutorial 2 SSMA Cee in Compression: 600S Fy = 50ksi Objective
EML 2023 – Stress Analysis Lecture 1 – Stress State.
Tilt N’ Store Design Analysis
Tutorial 1 Default Cee section in bending Objective
Bicycle Wrench Analysis
Criterion Methods and Approximation Concepts
Presentation transcript:

SHMS FEA Review Prepared for: Jefferson Lab Prepared by: AMSEC LLC

Introduction AMSEC LLC optimized the Jefferson Lab SHMS carriage design and performed a finite element analysis (FEA) Per ANSI/AISC , the following stress criteria apply: – Bending Stress Allowable, σ b = 0.6*σ y For ASTM A36 Steel, σ y = 36 ksi, σ b = 21.6 ksi For ASTM A572 Steel, σ y = 50 ksi, σ b = 30 ksi – Shear Stress Allowable, τ b = 0.4*σ y For ASTM A36 Steel, σ y = 36 ksi, τ b = 14.4 ksi For ASTM A572 Steel, σ y = 50 ksi, τ b = 20 ksi Overstresses found will be examined with the following criteria: – Insure the overstress is a localized (peak) stress – Check to verify stress are below material yield strengths For ASTM A36 Steel, σ y = 36 ksi, τ y = 0.5*σ y = 18 ksi For ASTM A572 Steel, σ y = 50 ksi, τ y = 0.5*σ y = 25 ksi Per Jefferson Lab, the following buckling criteria apply: – Minimum Factor of Safety on Buckling = 1.4 – Criteria applies only to buckling modes exhibiting downward gravity

Full Model Front pivot housing is constructed with ASTM A572 Steel The majority of the carriage structure is constructed with ASTM A36 Steel

Full Model – Maximum Von Mises Stress Scale is set to show elements above allowable in red Overstress areas are localized and are examined further on following slides

Criteria Plot – Elements Above Allowable Bending Stress Scale is set to show maximum stress Maximum Von Mises Stress = 35.5 ksi, including both A36 and A572 Steel material Front pivot housing is constructed with ASTM A572 Steel

Full Model – Maximum Shear Stress Scale is set to show elements above allowable in red Overstress areas are localized and are examined further on following slides

Criteria Plot – Elements Above Allowable Shear Stress Scale is set to show maximum stress Maximum Shear Stress = 17.4 ksi, including both A36 and A572 Steel material Front pivot housing is constructed with ASTM A572 Steel

Full Model – First Buckling Mode

Conclusion Weight of the SHMS carriage structure is approximately 103 tons, excluding concrete The Maximum Von Mises Stress was 35.5 ksi – This was a peak stress, and was still found to be below yield The Maximum Shear Stress was 17.4 ksi – This was a peak stress, and was still found to be below yield The first buckling mode had a factor of safety of 1.4 – This accounts for the first real buckling mode