Do Now – p. 112 Do you think it is okay for the government to limit free speech during times of war? Why or why not? Copy and Answer.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Schenck v US Facts of the case Charles Schenck, Secretary of the Socialist party, was charged with violating the Espionage Act of 1917 Along with.
Advertisements

Supreme Court First Amendment Case Freedom of Speech
Marbury vs. Madison (1803) Essential Skill:
The First Amendment guarantees people the right to express themselves through speech and writing – Allows everyone to hear opinions and ideas of others.
Tinker v. DeMoines ". . . In the absence of a specific showing of constitutionally valid reasons to regulate their speech, students are entitled to freedom.
II. Basis of Citizenship
Formulating a Legal Question The Case of Tinker v. Des Moines (1969)
By: Miguel Suarez. Information  1 st Amendment – Speech, press, and Assemble  Is it illegal to express your feelings in public?  Walter Chaplinsky.
Chapter 5 Civil Liberties
Landmark Cases.
Famous court cases #4 Emmitt and Jordan.
Learning target: I can analyze the Supreme Court case Schenck v. United States to understand the importance of the First Amendment.
Supreme Court Cases. What you need to know to present your case: The background of the case – What happened? – What were both sides of the argument? Constitutional.
Do Now – p. 82 Think of an interview that you have recently seen on television… – Who was getting interviewed? – What kinds of questions did the reporter.
Our First Amendment Rights
“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or.
Unit 5 p. 195 How does the Constitution protect our basic rights?
BY:ANNA GRACE,LACEY,KATIE,CATE SUPREME COURT This is a picture of the Supreme Court. The judges work here.
1.How many people make up the Supreme court? 2.How long does a member of the Supreme Court have their job? 3.What does a trial court have that the Supreme.
CALL TO ORDER Ms. Zeins decides that she is fed up with the national government’s education policy, and burns the United States’ flag in front the White.
“ Congress shall make no law respecting the establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof...” Government can neither help no hurt.
Chapter 19: Civil Liberties: First Amendment Freedoms Section 1
Eric Almberg 2005 Question 3.
The Basics The Constitution is the highest law in the United States. All other laws come from the Constitution. It says how the government works. It creates.
ET: What Would You Decide? DIRECTIONS: On a clean sheet of paper, place a heading in the upper- right corner. Read the brief case synopsis and then answer.
Bell Ringer Read the article “Searching for Details Online, Lawyers Facebook the Jury” and answer the questions. Be ready to discuss your answers with.
Can the First Amendment Save Controversial Packaging? Janet M. Evans Federal Trade Commission Presentation for NABCA Legal Symposium March 12, 2013.
Unit 2: The Constitution and the Bill of Rights. Journal #10 How was your break? What did you see on the news over the break? Any connections to class?
Freedom of Speech and Press. The Big Idea While the 1st and 14th Amendments gives Americans the right to express ideas freely, the Constitution and the.
Interpreting the Bill of Rights.  Judges - interpret meaning of citizens’ rights 1. local judges 2. states judges 3. Supreme Court *Decisions of the.
Mon., Jan. 5 Eng. 10-A Starter Answer Human Rights Qs (see next slide) Homework Read from “Universal Declaration of Human Rights” & complete Qs in Close.
 Paper Preparation We are paper boxing today. Title your paper “Supreme Decision”.
Miranda vs. Arizona Right to Remain Silent.
Formulating a Legal Question The Case of Tinker v. Des Moines (1969)
Tinker v. Des Moines Unit 4 Lesson 9.
Texas vs. Johnson Argued: March 21, 1989 Decided: June 21, 1989 By: Garialdy De Jesus.
Texas vs. Johnson and Tinker vs. Des Moines By Emily Franklin.
The Selective Service and Civil Liberties during World War I APUSH: Spiconardi.
US Government: Civil Rights & Civil Liberties Supreme Court Case Project By: Meadow Noonan.
Judicial and First Amendment Supreme CourtJudicial BranchMore Supreme Court Freedom of Religion Freedom of Speech
Due Process, including no forced testimony Unwritten power is reserved to the people or the state.
Baker v. Carr Facts  Charles Baker was a Republican who lived in Shelby County, Tennessee who argued that although the Tennessee Constitution requires.
WhoA Missouri slave What When Where Why Concept Development: Dredd Scott was a slave who argued for his freedom to the Supreme Court. Dredd Scott vs. Sanford.
Freedom of Speech: First Amendment “The test of democracy is freedom of criticism.” ~David Ben-Gurion.
FINAL REVIEW. HELPS AFTER THE CRIME AIDING AND ABETTING HIDING THE CRIMINAL.
Aim: What are the landmark First Amendment cases of the 20 th Century? Do Now: What does the First Amendment protect?
Purpose You will define 1 st amendment free speech protections using court precedent as examples.
Do Now: Are there any factors that prevent you from fully exercising your right to free speech? Are these factors fair?
Freedom v. Security during WWI. Debt Reduction Every year the government spends more money than it raises from tax revenue. It is able to do so by borrowing.
Chapter 5 Civil Liberties
Interpreting the Bill of Rights
Schenck vs United States
1st Amendment.
Civil Liberties Americans have held liberty in high regard since lost their liberties spurred a break from Great Britain. Americans valued the idea of.
Who was Charles Schenck?
Freedom of Speech GOVT Notes 6-3.
Bell Work 4/19/16 Tuesday Look back in your notes on the Bill of Rights. Which of these Amendments do you think is the most important? The least important?
How did the Charles Schenck impact the U.S. freedom of speech?
Freedom of Speech GOVT Notes 6-3.
10 Court Cases in American History
Ch. 13 Sect. 3 Obj: Explain the issue of freedom of speech
Hazelwood v Kuhlmeier 1987.
The Expansion of Expression
The Dred Scott Decision
Chapter 5 Civil Liberties
Texas v Johnson Decided 1989.
Plessy v. Ferguson Supreme Court Case 1896
Case Study: Important Supreme Court Cases
SWBAT evaluate the impact of the Supreme Court decision in Schenck v
Texas v. Johnson (1989) 491 U.S. 397 Morgan Fraley Pd. 7/8.
Presentation transcript:

Do Now – p. 112 Do you think it is okay for the government to limit free speech during times of war? Why or why not? Copy and Answer

Today’s Objectives What happened in the case of United States v. O’Brien? How did the Supreme Court make its decision? Do you think the Supreme Court made the right choice?

It is very important that you keep all of your documents together!!! United States v. O’Brien Activity You will work with a partner for this activity Each group will receive a packet of information about the United States v. O’Brien Supreme Court case Read through each of the following documents… The Story Behind the Case Relevant Case Arguments for the United States Arguments for David Paul O’Brien Once you have read through all of the documents, complete the analysis worksheet together

Helpful hint… This is the background and will help on Q’s 1-3 This is an example of precedent and will help on Q’s 4-5 This is the argument against O’Brien This is the argument for O’Brien

If you finish early… Come on up to get a survey card that will be sent into the Boston City Council hearing this Tuesday. Please bring it back to your seat, read it over, and fill it out if it applies to you.

United States v. O’Brien Decision Does the Selective Service Act, which requires young men to carry draft cards at all times and bans the destruction of draft cards, violate the right of free speech as protected by the First Amendment? You make the call

United States v. O’Brien David Paul O’Brien was arrested for burning his draft card but claimed a 1965 law against it limited his freedom of “symbolic speech” In a 7-1 decision, the Supreme Court decided that the government can limit free expression under four conditions including… When it is important to a government interest When that government interest is unrelated to free speech When free speech is not limited any more than is necessary The Court decided that the 1965 law against destroying draft cards was in fact constitutional The Selective Service Act remained in force and O’Brien’s conviction was upheld Notes p. 113

MEAL Paragraph Do you agree with the Supreme Court’s decision in the United States v. O’Brien? Why or why not? ain Idea vidence nalysis ink State the main idea of your argument Give facts or ideas to support your argument Tell why those facts or ideas are important Restate your main idea