MARS 867_03F ROR vs. Settlement vs. 810 Scenarios ERCOT September 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Market True-Up Discussion RMS Meeting 03/13/02 Draft Only for Discussion Purposes.
Advertisements

Profiling Working Group May 15, PWG Report By Ernie Podraza of Reliant Energy ERCOT PWG Chair for WMS Meeting June 18, 2003.
1.  An inadvertent issue begins upon the discovery of an Inadvertent Gain or Move-In transaction submission. Upon identification of an Inadvertent Gain.
1 Pre-TX Set 1.5 Data Clean Up. 2 Pre-TX SET 1.5 Data Clean-up Process In-Review - currently 12 (Original Quantity = 863) –June RMS, count 207 In-Review.
Retail Sub-Committee Update Robert Connell June 14, 2002.
1 Update to RMS December 8, Texas SET 4.0 Change Controls
1 AMS Data Workshop ERCOT Overview of AMS Data Processes June 27, 2014 ERCOT June 27, 2014.
SCR 740 Implementation of Web Services for ESIID level data Jackie Ashbaugh EAA Data Management.
1 Update from ERCOT Retail Market Services to RMS Additional Material February 12, 2004.
Compiled by Load Profiling ERCOT Energy Analysis & Aggregation
1 Market Data Transparency SCR 740 Business Training SCR 727 Phase II: Web Services ERCOT presents:
MARS Taskforce COPS Update May 12, Execution MilestonesBaseline DateStatus Technical Architecture Complete 05/15/2009On Schedule Development Complete07/24/2009On.
LRS Update Meeting LRS Participants and Profiling Working Group October 27, 2005.
09/15/10 RMS RMS Market Reports – Recommendations Karen Farley Manager, Retail Customer Choice.
UFE 2005 Analysis 1 UFE 2005 ANALYSIS Compiled by Load Profiling ERCOT Energy Analysis & Aggregation.
10/13/10 RMS RMS Market Reports – Recommendations Karen Farley Manager, Retail Customer Choice.
May 03, UFE ANALYSIS Old – New Model Comparison Compiled by the Load Profiling Group ERCOT Energy Analysis & Aggregation May 03, 2007.
1 PWG Update Report By Ed Echols Of Oncor ERCOT PWG Chair Jim Lee of Direct Energy ERCOT PWG Vice Chair for COPS Meeting Sept 10, 2014.
Demand Response Status Report Calvin Opheim October 9, 2007.
RMS Update to TAC April 7, RMS Voting Items  RMGRR032- Transaction Timing Matrix Corrections Includes updates to Appendix D to correct examples.
1 ESI ID SERVICE HISTORY AND USAGE DATA EXTRACT SYSTEM CHANGE REQUEST (SCR 727) February 24, 2003.
3 rd Party Registration & Account Management 1 SMT Historical Usage Reporting Functionality Backfill Requests Interim Solution Instructions Version Dated.
3 rd Party Registration & Account Management SMT Update To AMWG August 26, 2014.
1 History of UFE (shortened version of presentation provided at UFE Taskforce Workshop on 9/14/2004) UFE Taskforce Meeting February 21, 2006.
Load Profiling Working Group RMS Presentation 8/01/2002 by Ernie Podraza Reliant Energy Retail Group Chair PWG.
Retail Market Subcommittee Update to COPS Kathy Scott March 17,
ERCOT MARKET EDUCATION Retail 101. Retail Transaction Processing.
RMS/COPS Workshop VI 1 October 06, Antitrust Admonition ERCOT strictly prohibits Market Participants and their employees who are participating in.
Profiling Working Group October 16, PWG Update Report By Ernie Podraza of Reliant Energy ERCOT PWG Chair for RMS Meeting October 16, 2003.
MARS Advanced Metering – ERCOT Market Facing Changes Jackie Ashbaugh Manager Data Integrity and Administration 3/9/2009.
1 ERCOT Load Profile Transition Option 1 – 4 Analysis August 21, 2006.
AMIT Update to RMS May 16, 2012 Andrea O’Flaherty SMT Project Manager.
AMS Indicator ERCOT Recommendations
MARS Taskforce RMS Update November 10, Conference Call concerning Settlement Estimates TDSPs held a conference call on October 28, 2010, where we:
ERCOT MARKET EDUCATION Retail 101. Smart Meter Technology.
1 Linked-Service Address Discussion Thursday - April 8, 2004 (Updated 4/12/04 to include meeting results) Airport Hilton - Austin.
Tuesday, October 6, 2015 (following RMS) COPS-RMS-WORKSHOPShttp://
01/17/ CP Discussion October 16,2002 Retail Market Subcommittee Austin, Texas.
1 Critical Retail Issues RMS Update RMS Meeting Results 2/01 RMS Formed 3/01 RMS Identified “pent-up” issues Tx Set transaction development Service Order.
1 Supporting materials for RMS Provided by Retail Customer Choice (RCC) team.
Distributed Renewable Generation Profile Implementation Plan.
1 RMS Update By Don Bender January 9, RMS Approved Resolution Upon TAC approval, suspend further True-up settlements for True-up resettlement.
Profiling Working Group June 15, PWG Update Report By Ernie Podraza of Reliant Energy ERCOT PWG Chair for RMS Meeting June 15, 2005.
Issue 2007-I071 Modify Cancellation Window to Accept Cancels Closer to SMRD.
Demand Response Task Force. 2 2 Outline  Overview of ERCOT’s role in the CCET Pilot  Overview of Stakeholder Process – What’s been done to date?  Questions.
ERCOT MARKET EDUCATION Retail 101. Advanced Meter Technology.
1 TX SET Mass Transition Project RMS Update March 15, 2006.
MARS Taskforce COPS Update August 10, Definitions AMC – AMS (IDR) meter type settled using the 15-Minute LSE data received from TDSP AMDG – 15 Minute.
1DRAFT for DISCUSSION Transition From Non-IDR to IDR Load Profile and LSE 15-minute Data for AMS Market Advanced Readings and Settlements Taskforce 10/9/09.
RMS Update to TAC October 2, RMS Update to TAC TAC Confirmation Vote Request Kyle Patrick of Reliant Energy and Independent Power Marketer segment.
February 2, 2016 RMS Meeting 1. * Reasons: * Per the ERCOT Board Report dated 8/5/14 there were 6.6M Advanced Metering System (AMS) Electric Service Identifiers.
Issue 2012-I134 Non-CSA CR sends MVO with bypass CSA Flag.
MIMO Stacking Document and the current RMG are inconsistent with current logic and should be updated.
Proposed Timeline for Extract, Variances, True-Ups Extracts 10/1/03 Clear all “old” extracts from Portal 9/26/03 Post last “old” daily extract 10/6/03.
PRR 568 – Settlement Timeline September day Analysis COPS October 25, 2005.
1 A Review of Impacts to UFE and Load Ratio Share Based on AV Profile ID Changes Presented by ERCOT Staff to the Profiling Working Group 10/26/2005.
Mass Transition—Timelines & Volume Limitation RMGRR116—Acquisition Transfer Non-standard Metering Future Meetings 1.
Demand Response Options Review Carl Raish November 27, 2007.
PWG Demand Response Follow Up Jackie Ashbaugh October 23, 2007.
Hypothetical Examples of How Residential Photovoltaic (PV) ESI IDs Could be Settled ERCOT Load Profiling.
1.  What is the purpose of DEVs? Data Extract Variances (DEVs) are used to synchronize the data among all Market Participants (MP)  What is a DEV? It's.
1 Market Participant Default Joint Taskforce Update and Report on Recent Customer Transition Activity Report to WMS August 17, 2005.
1 Supporting materials for RMS Provided by Retail Customer Choice (RCC) team.
November 17, 2014 ERCOT AMS Data Loading Result Code Descriptions & Distribution AMS Workshop IV.
MARS Taskforce RMS Update October 13, 2010.
Settlement Timeline Workshop
MARS Taskforce RMS Update December 9, 2009.
Pro-Active Transaction Resolution Measures
Usage Billing Issues.
Demand Response – ERCOT discussion items
Presentation transcript:

MARS 867_03F ROR vs. Settlement vs. 810 Scenarios ERCOT September 2008

2 Purpose: Facilitate discussion of how the REP of Record (ROR) history is maintained for ESI IDs with AMI meters, how/what usage is used in settlement and what is affiliated with the 810 –Currently - NIDR 867_03F - ERCOT stops the REP history with the day prior to the date received in the 867_03F at 23:59:59. –With AMI - NIDR 867_03F will continue to be used to complete service orders and maintain the REP history. Therefore, ERCOT will continue to stop the REP history with the day prior to the date received in the 867_03F at 23:59:59. AMI IDR data provided via LSE file could be available through the stop date provided in the NIDR 867_03F at 23:59:59. This would be an extra day of usage where there is no ROR. –Currently - IDR 867_03F - ERCOT stops the REP history with the date received in the 867_03F at 23:59:59.

3 7/22 23:59:59 7/21 23:59:59 REP A Relationship 867_03F NIDR Data MVO requested for 7/22/2008 TDSP reads meter for MVO 7/22/ :03:00 Non IDR 867_03F is sent in with date of 7/22/2008 Current ERCOT System: Move Out Non-IDR

4 REP of Record history: Rep A Relationship exists from 1/1/2007 to current. Rep A submits a MVO for 7/22/2008. MVO for Rep A is Scheduled for 7/22/2008. MVO occurred 7/22/ :03:00 – TDSP reads meter at this time. TDSP sends Non IDR 867_03F with a stop date of 7/22/2008, which includes the usage that occurred on 7/22/2008 in the total kWh. Non IDR 867_03F completes MVO with a stop date of 7/21/ :59:59. This ESIID is available for settlement of operating days 1/1/2007 through 7/21/2008 (inclusive). Non IDR Usage/810: ERCOT loads the Non IDR 867_03F from the TDSP for 6/22/2008 – 7/22/2008, which includes the usage that occurred on 7/22/2008 in the total kWh. The usage stop time is interpreted as 7/21/ :59:59 for ERCOT settlement. The 810 from the TDSP to LSE is for 6/22/2008 – 7/22/2008, which includes the changes that occurred on 7/22/2008. Settlement using NIDR data: For all operating days between 6/22/2008 and 7/21/2008 (inclusive), the NIDR usage read loaded for this example will be used to scale the NIDR profile for settlement for each operating day. The scalar ratio is the meter read total kWh divided by profile total kWh. ERCOT applies the backcasted profile to the ESIID Non-IDR monthly cumulative read data to convert data to 15 minute intervals.

5 Example Non-IDR Load Profile for settlement

6 Move Out Non-IDR using AMI for settlement MVO requested for 7/22/2008 TDSP reads meter for MVO 7/22/ :03:00 Non IDR 867_03F is sent in with date of 7/22/2008 to complete MVO AMI Interval data sent in through 7/22/ :59:59 7/22 23:59:59 7/21 23:59:59 REP A Relationship 867_03F NIDR Data AMI IDR Data UFE

7 Move Out Non-IDR using AMI for settlement REP of Record history: Rep A Relationship exists from 1/1/2007 to current. Rep A submits a MVO for 7/22/2008. MVO for Rep A is Scheduled for 7/22/2008. MVO occurred 7/22/ :03:00 – TDSP reads meter at this time. TDSP sends Non IDR 867_03F with a stop date of 7/22/2008, which includes the usage that occurred on 7/22/2008 in the total kWh. Non IDR 867_03F completes MVO with a stop date of 7/21/ :59:59. This ESIID is available for settlement of operating days 1/1/2007 through 7/21/2008 (inclusive). Non IDR Usage/810: ERCOT loads the Non IDR 867_03F from the TDSP for 6/22/2008 – 7/22/2008, which includes the usage that occurred on 7/22/2008 in the total kWh. This is not used for settlement. The 810 from the TDSP to LSE is for 6/22/2008 – 7/22/2008, which includes the activity that occurred on 7/22/2008. AMI IDR data: Since the MVO occurred 7/22/ :03:00, the TDSP will provide data to ERCOT for the complete operating day of 7/22/2008. Settlement using AMI IDR data: Settlement is based on the ‘ACTIVE’ status of the ESIID, the characteristics assigned and the usage. In this example, last operating day for this ESIID for settlement is 7/21/2008. The ESIID is de-energized starting 7/22/2008, therefore, the AMI IDR data for 7/22/2008 would not be used in settlement.

8 Example AMI IDR Load for settlement 7/21/08 - Used in Settlement 7/22/08 - Not used in Settlement

9 7/22 23:59:59 REP A Relationship 867_03F IDR Data MVO requested for 7/22/2008 TDSP reads meter for MVO 7/22/ :03:00 IDR 867_03F is sent in with date of 7/22/ :59:59 Current ERCOT System: Move Out IDR

10 Current ERCOT System: Move Out IDR REP of Record history: Rep A Relationship exists from 1/1/2007 to current. Rep A submits a MVO for 7/22/2008. MVO for Rep A is Scheduled for 7/22/2008. MVO occurred 7/22/ :03:00 – TDSP reads the meter at this time. TDSP sends IDR 867_03F with a stop date of 7/22/ :59:59. IDR 867_03F completes MVO with a stop date of 7/22/ :59:59. This ESIID is available for settlement of operating days 1/1/2007 through 7/22/2008 (inclusive). IDR Usage/810: ERCOT loads the IDR 867_03F from the TDSP for 6/22/ :00:00 – 7/22/ :59:59. The 810 from the TDSP to LSE is for 6/22/ :00:00 – 7/22/ :59:59. Settlement using IDR data: For all operating days between 6/22/2008 and 7/22/2008 (inclusive), the associated 96 intervals for each operating day in the IDR usage read loaded for this example will be used for each settlement.

11 Example IDR Load for settlement 7/21/08 - Used in Settlement7/22/08 - Used in Settlement

12 Summary of all 3 examples Scenario - MVO schedule for 7/22/2008 and TDSP reads meter 7/22/ :03:00 ESIID Characteristics for Settlement Rep of Record History Profile Code Meter Type 867_03F Non-Interval Usage 867_03F Interval Data AMI Interval Data (LSE File)810Comments #1 Current – Using 867_03F NIDR to complete Service Order and NIDR usage for Settlements start - 01/01/ :00:00 stop - 07/21/ :59:59 NIDR start - 06/22/2008 stop - 07/22/2008 (interpreted as 07/21/08 23:59:59) -- start - 06/22/2008 stop - 07/22/2008 (interpreted as 07/21/08 23:59:59) #2 Using 867_03F NIDR to complete Service Order and AMIT LSE usage for Settlements start - 01/01/ :00:00 stop - 07/21/ :59:59 IDR start - 06/22/2008 stop - 07/22/2008 (interpreted as 07/21/08 23:59:59) -- daily reads through 7/22/ :59:59 start - 06/22/2008 stop - 07/22/2008 (interpreted as 07/21/08 23:59:59) ESIID not included in the 07/22 settlement due to stop time on service instance although usage is available. #3 Current – Using 867_03F IDR to complete Service Order and IDR usage for Settlement start - 01/01/ :00:00 stop - 07/22/ :59:59 IDR-- start - 06/22/ :00:00 stop - 07/22/ :59:59 -- start - 06/22/ :00:00 stop - 07/22/ :59:59

13 Number of orders completed by 867_03F Orders Completed by 867_03 Final Note: The number of MVOs where a MVI completed within one day was around 1,000 for a 3 month period. count Move InMove Out Move Out to CSA Switch Mass Transition Drops Jun-08 12,16878,4581,6542,38745 May-08 11,81170,0521,8473, Apr-08 10,77571,1311,5724,274n/a Percentage Of Total Completed Orders Move InMove Out Move Out to CSA Switch Mass Transition Drops Jun %100.00%4.42%3.63%0.14% May %100.00%5.64%7.33%6.82% Apr %100.00%4.96%7.19%n/a

14 Food for thought This presentation shows the example of a MVO completing with an 867_03F, as well as what happens in settlements and the 810. You could take this same example and apply it to MVI, MVO to CSA, Switch, etc. Options: –Do nothing Consider impacts to: –UFE for settlement for MVO –Who is settled in the instance of a MVI, MVO to CSA, SWITCH, etc. –Change the ROR date logic Consider impacts to: –MVO only solution – consider impact to ‘leap frogging’. –Stacking logic –What happens if we apply this across SWITCH, MVI, etc. as well? (a much larger impact) –Increase the volume of Siebel exceptions that ERCOT manages, if there is no change to TDSPs sending data What’s next? For the interim AMI solution (PR 80027), are there any changes to the order completion process to account for AMI interval data available for settlement that need to be included in the project requirements?