Agency Questionnaire Results Eastern Brook Trout Joint Venture Conservation Strategy Work Group Information gathered September/October 2005.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Restore and Protect Red River Watershed Nez Perce Tribe Fisheries Watershed Program.
Advertisements

LOWER SALMON RIVER Tributary Protection and Enhancement.
This presentation will probably involve audience discussion, which will create action items. Use PowerPoint to keep track of these action items during.
Little Canyon Creek Subwatershed Steelhead Trout Habitat Improvement Project Sponsored by: Lewis Soil Conservation District.
Measure 76 Parks and Natural Resources Fund 15% Lottery Revenue Parks Subaccount Natural Resources Subaccount Grant Fund 65% Operating Fund 35%
LAMP 101 Elizabeth LaPlante US Co-Chair, Superior Work Group US Environmental Protection Agency.
OUTREACH and EDUCATION SUBCOMMITTEE Dianne Timmins, Chair Eastern Brook Trout Joint Venture- Fish Habitat Partnership.
Keeping Maine’s Forests Pilot Project Update Fisheries Habitat Restoration Pleasant River Watershed.
Climate Adaptation: the Power of Conservation Across Boundaries Steven Fuller, NALCC The Wildlife Management Institute.
Mid-Atlantic Region Workgroup Pennsylvania, West Virginia, New Jersey, Maryland, Ohio 1. Maintain the status of 746 subwatersheds classified as healthy.
Deputy Chief James E. Hubbard August 25, A Quick Refresher on the Farm Bill (Title VIII) Requirements Statewide assessment of forest resource conditions.
1 The Chesapeake Bay Program James Edward, Deputy Director EPA Chesapeake Bay Program Office CAC meeting, June 1, 2012 EO Action Plan, Progress Report.
Wetland & Riparian Restoration In the Swan Valley Swan Ecosystem Center.
New England Cottontail Conservation Efforts Anthony Tur US Fish and Wildlife Service New England Field Office Concord, New Hampshire.
WNTI Habitat Assessment Robin Knox – WNTI Coordinator.
Restoration of Chamberlain Creek Amy Clinefelter Riparian Wetland Research Program Restoration of Chamberlain Creek Amy Clinefelter Riparian Wetland Research.
Virginia Wildlife Action Plan David K. Whitehurst Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries.
Burl Carraway. Purpose of Redesign Shape and influence use of forest land on a scale and in a way that optimizes public benefits from trees and forests.
Rogue Basin Water Quality Implementation Plans Greg Stabach, Natural Resources Project Manager Rogue Valley Council of Governments.
Protect & Restore Northeast Oregon/Southeast Washington Project Number ISRP – Geographic Review May 1, 2013.
Update on Forest Goals and Progress in the Chesapeake Bay Partnership Citizens Advisory Committee Meeting, 8/23/13 Sally Claggett & Julie Mawhorter, US.
Kyle Abraham Effectiveness Monitoring Coordinator Oregon Watershed Enhancement Board.
Conservation Design and the Sagebrush Ecosystem Russell George Executive Director Colorado Dept. of Natural Resources.
Chesapeake Bay Program: Governance and Goals Options for Principals’ Staff Committee Consideration March 7, 2013.
EBT Joint Venture Goals. Visionary EBT Joint Venture Goals Visionary Long Term.
May 27 th, 2003FRCV Conservation Plan Summary and Status Rock Creek Valley Conservation Plan & Priorities Prepared by Friends of Rock Creek Valley with.
Lower South ForkClearwater River Lower South Fork Clearwater River Nez Perce Tribe DFRM Watershed Division Mark Johnson-Project Leader
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Leetown Science Center Research in the Shenandoah Valley Presented to the Shenandoah Valley Natural.
Conservation of Lake Sammamish Kokanee A Briefing for the City of Bellevue Planning Commission David St. John – Lake Sammamish Kokanee Work Group
Fiscal Year 2004 April 10, FY 2002FY 2003FY 2004 EnactedBudgetBudget COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN: Army Corps of Engineers Bureau of Land.
Indiana’s Coastal Nonpoint Pollution Control Program Coastal Advisory Board Meeting April 18, 2007.
THE ADMINISTRATION OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT Wildlife Management Unit 1 Part 2.
Laguna Creek Watershed Council Development of the Laguna Creek Watershed Management Action Plan & It’s Relevance to the Elk Grove Drainage Master Planning.
Solutions on the Horizon: Integrated Planning in the 21 st Century Trisha White Defenders of Wildlife.
WNTI Strategic Planning Robin Knox – WNTI Coordinator “A National Fish Habitat Partnership”
Reducing Nutrient Loads from the Opequon Creek Watershed Project Team Meeting Oct 19, 2007 Chesapeake Bay Targeted Watersheds Grant Program.
HYDROELECTRIC POWER AND FERC. HYDRO 101A ”Water Runs Down Hill”
UDWR Role in the Right Hand Fork Logan River Project Paul Burnett Aquatic Biologist Utah Division of Wildlife Resources.
Taunton River Wild & Scenic Study A Partnership Effort on Behalf of The Taunton River.
NOAA RESTORATION CENTER The NOAA RC seeks to make the process of regulatory review and permitting of environmentally beneficial habitat restoration projects.
CALIFORNIA'S STATE WILDLIFE ACTION PLAN 2015 UPDATE A Conservation Legacy for Californians Armand Gonzales, Project Lead.
Eastern Brook Trout Joint Venture Habitat Work Group Update Hannibal Bolton Chair, Habitat Work Group.
More People Working for More Fish Overview of the National Fish Habitat Action Plan.
Chesapeake Forest Restoration Strategy Kick-off webinar May Strategy Teams 60+ representatives 30+ federal, state, ngos Draft/public input July.
…empowering communities through modeling and adaptive management Adaptive Management Conservation Strategies for Restoring Ecosystems.
Chesapeake Fish Passage Prioritization Project: Overview MARY ANDREWS NOAA JULIE DEVERS USFWS ERIK MARTIN THE NATURE CONSERVANCY CHESAPEAKE BAY FISH PASSAGE.
Jeff Horan, Habitat GIT Chair February 16, 2012 CBP Decision Framework in Action.
Establishing Successful Community-Based Partnerships Craig L. Fleener.
A summary of the work and programs of the Gulf of Maine Council on the Marine Environment.
For EBTJV meeting October 26, 2010 Executive Order Strategy for Protecting and Restoring the Chesapeake Bay Watershed.
A Fish Habitat Partnership
COLUMBIA RIVER SALMON CUMULATIVE IMPACTS EXAMPLE.
Goals, Priorities, & Outcomes Fostering Participation in the Eastern Brook Trout Joint Venture.
North Atlantic LCC Science Needs and Projects Background Vision and Mission 2010 Projects (review, status, next steps) 2011 Science Needs Assessment, Workshop.
Private Lands, Public Benefits John Glenn Southern Iowa Farmer and Executive Director, Rathbun Regional Water Association.
Overview & Implementation January 30, Large geographic area (22,360 square miles primarily in VA, NC, and TN)
WNTI Projects. Overview Historically, our funding has limited us to smaller projects. All of these “low hanging fruit” type projects have now been accomplished.
Collaborative Restoration Workshop April 26, 2016 James Capurso, PhD Regional Fisheries Biologist Pacific Northwest Region USDA Forest Service.
Success of Flathead River to Lake Initiative. Non-profit organization implementing land conservation to protect the Flathead Valley’s natural beauty,
Bull Trout Recovery & Watershed Restoration in the Clark Fork River Basin.
A summary of the values of the Gulf of Maine and contributions of the work and programs of the Gulf of Maine Council on the Marine Environment.
The Oregon Watershed Council Model, USA
Critical Linkages: Identifying Culvert Replacement Priorities to Maintain Connectivity of Cold Water Streams in the Face of Climate Change Scott Jackson,
An Overview of the Flathead Subbasin Planning Process
TU EBT Portfolio, Range-wide, & Focal Area Assessments
Local Government Engagement and Communication Strategy
Watershed Restoration on the Lolo NF Benefits for the Clark Fork Watershed Taylor Greenup, Hydrologist, Lolo National Forest Jennifer Mickelson,
Economic Study for Watts Branch Stream Restoration N. E
Watershed Restoration, Chesapeake Bay
Northern Workgroup Update
Presentation transcript:

Agency Questionnaire Results Eastern Brook Trout Joint Venture Conservation Strategy Work Group Information gathered September/October 2005

Questionnaire Audience 17 State wildlife management agencies 6 National Forests 4 National Parks

Questionnaire Response 13 State wildlife management agencies 5 National Forests 4 National Parks

Questionnaire Components 1. Current work 2. Needs/goals 3. Current funding 4. Funding needs 5. Threats to address 6. Threats NOT to address 7. Priorities

State Current Work Fish monitoring (11) Water chemistry monitoring (7) Reintroduce brook trout (7) Brook trout management planning (6) Genetic analysis (6) Protective regulations (6) Habitat assessment (5)

State Needs/Goals Operating funds (11) Hire additional staff (11) Habitat improvement (8) Fish monitoring (8) Non-native fish removal (7) CRP and other riparian projects (7) Habitat/water quality assessment (7)

Federal Current Work Protection of forested land (8) Culvert & barrier replacement (4) Habitat improvement (4) Fish monitoring (4) Protective regulations (4) CRP & other riparian projects (3) Reintroduce brook trout (3)

Federal Needs/Goals Operating funds (7) Habitat improvement (7) Non-native fish removal (4) Reintroduce brook trout (4) Fish monitoring (3) Culvert/barrier replacement (3)

Current Annual Brook Trout Program Expenditures (not including VA, MA, RI, CT and NH USFS) State = $ 3,673,025 Federal = $ 689,000 _______________________________________________________________ Total = $ 4,362,025

State Funding Sources Wallop-Breaux Sportfish Restoration Program License sales USFWS state wildlife grants State funds

Federal Funding Sources USFWS state wildlife grants USFS budget USGS research funding National Fish Wildlife Foundation

State Annual Funding Needs $4,425,000 Staffing Completing planned work Genetics research Contracting for monitoring/habitat improvement projects Land protection Equipment

Federal Annual Funding Needs $1,275,000 Completing planned work Staffing

Total Annual Budget Needs for EBTJV Partners $5,700, year time frame

Address these Range-wide Impacts Combined State & Federal Agencies Agriculture (11) Non-native fish (10) Road sediment (9) High water temperatures (7) Riparian habitat (7) Road/culvert fragmentation (4)

NOT Address Range-wide Impacts Combined State & Federal Agencies Urbanization (4) Agriculture (4) Road/culvert fragmentation (4) Dam fragmentation (2) Beavers (2) Non-native fish (1) Acid deposition (1) Forestry (1)

Prioritize Actions Protect greatly reduced stream populations from extirpation Protect moderately reduced stream populations from further degradation Restore populations to streams or watersheds where they are absent or extirpated Work to extend existing strong populations downstream into larger river habitats Protect lake/pond populations (where applicable) Assess or monitor streams and watersheds where brook trout data is insufficient or nonexistent Increase the number of biologists on staff to implement regulations, monitoring and management Educate public and decision-makers about the current status of brook trout in your or jurisdiction and the threats they face Other (please specify) -

State Priority Actions 1.Protect greatly reduced populations from extirpation 2.Protect moderately reduced populations from further degradation (tie) 3.Assess or monitor streams and watersheds where data is insufficient (tie) 4.Restore populations to streams or watersheds where they are absent or extirpated (tie) 5.Increase the number of staff biologists (tie)

Federal Priority Actions 1.Protect greatly reduced populations from extirpation 2.Restore populations to streams or watersheds where they are absent or extirpated 3.Educate public and decision-makers about current status of brook trout in their jurisdiction and the threats they face 4.Protect moderately reduced populations from further degradation 5.Assess or monitor streams and watersheds where data is insufficient

Summary Agencies seek a minimum of $5.7 million a year Funding needs –Increase staff and implement planned work –Monitoring and assessment –Habitat improvement –Brook trout reintroduction Agencies open to addressing most impacts Priorities –Protect vulnerable populations of brook trout –Assess and monitor watersheds –Restore brook trout