Philosophical Chairs. Welcome Sign In Introductions Parking Lot Logistics Materials.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Vision Socrates believed that enabling students to think for themselves was more important than filling their heads with right answers.
Advertisements

Philosophical Chairs Speak Your Mind.
1 AVID’s mission is to close the achievement gap by preparing all students for college readiness and success in a global society. Summaries.
1 AVID’s mission is to close the achievement gap by preparing all students for college readiness and success in a global society. Socratic Seminar Trainer’s.
HANCOCK CENTRAL SCHOOL INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP TEAM SEPTEMBER 14, 2012.
Literature Circles.
Comprehension Strategies for Middle School & High School FISD.
The Vision Socrates believed that enabling students to think for themselves was more important than filling their heads with “right answers.”
Socratic Seminar #1 WHY ETHNIC STUDIES?
September 4, On a sheet of paper… Write about your thoughts about starting this school year. What are you excited about? What are you most looking.
Join a6psrbwww.classroom.google.com Critical Reading Strategies Achieving Rigor through Reading, Writing, and Collaboration Mathew.
SOCRATIC SEMINARS An Inquiry Strategy. Socratic Seminar Vision  Socrates believed that enabling students to think for themselves was more important than.
WICORize Your lessons Lee Fox: Umatilla High School, AVID Coordinator/Elective Teacher Kristen Pautienus: Lake Minneola High School, AVID Coordinator/Elective.
Fishbowl A Socratic Seminar Adventure. What is a Socratic Seminar? The Socratic Method, named after the classical Greek philosopher Socrates, is a form.
1 AVID Tutor Training, Part 2. 2 Your Tutor Trainer [Note to Presenter: Add your introduction and contact information here.]
Collaboration: Increasing Levels of Inquiry and Rigor.
1 AVID’s mission is to close the achievement gap by preparing all students for college readiness and success in a global society. AVID Elective Teacher.
Students will be able to break down a piece of text using text marking and group discussion to identify information useful in preparing a written argument.
Reflection: TOPIC: Are people naturally “good” or are they forced to be “good” by social rules and legal institutions? INTRODUCE EVIDENCE: Why do you believe.
TKAM Philosophical Debate Task 1: Quote Analysis Task 2: Philosophical Debate Task 3: Reflection.
Learning Focused Observations BEST Leadership Roundtable February 1 st, 2012.
Introduction, Guidelines, and Rules of Engagement.
Please get your journal and performance assessment book
Bell ringer: October Long ago, the planet Venus was believed to be a tropical paradise similar to earth, yet a bit closer to the Sun. As scientists.
1 AVID’s mission is to close the achievement gap by preparing all students for college readiness and success in a global society. Philosophical Chairs.
1 AVID’s mission is to close the achievement gap by preparing all students for college readiness and success in a global society. Family Involvement Insert.
Name Tent School, District Number of years involved with AVID NAME College attended/attending Hobby/Interests Note: Please place your name on both sides.
EQ: “What are the keys to participating in successful tutorials?" Topic: Tutorial Groups DO NOW: 2. Quickwrite 1. Tutorial Request Form (TRF) Collection.
Lead Teach Learn PLC Fundamental I: Core Curriculum & Instruction Session 3.
Mathew Barnett, Ph.D. Director, Educational Services Fullerton School District.
DO NOW: Get out your planners please 9/8/15. CORNELL NOTES 9/8/15.
Writing 1 and Writing 2—January 13, 2016 Journal #7: What do you think about ghosts or aliens or other supernatural occurrences? Do you believe in them?
Socratic Seminar By participating in Scholars will practice academic behavior and language that will be expected in a 21 st century classroom & worksplace.
Mass Energy equivalence Thursday, April 23, 2015.
Sept. 7, 2012 AGENDA: 1 – Bell Ringer 2 – Philosophical Chairs Discussion 3 – Envi. Sci. Pre- Assessment! 4 – Start HW: Discussion Reflection Today’s.
Instructional Leadership: Applying Concern & Use Name Workshop Facilitator.
Philosophical Chairs Philosophical Chairs. Performance Objective Students will develop inquiry, oral-language, and argumentation skills through participation.
Where questions, not answers, are the driving force in thinking.
AVID Leading College & Career Readiness Districtwide - Transforming Student Outcomes AVID's mission is to close the achievement gap by preparing all students.
Philosophical Chairs. Preparing for the Discussion Read the two articles provided by your teacher about a given issue. One article with be FOR the issue.
8 Step writing process. 8 STEPS AT A GLANCE 1. Read the Question 2. Circle Key Words 3. Paraphrase the Question 4. Flip the Question into a Statement.
AVID’s mission is to close the achievement gap by preparing all students for college readiness and success in a global society. Welcome to AVID! Ms. Beaith.
Advancement Via Individual Determination (AVID) Official Web Site Link.
October 2013 Mineola Nature Preserve. A.The trails people leave behind when they live online, and internet predators use these trails to track down careless.
Philosophical Chairs Take out a piece of paper Set paper up in Cornell Note form Title page “Cell Phones in School” Take notes on important things in the.
Overview of Standards for Literacy in History/Social Studies, Science, and Technical Subjects The Common Core State Standards.
Socratic Seminar Waiver Day Purdy and Snellgrove January 11, 2016.
Slide AVID SUSD Summer Institute In Pursuit of Success: DREAM BIG.
November 11, 2016 Paula Settoon, Dean of Libraries
Philosophical Chairs Introductory Slide.
Philosophical Chairs What is Philosophical Chairs?
The Road to College: Rigor, Readiness, and Retention
Students will be able to break down a piece of text using text marking and group discussion to identify information useful in preparing a written argument.
Monday.
CORNELL WAY Schoolwide
AVID Professional Learning
Socratic Seminar This PowerPoint is meant to be used with either teachers or students schoolwide to assist in implementing Socratic Seminar. It is written.
Philosophical Chairs.
Socratic Seminar By participating in
Introduction to Socratic Seminars
Philosophical Chairs.
Philosophical Chairs.
AVID Professional Learning
Students will be able to break down a piece of text using text marking and group discussion to identify information useful in preparing a written argument.
AVID Standard 2.8 Refine oral language skills
AVID Program Advancement Via Individual Determination
-Take out a sheet of paper -Fold it in half -On the top of the left hand side write POSITIVE -On the top of the right hand side write NEGATIVE.
Lesson 4 Synthesis Overview & Peer Evaluation
Presentation transcript:

Philosophical Chairs

Welcome Sign In Introductions Parking Lot Logistics Materials

Norms Ask questions. Engage fully. Integrate new information. Open your mind to diverse views. Utilize what you learn. Learn more about the Standards for Professional Learning at

AVID’s mission is to close the achievement gap gap by preparing all students for college readiness and success success in a global society. 4

Essential Question How can we engage students appropriately in rigorous debate using collaboration and deep reading strategies?

Objectives Collaborate with colleagues Understand the Rules of Engagement of Philosophical Chairs Understand the role of the Mediator Participate in a Philosophical Chairs Debate Apply using a text Debrief and Evaluate

Philosophical Chairs “An organized dialogue that helps students develop the ability to give careful attention to other students’ comments and to actively engage in constructive dialogue with one another” Inquiry and collaboration are inherent in Philosophical Chairs. Writing and reading are easily incorporated into the prework for Philosophical Chairs. A great prewriting activity - allows students to gain and develop a variety of ideas about a topic.

The 11 Essentials 1. Student Selection 2. Voluntary Participation 3. AVID Elective During School Implementing AVID 4. Rigorous Curriculum 5. Organization 6. Reading and Writing Curriculum 7. Inquiry and Collaboration 8. Trained Tutors The AVID Elective 9. Data Collection & Analysis 10. Resource Commitment 11. Active Interdisciplinary Site Team Supporting AVID

Classroom Set Up Class is divided into those who agree with the statement... and those who disagree with the statement

The Mediator Remains neutral Calls on sides to speak May paraphrase arguments made by each side for clarification Ensures participation by as many students as possible

Rules of Engagement Understand the statement and choose a side. Listen carefully when others speak and seek to understand their argument even if you don’t agree. Wait for the mediator to recognize you before you speak; only one person speaks at a time. You must first summarize briefly the previous speaker’s arguments before you make your response.

Rules of Engagement Be sure that when you speak, you address the ideas, not the person stating them. Keep an open mind and move to the other side or the undecided section if you feel that someone made a good argument or your opinion is swayed. Support the mediator by maintaining order and by NOT dominating the Philosophical Chairs debate.

Central Statement Only Children and teens under the age of 18 should be prohibited from purchasing “energy drinks.”

The Written Evaluation Using the Philosophical Chairs Written Evaluation Sheet, answer questions 1-5 in your table group.

Children and teens under the age of 18 should be prohibited from purchasing “energy drinks.” Central Statement with Text

Directions: Number each paragraph of the text before reading. Read the text. Reread the text and do the following: – Circle key terms, names of people, names of places or dates –Underline the author’s claims, arguments, and/or assertions Marking the Text

Group Brainstorm

How would using a text enrich the Philosophical Chairs debate experience? What new arguments, claims and/or assertions would have been made using the article? When and Why would using a text be appropriate and necessary? Conversely, when would it be inappropriate or unnecessary? Discuss...

Classroom Application “How would you use Philosophical Chairs in your classroom?”

Essential Question Revisited How can we engage students appropriately in rigorous debate using collaboration and deep reading strategies?

Rigor Defined AVID’s Definition of Rigor: “Using inquiry-based, collaborative strategies to challenge and engage students in content resulting in increasingly complex levels of understanding”

Ask Yourself... Are students actively engaged in the material or with the text? What opportunities have been made available for processing and reflection?

Thank You! Please complete the training evaluation before you leave today!

Contact Information Name Phone