Overlap Removal and Timing Optimization Studies Nicole Carlson, Northwestern University 8/8/07 Supervisor: Tomasz Bold.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ATLAS PESA Meeting 20/11/02 1 B-Physics Trigger in the TDR Demonstrate viable & affordable B-physics trigger based on the evaluation of two strategies:
Advertisements

ATLAS ATLAS PESA Meeting 25/04/02 B-Trigger Working Group Work-plan This talk:
Tracey Berry1 Looking into e &  for high energy e/  Dr Tracey Berry Royal Holloway.
Sander Klous on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration Real-Time May /5/20101.
Jet Slice Status Report Ricardo Gonçalo (LIP) and David Miller (Chicago) For the Jet Trigger Group Trigger General Meeting – 9 July 2014.
Stripping Plans for 2014 and 2015 Laurence Carson (Edinburgh), Stefano Perazzini (Bologna) 2 nd LHCb Computing Workshop,
B triggering Fabrizio Palla INFN Pisa Consorzio CMS Italia Firenze 7 Sept
1 Introduction to Geneva ATLAS High Level Trigger Activities Xin Wu Journée de réflexion du DPNC, 11 septembre, 2007 Participants Assitant(e)s: Gauthier.
The First-Level Trigger of ATLAS Johannes Haller (CERN) on behalf of the ATLAS First-Level Trigger Groups International Europhysics Conference on High.
The ATLAS High Level Trigger Steering Journée de réflexion – Sept. 14 th 2007 Till Eifert DPNC – ATLAS group.
July 7, 2008SLAC Annual Program ReviewPage 1 High-level Trigger Algorithm Development Ignacio Aracena for the SLAC ATLAS group.
1 W’  tb  lnubb: the first read. 2 introduction sample: W’  tb  lnubb generator: PYTHIA number of events: 5000 will only use events in the good run.
New Run IIb L1Cal EM Algorithm Greg Pawloski Rice University Run IIb L1Cal Meeting May 31, 2005.
The ATLAS trigger Ricardo Gonçalo Royal Holloway University of London.
Real Time 2010Monika Wielers (RAL)1 ATLAS e/  /  /jet/E T miss High Level Trigger Algorithms Performance with first LHC collisions Monika Wielers (RAL)
Axel Naumann, DØ University of Nijmegen, The Netherlands 28 June 2002 ACAT02 1 Session IV: Innovative Algorithms The Sum Statistics Clusters by Content.
Acceleration Based Pedometer
Tracking at the ATLAS LVL2 Trigger Athens – HEP2003 Nikos Konstantinidis University College London.
Finding dense components in weighted graphs Paul Horn
The New TrigDecision Nicolas Berger, Till Eifert, Ricardo Gonçalo Physics Analysis Tools session ATLAS Software Workshop – Munich, March 2007.
Faster tracking in hadron collider experiments  The problem  The solution  Conclusions Hans Drevermann (CERN) Nikos Konstantinidis ( Santa Cruz)
What’s in the ATLAS data : Trigger Decision ATLAS Offline Software Tutorial CERN, August 2008 Ricardo Gonçalo - RHUL.
Copyright © 2000 OPNET Technologies, Inc. Title – 1 Distributed Trigger System for the LHC experiments Krzysztof Korcyl ATLAS experiment laboratory H.
Trigger validation for Event size TrigDecision Jets Electrons Ricardo Gonçalo, RHUL Physics Validation Meeting – 9 October 2007.
C.ClémentTile commissioning meeting – From susy group talk of last Wednesday  Simulation and digitization is done in version (8) 
The Region of Interest Strategy for the ATLAS Second Level Trigger
Control in ATLAS TDAQ Dietrich Liko on behalf of the ATLAS TDAQ Group.
Recent Software Issues L3 Review of SM Software, 28 Oct Recent Software Issues Occasional runs had large numbers of single-event files. INIT message.
Optimising Cuts for HLT George Talbot Supervisor: Stewart Martin-Haugh.
HEP 2005 WorkShop, Thessaloniki April, 21 st – 24 th 2005 Efstathios (Stathis) Stefanidis Studies on the High.
News from Atlantis Event Display Qiang Lu, Mark Stockton, Juergen Thomas, Peter Watkins (Birmingham) Hans Drevermann (CERN) Andrew Haas (Columbia) Eric.
DPDs and Trigger Plans for Derived Physics Data Follow up and trigger specific issues Ricardo Gonçalo and Fabrizio Salvatore RHUL.
Trigger input to FFReq 1. Specific Issues for Trigger The HLT trigger reconstruction is a bit different from the offline reconstruction: – The trigger.
A Pattern Recognition Scheme for Large Curvature Circular Tracks and Its FPGA Implementation Example Using Hash Sorter Jinyuan Wu and Z. Shi Fermi National.
Trigger ESD/AOD Simon George (RHUL) Ricardo Goncalo (RHUL) Monika Wielers (RAL) Reporting on the work of many people. ATLAS software week September.
1 “Steering the ATLAS High Level Trigger” COMUNE, G. (Michigan State University ) GEORGE, S. (Royal Holloway, University of London) HALLER, J. (CERN) MORETTINI,
Cern -April 24, 2007Atlas Data Quality Workshop M. Primavera1 Muon EF Data Quality Muon EF Data Quality M. Primavera - I.N.F.N. Lecce on behalf of Muon.
The ATLAS Trigger: High-Level Trigger Commissioning and Operation During Early Data Taking Ricardo Gonçalo, Royal Holloway University of London On behalf.
Navigation Timing Studies of the ATLAS High-Level Trigger Andrew Lowe Royal Holloway, University of London.
IOP HEPP: Beauty Physics in the UK, 12/11/08Julie Kirk1 B-triggers at ATLAS Julie Kirk Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Introduction – B physics at LHC –
28 July 2006 CERN REU Status Report 1 Lindsey Gray, University of Florida RCT Trigger Supervisor and Database Project Status Lindsey Gray Advisors: Dr.
Implementing ISA Server Caching
Artemis School On Calibration and Performance of ATLAS Detectors Jörg Stelzer / David Berge.
PESAsim – the e/  analysis framework Validation of the framework First look at a trigger menu combining several signatures Short-term plans Mark Sutton.
MOORE MOORE (Muon Object Oriented REconstruction) Track reconstruction in the Muon Spectrometer MuonIdentification MuonIdentification Reconstruction and.
FTKSim Status and plans FTK Meeting 07/13/2006 F. Crescioli, M. Dell'Orso, G. Punzi, G.Volpi, P. Giannetti.
4/9/2007RPC converter1/18 RPC bytestream converter: Brainstorming a summary of discussions involving M.Bianco, G.Cataldi, G.Chiodini, E.Gorini, A.Guida,
Software offline tutorial, CERN, Dec 7 th Electrons and photons in ATHENA Frédéric DERUE – LPNHE Paris ATLAS offline software tutorial Detectors.
The PESAsim analysis framework What it is How it works What it can do How to get it and use it Mark Sutton Tania McMahon Ricardo Gonçalo.
General requirements for BES III offline & EF selection software Weidong Li.
Performance of the ATLAS Trigger with Proton Collisions at the LHC John Baines (RAL) for the ATLAS Collaboration 1.
SARAH MARIE BRUNO HGCAL OVERVIEW Endcap More sensitive to radiation Crystals degrade quickly and must be replaced – expensive!
Mark OwenManchester Christmas Meeting Jan Search for h ->  with Muons at D  Mark Owen Manchester HEP Group Meeting January 2006 Outline: –Introduction.
Muon HLT: status of the algorithms and performance Sergio Grancagnolo for the Muon HLT group.
Peter ClarkeATLAS software week / Berkley 9-13 May 2000ATLFAST status report Status of ATLFAST integration into Gaudi P.Clarke H.Phillips E. Richter-Was.
IceCube DAQ Mtg. 10,28-30 IceCube DAQ: Implementation Plan.
ATLAS UK physics meeting, 10/01/08 1 Triggers for B physics Julie Kirk RAL Overview of B trigger strategy Algorithms – current status and plans Menus Efficiencies.
ATLAS B trigger Overview of B trigger Di-muon algorithms Performance (efficiency/rates) Menu for data taking experience 7/1/20101ATLAS UK Meeting,
MTA ETA. Product Description A real-time simulation system that estimates the expected time that it will take a certain bus to arrive at an end- user’s.
T2 Jet Reconstruction Studies
High Level Trigger Studies for the Efstathios (Stathis) Stefanidis
The First-Level Trigger of ATLAS
MOORE (Muon Object Oriented REconstruction) MuonIdentification
Low Level HLT Reconstruction Software for the CMS SST
Julie Kirk Rutherford Appleton Laboratory
integration in HLT-status and prospects
Samples and MC Selection
CHEP La Jolla San Diego 24-28/3/2003
Clustering-based Studies on the upgraded ITS of the Alice Experiment
Presentation transcript:

Overlap Removal and Timing Optimization Studies Nicole Carlson, Northwestern University 8/8/07 Supervisor: Tomasz Bold

2 ATLAS Trigger System Allotted 40 ms Allotted 4 s

3 RoI’s in the LVL1 Detector

4 HLT Selection Process 2 most Important Features: 1)Early Rejection Principle 2)Regions of Interest (RoI’s) RoI’s from LVL1 Chain Signature Algorithm TE’s

5 Reason for the Overlap Algorithm If one wants a jet + electron in one event from the calorimeter, it is important when looking at the combined signature to make sure they come from different eta/phi If two TE’s have exactly the same RoI eta/phi position, then they probably originated from the same cluster The chain needs to be stopped (since in reality, both TE’s describe the same physical object)

6 Basic Method ComboAlgo to compare 2 or more types Path: offline/Trigger/TrigAlgorithms/TrigGenericAlgs/Algo Overlap.h (NEW PACKAGE!) Compare the actual center distance between two RoI’s with a user-defined minimum center distance If the actual distance (of the specific TE’s) is smaller, then the chain is stopped Otherwise, the chain continues

7 Navigation Structure (w/o features) of 1 Event Electron and jet overlap so no TE created Electron and jet overlap so no TE created Electron and jet overlap so no TE created

8 Extra Features: 1) Higher multiplicity Triggers can be handled by this algorithm e.g. with jet + electron + tau, the algorithm will compare jet, e; jet, tau; e, tau (within the same event) Given 3 TE, if one of the combinations fails (say jet, e), then the whole set will fail and no output TE will be created

9 Extra Features: 2) User can specify minimum eta and phi distances instead This allows for tighter control along one coordinate Algorithm rejects those pairs which have both actual eta and phi distances smaller than the user-defined mins

10 Timing Studies 1: Overhead of timing, monitoring, and caching 4 Cases: 1) Timing & Validation Enabled 2) Timing Disabled/Validation Enabled 3) “Online Mode”: Timing & Validation Disabled 4) Caching Disabled, Timing & Validation Enabled

11 Results

12 Key Points Disabling the timers reduces consumption in LVL2 but not in EF Disabling monitoring does not seem to have an effect Caching reduces the time by approximately a factor of 2

13 Timing Studies 2: Overhead of Framework of Algorithms The algorithms take a certain amount of time to reconstruct physical objects These are run in a steering framework which schedules them so find this scheduling time Determine this time by replacing real algorithms with dummy algorithms which do nothing

14 Results Overhead of Framework: LVL2: ~10% EF: ~ 4%

15 Fun Stuffs

16 Thanks Tomasz Bold, Till Eifert NSF, University of Michigan, CERN Summer Student Programme Jeremy Herr All the other summer students Enter away message text here.