2010 Public Opinion Research: A Nation-Wide Study of Attitudes Towards Electronic Health Records and Health System Use of Patient Information This study.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Aim: What must we understand before designing an study? HW#2: complete the assignment on the last slide (must be typed and article must be included when.

Advertisements

Insights into the Canadian Education System A. Abigail Payne Department of Economics McMaster University.

Survey Design Teri Peterson Acknowledgements The Survey Kit By Arlene Fink Survey Design and Sampling Procedures By Tony Babinec Statistics.com.

ACWS Men’s Attitudes and Behaviours Toward Violence Against Women March 12, 2012.

BLANDFORD MEDICAL CENTRE Presentation to Patient Forum Group Monday 16 March 2015.

ENROLLED STILL UNINSURED Voices from the Newly- Enrolled And Still Uninsured A Survey about the Affordable Care Act’s First Open Enrollment Period June.

Cambridgeshire County Council is talking to people about a policy for transport for people who use its service. This will help us to make sure we can support.

Digital Footprints Where have you been? Where are you going?

Documentation for Acute Care

Privacy & Personal Information -- Why do we care or do we?

Health Care and Patients’ Attitudes: Does the type of health care insurance matter? Joan Babcock University of Texas at San Antonio.

Taking Steps to Protect Privacy A presentation to Hamilton-area Physiotherapy Managers by Bob Spence Communications Co-ordinator Office of the Ontario.

Caregiver Policy Lens (CGPL) Dr. Penny MacCourt “Supporting Caregivers of Older Adults” B.C. Psychogeriatric Association 2011.

Chapter 12. Observational and Survey Research Methods Chapter Objectives Distinguish between naturalistic and participant observation methods Articulate.

Patients as Partners: at the Forefront of Service Redesign An Introduction to Patient Focus Public Involvement.

Formal Appraisal of Undergraduates – worth the effort? Deborah Murdoch-Eaton Professor of Medical Education Leeds.

Nobody’s Unpredictable March 2009 Legal Aid in BC Prepared by Ipsos Reid for the Legal Services Society of British Columbia.

Essentia EMR Jenifer Brilla CRNP Wilkes University.

Monitoring Attitudes of the Public 2002 ACLI Webcast December 12, 2002 By Brian Perlman, Ph.D., CLU, ChFC, FLMI Mathew Greenwald & Associates.

A Summary Of Key Findings From A National Survey Of Voters. #07160.

CHAPTER 1 Introduction to the nursing management Dr Fadwa Alhalaiqa.

Lake Research Partners * Voter/Consumer Research 1 Partnership to Fight Chronic Disease A presentation on findings from a nationwide survey of 1,500 likely.

1 Final Version© Ipsos MORI Final Version Evaluation of Adult Cancer Aftercare Services Quantitative and Qualitative Service Evaluation for NHS Improvement.

EHealth 2013: Do eHealth investments really match consumer expectations? Presented by: Aaron Berk (Director, Advisory, KPMG) Craig Worden (SVP, Public.

460 ~ 28 March 2006 Physio feedback Integration of mind-body example NHP 2005 survey précis Exam is Sunday April 23/06 in Talbot College room # 348, 2-4.

Canadian Hospice Palliative Care Association The Way Forward Initiative - Topline Results (National vs. Ontario) February 7, 2014.

Prepared for: Quantitative Research November 2009.

Confidentiality and Security Issues in ART & MTCT Clinical Monitoring Systems Meade Morgan and Xen Santas Informatics Team Surveillance and Infrastructure.

Public opinion on sociodemographic data collection in Ontario healthcare settings KETAN SHANKARDASS, PhD, Research Associate Centre for Research on Inner.

Portraits of Canada Portraits of Canada CRIC survey conducted by Environics Research Group and CROP. 2,939 adult Canadians were surveyed by telephone.

Making IT Meaningful Christine Bechtel Vice President National Partnership for Women & Families Making IT Meaningful: How Consumers Value and Trust Health.

Privacy, Quality and Electronic Health Information Royal New Zealand College of GPs Quality Forum 14 February 2009 Sebastian Morgan-Lynch

Mutual Fund Investors in Canada 2011: Sixth Annual Landscape Study Overview of Key Findings.

This material was developed by Duke University, funded by the Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information.

Doctor Becomes Typist Final Project Presentation Carmen Price.

TNS Independence Referendum Survey © TNS January ScotlandSeptember18.com Independence Referendum Survey January 2014 Phase 1 and 2 results.

Medicare Sustainability: Public Opinion Environment June 17 th, 2010.

Market Research The key to the customers wallet …..

Privacy in Healthcare Challenges Associated with Implementing Privacy in an Electronic Health Records Environment John P. Houston, J.D. Vice President,

Market Research Introduction. What is market research?

2009 Perceptions on Health Care National Consumer Survey from Opinion Research Corporation and CIGNA HealthCare Confidential, unpublished property of CIGNA.

Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved. McGraw-Hill Chapter 6 The Privacy and Security of Electronic Health Information.

Patient Confidentiality and Electronic Medical Records Ann J. Olsen, MBA, MA Information Security Officer and Director, Information Management Planning.

Interpreting Statistics LG: I can evaluate the reliability of data based on its source and margin of error.

PIPEDA and Receivables Management Robin Gould-Soil Receivables Management Association of Canada November 16, 2011.

HIPAA LAWS.  Under the privacy rule, the patient must give consent to use his or her Protected Health Information.  Examples in which consent must be.

Psychological Research Methods Psychology: Chapter 2, Section 2.

NYC Consumer Attitudes towards Electronic Health Records A Qualitative Analysis Edward Wu, MD, MBA, MS 1 Kathryn LaSorsa, MS 2 Farzad Mostashari, MD, MSc.

CBC News Poll on Discrimination November Methodology This report presents the findings of an online survey conducted among 1,500 Canadian adults.

LEEDS & GRENVILLE TRANSPORTATION NEEDS ASSESSMENT.

4. Marketing research After carefully studying this chapter, you should be able to: Define marketing research; Identify and explain the major forms of.

Psychology As Science Psychologists use the “scientific method” Steps to the scientific method: - make observations - ask question - develop hypothesis.

ISTANBUL STOCK EXCHANGE FELL 6 POINTS IN AVERAGE TODAY THE CONSUMER PRICE INDEX ROSE BY 0,5 PERCENT LAST MONTH THE LATEST SURVEY INDICATES THAT THE PRESIDENT`S.

2012 Public Opinion Research: Canadian Views on Electronic Health Records This study was commissioned by the Canadian Institute for Health Information.

Results Providers (n=20) were more willing to share patient data when: Sharing with universities vs. private firms and non-government organizations No.

Introduction to research

Human Research Protection Program 101 March 20, 2007 Cincinnati, OH.

Department of Education: Valuing Education Tracking February 2016 Research Presentation 14 th April 2016.

Introduction to eHealth eHealth Workshop February 18-19, 2009.

The “Canada” Wordmark. Federal Identity Program A key element of presence and visibility Makes government visible in the lives of Canadians Shows how.

Health Management Information Systems Unit 3 Electronic Health Records Component 6/Unit31 Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 1.0/Fall 2010.

How do patients feel about pharmacist access to their medical records? Christine M Bond Department of General Practice and Primary Care.

Pharmacists in Nova Scotia Perceptions and attitudes towards pharmacists in Nova Scotia with national comparisons. February 2016 Prepared for the Pharmacy.

BASHH Conference – Oxford 2016 CONFIDENTIALITY AND GP DISCLOSURE IN GUM CLINICS Qiang Lu University of Southampton Supervisors: Dr Emily Clarke, Dr Raj.

Marketplace: 2017 Cell Phone Risk-Knowledge Study

Basics of Knowledge Translation

Market Research.

Market Research.

Presentation transcript:

2010 Public Opinion Research: A Nation-Wide Study of Attitudes Towards Electronic Health Records and Health System Use of Patient Information This study was commissioned by the Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI) and Canada Health Infoway. March 2010

Background This nation-wide survey was conducted via telephone between February 25 th and March 8 th ,000 adult Canadian were selected on a random probability basis to be interviewed Results from this survey can be considered accurate within a margin of error of +/- 3.1% The survey was conducted to: – Obtain baseline measures of key attitudes towards EHR and HSU which can be tracked, over time – Quantify opinion to these issues, observed in an earlier phase of qualitative research

Top Problem Facing The Health Care System Q: “What would you say is the most important issue facing the health care system today?

Reported State of Personal Health Care Records High Categories for Difficult to Access Post-Grad (34%) Quebec (30%) $100k+ (29%) Yrs (28%) Q: How would you describe the state of your health records… 22%

Impact of Health Records on the Kind of Care Received High Categories for Negative Responses Post-Grad (20%) $80k+ (20%) Quebec (19%) Females (17%) Q: Would you say that the way your health care records are maintained has a … impact on the kind of care you receive?… 14%

Impact of Health Records on the Health Care System High Categories for Big Problem Post-Grad (40%) Quebec (40%) 55 Yrs+ (39%) $80-$100k (38%) Q: Would you say that the way personal health records are maintained is…for the health care system 31%

Relation Between Perceived State of Health Care Records and Quality of Care and System Impacts All in one place and very easy to access Mostly in one place and fairly easy to access In a number of places and fairly difficult to access All over then place and very difficult to access Impact on Personal care Positive72%62%17%18% None23%27%36%26% Negative1%7%40%52% Impact on System Very big/Big problem20%26%51%63% Small/No Problem71%65%44%35%

Recognition that Canada has a Goal and a Plan to Convert All Personal Health Records from a Paper Format to an Electronic Format Lower Recognition Yrs (28%) Alberta (31%) B.C. (35%) High Recognition Post Grad (61%) Yrs (56%) Ontario. (55%) Quebec (54%) Q: Do we have a goal and a plan to convert all personal health care records in Canada from a paper to an electronic format? 18%

Reaction to the Idea of Converting All Personal Health Records from a Paper Format to an Electronic Format High Categories – Good idea $60k+ (83%) Families (83%) Quebec (82%) Yrs (80%) Atlantic (80%) Employed (80%) Q: On balance, do you think converting personal health records from a paper to an electronic format is… High Categories – Bad idea Unemployed (33%) Homemakers (27%) Yrs (27%) Alberta (27%) Under $40k (26%) Less than HS (26%)

Concerns About Electronic Health Care Records Q: “Is there anything about having your health car records in an electronic format that would concern you? High Categories – Concern Unemployed (77%) Alberta (73%) Yrs (69%) Ontario (66%)

Reported Use of Electronic Record in Principal Doctor’s Office Low Categories – No Quebec (61%) $40k-$60k (50%) Student (49%) High Categories - Yes Alberta (55%) Homemaker (49%) Ontario (44%) 55+ (43%) Q. Does your principal doctor or care provider use an electronic record in their office?

Impact of Principal Care Giver Having EMR on Patient’s View that EHRs are a Good Idea or a Bad Idea Have EMRDon’t have EMR EHR’s are… Good idea78%73% Bad idea17%22%

Knowledge of Current Use of Personal Health Information for Other than Direct Patient Use High Categories - Yes Quebec (26%) Homemaker (22%) Q: As far as you know, is personal health information used for any purpose other than by your health provider in giving care to an individual patient?

Can Electronic Records be Used in Different or More Ways than a Paper Record ? High Categories - Yes $100k (81%) Post-Grad (79%) Yrs (76%) Unemployed (76%) Student (75%) Q: Do you think that personal health information could be used in different or more ways if it was stored as an electronic record, compared to a paper record?

Reported Recall of the Term “Health System” or “Secondary Use” of Patient Information High Categories - Yes Quebec (47%) Yrs (42%) $80k + (41%) Q: Have you ever heard of Health System or Secondary Use of Patient Health Information?

Perceived Impacts of HSU of information on Patient Care and the Operation and Quality of Health Care in Canada Q: Does Health System or Secondary Use of patient health information strike you as something that is going to have a … impact on the operation and quality of health care/the kind of care you might receive?

Perceived Impact of Various HSU of Data on Health Care in Canada…Front line Health Care Q: What sort of impact would the following use of information for HSUs have on health care in Canada…Improving front line health care

Perceived Impact of Various HSU of Data on Health Care in Canada… Efficiency and Effectiveness of Health Care Delivery Q: What sort of impact would the following use of information for HSUs have on health care in Canada… Improving efficiency and effectiveness of health care delivery

Perceived Impact of Various HSU of Data on Health Care in Canada… Tracking Public Health Q: What sort of impact would the following use of information for HSUs have on health care in Canada… Tracking the health of the general population

Perceived Impact of Various HSU of Data on Health Care in Canada… Medical and Health Research Q: What sort of impact would the following use of information for HSUs have on health care in Canada… Strengthening Medical and Health Research

Perceived Impact of Various HSU of Data on Health Care in Canada… Percent of Very Positive Reponses Q: What sort of impact would the following use of information for HSUs have on health care in Canada

Reported Levels of Concern About Individual Information Being Used for HSU Purposes Q: How concerned would you be about your health information being used for these types of HSUs High Concern Unemployed (62%) Females (55%) Yrs (55%) Low Concern 100k+ (32%) (35%) Man/Sask (38%)

Reported Levels of Concern if Information was De-identified Q: If your health information was de-identified, how concerned would you be about it being used for HS purposes? High Concern Under $40k (41%) BC (40%) High School (40%) Low Concern $80k (21%) Post Grad (23%) Yrs (25%)

Comfort with Sharing De-identified Information with Various Organizations – Provincial Department of Health Q: How would you feel about sharing your de-identified information with the following organization…

Comfort with Sharing De-identified Information with Various Organizations – Other Health Care Organizations Q: How would you feel about sharing your de-identified information with the following organization…

Comfort with Sharing De-identified Information with Various Organizations – Research Organizations Q: How would you feel about sharing your de-identified information with the following organization…

Comfort with Sharing De-identified Information with Various Organizations – Statistical Organizations Q: How would you feel about sharing your de-identified information with the following organization…

Comfort with Sharing De-identified Information with Various Organizations – Private Organizations Q: How would you feel about sharing your de-identified information with the following organization…

Comfort with Sharing De-identified Information with Various Organizations – ( Net Scores -- Comfortable Minus Uncomfortable) Q: How would you feel about sharing your de-identified information with the following organization…

Control of Decision to Share Information – Perceived and Preferred Q: Does Health System or Secondary Use of patient health information strike you as something that is going to have a … impact on the operation and quality of health care/the kind of care you might receive?

Comfort with Use of Identified Information Q: How comfortable would you feel if your information was identified and contained your name and address? High Concern Female (62%) Post-Grad (60%) Retired (59%) $60k-$80k (59%) B.C. (58%)

Comparison of Comfort/Concern about the General Concept of HSU vs De-Identified vs Identified Uses

Level of Demand for Consent in Cases Where Identified Information was Used Q: How would you feel about a requirement that your personal approval or consent would have to be given before de-identified information was used? High Consent Required Post-Grad (81%) $80k-$100k (79%) Female (74%) Yrs (73%)

Reported Likelihood of Granting or Withholding Consent, if Required for Identified Use Q: If your approval or consent was required… Do you think you would or would not give your approval or consent?

Likelihood of Granting Consent Based on Likelihood of Insisting on Consent Insist on Consent (67%) Prefer Consent (22%) Wouldn’t care (9%) Would grant (69%) 64%77%81% Would not grant (21%) 22%15%18% Don’t Know (11%) 13%7%1%

Reaction to the idea of an Independent Oversight Body to Approve Identified Use Insist on Consent (67%) Prefer Consent (22%) Wouldn’t care (9%) Oversight adds comfort (65%) 67%40%39% Makes no difference (33%) 31%55%57% Q: Would you be more comfortable if you knew that use of identified information would be reviewed and approved?

The Size of Hard Resistance to HSU

Expectation that Personal Doctor would Notify Patient when Information was used for HS Purposes Q: Would you expect your doctor or care giver to notify you about when and how your information was being used?

Privacy Vs HSU – Which is Most Important? High Privacy Living alone (48%) Female (45%) Under $40k (45%) High School (45%) Yrs (45%) High HSU $80k+ (63%) Yrs (61%) Yrs (59%) Q: What is more important to you: Protecting the privacy of your health information or being able to use it for HSU?