Analysis tool pack for STORET for biological assessment Erik W. Leppo Las Vegas, Nevada November 8, 2001.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Information Needs for the Integrated F&W Program (ESA and Power Act) Jim Geiselman - BPA.
Advertisements

Framework for the Ecological Assessment of Impacted Sediments at Mining Sites in Region 7 By Jason Gunter (R7 Life Scientist) and.
WATER QUALITY ANALYSIS for ANTIDEGRADATION
Yakama Nation Pacific Lamprey Recovery Project Core Data And Monitoring Framework.
Current Issues and Projects Regarding Beaver in Montana Steve Carpenedo Mt DEQ – Wetland Program.
Clearwater River Habitat/Bioassessment
Lec 12: Rapid Bioassessment Protocols (RBP’s)
The Ecological Data Application System (EDAS) for biological data analysis and data upload to STORET
Watershed System Physical Properties Stream flow (cfs) Stream Channel Pattern Substrate Chemical Properties pH Dissolved Oxygen Temperature Nutrients Turbidity.
Adem.alabama.gov Incorporating NPS Intensive Surveys into ADEM’s Monitoring Strategy Southeastern Water Pollution Biologists’ Association Meeting Lake.
Final stuff: n Lab practical –Coleoptera, Hemiptera n Final exam: Fri May 2:15 –Assessment with Invertebrates n Lecture material (IDEM protocol) n.
Good or Bad? Coarse particulate organic matter (e.g., tree parts) absent _____ Riparian vegetation abundant _____ Groundwater input negligible_____ Temperature.
MCDEP’s Database Conversion Overview Benthic MonitoringFish Monitoring Rapid Habitat Geomorphology Physchem Herpetofauna Spring MonitoringSummer Monitoring.
Hydrology River Ecosystems and Humans. Dimensions of river ecosystems Longitudinal Lateral Vertical Temporal 2.
Common Monitoring Parameters. Step 1 Consider purpose/objectives of monitoring Assess use attainment Characterize watershed Identify pollutants and sources.
Assessing Aquatic Ecosystems & Measurement. Aquatic Ecosystem Assessment The health of an aquatic ecosystem can be determined by examining a variety of.
Rapid Bioassessment Protocol (RBP). Background to RBP changes in community/assemblage composition used to evaluate existence and degree of impact.
Managing Data & Information with the SECN Decision Support System GWS Meeting New Orleans, LA March 14-18, 2011.
Analyzing Stream Condition Using EMAP Algae Data By Nick Paretti ARIZONA PHYCOLOGY ECOL 475.
Lecture ERS 482/682 (Fall 2002) TMDL Assessment ERS 482/682 Small Watershed Hydrology.
Determining the effectiveness of best management practices to reduce nutrient loading from cattle grazed pastures in Utah Nicki Devanny Utah State University,
“Habitat Assessment Using the QHEI “ Edward T. Rankin June 6 City of Columbus, Level 3 Training Course Columbus, Ohio Senior ResearchScientist
Utah Department of Environmental Quality Division of Water Quality Modern STORET Implementation Why Move From a Working Database To STORET: Originally.
Benjamin Jessup. Tetra Tech, Inc.
What is a database? An organized collection of data. This can be in an electronic, paper, or other format. Types of databases Operational -constantly changing.
Presented by Insert your name, title, and district Lower Hudson Coalition of Conservation Districts Volunteer Streamwalk Program Developed by the Westchester.
SFCC Walkover Habitat Survey Training Course July 2015.
POPULATION ECOLOGY. ECOLOGY Study of living organisms as groups Interactions between living organisms (predator-prey, parasitism etc) Interactions between.
Developing Monitoring Programs to Detect NPS Load Reductions.
Watershed Assessment and Planning. Review Watershed Hydrology Watershed Hydrology Watershed Characteristics and Processes Watershed Characteristics and.
Water Quality Standards, TMDLs and Bioassessment Tom Porta, P.E. Nevada Division of Environmental Protection Bureau of Water Quality Planning.
NC Division of Water Quality Water Quality Assessments and Local Watershed Plans.
PNAMP Habitat Status and Trends Monitoring Management Question: Are the Primary Habitat Factors Limiting the Status of the Salmon and Steelhead Populations.
Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission Invertebrate Communities as Tools for Establishing Minimum Flows and Levels in Florida Streams.
Colorado EDAS Enhancement and Index Development 2004 Tetra Tech, Inc. and Utah State University.
R I O Hs - Rio Grande Silvery Minnow Index of Habitat Health Joel D. Lusk and Cyndie Abeyta U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Bosque Hydrology Group Water.
Final stuff: n Lab practical: Apr 29 n Final exam: due Fri May 2:15.
Using STORET Data to Characterize Your Watershed 1 Webcast on June 21, 2007 Randy E. Hill IT Project Manager, EPA Monitoring Branch Dwane Young IT Specialist,
Development of a Southeastern Reference Stream Monitoring Network Debbie Arnwine Water Resources, TDEC
SOUTH DAKOTA WATERSHED PROTECTION PROGRAM STORET INPUT SCREENS.
Kentucky’s comprehensive Water Monitoring and Assessment Program addresses water quality management objectives outlined in the Clean Water Act, as well.
Module 2 Biocomplexity of the North Dactylica arctica Algae under Arctic sea ice Xanthoria elegens Poripidia flavocaerulescens.
National Aquatic Resource Surveys Wadeable Streams Assessment Overview November, 2007.
 Sustainability Master Plan  Effect of Runoff on Stream  Negative Effect on Lake Carnegie  Final Pre-Restoration Assessment  Why this first order.
Expanding Water Quality Assessments beyond the Realm of 'Impairments' and into a Tool Useful to Watershed Managers at the Local Level Ken Edwardson Watershed.
Stream macroinvertebrate responses to landscape variables; an evaluation of rapid bioassessment techniques using a statistical modeling approach. Declan.
STORET 1001 and the State of Utah Monitoring Strategy Today you will see: –What kind of attributes are available in STORET –How results, stations, and.
Stream Ecosystem Assessment Group 1 Camp Caesar August 2003.
Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for low gradient streams) for species richness, composition and pollution tolerance, as well as a composite benthic macroinvertebrate.
January 27, 2011 Summary Background on Delta Flow and Habitat Relationships Delta Stewardship Council Presentation by the Independent Consultant.
Adem.alabama.gov ADEM’s Monitoring Summary Reports Alabama – Tombigbee CWP Stakeholders Meeting Montgomery, Alabama 3 February 2010 Lisa Huff – ADEM Field.
Comparison of Benthic Invertebrate Communities Upstream and Downstream of Proposed Culvert Installations in Alabama Amy C. Gill USGS, Alabama Water Science.
National Monitoring Conference May 7-11, 2006
K aren Worcester Staff Environmental Scientist with thanks to M. Thomas, D. Paradies, L. Harlan, and P. Meertens California Central Coast Regional Water.
Detecting Ecological Effects of Development in the Wappingers and Fishkill Watersheds Karin Limburg, Karen Stainbrook, Bongghi Hong SUNY College of Environmental.
Case Study Development of an Index of Biotic Integrity for the Mid-Atlantic Highland Region McCormick et al
New Mexico Watershed Watch Your school name and river name This project funded by the NM Dept. Of Game & Fish and the Sports Fish Restoration Program.
BENTHIC INDICATORS FOR THE SUBSTANTIALLY ALTERED LANDSCAPE OF THE MISSISSIPPI ALLUVIAL PLAINS Ben Jessup – Tetra Tech, Inc. Valerie Alley – Mississippi.
Development of Nutrient Water Quality Standards for Rivers and Streams in Ohio Ohio EPA ORSANCO, October 20, 2009 George Elmaraghy, P.E., Chief.
Environmental Flow Instream Flow “Environmental flow” is the term for the amount of water needed in a watercourse to maintain healthy, natural ecosystems.
Common Issues With Water Quality Submissions New Directions in Data Management Continuous Monitoring Water Quality Assessments Tribal/EPA CWA Training.
EVALUATING STREAM COMPENSATION PERFORMANCE: Overcoming the Data Deficit Through Standardized Study Design Kenton L. Sena (EPA VSFS Intern), Joe Morgan,
STREAM ECOLOGY.
Watershed Management Plan Summary of 2014 Activities/Progress Presented by: Matthew Bennett, MS December 2014.
Tools for Tracking Healthy Watersheds
Watershed Health Indicators
J. M. C. K Jayawardhana1, W. D. T. M Gunawardhana 1, E. P
Water Testing Project for the North Fork River
The Index of Biotic Integrity (the BI or IBI)
IBI’s: An Introduction
Presentation transcript:

Analysis tool pack for STORET for biological assessment Erik W. Leppo Las Vegas, Nevada November 8, 2001

Five classes of environmental variables that affect water resource integrity and overall biological condition (modified from Karr et al. 1986). Flow Regime Volume Watershed Characteristics Runoff Velocity High-Low Extremes Precipitation Groundwater Ecosystem Health Chemical Variables Metals Nutrients Dissolved Oxygen Chemical Solubilities Organics Alkalinity Temperature Hardness Turbidity Biotic Interactions Disease Reproduction Competition Predation Feeding Parasitism Biological Condition Stressor Response Status Energy Source Nutrient Availability Organic Matter Inputs Primary and Secondary Production Seasonal patterns Sunlight Habitat Structure Sinuosity Current Riparian Vegetation Substrate Instream Cover Gradient Channel Morphology Bank Stability Canopy

Biological Monitoring Data Biological monitoring is becoming more and more widespread in the US in response to heightened emphasis on preserving the biological integrity of the nation’s waters under the CWA. Data produced through these monitoring efforts are: –incorporated into state’s 305(b) reports, –used to generate 303(d) lists, and –involved in the development and implementation of TMDLs.

Use STORET To Hold Your Data Desserobdella phalera Dero botrytis Heteroplectron americanum Anopsilana Nimbocera limnetica Beardius truncatus Tribelos atrum Apedilum Pagastiella orophila Goeldichironomus amazonicus Dicrotendipes thanatogratus Fittkauimyia serta Alotanypus Hydropsyche rossi Tyloderma capitale Ischnura hastata Epitheca princeps Stylurus ivae Hylogomphus geminatus Procloeon viridocularis Baetis alachua Acerpenna pygmaeus Baetis punctiventris Baetis armillatus Procloeon rubropictum Drunella walkeri Stenonema mexicanum integrum Gomphus Ectoprocta Stenochironomus Taxa List Field Data Sheets D.O. Turbidity Temperature See attached taxa list Substrate Availability Sinuousity Embeddedness Bank Vegetation % Impervious Area Land Use Station ID Waterbody Name Sample Date Field Team Channelized? Dam? NPS Sources? # of Sweeps per Habitat Flow Channel Width Max. Depth

Why Analyze Your Data Translate raw data into metric values. Hard to communicate species lists. Look for trends over time and patterns within your watershed. Identify new hotspots, and watch for change in water bodies of known impairment. Communicate interpreted results of your sampling efforts to the public. Easier to create understandable, graphic displays of metrics than raw data. Allows for QA/QC analysis of data. Ensures the reliability of your data.

Communicating Results DATA 12 EPT Taxa 78% Impervious Channelized 4.2 mg/l D.O. Obvious NPS sources 72% Chironomids 23 Total Taxa Substrate Availability 13 10% Collector-Filterers 13% Ephemeroptera

DATA 12 EPT Taxa 78% Impervious Channelized 4.2 mg/l D.O. Obvious NPS sources 72% Chironomids 23 Total Taxa Substrate Availability 13 10% Collector-Filterers Communicating Results 13% Ephemeroptera

POOR Yellow River MRW12 Displaying Your Data With GIS

Digestible Site Reports

Getting To The Analysis Step In the past have had to export data from STORET and format it for use in another program. The Analysis Tool Pack allows the user to skip formatting and query data directly from STORET. –Limited to benthic macroinvertebrates (for now). –Addresses one of the concerns from end-users of having to use multiple databases (i.e., one for storage and one for analysis).

Getting to The Reporting Step Data entry. –Input data into STORET. Organize your data for analysis purposes. STORET has no analytical capabilities, it wasn’t designed with any in mind. Through ODBC (Open Database Connectivity) can link to the data in STORET to do calculations.

Why STORET? More and more funding sources require that data collected be put into STORET. There is some resistance due to the view that a user sees little return on his/her investment of time and energies. Having an analysis tool can help to change this mindset (along with the import utility – SIM2).

How the Tool Pack Works Through the use of ODBC users will no longer have to spend time exporting their data from STORET to another database, but can access their data directly with the use of this utility. Based on Access 2000 this utility connects to a view specific benthic macroinvertebrate-specific view within STORET. All data necessary for metric calculations is incorporated into this view. It will have the same suite of metrics as EDAS, i.e., all of the metrics contained in the Rapid Bioassessment Protocols (2nd Edition).

Parameters for BioView An EDAS-BioView within STORET. Linked in Access with the following restrictions: –Activity Community Benthic Macroinvertebrates –Activity Intent Taxon Abundance –Result Unit Count –Result Value Status Final (Can be changed to Preliminary) –Bio Group Type Multi-Taxon Population Census

Future Functionality Just as the SIM module will simplify the import of data into STORET, the EDAS Analysis Tool Pack will simplify analyzing data in STORET. It is planned to build in the capability to analyze other data types (biological, chemical, and physical). Also planned is the ability to allow users to input their biocriteria endpoints and output assessment reports. Move toward a more stable platform, Oracle, and away from the constant “upgrades” of MS Access.

Analysis Tool Pack Advantages The Tool Pack will encompass most of the functions that are built into some other databases, e.g., EDAS. Data being analyzed will always be current. Can easily share data. Built in reports based upon data analysis.