1 PNW Regional Contingency Resources Resource Adequacy Technical Committee April 6 th, 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Intra Hour Tagging/Oasis During System Contingencies The transmission tagging process was initially developed to solve an after the fact accounting issue.
Advertisements

Out of Region Market Assumptions Resource Adequacy Technical Committee April 6 th, 2011.
Goshen Area Bus Reconfiguration
Power Supply Adequacy Assessment Model/Methodology Review Steering Subcommittee Meeting January 29, 2010.
PJM©2014www.pjm.com Winter 2014 Overview & Recent and Upcoming Market Rule Changes Adam Keech Director, Market Operations.
Demand Response in New York State Northwest Power and Conservation Council DR workshop February 24, 2006.
Preliminary Review of July 24 th Extreme Temperature Event & Implications for Pilot Capacity Standard Mary Johannis & Wally Gibson PNW Resource Adequacy.
ERCOT Load Forecast Uncertainty V2 August 2, 2006.
Temperature-Sensitive Loads and Class Cost Allocation Presentation to Utah Cost-of-Service Working Group Kevin Higgins, Energy Strategies July 13, 2005.
Compare and Contrast ELCC Methodologies Across CPUC Proceedings
Demand Response in MISO Markets NASUCA Panel on DR November 12, 2012.
1 Demand Response Update April, Strategic Perspective Demand Response  Aligns with PGE’s Strategic Direction; helping to provide exceptional.
Joel Koepke, P.E. ERCOT Operations Support Engineer ERCOT Experiences During Summer 2011.
Coincident Peak Load Forecasting Methodology Prepared for June 3, 2010 Meeting with Division of Public Utilities.
Demand Response in Midwest ISO Markets February 17, 2008.
1 Planning Reserve Margin Dan Egolf Senior Manager, Power Supply & Planning.
A Resource Adequacy Standard for the Pacific Northwest Resource Adequacy Technical Committee January 17, 2008 Portland Airport.
Resource Adequacy Technical Committee Meeting April 6, 2011.
Demand Response: Keeping the Power Flowing in Southwest Connecticut Presented by: Henry Yoshimura Manager, Demand Response ISO New England September 30,
Developing an Adequacy Metric Resource Adequacy Forum Technical Subcommittee Meeting October 16, 2009.
Revising the Pacific Northwest Resource Adequacy Standard Resource Adequacy Technical Committee June 23, 2011.
Loss of Load Probability (LOLP) Project October 16, 2009 Resource Adequacy Technical Committee Meeting.
Illustrative FCRPS Examples Comparing Capacity Adequacy Calculations for Federal Hydro- Dominated System Mary Johannis PNW Resource Adequacy Technical.
Northwest Power and Conservation Council Action Plan Summary.
Comparison of LOLP Practices Mary Johannis PNW Resource Adequacy Technical Committee Mtg January 23, 2009.
PJM©2013www.pjm.com Economic DR participation in energy market ERCOT April 14, 2014 Pete Langbein.
Proposed Contract to Perform Regional Sustained Hydro Peaking Capability Study Mary Johannis PNW Resource Adequacy Steering Committee January 29, 2008.
May 31, Resource Adequacy Capacity Standard Resource Adequacy Forum Technical Committee May 31, 2006 Background Image: Bennett, Christian Science.
June 27, Pacific Northwest Resource Adequacy Assessment for 2010 and 2012 Resource Adequacy Forum Steering Committee Meeting Northwest Power Pool.
Resource Adequacy Technical Committee Meeting April 6, 2011.
Evaluating Hydro Capacity for Capacity Adequacy Standard: Selection of Hydro Events Mary Johannis PNW Resource Adequacy Technical Committee Mtg November.
Evaluating Hydro Capacity for Capacity Adequacy Standard: Selection of Hydro Events Eric King/ Mary Johannis PNW Resource Adequacy Technical Committee.
Resource Adequacy Steering Committee Meeting October 4, 2011.
Rocky Mountain Area Transmission Study Steering Committee Meeting January 13, 2003 RAWG proposed Alternatives.
PJM© Demand Response in PJM 2009 NASUCA Mid-Year Meeting June 30, 2009 Boston, MA Panel: Price Responsive Demand – A Long-Term Bargain.
Demand Response: What It Is and Why It’s Important 2007 APPA National Conference San Antonio, Texas June 26, :00 a.m. to Noon Glenn M. Wilson Director.
January 29, 2010Resource Adequacy Steering Committee 1 Sustained Peaking Capacity Analysis Initiated by the Adequacy Forum Input Information from Utilities.
Relationship of Regional Resource Adequacy Standards to Utility Planning PNW Resource Adequacy Steering Committee Meeting June 27, 2007.
Providing Resource Planning Guidance to Individual Utilities PNW Resource Adequacy Technical Committee Meeting June 20, 2007.
DR issues in California discussed last year in March Historical DR in California: some background issues –Twenty years of programs/tariffs I/C and AC cycling.
2009 Pacific Northwest Resource Adequacy Assessment Resource Adequacy Technical Committee October 16, 2009.
Moving toward a Final Resource Adequacy Standard Resource Adequacy Forum Steering Committee Meeting September 27, 2007.
Rocky Mountain States Sub-Regional Transmission Study December 9, 2003 Generation Additions Strawman.
Providing Resource Planning Guidance to Individual Utilities PNW Resource Adequacy Steering Committee Meeting April 13, 2007.
An Overview of Demand Response in California July 2011.
Capacity Metric & Hydro Capacity Assessment Decisions Mary Johannis PNW Resource Adequacy Technical Committee Meeting June 20, 2007.
Out of Region Market Assumption Resource Adequacy Technical Committee December 1, 2011.
Pacific Northwest Resource Adequacy Assessment for 2011 and 2013 Resource Adequacy Forum Steering Committee Meeting July 21, 2008.
Utility Benefits of Demand Response Trevor Lauer DTE Energy Marketing Executive Conference Coeur d’Alene, Idaho.
Probabilistic Approach to Resource Adequacy Resource Adequacy Forum Technical Committee Meeting Portland, OR January 23, 2009.
April 13, 2007 Regional Planning Group Meeting Wind Impact/Integration Analysis Warren Lasher Regional Planning.
RA workshop presentation Karl Meeusen, Ph.D. Senior Advisor – Infrastructure Policy CPUC Resource Adequacy Workshop February 18, 2016.
Demand Response 2010 and Beyond April 28, 2011 Pete Pengilly.
Defining LOLP Resource Adequacy Forum Technical Subcommittee Meeting November 14, 2008.
Understanding Value of Short-Duration Resources CPUC RA Workshop March 5, 2016.
1 Meredith Younghein Energy Division Local RA Requirements for Demand Response Resources: Staff Proposal.
Modeling the Hydroelectric System in GENESYS Resource Adequacy Forum Technical Committee Meeting July 25, 2007.
2010 Northwest Regional Forecast Resource Adequacy Technical Committee April 22, 2010.
CPUC Resource Adequacy Program – LAO briefing May 25, 2009.
2021 Adequacy Assessment Data Requirements Resource Adequacy Advisory Committee Technical Committee Meeting March 18, 2016.
Power Supply Adequacy for the 2021 Operating Year Resource Adequacy Advisory Committee Steering Committee Webinar June 8, 2016.
Demand Response in the 7th Power Plan
Steering Committee Webinar March 25, 2016
December 9, 2005 Allison DiGrande, External Affairs Department, ISO/NE
Out of Region Market Assumptions
2021 Adequacy Assessment Status Report
Technical Committee Meeting March 18, 2016
Technical Committee Meeting March 18, 2016
Steering Committee Webinar March 25, 2016
Resource Adequacy Technical Committee Meeting April 22, 2010
Presentation transcript:

1 PNW Regional Contingency Resources Resource Adequacy Technical Committee April 6 th, 2011

Resource Adequacy Standard  2008 RA standard counts significant events: 28,800 MWhrs of energy (per season) or 3,000 MW of capacity (any 1 hour)  Any games that exceed these thresholds are considered a ‘miss’  Proposed alternative: build a contingency resource stack and count all misses  Assign contingency resources to various ‘buckets’ (by cost, control, stress, etc.) and evaluate use in Genesys post processing  First bucket (CR 1) – utility programs  Second bucket (CR 2) – non-utility emergency generators  Additional buckets?

Utility Contingency Resources – CR 1  Includes Demand Response (DR) programs sponsored by load serving entities – direct control over loads and or resources either in real-time or day ahead  Most successful DR programs are for irrigation and A/C – good for peak shaving of summer peaking utilities  Other programs such as AGC standby generation can provide capacity and energy across seasons  Therefore it is necessary to track contingency resources by seasons and contributions to both energy and capacity

PacifiCorp

Idaho Power and PGE

Summary of CR 1

CR 2 – Data Center Emergency Generation