Understanding AMAOs Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives for Title III Districts 2013-14 School Year Results.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NCLB Accountability Title III of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (ESEA) as Amended by the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (NCLB) Presented.
Advertisements

Title III Update Planning for Success In
Title III AMAO Improvement Plan SY
ESEA Title III AMAOs Ensuring Academic Success for English Learners Dr. Shereen Tabrizi, Manager Special Populations Unit Maria Silva, EL Consultant Office.
Improvement Plan Training NCLB. No Child Left Behind Program Series: Improvement Plans.
System Safeguards and Campus Improvement
Pennsylvania’s Continuous Improvement Process. Understanding AYP How much do you know about AYP?
Title III, Part A Update Texas Education Agency Division of NCLB Program Coordination Institute for Second Language Achievement (ISLA) Texas A&M University.
1 Supplemental Educational Services Office of Elementary and Secondary Education June 2002.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Title III Accountability Update Cathy George Academic Accountability.
Title III Alamance Burlington School System
Designing and Implementing An Effective Schoolwide Program
Annual Title I Parent Meeting Martin Luther King Jr. Middle School.
Our Children Are Our Future: No Child Left Behind No Child Left Behind Accountability and AYP A Archived Information.
Michael Toole Southwest Plains Regional Service Center.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Bilingual Coordinators Network November 20-21, 2008 Sacramento,
Title III Accountability. Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives How well are English Learners achieving academically? How well are English Learners.
San Leandro Unified School Board Looking Closely About Our Data September 6, 2006 Presented by Department of Curriculum and Instruction Prepared by Daniel.
Education in Delaware: ESEA Flexibility Renewal Community Town Hall Ryan Reyna, Office of Accountability.
Acquiring English Proficiency in the Torrington Public Schools Programs, Process, and Student Progress Cheryl F. Kloczko.
Assessing Students With Disabilities: IDEA and NCLB Working Together.
RESPRO Area 1C Area 1C RESPRO Meeting RESPRO Area 1C November 24, 2009.
Cambrian School District Board of Education Presentation April 3, 2014 Local Educational Agency Plan (LEAP)
1 Watertown Public Schools Assessment Reports 2010 Ann Koufman-Frederick and Administrative Council School Committee Meetings Oct, Nov, Dec, 2010 Part.
Virginia Department of Education May 8, English Language Proficiency Targets: Title III Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives (AMAOs) 2.
Title III Notice of Proposed Interpretations Presentation for LEP SCASS/CCSSO May 7, 2008.
Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives. Thompson School District Core Values Integrity –We will consistently demonstrate respect, honesty, transparency,
1 DRAFT Monitoring/Evaluation Overview September 20, 2010 Title III Director’s Fall Meeting.
Using the Indistar® Web-based Planning Tool to Support School Improvement Session #2 Presenters: Yvonne A. Holloman, Ph.D. Michael Hill Office of School.
NCLB Federal Funding Planning Meeting Private Non Profit Schools LEA Date.
Title III, Part A: Language Instruction for Limited English Proficient (LEP) and Immigrant Students  The purpose of Title III, Part A is to help ensure.
Presented by: Dr. Jobi Lawrence Director, Title III Iowa Department of Education.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 10, 2007.
Laws Governing ESL Programs in the US Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 Title VI prohibits discrimination on the grounds of race, color,
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
Annual Measurable Achievement Objective s (AMAOs): Update Jacqueline A. Iribarren, DPI September 27, 2007.
Iowa Support System for Schools in Need of Assistance (SINA) Overview and Audit Iowa Department of Education and AEA 267 August 2011.
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services.
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services Last Revised 8/15/2011.
Petraine Johnson, Moderator, Presenters: Millie Bentley-Memon, Fengju Zhang, Elizabeth Judd Office of English Language Acquisition Language Enhancement.
Creating a Good Title III Plan Title III & Migrant Directors’ Meeting Lansing, Michigan April 26, 2011 Shereen Tabrizi, Ph.D. Manager, Special Populations.
Title II, Part A, Division Improvement Procedures for Compliance with Section 2141 of Title II, Part A Virginia Department of Education.
No Child Left Behind. HISTORY President Lyndon B. Johnson signs Elementary and Secondary Education Act, 1965 Title I and ESEA coordinated through Improving.
Local Educational Agency Plan (LEA Plan) Cambrian School District Board Presentation March 22, 2012.
Successfully “Translating” ELPA Results Session #25 Assessment and Accountability Conference 2008.
1 Monitoring/Evaluation Program Overview December 3, 2008 Title III Director’s Meeting.
ELL AMAO and Grad Rate Data ELL Outcome Improvement Group Oregon Department of Education July 21, 2015.
Title III Updates & AMAOs Jacqueline A. Iribarren, Title III Susan Ketchum, Office of Educational Accountability September 24, 2008.
ESEA Title III AMAOs Ensuring Academic Success for English Learners Dr. Shereen Tabrizi, Education Consultant Manager and Maria Silva, EL Consultant Special.
Title III Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives (AMAOs): LEA Reports and Responsibilities Presented by the Pennsylvania Department of Education Bureau.
MDE Accountability Update SLIP Conference, January 2016.
Title III: 101 Jacqueline A. Iribarren Ph.D. Title III, ESL & Bilingual Ed. Consultant October 20, 2011.
Title III, Part A, Foundations Stacy Freeman, Title III Specialist Shyla Vesitis, Title I/III Specialist Title III University October 8, 2015.
Virginia Department of Education November 5, 2015.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 1, 2008.
Discussion of W-APT, ACCESS Testing, Adequate Yearly Progress and Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP). What is Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)? As a condition of receiving federal funds under No Child Left Behind (NCLB), all.
English Learner Subgroup Self-Assessment (ELSSA) and the Title III Year 4 Plan Montague Charter Academy for the Arts and Sciences Prepared and Presented.
ESEA Title III Accountability System. JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction 22 Title III Requires States to: Define two annual measurable.
Transition to ESSA WVDE Office of Federal Programs March 8, 2016 Alternate Audio Access: #
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) Accountability
Every Student Succeeds Act of 2015: Highlights and
Title III of the No Child Left Behind Act
Kansas Leads the World in the Success of Each Student.
Kim Miller Oregon Department of Education
Title III AMAO Improvement Plan Webinar
ESL/Title III Consultants
Neptune Township School District ESEA/Title I Presentation
Neptune Township School District ESEA/Title I Presentation
Welcome! Title III, Part A Meeting
Presentation transcript:

Understanding AMAOs Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives for Title III Districts School Year Results

What are AMAOs? Performance objectives for districts with Title III programs serving English- Learner (EL) populations. Over 80,000 ELs in Michigan public schools! Part of Title III in No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act of 2001 Serves as an additional layer of accountability, ensuring EL students are successfully learning English as a second language

Title III of NCLB States must establish English language proficiency (ELP) standards States must annually assess the English language proficiency of each EL student using an English ­language proficiency assessment aligned to ELP standards Establish AMAOs to measure and report on progress toward and achievement of English proficiency and academic achievement standards Hold local education agencies (LEAs; i.e., districts ) accountable for meeting increasing AMAO targets for English language proficiency over time

AMAO Overview NCLB established 3 specific AMAOs : AMAO I: Progress on English language acquisition Annual increases in the percentage of students making progress in learning English AMAO II: Proficiency of English language Annual increases in the percentage of students attaining English language proficiency AMAO III: Scorecard EL Components Adequate yearly progress for the EL subgroup in EL subgroup meeting targets for participation and proficiency on the state’s reading and math assessments, and graduation rates. Must meet all 3 AMAOs in order to meet overall!

AMAO I: Progress The district must demonstrate that the percentage of its students making “progress” on the World-Class Instructional Design and Assessment (WIDA) ACCESS for ELLs (English Language Learners) meets or exceeds the current year’s target. Progress is defined as obtaining a student growth percentile (SGP) of 50 or more.student growth percentile SGP Annual targets— : at least 50% students have an SGP of 50 or higher on the WIDA : at least 51% students have an SGP of 50 or higher on the WIDA : at least 52% students have an SGP of 50 or higher on the WIDA Need at least 10 EL students with SGP data to have this AMAO calculated.

AMAO II: Proficiency District must demonstrate that the percentage of its students achieving proficiency on WIDA meets or exceeds the current year’s target. 2013–14: at least 21% of students bridging or reaching on WIDA 2014–15: at least 22% of students bridging or reaching on WIDA 2015–16: at least 23% of students bridging or reaching on WIDA Need at least 10 EL students with WIDA data to have this AMAO calculated.

AMAO III: Scorecard EL Components District must demonstrate its English Learner (EL) subgroup is met performance and participation requirements on state assessments in both reading and math and also met its graduation rate target Evaluated for districts with at least 30 EL students assessed

WIDA Participation Compliance In addition to the 3 AMAOs, districts also receive a WIDA participation rate At least 95% of EL students must be tested with the WIDA to meet objective For and WIDA Participation Rates will only be reported for informational purposes For districts not meeting WIDA Participation targets will have to comply with a series of notifications, supports, and interventions Ensures EL students are tested with the WIDA in compliance with Title III

Overall AMAO Status Districts meeting all applicable AMAOs (I, II, & III) will have an overall status of “Met” Districts not meeting one or more AMAOs will have an overall status of “Not Met“ District having an overall status of “Not Met” for 2 or more consecutive years must comply with a series of notifications, supports, and interventions WIDA Participation objective does not impact a district’s overall AMAO status.

Districts Not Meeting AMAOs Districts that do not meet ANY of the AMAOs must comply with a series of notifications, supports, and interventions which vary depending upon the number of consecutive years the district has missed an AMAO. Year 1: Within 30 days after the Michigan Department of Education (MDE) releases AMAOs, the district shall send a letter to parents of students participating in a Title III-funded language instruction educational program. The letter must explain that the district did not meet one or more of the AMAO targets and it must provide parents with the district’s plan to meet the targets in future years. A sample letter can be found on the AMAO website at The district must develop a Title III program improvement plan to specifically address the factors that prevented the district from meeting its objectives. The MDE’s Title III Team will provide technical assistance to enable the district to meet AMAOs.

AMAOs Not Met for 2 Consecutive Years Letter to parents of Title III-funded EL students (same as year 1) MDE’s Title III Team will provide technical assistance to develop, in consultation with the district, professional development strategies and activities, based on scientifically based research, that the district will use to meet AMAOs; The MDE will require the district to utilize such strategies and activities; and Develop/revise the Title III plan to incorporate strategies and methodologies, based on scientifically based research, to improve the specific program or method of instruction provided to EL students.

AMAOs Not Met for 3 Consecutive Years Letter to parents of Title III-funded EL students (same as year 1) MDE expects districts to continue implementing the Title III plan

AMAOs Not Met for 4 Consecutive Years Letter to parents of Title III-funded EL students (same as year 1) The MDE will require the district to modify the its curriculum, program, and method of instruction; or Make a determination whether the district shall continue to receive funds related to the district’s failure to meet such objectives; and Require the district to replace educational personnel relevant to the entity's failure to meet such objectives [ESEA Section 3122 (b)(1-4)]

Districts Not Meeting WIDA Participation WIDA/WIDA Alt Participation is being reported for informational purposes only for and Beginning in , districts not meeting participation targets will be required to comply with the following series of consequences: Year 1: The district will receive a letter outlining the escalating consequences for years 2-4 of non-compliance with full participation rate of English Learners (ELs) on Michigan’s annual English Language Proficiency (ELP) assessment (WIDA). Year 2: The district will be required to investigate, develop, and implement a plan to address root causes for low participation. The plan will require MDE approval. Year 3: Technical assistance will be provided to adjust and implement the approved plan. Year 4: The plan will be updated as needed.

AMAO Resources For more information on AMAO calculations, including technical business rules, please visit: For more information on Title III programming, please visit:

Contact Information Title III and Supports: OR- Data and Metric Questions: OR-