LLR Analysis Workshop John Chandler CfA 2010 Dec 9-10.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Principles of the Global Positioning System Lecture 19 Prof. Thomas Herring Room A;
Advertisements

1 Tests of gravitational physics by ranging to Mercury Neil Ashby*, John Wahr Dept. of Physics, University of Colorado at Boulder Peter Bender Joint Institute.
GRACE GRAVITY FIELD SOLUTIONS USING THE DIFFERENTIAL GRAVIMETRY APPROACH M. Weigelt, W. Keller.
Halliday/Resnick/Walker Fundamentals of Physics 8th edition
Institut for Geodesy Research Unit Earth Rotation and Global Dynamic Processes Earth Orientation Parameters from Lunar Laser Ranging Liliane Biskupek Jürgen.
VieVS User Workshop 7 – 9 September, 2010 Vienna Hana Spicakova Results obtained using VieVS: Love numbers and FCN period presented at IVS General Meeting.
The Heartbeat of the Ocean. Introduction Tides are one of the most obvious features of the oceans. Natural rhythms can easily be observed. Long term records.
The Science of Relativistic Celestial Mechanics
Orbit Determination Software at ESOC Flight Dynamics
Excess phase computation S. Casotto, A. Nardo, P. Zoccarato, M. Bardella CISAS, University of Padova.
VieVS User Workshop 14 – 16 September, 2011 Vienna VIE_MOD Lucia Plank.
1 Pertubations by the Sun + Moon (Seeber, 3.2.3) Earth, Sun, Moon regarded as point-masses.
Rome MORE meeting Feb 16-17, Strong Equivalence Principle Violation in Coplanar 3-Body Systems Neil Ashby University of Colorado Boulder, CO USA.
17 January 2006Astronomy Chapter 2 Orbits and Gravity What causes one object to orbit another? What is the shape of a planetary orbit? What general.
Historically very interesting, Geocentric vs. heliocentric universe The main cast: Copernicus, Brahe, Galileo, Kepler, Newton Chapter 13: The Law of Gravity.
Homework 3 will include a Helmert Transformation Estimation problem. Specifically interested in scale. Started on January 29, 2010.
General-Relativistic Effects in Astrometry S.A.Klioner, M.H.Soffel Lohrmann Observatory, Dresden Technical University 2005 Michelson Summer Workshop, Pasadena,
{ Solar System: Part II J. Blake Fall  When studying the solar system, there are a few terms you need to know to understand the magnitude of.
Modern Navigation Thomas Herring MW 11:00-12:30 Room
Modern Navigation Thomas Herring MW 11:00-12:30 Room
Section 7–3: Motion in Space
Gravity & orbits. Isaac Newton ( ) developed a mathematical model of Gravity which predicted the elliptical orbits proposed by Kepler Semi-major.
Determination of the Geodetic Rotation of the Solar System Bodies by means of Spectral Analysis Method G.I. Eroshkin and V.V. Pashkevich Central (Pulkovo)
11 Regarding the re-definition of the astronomical unit of length (AU) E.V. Pitjeva Institute of Applied Astronomy, Russian Academy of Sciences Workshop.
Essential Idea:  The Newtonian idea of gravitational force acting between two spherical bodies and the laws of mechanics create a model that can be.
University of Colorado Boulder ASEN 5070: Statistical Orbit Determination I Fall 2014 Professor Brandon A. Jones Lecture 3: Basics of Orbit Propagation.
Phys141 Principles of Physical Science Chapter 15 The Solar System Instructor: Li Ma Office: NBC 126 Phone: (713)
Gravity. Geocentric vs. Heliocentric Model The Geocentric Model Arguments For: Parallax not seen Almagest says so Fits with “heavenly” perfection Arguments.
Precession, nutation, pole motion and variations of LOD of the Earth and the Moon Yuri Barkin, Hideo Hanada, Misha Barkin Sternberg Astronomical Institute,
Universal Gravitation.
Crash Course of Relativistic Astrometry Four Dimensional Spacetime Poincare Transformation Time Dilatation Wavelength Shift Gravitational Deflection of.
SNARF: Theory and Practice, and Implications Thomas Herring Department of Earth Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences, MIT
1 1 Determination of the PPN parameters, and limiting estimations for the density of dark matter and change G in Solar system 1 E.V. Pitjeva, 2 N. P. Pitjev.
Earth’s Place in the Universe. Starter- Do on page 181 in the starter section of your notebook.  Our new unit is Earth’s Role in Space, where do you.
8. Gravity 1.Toward a Law of Gravity 2. Universal Gravitation 3. Orbital Motion 4. Gravitational Energy 5. The Gravitational Field.
General Motion Rest: Quasars Linear: Stars Keplerian: Binary Perturbed Keplerian: Asteroids, Satellites Complex: Planets, Space Vehicles Rotational: Earth,
FAMOUS ASTRONOMERS  Believed in geocentric universe  earth was the center  used circular orbits with epicycles  was supported by the church for.
8/8/2011 Physics 111 Practice Problem Statements 13 Universal Gravitation SJ 8th Ed.: Chap 13.1 – 13.6 Overview - Gravitation Newton’s Law of Gravitation.
University of Colorado Boulder ASEN 5070: Statistical Orbit Determination I Fall 2015 Professor Brandon A. Jones Lecture 3: Time and Coordinate Systems.
On the geodetic rotation of the major planets, the Moon and the Sun G.I. Eroshkin and V.V. Pashkevich Central (Pulkovo) Astronomical Observatory of the.
Gravity Summary For a point source or for a homogeneous sphere the solution is easy to compute and are given by the Newton’s law. Gravity Force for the.
Gravimetry Geodesy Rotation
Franz Hofmann, Jürgen Müller, Institut für Erdmessung, Leibniz Universität Hannover Institut für Erdmessung Hannover LLR analysis software „LUNAR“
Developing the Science of Astronomy (Chapter 4). Student Learning Objectives Compare ancient and modern theories of the solar system Apply Kepler’s Laws.
Space-Time coordinates are not fundamental,
Development of Regular & Singular Perturbation Methods Anshu Narang-Siddarth.
Signal Propagation  Electro-Magnetic Signal  Geometric Approximation ~ Fast Particle Approximation  Speed of Light in Vacuum.
Newton’s Universal Law of Gravitation Chapter 8. Gravity What is it? The force of attraction between any two masses in the universe. It decreases with.
Midterm Exam Material Covered –Chapter 1 to 6 Format of Exam –Multiple-Choice Questions: 40 to 50 questions –Facts –Concepts –Reasoning –Quantitative --
Parameters : Temperature profile Bulk iron and olivine weight fraction Pressure gradient. Modeling of the Martian mantle Recently taken into account :
Calc - Updating for IERS Conventions (2010): Precession/Nutation – change to use IAU2006 precession model. Makes a difference of ~0.5 µas/yr from
Motions of Self-Gravitating bodies to the Second Post- Newtonian Order of General Relativity.
Principles of the Global Positioning System Lecture 18 Prof. Thomas Herring Room A;
LLR Analysis – Relativistic Model and Tests of Gravitational Physics James G. Williams Dale H. Boggs Slava G. Turyshev Jet Propulsion Laboratory California.
General Relativity and Cosmology The End of Absolute Space Cosmological Principle Black Holes CBMR and Big Bang.
Application of Perturbation Theory in Classical Mechanics
The Solar System Missions. planets not shown to scale >> MercuryVenusEarthMarsJupiterSaturnUranusNeptunePluto Mean Distance from the Sun (AU)
University of Colorado Boulder ASEN 5070: Statistical Orbit Determination I Fall 2015 Professor Brandon A. Jones Lecture 2: Basics of Orbit Propagation.
12.201/ Essentials of Geophysics Geodesy and Earth Rotation Prof. Thomas Herring
Celestial Mechanics I Introduction Kepler’s Laws.
Celestial Mechanics VI The N-body Problem: Equations of motion and general integrals The Virial Theorem Planetary motion: The perturbing function Numerical.
Celestial Mechanics IV Central orbits Force from shape, shape from force General relativity correction.
Celestial Mechanics III
Celestial Mechanics VII
Universal Gravitation
EARTH AND THE SOLAR SYSTEM
Overview of the Solar System Shaped like a thin disk
X SERBIAN-BULGARIAN ASTRONOMICAL CONFERENCE 30 MAY - 3 JUNE, 2016, BELGRADE, SERBIA EARTH ORIENTATION PARAMETERS AND GRAVITY VARIATIONS DETERMINED FROM.
Sun-Earth-Moon Interactions
Sun-Earth-Moon Interactions
Presentation transcript:

LLR Analysis Workshop John Chandler CfA 2010 Dec 9-10

Underlying theory and coordinate system Metric gravity with PPN formalism Isotropic coordinate system Solar-system barycenter origin –Sun computed to balance planets –Optional heliocentric approximation Explicitly an approximation –Optional geocentric approximation Not in integrations, only in observables

Free Parameters Metric parameter β Metric parameter γ Ġ (two flavors) “RELFCT” coefficient of post-Newtonian terms in equations of motion “RELDEL” coefficient of post-Newtonian terms in light propagation delay

More Free Parameters “ATCTSC” coefficient of conversion between coordinate and proper time Coefficient of additional de Sitter-like precession Nordtvedt ηΔ, where Δ for Earth-Moon system is the difference of Earth and Moon

Units for Integrations Gaussian gravitational constant Distance - Astronomical Unit –AU in light seconds a free parameter Mass – Solar Mass –No variation of mass assumed –Solar Mass in SI units a derived parameter from Astronomical Unit Time – Ephemeris Day

Historical Footnote to Units Moon integrations are allowed in “Moon units” in deference to traditional expression of lunar ephemerides in Earth radii – not used anymore

Numerical Integration 15th-order Adams-Moulton, fixed step size Starting procedure uses Nordsieck Output at fixed tabular interval –Not necessarily the same as step size Partial derivatives obtained by simultaneous integration of variational equations Partial derivatives (if included) are interleaved with coordinates

Hierarchy of Integrations, I N-body integration includes 9 planets –One is a dwarf planet –One is a 2-body subsystem (Earth-Moon) –Earth-Moon offset is supplied externally and copied to output ephemeris –Partial derivatives not included Individual planet –Partial derivatives included –Earth-Moon done as 2-body system as above

Hierarchy of Integrations, II Moon orbit and rotation are integrated simultaneously –Partial derivatives included –Rest of solar system supplied externally Other artificial or natural satellites are integrated separately –Partial derivatives included –Moon and planets supplied externally

Hierarchy of Integrations, III Iterate to reconcile n-body with Moon Initial n-body uses analytic (Brown) Moon Moon integration uses latest n-body Moon output then replaces previous Moon for subsequent n-body integration Three iterations suffice

Step size and tabular interval Moon – 1/8 day, 1/2 day Mercury (n-body) – 1/2 day, 2 days Mercury (single) – 1/4 day, 1 day Other planets (n-body) – 1/2 day, 4 days Earth-Moon (single) – 1/2 day, 1 day Venus, Mars (single) – 1 day, 4 days

Evaluation of Ephemerides 10-point Everett interpolation Coefficients computed as needed Same procedure for both coordinates and partial derivatives Same procedure for input both to integration and to observable calculation

Accelerations – lunar orbit Integrated quantity is Moon-Earth difference – all accelerations are ditto Point-mass Sun, planets relativistic (PPN) Earth tidal drag on Moon Earth harmonics on Moon and Sun –J2-J4 (only J2 effect on Sun) Moon harmonics on Earth –J2, J3, C22, C31, C32, C33, S31, S32, S33

Accelerations – lunar orbit (cont) Equivalence Principle violation, if any Solar radiation pressure –uniform albedo on each body, neglecting thermal inertia Additional de Sitter-like precession is nominally zero, implemented only as a partial derivative

Accelerations – libration Earth point-mass on Moon harmonics Sun point-mass on Moon harmonics Earth J2 on Moon harmonics Effect of solid Moon elasticity/dissipation –k2 and lag (either constant T or constant Q) Effect of independently-rotating, spherical fluid core –Averaged coupling coefficient

Accelerations – planet orbits Integrated quantity is planet-Sun difference – all accelerations are ditto Point-mass Sun, planets relativistic (PPN) Sun J2 on planet Asteroids (orbits: Minor Planet Center) –8 with adjustable masses –90 with adjustable densities in 5 classes –Additional uniform ring (optional 2 nd ring)

Accelerations – planets (cont) Equivalence Principle violation, if any Solar radiation pressure not included Earth-Moon barycenter integrated as two mass points with externally prescribed coordinate differences

Earth orientation IAU 2000 precession/nutation series –Estimated corrections to precession and nutation at fortnightly, semiannual, annual, 18.6-year, and 433-day (free core) IERS polar motion and UT1 –Not considered in Earth gravity field calc. –Estimated corrections through 2003

Station coordinates Earth orientation + body-fixed coordinates + body-fixed secular drift + Lorentz contraction + tide correction Tide is degree-independent response to perturbing potential characterized by two Love numbers and a time lag (all fit parameters)

Reflector coordinates Integrated Moon orientation + body-fixed coordinates + Lorentz contraction + tide correction Tide is degree-independent response to perturbing potential characterized by two Love numbers and a time lag (all fit parameters)

Planetary lander coordinates Modeled planet orientation in proper time + body-fixed coordinates Mars orientation includes precession and seasonal variations

Proper time/coordinate time Diurnal term from · Long-period term from integrated time ephemeris or from monthly and yearly analytic approximations One version of Ġ uses a secular drift in the relative rates of atomic (proper) time and gravitational (coordinate) time Combination of above is labeled “CTAT”

Chain of times/epochs Recv UTC: leap seconds etc→ Recv TAI –PEP uses A.1 internally (constant offset from TAI, for historical reasons) Recv TAI: “Recv CTAT”→ CT –CT same as TDB, except for constant offset Recv CT: light-time iteration→ Rflt CT Rflt CT: light-time iteration→ Xmit CT Xmit CT: “Xmit CTAT”→ Xmit TAI Xmit TAI: leap seconds etc→ Xmit UTC

Corrections after light-time iteration Shapiro delay (up-leg + down-leg) –Effect of Sun for all observations –Effect of Earth for lunar/cislunar obs Physical propagation delay (up + down) –Mendes & Pavlis (2004) for neutral atmosphere, using meteorological data –Various calibrations for radio-frequency obs Measurement bias Antenna fiducial point offset, if any

Integrated lunar partials Mass(Earth,Moon), RELFCT, Ġ, metric β,γ Moon harmonic coefficients Earth, Moon orbital elements Lunar core, mantle rotation I.C.’s Lunar core&mantle moments, coupling Tidal drag, lunar k2, and dissipation EP violation, de Sitter-like precession

Integrated E-M-bary partials Mass(planets, asteroids, belt) Asteroid densities RELFCT, Ġ, Sun J2, metric β,γ Planet orbital elements EP violation

Indirect integrated partials PEP integrates partials only for one body at a time Dependence of each body on coordinates of other bodies and thence by chain-rule on parameters affecting other bodies Such partials are evaluated by reading the other single-body integrations Iterate as needed

Non-integrated partials Station positions and velocities Coordinates of targets on Moon, planets Earth precession and nutation coefficients Adjustments to polar motion and UT1 Planetary radii, spins, topography grids Interplanetary plasma density CT-rate version of Ġ Ad hoc coefficients of Shapiro delay, CTAT AU in light-seconds

Partial derivatives of observations Integrated partials computed by chain rule Non-integrated partials computed according to model Metric β,γ are both

Solutions Calculate residuals and partials for all data Form normal equations Include information from other investigations as a priori constraints Optionally pre-reduce equations to project away uninteresting parameters Solve normal equations to adjust parameters, optionally suppressing ill-defined directions in parameter space Form postfit residuals by linear correction