1 Requirements for GMPLS-based multi-region and multi-layer networks (MRN/MLN) draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-mln-reqs-01.txt CCAMP WG, IETF 66 Jul. 10, 2006 Kohei.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CCAMP WG, IETF 80th, Prague, Czech Republic draft-gonzalezdedios-subwavelength-framework-00 Framework for GMPLS and path computation support of sub-wavelength.
Advertisements

IETF 78, Maastricht, Netherlands, July 25-30, 2010Page - 1 Requirement and Framework for Multi Stages Multiplexing Configuration in G.709 network draft-fuxh-ccamp-multi-stage-multiplex-config-req-01.
RSVP-TE Extensions for SRLG Configuration of FA
Page - 1IETF 76, Hiroshima, November 8-13, 2009 Explicit Control of Region Boundary for PCE-Based Inter-Layer draft-lin-pce-ccamp-multilayer-lsp-00.txt.
71 th IETF – Philadelphia, USA March 2008 PCECP Requirements and Protocol Extensions in Support of Global Concurrent Optimization Young Lee (Huawei) J-L.
G : DCM Signaling Mechanism Using GMPLS RSVP-TE ITU-T Workshop on IP-Optical, Chitose, Japan 7/11/2002 Dimitrios Pendarakis, Tellium, Inc. ITU-T.
MPLS/GMPLS Migration and Interworking CCAMP, IETF 64 Kohei Shiomoto,
Requirement and protocol for WSON and non-WSON interoperability CCAMP WG, IETF 81th, Quebec City, Canada draft-shimazaki-ccamp-wson-interoperability-00.
CCAMP - 69th IETF1 Generalized MPLS (GMPLS) Support For Metro Ethernet Forum and G.8011 User-Network Interface (UNI) draft-berger-ccamp-gmpls-mef-uni-00.txt.
1 draft-ali-ccamp-rc-objective-function-metric-bound-02.txt draft-ali-ccamp-rsvp-te-include-route-02.txt draft-ali-ccamp-xro-lsp-subobject-02.txt CCAMP.
OLD DOG CONSULTING Traffic Engineering or Network Engineering? The transition to dynamic management of multi-layer networks Adrian Farrel Old Dog Consulting.
66th IETF Montreal July 2006 Requirements for delivering MPLS services Over L3VPN draft-kumaki-l3VPN-e2e-mpls-rsvp-te-reqts-01.txt Kenji Kumaki KDDI, Editor.
CCAMP WG, IETF 76th, Hiroshima, Japan draft-zhang-ccamp-gmpls-g709-framework-00.txt Fatai Zhang Dan Li Jianrui.
GVPNs: Generalized VPNs using BGP and GMPLS Toolkit draft-ouldbrahim-ppvpn-gvpn-bgpgmpls-06.txt Hamid Ould-Brahim Yakov Rekhter
IETF 68, MPLS WG, Prague P2MP MPLS-TE Fast Reroute with P2MP Bypass Tunnels draft-leroux-mpls-p2mp-te-bypass-01.txt J.L. Le Roux (France Telecom) R. Aggarwal.
64th IETF Vancouver November 2005 CCAMP Working Group Online Agenda and Slides at:
Page th IETF Vancouver, B.C., Canada Operating Virtual Concatenation (VCAT) and the Link Capacity Adjustment Scheme (LCAS) with GMPLS Greg Bernstein.
GMPLS for Multi-Region Networks {martin.vigoureux, {shiomoto.kohei, oki.eiji,
60th IETF San Diego August 2004 Layer 1 VPNs draft-takeda-l1vpn-framework-01.txt Raymond Aubin (Nortel) Marco Carugi (Nortel) Ichiro Inoue (NTT) Hamid.
Extensions to OSPF-TE for Inter-AS TE draft-ietf-ccamp-ospf-interas-te-extension-01.txt Mach Renhai
CCAMP Working Group Agenda and slides at 59th IETF Seoul.
OIF NNI: The Roadmap to Non- Disruptive Control Plane Interoperability Dimitrios Pendarakis
61st IETF Washington DC November 2004 IP/MPLS - GMPLS interworking in support of IP/MPLS to GMPLS migration draft-oki-ccamp-gmpls-ip-interworking-04.txt.
1 IETF- 56 – TE WG- SAN FRANCISCO Inter-AS MPLS Traffic Engineering draft-vasseur-inter-AS-TE-00.txt Jean-Philippe Vasseur – Cisco Systems Raymond Zhang.
62nd IETF Minneapolis March 2005 CCAMP Working Group Online Agenda and Slides at:
PCE Traffic Engineering Database Requirements draft-dugeon-pce-ted-reqs-01.txt O. Dugeon, J. Meuric (France Telecom / Orange) R. Douville (Alcatel-Lucent)
IETF 66 L1VPN Basic Mode Draft draft-ietf-l1vpn-basic-mode-00.txt Don Fedyk (Editor) Yakov Rekhter (Editor)
OSPF Extensions for ASON Routing draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-ason-routing-ospf-02.txt IETF67 - San Diego - Nov’06 Dimitri Papadimitriou (Alcatel)
Extensions to G/RSVP-TE for Point to Multipoint TE LSPs R.Aggarwal, D.Papadimitriou, and S.Yasukawa (Editors) and contributors (L.Berger, I.Bryskin, D.Cheng,
Framework for latency and loss traffic engineering application draft-fuxh-ccamp-delay-loss-te-framework-00.txt draft-fuxh-ccamp-delay-loss-rsvp-te-ext-00.txt.
Terminology and Models for Control of Traffic Engineered Networks with Provider- Customer Relationship CCAMP WG, IETF 89th, London draft-dios-ccamp-control-models-customer-
Framework for G.709 Optical Transport Network (OTN) draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-g709-framework-05 CCAMP WG, IETF 82 nd Taipei.
RSVP-TE Extensions to Notification for Shared Mesh Protection CCAMP WG, IETF 81th draft-he-ccamp-notification-shared-mesh-protection-00 Wenjuan He
June 4, 2003Carleton University & EIONGMPLS - 1 GMPLS Generalized Multiprotocol Label Switching Vijay Mahendran Sumita Ponnuchamy Christy Gnanapragasam.
Draft-oki-pce-vntm-def-00.txt 1 Definition of Virtual Network Topology Manager (VNTM) for PCE-based Inter-Layer MPLS and GMPLS Traffic Engineering draft-oki-pce-vntm-def-00.txt.
1 Ping and Traceroute for GMPLS LSPs in Non-Packet Switched Networks draft-ali-ccamp-gmpls-lsp-ping-traceroute-01.txt Zafar Ali, Roberto Cassata (Cisco.
79th IETF – Beijing, November 2010 OSPF Enhancement for Signal and Network Element Compatibility for Wavelength Switched Optical Networks Young
Applicability of Existing Solutions to the Problem Space draft-takeda-l1vpn-applicability-03.txt.
L1VPN Extended Overlay Model draft-fedyk-ccamp-l1vpn-extnd-overlay-00 Don Dieter
70th IETF Vancouver, December 2007 CCAMP Working Group Status Chairs: Deborah Brungard : Adrian Farrel :
Limit for content Do not exceed Limit for content Do not exceed Limit for content Do not exceed Limit for content Do not exceed Page 1 © The.
66th IETF, Montreal, July 2006 PCE Working Group Meeting IETF-66, July 2006, Montreal A Backward Recursive PCE-based Computation (BRPC) procedure to compute.
What do we put in the TED? Which TE links from the network should appear in the Traffic Engineering Database at a Label Switching Router? An attempt to.
Multi layer implications in GMPLS controlled networks draft-bcg-ccamp-gmpls-ml-implications-05 D.Papadimitriou (Alcatel-Lucent) D.Ceccarelli (Ericsson)
OSPF Traffic Engineering (TE) Express Path Updates draft-giacalone-ospf-te-express-path-01.txt Spencer Giacalone, Alia Atlas, John Drake, Stefano Previdi,
Requirements for PCE Discovery draft-leroux-pce-discovery-reqs-00.txt Jean-Louis Le Roux (France Telecom) Paul Mabey (Qwest) Eiji Oki (NTT) Ting Wo Chung.
Requirements for PCE Discovery draft-ietf-pce-discovery-reqs-01.txt Jean-Louis Le Roux (France Telecom) Paul Mabey (Qwest) Eiji Oki (NTT) Richard Rabbat.
RSVP-TE Signaling Extension for Explicit Control of LSP Boundary in MRN/MLN draft-fuxh-ccamp-boundary-explicit-control-ext-01.txt draft-fuxh-ccamp-boundary-explicit-control-ext-01.txt.
OIF Liaison on Routing IETF 75 – Stockholm – Jul ‘09 L. Ong (Ciena)
67th IETF San Diego November 2006 Applicability analysis of Generalized Multiprotocol Label Switching (GMPLS) protocols for the Layer 1 Virtual Private.
1 Role based Auto Mesh IETF90 CCAMP Jul Toronto draft-li-ccamp-role-based-automesh-02.
1 draft-ali-ccamp-te-metric-recording-02.txt CCAMP – IETF 84 – Vancouver July - August 2012 Zafar Ali Cisco Systems Clarence Filsfils  Cisco Systems Kenji.
GMPLS extensions to communicate latency as a Traffic Engineering performance metric draft-wang-ccamp-latency-te-metric-03.txt draft-wang-ccamp-latency-te-metric-03.txt.
GMPLS extensions to communicate latency as a Traffic Engineering performance metric draft-wang-ccamp-latency-te-metric-00.txt draft-wang-ccamp-latency-te-metric-00.txt.
60th IETF, San Diego, August 2004 OSPF MPLS Traffic Engineering capabilities draft-vasseur-ospf-te-caps-00.txt Jean-Philippe Vasseur
6. Hierarchy bis - Signaled FAs CCAMP, IETF64 Kohei Shiomoto:
Applicability Statement for Layer 1 Virtual Private Networks (L1VPNs) Basic Mode draft-takeda-l1vpn-applicability-basic-mode-00.txt Deborah Brungard (AT&T)
IETF 67, MPLS WG, San Diego 11/08/2006
Jean-Philippe Vasseur – Cisco Systems Raymond Zhang - Infonet
PCE Applicability for Inter-Layer MPLS and GMPLS Traffic Engineering draft-oki-pce-inter-layer-app-00.txt Mar. 20, 2006 Eiji Oki (NTT) Jean-Louis Le.
P2MP MPLS-TE Fast Reroute with P2MP Bypass Tunnels
Raymond Aubin (Nortel) Marco Carugi (Nortel) Ichiro Inoue (NTT)
Tomohiro Otani Kenji Kumaki Satoru Okamoto Wataru Imajuku
ASON routing implementation and testing ASON routing extensions
RSVP-TE Signaling Extension for Explicit Control of LSP Boundary in MRN/MLN draft-fuxh-ccamp-boundary-explicit-control-ext-02.txt Xihua Fu Qilei Wang.
Operating Virtual Concatenation (VCAT) and the Link Capacity Adjustment Scheme (LCAS) with GMPLS draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-vcat-lcas-02.txt Greg Bernstein.
Service Provider Requirements for Ethernet Control with GMPLS
Protection & Restoration Design Team - CCAMP WG
GMPLS Signaling Extensions for the Evolving G.709 OTN Control
OSPF Extensions for ASON Routing draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-ason-routing-ospf-03.txt IETF67 - Prague - Mar’07 Dimitri.
Presentation transcript:

1 Requirements for GMPLS-based multi-region and multi-layer networks (MRN/MLN) draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-mln-reqs-01.txt CCAMP WG, IETF 66 Jul. 10, 2006 Kohei Shiomoto (NTT) Dimitri Papadimitriou (Alcatel) Jean-Louis Le Roux (France Telecom) Martin Vigoureux (Alcatel) Deborah Brungard (AT&T) Eiji Oki (NTT) Ichiro Inoue (NTT) Emmanuel Dotaro (Alcatel)

2 MRN document set Requirements Analysis GMPLS Protocol Extensions draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-mln-reqs-01.txt draft-papadimitriou-ccamp-gmpls-mrn-extensions-02 draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-mln-eval-01.txt

3 Changes since Dallas (1) Clarified client/server relationship –Customer network provided on top of a server MRN/MLN MLN/MRN services –The customer network may form part of the MRN/MLN or may be partially separated E.g. separate routing instances Multiple control plane instances addressed as part of the client/server relationship MLN definition kept as is: –"A set of LSR with multiple data plane layers of either the same ISC or different ISCs, controlled by a single GMPLS control plane instance"

4 Changes since Dallas (2) Added some requirements –FA LSP rerouting MUST be possible while the FA LSP is carrying traffic, with minimal traffic disruption –Virtual TE link creation/deletion MUST be under the control of operator policy Some rewordings for the sake of clarity

5 Next Steps Requirements for control plane separation between client and server layers –Support for administrative boundary between client and server MLN/MRN network, minimizing impact on the customer network design, operation, and administration –Support for path computation across separated TEDs associated with client and server MLN/MRN network –Support for association between TE-links in separated TEDs associated with client and server MLN/MRN networks Discussion should continue on the list

6 Evaluation of existing GMPLS protocols against MLN requirements draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-mln-eval-01.txt CCAMP WG, IETF 66 July 10, 2006 Jean-Louis Le Roux (France Telecom) Deborah Brungard (AT&T) Eiji Oki (NTT) Dimitri Papadimitriou (Alcatel) Kohei Shiomoto (NTT) Martin Vigoureux (Alcatel) Ichiro Inoue (NTT) Emmanuel Dotaro (Alcatel)

7 Evaluation Summary Four areas, where extensions of GMPLS protocols and procedures are required, have been identified 1.GMPLS signaling extension for the setup/deletion of virtual TE-links 2.GMPLS routing and signaling extension for graceful TE-link deletion 3.GMPLS signaling extension for constrained multi-region signaling (SC inclusion/exclusion) 4.GMPLS routing extension for the advertisement of the internal adaptation capability of hybrid nodes.

8 Changes since Dallas Aligned client/server relationship with the requirement draft Clarified analysis of the VNT reconfiguration function –Clear distinction between elementary functional blocks Collection of traffic demands of an upper layer VNT Management (decision to setup/remove FA-LSPs, FA config) VNT Computation –There functions can be distributed on networks elements and/or centralized –Anyway, no need for GMPLS protocol extensions here Detailed analysis of virtual TE link function –Two approaches Soft-FA: LSP signaled but data plane resources not committed => Could rely on procedures similar to secondary LSPs (shared meshed restoration) Remote Association: LSP not signaled, TE link ids and parameters exchanged between FA end-points => Could rely on extensions to the Call procedure (with Notify messages) –Pros and cons are discussed Soft FA: More admission control capabilities, but scalability limitations Remote Association: Scales well but less admission control

9 Next Steps Analyze requirements for control plane separation between client and server layers –Path computation across separated TEDs –Association of TE-links in separated TEDs –Client/MLN administrative boundaries Continue discussion on the list

10 (GMPLS) Protocol Extensions for Multi-Layer and Multi-Region Networks (MLN/MRN) draft-papadimitriou-ccamp-gmpls-mrn-extensions-02.txt CCAMP WG, IETF 66 July 10, 2006 Dimitri Papadimitriou (Alcatel) Kohei Shiomoto (NTT) Martin Vigoureux (Alcatel) Deborah Brungard (AT&T) Jean-Louis Le Roux (France Telecom) Ichiro Inoue (NTT) Emmanuel Dotaro (Alcatel) Gert Grammel (Alcatel)

11 Overview This draft defines GMPLS protocol extensions for Multi Layer Networks Currently two protocol extensions defined –Routing extensions for the advertisement of the Internal Adaptation Capabilities: IACD sub-TLV to be carried within the ISIS Extended IS Reacheability TLV or the OPSF Link TLV –Signaling extensions for SC inclusion exclusion A new SC subobject to be carried within the ERO and XRO

12 Next Steps Draft restructuring to focus on GMPLS protocol extensions Clarify SC Inclusion/exclusion procedures Define solution(s) for virtual TE links WG feedback required Adopt as WG doc?