Perspectives on Conflict Resolution at the GEF Sekou Toure Conflict Resolution Commissioner.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SDM Strategy SDM Joint Coordination Workshop
Advertisements

Policies and Procedures for Civil Society Participation in GEF Programme and Projects presented by GEF NGO Network ECW.
RESPONSE TO THE THEMATIC EVALUATION: INCREASING WOMEN’S LEADERSHIP AND PARTICIPATION IN PEACE AND SECURITY AND IN HUMANITARIAN RESPONSE Saraswathi Menon,
Child Safeguarding Standards
SEMINAR NAIC/ASSAL/SVS REGULATION & SUPERVISION OF MARKET CONDUCT © 2014 National Association of Insurance Commissioners Overview and Purpose of Market.
Country Support Programme GEF Expanded Constituency Workshop Windhoek, Namibia February 17-18, 2015.
Yoko Watanabe Gender Focal Point GEF Secretariat GENDER EQUALITY ACTION PLAN (GEAP)
By Saurabh Sardesai October 2014.
Prof. Liviu Matei. I. The Bologna Process Researchers’ Conference I. Main conclusions and recommendations from the second edition of the Conference.
OPTIONS AND REQUIREMENTS FOR ENGAGEMENT OF CIVIL SOCIETY IN GEF PROJECTS AND PROGRAMMES presented by Faizal Parish Regional/Central Focal Point GEF NGO.
Evaluation of OCHA’s Role in Humanitarian Civil-Military Coordination Findings and Recommendations Seminar on Evaluation of UN Support for Conflict Affected.
Online Collaborative Learning Spaces & Program Cycle Capacity Building.
Mr. Sekou Toure Conflict Resolution Commissioner (CRC) GEF Familiarization Seminar Washington, DC January 17 – 19, 2012 GEF Conflict Resolution.
GEF Expanded Constituency Workshop 5 to 6 November 2012 New Delhi, India Roles and Responsibilities of Council Members and Focal Points.
 Critical Enablers for HIV, TB & Malaria Responses UNDP & Global Fund informal session 30 th meeting of the Global Fund Board Dr Mandeep Dhaliwal United.
GEF Policies and Processes in GEF 4 Sub-regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points Europe and the CIS 7-8 March 2007, Istanbul.
Sub-Regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points in Asia Bangkok, Thailand 7-8 April 2009 Tracking national portfolios and assessing results.
GEF Project Cycle Sub-Regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points in the Pacific SIDS Auckland, New Zealand, September 2008.
GEF Project Cycle Sub-Regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points in Asia May 2008, Manila.
Fifth Overall Performance Study (OPS5).  Objective  Analytical framework  Key issues to be covered  OPS5 audience  Organizational issues  Group.
Empowering People The Electricity Governance Initiative PRAYAS- PUNE ENERGYGROUP Smita Nakhooda 11 May 2007 New York CSD 15.
Evaluation in the GEF and Training Module on Terminal Evaluations
Reflections on the Independent Strategic Review of the Performance-Based Research Fund by Jonathan Adams Presentation to Forum on “ Measuring Research.
Presented by Linda Martin
Corporate Responsibility and Compliance A Resource for Health Care Boards of Directors By Debbie Troklus, CHC and Michael C. Hemsley, Esq.
Toolkit for Mainstreaming HIV and AIDS in the Education Sector Guidelines for Development Cooperation Agencies.
Tracking of GEF Portfolio: Monitoring and Evaluation of Results Sub-regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points Aaron Zazueta March 2010 Hanoi, Vietnam.
Sub-Regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points in West and Central Africa Accra, Ghana, 9-11 July 2009 Tracking National Portfolios and Assessing Results.
Tracking national portfolios and assessing results Sub-regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points Western and Central Africa Dakar, May 2007.
Stakeholder consultations Kyiv May 13, Why stakeholder consultations? To help improve project design and implementation To inform people about changes.
T he Istanbul Principles and the International Framework Geneva, Switzerland June 2013.
Realising the European Union Lisbon Goal The Copenhagen process and the Maaastricht Communiqué: Martina Ní Cheallaigh DG Education and Culture.
Has gender been mainstreamed in YOUR organization? CAPWIP MGGR Nov 2007.
Improving Partnership Can Improve Humanitarian Action Summary of Global Humanitarian Platform Discussion: Recommendations, Action Points, and Challenges.
OPTIONS AND REQUIREMENTS FOR ENGAGEMENT OF CIVIL SOCIETY IN GEF PROJECTS presented by Ermath Harrington GEF Regional Focal Point.
ETUC and European Framework Agreements (EFAs) Wolfgang Kowalsky.
Faisal Naru Head of Better Regulation DAI Europe Ltd November 2007 Washington London Johannesburg Ramallah RIA – An Art and not a Science.
Gender Equality Action Plan (GEAP) GEF Expanded Constituency Workshop Colombo, Sri Lanka March 17-19, 2015.
Tracking national portfolios and assessing results Sub-regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points in West and Central Africa June 2008, Douala, Cameroon.
Uniting Nations by Learning Together UPR as a process of accountability Regional Governance Week Social Accountability in a Changing Region Cairo,
G L O B A L E N V I R O N M E N T F A C I L I T Y - GEF Conflict Resolutions Sekou Toure Sub-regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points in East.
Tools to Support GEF National Focal Points Sub-regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points in Asia May 2008, Manila.
Supporting policy development in the field of ICH in Africa CONCLUSIONS Constantine — ALGERIA 28 September to 2 October 2015.
PERSPECTIVES FROM THE OECD ROLF ALTER DIRECTOR FOR PUBLIC GOVERNANCE AND TERRITORIAL DEVELOPMENT OECD Key Challenges in Public Procurement 3 rd Annual.
Kathy Corbiere Service Delivery and Performance Commission
DEVELOPING THE WORK PLAN
Tools to Support GEF National Focal Points Sub-Regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points In the Caribbean Havana, Cuba, 8-10 July 2008.
Tools to Support GEF National Focal Points Sub-Regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points in the Pacific SIDS Auckland, New Zealand, September 2008.
Tools to Support GEF National Focal Points Sub-Regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points West and Central Africa June 2008, Douala, Cameroon.
Tools to Support GEF National Focal Points Sub-Regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points East and Southern Africa June 2008, Windhoek, Namibia.
Tools to Support GEF National Focal Points Sub-regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points Europe & CIS 1-2 April 2008, Belgrade.
Tools to Support GEF National Focal Points Sub-Regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points Middle East and North Africa Casablanca, Morocco, November.
Developing National GEF Strategies and Setting Priorities Nino Tkhilava GEF Operational Focal Point in Georgia Europe and CIS workshop for GEF Focal Points.
Tools for Mainstreaming Disaster Risk Reduction: Guidance Notes for Development Organisations Charlotte Benson and John Twigg Presented by Margaret Arnold.
The AUC TVET Strategy for Youth Employme nt Windhoek, April 2014 Prudence Ngwenya Department for Human Resources Science & Technology.
United Nations Statistics Division Developing a short-term statistics implementation programme Expert Group Meeting on Short-Term Economic Statistics in.
Alice Pedretti, Project Manager Effective management of complaints for companies Lessons learned from the Management of Complaints Assessment Tool Amsterdam,
Evaluation Capacity Building at Country Level: GEF Focal Points 1 Osvaldo Néstor Feinstein AEA 2011 Conference GEF Evaluation Office Panel.
CCfER Training, 7 December, 2015 Integrated Early Recovery Programme Response.
GEF Familiarization Seminar
Herman Smith United Nations Statistics Division
Stakeholder consultations
& gender mainstreaming
GEF governance reforms to enhance effectiveness and civil society engagement Faizal Parish GEC, Central Focal Point , GEF NGO Network GEF-NGO Consultation.
Governance for Development: the way forward in the Arab region in the framework of the SDGs Mostafa Hunter.
Practical Steps to Improve Coordination and Workflow
Roles and Responsibilities of Council Members and Focal Points
Practical Steps to Improve Coordination and Workflow
Environment and Development Policy Section
The GEF Public Involvement Policy
Presentation transcript:

Perspectives on Conflict Resolution at the GEF Sekou Toure Conflict Resolution Commissioner

1.Perspectives 2.Highlight of a few key Issues 3.Conflict resolution in the context of CEO’s reform 4.Key initial dimensions au the work at the GEF Outline

Perspectives  Historically, Secretariat kept away from engaging in systematic conflict resolution  Nature of the GEF and its mode of operations conducive to disputes, conflicts and complaints  Policy: Limited secretariat involvement (countries and the implementing agencies left to sort out issues of disputes)

Limitations/Drawbacks  No formal mechanism at Secretariat  Staff took assume little responsibility in disputes/conflicts  Detrimental to the GEF, its integrity and image and has left some countries/agencies the impression that the GEF is unconcerned.

Limitations/Drawbacks  Consequence: GEF often perceived as the culprit responsible for the slow pace of project implementation, lengthy project cycles, inequity in resource distribution and non responsiveness to country concerns and for many other shortcomings.  Many small countries, in particular, have felt isolated without proper mechanisms to address their concerns.

Context of CEO’s policies and reforms  New GEF’s engagement key stakeholders  Moving/breaking into new ground  Emphasis on protecting the integrity of GEF operations  Building trust amongst and between the GEF agencies  Ensuring a system of accountability

Context of CEO’s policies and reforms  Challenges of paying closer attention to three critical issues, misgivings/concerns/resistance (I.e.RAF),  Consolidation of the reforms and future replenishment of the GEF.  Also challenges: any reform, changes must be well understood, steps taken to nurture the gains and areas of concerns fully addressed.

Relevant steps taken by CEO  Embrace conflict resolution as an integral part of the GEF  Build bridges with the countries and agencies alike  work in such a manner that results in less work on "damage control", i.e. RAF issue  Commissioner for Conflict Resolution: Idea embed in the GEF’s helm new tool/dynamic/direction  Entry point of contact, a window inside the secretariat for issues of conflicts and dispute

Dimensions to conflict/dispute resolution 1.Enhancing measures in place to protect the integrity of the organization 2.Comprehensive/simple? conflict/dispute settling mechanism/system 3.Institutionalization of a precautionary system of addressing conflicts and disputes in the GEF operations more. 4.Addressing systematically operational issues which are bound to generate conflicts and disputes (RAF, misunderstanding/clarification of GEF policies and operations_

Dimensions to conflict/dispute resolution I - Protecting the integrity of the GEF/Raising GEF’s standard of responsiveness and delivery Actions to be undertaken:  To initiate a system of policy reviews and assessments of GEF operations with the view to identifying measures required to sustain confidence in the organization,  Develop a public disclosure policy.  The disclosure policy to then lead to the development of a set of guidelines and operational procedures and tools,

Dimensions to conflict/dispute resolution I - Protecting the integrity of the GEF/Raising GEF’s standard of responsiveness and delivery Actions to be undertaken:  Sensitize focal points on GEF disclosure policy

Dimensions to conflict/dispute resolution I - Protecting the integrity of the GEF/Raising GEF’s standard of responsiveness and delivery Actions to be undertaken:  Sensitize staff on new policies  Information/briefing/dissemination of the role, responsibility of the Conflict resolution commissioner and the GEF’s effort to all stakeholders  Promotion of appropriate behaviors and attitudes advancing implementation of core principles of the GEF.

Dimensions to conflict/dispute resolution I - Protecting the integrity of the GEF/Raising GEF’s standard of responsiveness and delivery Outputs The outputs will include:  Measures required to sustain confidence in the GEF,  Rules governing complaints,  Public disclosure policy,  Compliance regime,  Promotional materials,  reward mechanisms,  Guidelines.

Dimensions to conflict/dispute resolution 2 - Development and operationalization of a GEF conflict resolution/dispute settlement mechanism Actions The set of actions to implement will be to:  Develop a protocol of compliance regime with the Agencies,  Identify and document though roughly cases of conflict/disputes in GEF project (consider regional balance),  Develop a complaint mechanism (i.e. panel, etc…)

Dimensions to conflict/dispute resolution 2 - Development and operationalization of a GEF conflict resolution/dispute settlement mechanism Actions  Resolve a few known reported cases of conflicts in GEF operations,  Explore/Identify potential mediation instruments,  Integrate relevant element of strategy into project development processes,  Develop concept of “ GEF Mediator”,  Identification of and operationalization the concept

Dimensions to conflict/dispute resolution 2 - Development and operationalization of a GEF conflict resolution/dispute settlement mechanism Outputs  The outputs will include the following:  Rules and procedures to handle complaints and disputes,  A Data base,  An Online complaint portal,  Quick wins,  A GEF mediation concept,  Documentation of conflict issues in GEF operations.

Dimensions to conflict/dispute resolution 3 – Development of a Precautionary system addressing conflicts and disputes Actions They include activities to:  Develop a system of categorization of projects into high to low conflict potential,  In close collaboration with portfolio managers, review project development procedures to take into account and integrate remediation schemes for those projects that are high conflict potentials,

Dimensions to conflict/dispute resolution 3 – Development of a Precautionary system addressing conflicts and disputes Actions They include activities to:  Train relevant staff and partners,  Based on lessons from the implementation processes, play substantive role in shaping dialogue on RAF and other innovations introduced by CEO.

Dimensions to conflict/dispute resolution 3 – Development of a Precautionary system addressing conflicts and disputes Outputs  Operational guidelines of project development with conflict remediation clause/ procedures/ tools, as appropriate,  Data base on classification of GEF project on the basis of their conflict potentials,  Training manual for GEF and other partners on conflict resolution in GEF operations,

Dimensions to conflict/dispute resolution 4 - Dialogue on issues of concern, future development and innovation in the GEF Actions The actions to undertake will be to:  Based on country dialogue and on the basis of the synthesis of concerns over the RAF and other operational issues, work with the internal team to address individual cases of complaints and misunderstanding,  Work with managers to recommend programs that will expand upon the services provided by the Secretariat and the GEF agencies,

Dimensions to conflict/dispute resolution 4 - Dialogue on issues of concern, future development and innovation in the GEF Actions  Develop a continuous dialogue format to enable closer consultations with countries and other partners,  Take substantive role in dialogue on RAF expansion.

Dimensions to conflict/dispute resolution 4 - Dialogue on issues of concern, future development and innovation in the GEF Outputs  Synthesis of complaints/disputes over RAF and other GEF operations,  Better understanding of RAF and other innovative approaches  Data base on individual cases of complaints and documentation of effort made by secretariat,  GEF emerging programmes

Conclusion 1  Shaping handling of conflicts, disputes and complaints  Key to improve credibility, responsiveness of GEF  4 broad objectives as initial focus: -Protection of the integrity of GEF/Raising its standard of responsiveness and delivery -Development and operationalization of a GEF conflict resolution/dispute settlement mechanism -Development of a Precautionary system addressing conflicts and disputes -Dialogue on issues of concern, future development and innovation in the GEF

Conclusion 1  Dialogue and consultations (Key stakeholders such as EO, Focal Points)  Delivery specific outputs and deliverables.  Start and reach full scope of activities by  GEF Website  Ideas and suggestions THANK YOU