National Quality Assurance and Accreditation Committee & Quality Assurance and Accreditation Project Assessment Design and its relationship to NARS and.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The 21st Century Context for
Advertisements

Assessment: Aligning Assessment to Learning Outcomes by Dr Charles Juwah Department for the Enhancement of Learning, Teaching and Assessment RGU: DELTA.
School Based Assessment and Reporting Unit Curriculum Directorate
Confirming Student Learning: Using Assessment Techniques in the Classroom Douglas R. Davenport Dean, College of Arts and Sciences Truman State University.
Assessment Assessment should be an integral part of a unit of work and should support student learning. Assessment is the process of identifying, gathering.
Criterion-Referenced Assessment on Dissertation (Level 4 Subject) Faculty T&L Forum on Outcome-based Curriculum and Criterion-referenced Assessment 1 April.
Training Module for Cooperating Teachers and Supervising Faculty
Special Meeting on ICT Education in Tertiary Institutions Towards a Regional Perspective on Quality and Academic Standards in ICT Education and Training.
K–12 Session 4.3 Standards for Mathematical Practices Part 3: Looking for the Practices through Observation Module 1: A Closer Look at the Common Core.
1 Functions of Assessment Why do we assess students? Discuss in your group and suggest the three most important reasons.
Learning Objectives, Performance Tasks and Rubrics: Demonstrating Understanding and Defining What Good Is Brenda Lyseng Minnesota State Colleges.
Assessment and Problem Based Learning PBL 2004 Glen O’Grady Director, Center for Educational Development.
BACKWARD MAPPING: Beginning with the end in mind
Know and understand how to apply the principles of assessment, recording and reporting as an integral part of the teaching process. (2.1.5) Have knowledge.
Consistency of Assessment
CHAPTER 3 ~~~~~ INFORMAL ASSESSMENT: SELECTING, SCORING, REPORTING.
Authentic Assessment Abdelmoneim A. Hassan. Welcome Authentic Assessment Qatar University Workshop.
The Graduate Attributes Project: a perspective on early stakeholder engagement Dr Caroline Walker Queen Mary, University of London.
What should be the basis of
Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European
Catherine Wehlburg, Ph.D. Office for Assessment & Quality Enhancement.
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
External Examiners’ Briefing Day Assessment Policy Tuesday 6 th January 2015.
Northampton – Development Opportunities a framework for enabling positive change.
Overall Teacher Judgements
PDHPE K-6 Using the syllabus for consistency of assessment © 2006 Curriculum K-12 Directorate, NSW Department of Education and Training.
Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC)
Brooke Bennett. *National Educational Technology Standards and Performance Indicators for Teachers* 1. Facilitate & inspire student learning and creativity.
Assessment for Optimal Learning Tace Crouse Faculty Center for Teaching and Learning University of Central Florida.
Professional Development through the Authentic Academic Achievement Project.
LeMoyne-Owen College December 16, 2009 Mimi Czarnik, Professor of English and Dean of Humanities Becky Burton, Associate Professor of Biology Alverno College,
Making It Meaningful: Authentic Assessment for Intentional Education David W. Marshall, PhD Joanna M. Oxendine, MEd.
Prof. György BAZSA, former president Hungarian Accreditation Committee (HAC) CUBRIK Workshop IV Beograd, 13 March, 2012 European Standards and Guidelines.
Focus on Learning: Student Outcomes Assessment and the Learning College.
Project-Based Assessment- innovative approach to assessment that focuses on assessing student projects. Based on a type of authentic learning called project.
International Conference on Enhancement and Innovation in Higher Education Crowne Plaza Hotel, Glasgow 9 – 11 June 2015 Welcome.
Workshop 3 Early career teacher induction: Literacy middle years Workshop 3 Literacy teaching and NSW syllabus 1.
Foundation Degrees Foundation Degree Forward Lichfield Centre The Friary Lichfield Staffs WS13 6QG — Tel: Fax: —
Integrating Differentiated Instruction & Understanding by Design: Connecting Content and Kids by Carol Ann Tomlinson and Jay McTighe.
March 26-28, 2013 SINGAPORE CDIO Asian Regional Meeting and Workshop on Engineering Education and Policies for Regional Leaders Programme Evaluation (CDIO.
REQUIRED ELEMENTS. Standards are the centerpiece of a strong academic program. They are your roadmap and provide the what as teachers build curriculum,
International Conference on Enhancement and Innovation in Higher Education Crowne Plaza Hotel, Glasgow 9-11 June 2015 Welcome.
Quality Assurance in Staff Development Training Seminar on Implementation of Effective Quality Assurance Systems in Romanian Higher Education Institutions.
Workshops to support the implementation of the new languages syllabuses in Years 7-10.
Strengthening Student Outcomes in Small Schools There’s been enough research done to know what to do – now we have to start doing it! Douglas Reeves.
Assessing Your Assessments: The Authentic Assessment Challenge Dr. Diane King Director, Curriculum Development School of Computer & Engineering Technologies.
Supporting Students’ Academic Success What is within our locus of control? Kay M. Sagmiller, Ph. D.
[Insert faculty Banner] Consistency of Teacher Judgement Mathematics 7-10.
The selection of appropriate assessment methods in a course is influenced by many factors: the intended learning outcomes, the discipline and related professional.
Curriculum Renewal in the Faculty of the Professions: Overview.
Using Groups in Academic Advising Dr. Nancy S. King Kennesaw State University.
Assessment Design and its relationship to NARS and ILOs Arthur Brown Advisor to the Quality Assurance and Accreditation Project Republic of Egypt.
Limitations and Future Directions of Tests. Test Interpretation and Use A valid test involves valid interpretation and valid use of the test scores A.
Dr. Salwa El-Magoli Chairperson of the National Quality Assurance and Accreditation Committee. Former Dean of the Faculty of Agricultural, Cairo university.
February, MansourahProf. Nadia Badrawi Implementation of National Academic Reference Standards Prof. Nadia Badrawi Senior Member and former chairperson.
30/10/2006 University Leaders Meeting 1 Student Assessment: A Mandatory Requirement For Accreditation Dr. Salwa El-Magoli Chair-Person National Quality.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
ENHANCING LEARNING THROUGH CONSTRUCTIVE ALIGNMENT(CA) IN MIDWIFERY COURSES AT A NURSING EDUCATION INSTITUTION MRS. N. L. RAMAGAGA & DR. S. P. VAN TONDER.
Pedagogical aspects in assuring quality in virtual education environments University of Gothenburg, Sweden.
Denise Kirkpatrick Pro Vice-Chancellor The Open University, UK Quality Assurance in Distance Education.
Dr. Christine Tom Griffith University School-based Assessment for and in Learning.
School – Based Assessment – Framework
Office of Planning & Development
DRAFT Standards for the Accreditation of e-Learning Programs
2nd Annual Faculty e-Learning Symposium 26th May 2016 Mrs E D Joubert
Programme Review Dhaya Naidoo Director: Quality Promotion
Assessment of student achievement of outcomes from the 7-10 Science syllabus Use this as a screen saver.
Presented by: Skyline College SLOAC Committee Fall 2007
February 21-22, 2018.
Presentation transcript:

National Quality Assurance and Accreditation Committee & Quality Assurance and Accreditation Project Assessment Design and its relationship to NARS and ILOs May, 2007 Mostafa Mohsen Radwan Vice Dean, Faculty of Engineering, Fayoum University Director, Fayoum University Quality Assurance and Strategic Planning Center Member of the Quality Assurance and Accreditation Committee

Assessment Design Intended Learning Outcomes (ILOs) National Academic Reference Standards (NARS) / Benchmarks

Intended Learning Outcomes (ILOs) Learning outcomes may be defined as “Statements of what a learner is expected to know, understand and/or be able to demonstrate after completion of a process of learning”. Intended learning outcomes (ILO) are simply the learning outcomes that were intended by the writer(s) of the module descriptor (Program/Course specification).

ILOs ILOs Teaching, learning and assessment Curriculum design design What students are expected to be able to do Resources Grading criteria criteria In education, ILOs should inform Adapted from Dr. Catherine Tang (2005,2006)

Backwash Effect of Assessment Teacher’s and student’s perspectives on assessment Teacher’s perspective: ILOs Teaching activities Assessment Teacher’s perspective: ILOs Teaching activities Assessment Student’s perspective:Assessment Learning activities Outcomes (or just activities) (or just activities) Assessment becomes the curriculum to the students. * Assessment should be aligned with the ILOs so that students will learn what we intend them to learn.

Testing for Learning, Not Learning for Testing

Assessment is the contextual factor which most strongly affects how students learn. It is the students’ perceptions of the assessment requirements that constitutes the hidden curriculum, and drives how students learn. Assessment system should be an integral part of the learning process, and it is a key element in the success of any education enhancement or reform process.

National Academic Reference Standards (NARS) / Benchmarks

WHY SHOULD STUDENTS PARTCIPATE IN QUALITY? Are students customers in higher education? ◦ If yes, what rights do they have in the institution? Are students stakeholders in higher education? ◦ Do they participate in decision-making ◦ Do they get support in order to participate effectively

……………………………….. …………………………………

National Academic Reference Standards (NARS) / Benchmarks

Common Part

*Practical *General& transferable *Intellectual *Knowledge & understanding

NARS/Benchmark Program Specification Course Specification

Students Assessment Design Often we are more concerned with proving growth and giving marks than we are with providing opportunities for students to learn.

Important Issues of Assessment.Clear purpose..Clear purpose..An integral part of the curriculum design and planning..An integral part of the curriculum design and planning..Relevant criteria based on ILOs..Relevant criteria based on ILOs..Appropriate methods to align with ILOs to be assessed..Appropriate methods to align with ILOs to be assessed.. Clear communication and transparent.. Clear communication and transparent..Consistent procedures..Consistent procedures..Valid and practicable tasks..Valid and practicable tasks.. Realistic workload.. Realistic workload..Provision of constructive feedback to facilitate.Provision of constructive feedback to facilitate and improve learning and teaching.. Regular review and improvement of the system.. Regular review and improvement of the system. Adapted from Dr. Catherine Tang (2006)

Processes Involved in Assessment 1. Set assessment criteria. 1. Set assessment criteria. 2. Select assessment methods to align with the ILOs. 2. Select assessment methods to align with the ILOs. 4. Communicate the results of the judgement and 4. Communicate the results of the judgement and provide constructive feedback. 5. Make use of the results of the assessment to improve teaching and learning. 5. Make use of the results of the assessment to improve teaching and learning. 3. Judge and grade the achievement of the ILOs based on the evidence provided. 3. Judge and grade the achievement of the ILOs based on the evidence provided.

1. Assessment Criteria: What do we want to assess our students?. Should be criterion-referenced.. Based on explicitly set ILOs.. Consider both content and level of understanding or standards of performance to be assessed.. Assessment criteria in-use align with espoused ILOs.. Clear to students and teacher(s) involved.

2. Methods of Assessment Assessment should not be labelled as “good” or Assessment should not be labelled as “good” or “bad”, but rather “appropriate” or “inappropriate”. “bad”, but rather “appropriate” or “inappropriate”. The important issue is how the assessment is designed The important issue is how the assessment is designed and implemented to appropriately address the and implemented to appropriately address the intended learning outcomes. intended learning outcomes.

Different methods of assessment assess different learning outcomes. A range of different methods of assessment may be required to address the range of ILOs of a course. Questions to be asked in selecting assessment methods: 1. What ILOs are to be assessed? 2. Are the assessment methods concerned able to address those ILOs? 3. Will the assessment methods encourage students to relate to real-life contexts? Are they authentic? 4. Are the assessment methods practicable with respect to time allowance and available resources? 5. Taking the course as a whole, will the different assessment methods offer a balanced assessment of all the course ILOs? 6. Is the assessment workload realistic for teachers and students? Selection of Methods of Assessment

Some Common Methods of Assessment Papers Papers Quizzes Quizzes Graded discussions Interviews Interviews Storytelling (digital and narrative) Storytelling (digital and narrative) Group or individual projects Group or individual projects Peer review and peer teaching Peer review and peer teaching WebQuests WebQuests Case studies Case studies Web page production Web page production Media production (pictures, diagrams, photos, videos) Media production (pictures, diagrams, photos, videos) Journals Journals Portfolios Portfolios Demonstrations Demonstrations Critiques Critiques

Constructive Alignment of ILOs and Assessment Methods Consider: If all ILOs are being addressed? If there is a balanced coverage of the ILOs? Course ILO 5 Course ILO 4 Course ILO 3 Course ILO 2 Course ILO 1 Method 3 Method 2 Method 1 Assessment Methods Course ILOs

3. Judging and Grading of ILOs Judgement and grading should be based on evidence presented in the students’ work of how well the ILOs have been achieved. Judgement and grading should be based on evidence presented in the students’ work of how well the ILOs have been achieved. Grades should be awarded to reflect how well the ILOs have been achieved in terms of the level of understanding / performance in a particular content area. Grades should be awarded to reflect how well the ILOs have been achieved in terms of the level of understanding / performance in a particular content area. Grading criteria (rubrics) should be set to clearly define the standards and quality of the students’ performance expected of each grade for the ILOs. Grading criteria (rubrics) should be set to clearly define the standards and quality of the students’ performance expected of each grade for the ILOs.

4,5. Communicating, Feedback and Making Use of the Results of Assessment.Feedback to improve teaching and learning..Feedback to improve teaching and learning.. Reflect on assessment results to identify areas for improvement of assessment and teaching.. Reflect on assessment results to identify areas for improvement of assessment and teaching. Consider procedures for:. providing feedback to students on their achievement of the ILOs.. providing feedback to students on their achievement of the ILOs.. staff to discuss results of assessment of the ILOs.. staff to discuss results of assessment of the ILOs.. review and revision of assessment practices.. review and revision of assessment practices.

Closing the Loop Develop, modify, or review a curriculum, course/program. Develop Student Learning Outcomes Design & Measure Student Learning as a result of the Curriculum, Course, or Program Collect, discuss, and analyze data. Determine refinements based on outcomes data. Closing the Assessment Loop Adapted from: Sue Granger-Dickson & Terrence Willett (2005)

…………………………………………………..……………………… …

University Assessment Strategy

Minimising plagiarism

Would a well designed assessment system solve the problem?

THANK YOU 42