RTT-D core educational reform areas (NIA, p. 2): Adopting standards and assessments that prepare students to succeed in college and the workplace and to.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Readiness Centers Initiative Early Education and Care Board Meeting Tuesday, May 11, 2010.
Advertisements

A relentless commitment to academic achievement and personal growth for every student. Redmond School District Graduates are fully prepared for the demands.
2011 Bridge to Excellence Master Plan Annual Update Review Division of Student, Family, and School Support Office of Finance Division of Academic Reform.
Dr. Kathleen M. Smith Director, Office of School Improvement (804) (804) (Cell) Dr. Dorothea Shannon.
How To Use Programs of Study to Develop Effective CTE Programs.
Marin Promise Partnership Networks 4 year olds enrolled in preschool Preschool attendance KOF assessment California Standards Test English Language Arts.
Career and Technical Education in Arizona adds so much value to the lives of its citizens and the state’s economy that every parent and student considers.
1 Presentation to USED Review Panel August 10, 2010 North Carolina Race to the Top Proposal R e d a c t e d.
Rutland High School Technical Review Visit Looking At Results Planning Next Steps Learning About Resources.
Academic Development and Planning for College and Career Readiness K-12 CHAPTER 11.
Catherine Cross Maple, Ph.D. Deputy Secretary Learning and Accountability
High Schools That Work A school reform design that provides a framework of goals, key practices, and key conditions for setting higher standards and accelerating.
Florida’s Race to the Top R e d a c t e d. 2 Florida’s Courage to Reform School and district grades A – F Differentiated Accountability High School Grades.
DRAFT Building Our Future 2017 Fulton County Schools Strategic Plan Name of Meeting Date.
Transforming Learning in High School for College and Career Success.
Understanding Stimulus Funding and Leveraging Philanthropy to Support Long-Term Education Goals A Webinar for the Foundation Community February 16, 2010.
Texas High School Project and the Texas Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (T-STEM) Initiative Texas Regional Collaboration March 6, 2007.
Strategic Planning Board Update February 27, 2012 Draft - For Discussion Purposes Only.
School Progress Index 2012 Results Mary Gable- Assistant State Superintendent Division of Academic Policy Carolyn Wood - Assistant State Superintendent.
WELCOME. AGENDA  LCFF/LCAP Review  LCAP Process  Community Input/Findings  2014/15 LCAP  Plan Alignment- LEAP/LCAP/SPSA  Planning and Input.
PROFESSIONAL ORGAINIZATIONS LEADERSHIP FORUM AUGUST 6-7, 2013 NYSACTE RECOMMENDATIONS FOR COLLEGE AND CAREER READINESS.
Pennsylvania Department of Edward G. Rendell Governor, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Dr. Gerald L. Zahorchak Secretary of Education.
The Power of US Putting AISD’s Strategic Plan Into Action.
Iowa’s Teacher Quality Program. Intent of the General Assembly To create a student achievement and teacher quality program that acknowledges that outstanding.
Montgomery County Public Schools, Maryland Middle School Reform in Montgomery County Public Schools Linda Ferrell Director Director Middle School Instruction.
Strategic Planning Update Kentucky Board of Education January 31, 2012.
MEASURES OF COLLEGE AND CAREER READINESS AND SUCCESS July 16, 2013.
Communication System Coherent Instructional Program Academic Behavior Support System Strategic FocusBuilding Capacity.
PANAMA-BUENA VISTA UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT
Mission The faculty and staff of Pittman Elementary School are committed to providing every student with adequate time, effective teaching, and a positive.
Texas Science Technology Engineering and Math (T-STEM) Initiative Robin Gelinas—Texas Education Agency Director of Policy Initiatives.
2009 Closing the Expectation Gap Fourth Annual 50-State Progress Report on the Alignment of High School Policies with the Demands of College and Careers.
High School Inc. Academies at Valley High School April 26, 2011 Jane A. Russo, Superintendent Dawn Miller, Assistant Superintendent, Secondary Division.
Race to the Top Scope of Work Broward County Public Schools.
DIPLOMAS NOW SUMMER INSTITUTE JULY 7-9, 2011 BOSTON, MA Welcome to Day 2!
The Challenge We must realize that the system is the cause of weak execution due to lack of clarity, commitment, collaboration and accountability resulting.
HEE Hui For Excellence in Education June 6, 2012
U.S. Department of Education Reform Agenda Overview April 2010.
The Improving Teacher Quality State Grants Program California Postsecondary Education Commission California Mathematics & Science Partnership 2011 Spring.
A significant and historic opportunity for states to collectively develop and adopt a core set of academic standards in Mathematics and English/Language.
March 12, Common Core Standards  K-12  Feedback by April 2, 2010, and finalized early spring.  Professional.
MARYLAND’S REFORM PLAN RACE TO THE TOP.  Maryland’s initiatives are about reform, not simply the money.  Reform efforts will continue with or without.
Oregon’s Approach: Policies and Practices that Link Economic and Workforce Development NGA Policy Advisors Institute September 19, 2005.
Greenville Technical Charter High School Strategic Plan Developed October 2014.
Dr. Nancy S. Grasmick July 26,2012.  Maryland is proud to be the top-ranked state in U.S. growth as reported in this study, and judged by Education Week.
1. Administrators will gain a deeper understanding of the connection between arts, engagement, student success, and college and career readiness. 2. Administrators.
By Billye Darlene Jones EDLD 5362 Section ET8004-1B February, 2010.
Rowland Unified School District District Local Education Agency (LEA)Plan Update Principals Meeting November 16, 2015.
January 15, Utilization of the Personal Curriculum.
Planning for School Implementation. Choice Programs Requires both district and school level coordination roles The district office establishes guidelines,
Principal – Adriene Stephenson. Enrollment – 371 General Education – 83% SPED – 17% LEP – Less than 1% African American – 75% White – 22% Asian, Hispanic,
Multi-year Academic Acceleration Plan (MAAP) and Community Plan for Accountability in Schools (ComPAS) Oakland Unified School District January 31, 2007.
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
Friday Institute Leadership Team Glenn Kleiman, Executive Director Jeni Corn, Director of Evaluation Programs Phil Emer, Director of Technology Planning.
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation South East High School March 11, 2015.
Elementary [166] K-8 [36] Middle [37] Secondary [1] High School [52] K-12 [1] Manhattan [53] Brooklyn [40] Bronx [18] Queens [176] Staten Island [6] 293.
The Future of CTE February 18, Career Readiness Career Ready is Postsecondary Ready! 2/3 of all jobs will soon require postsecondary education or.
2010 NATIONAL EDUCATION TECHNOLOGY PLAN Eva Perez EDIT 654 OL.
Local Control Accountability Plan Update, Renewal, Review Santa Barbara Unified School District
Minnesota’s Promise World-Class Schools, World-Class State.
Education 2018: Excellence for Every Student Presented to the Board of Education August 27,
Office of School Turnaround Center for Accountability and Improvement, Ohio Department of Education 25 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio
Aim: Does the US need to reform the educational system? Do Now: Make a list of the best aspects of the education you receive and make a list of the worst.
ICN, December 18, 2009 Agenda  DE Updates  January Workshops  AEA Snapshots  Sustaining and Increasing Capacity  Next Steps.
Kansas Education Longitudinal Data System Update to Kansas Commission on Graduation and Dropout Prevention and Recovery December 2010 Kathy Gosa Director,
Mission Motto Learning for Life
Worlds Best Workforce Annual Report
KAESP 2012 Spring Retreat April 2, /15/2018.
RACE TO THE TOP: An Overview
Eden Collegiate High School Eden CISD School Board Presentation
Presentation transcript:

RTT-D core educational reform areas (NIA, p. 2): Adopting standards and assessments that prepare students to succeed in college and the workplace and to compete in the global economy; (b) Building data systems that measure student growth and success and inform teachers and principals about how they can improve instruction; (c) Recruiting, developing, rewarding, and retaining effective teachers and principals, especially where they are needed most; (d) Turning around the Nation’s lowest-achieving schools. PROCESS: Critical strategies OUTPUTS: Produced by strategies RESULTS by Cohort: Short-term (1-2 year) changes RESULTS by Cohort: Long term (3-5 year) organizational changes SUSTAINABLE SYSTEM CHANGES (5+ years) ED Inputs: Grant funding, budget, TA, support, monitoring, etc. Program management to oversee implementation and transformation within school district, and project evaluation. ED provides continuous TA and support, monitoring and progress reports. Develop college and career pathways through curriculum and summer programs. ED ensures high quality grant performance of grantees. Progress in implementation of an RTTD project plan. Absolute Priority 1: Personalized Learning Environments designed to significantly improve learning / teaching through personalization of strategies, tools, & supports for students & educators (NIA p. 4). Competitive Preference Priority – Results, Resource Alignment, and Integrated Services that work to integrate public or private resources in a partnership designed to augment the schools’ resources (NIA p. 4). Provide equity and opportunity for all students and use data to drive accountability: HISD will strategically use data to track and monitor performance and hold leadership accountable to a set of objective standards, including the reduction of opportunity gaps. Increase the number of effective and highly effective teachers and principals: HISD will ensure teacher and principals are well-prepared, high- quality leaders and prepared to strongly influence students by improving the quality of instruction district-wide. Increase the number of students who are college- and career-ready: HISD will develop district-based systems of college and career pathways at the high school level that connect core college preparatory academics and with rigorous technical learning through project-based and work-based learning, all within a small learning community environment. External Factors/Context: Houston ISD L 2 = EARN! Absolute Priority 4: Non-Rural LEAs in non-RTT States: More than 50% of the participating students in non-rural LEAs in states that didn’t receive the RTT phase 1, 2, or 3 award; 86% of school students are eligible for free and reduced lunch; Leadership changes in HISD, TEA, Board, and Executive Leadership (Cabinet); Changes in state/federal legislation; Asset of business /corporate partnerships; Changes in state/local/federal funding; Deficiencies in technological infrastructure; Adverse local economic trends/events Implement rigorous instruction standards and bring innovation into the classroom through technology and other personalized methods. Implement the Effective Teachers (ETI) and Effective Principals Initiatives (EPI). Scale up and reform activities for project sustainability. Align Project goals and objectives, performance measures, and other metrics with the Board Monitoring System to ensure districtwide data- driven accountability. Review State & District policies and update District policies to ensure District schools’ flexibility, policies, infrastructure, and autonomy will support project scope, goals and objectives. Raise the bar through rigorous instructional standards and supports: HISD will stay current on emerging best practices and new innovations in teaching and learning in order to best prepare students to live and work productively in a new economy with new technology. Promote innovation and continuous improvement. Scale up and translate into meaningful reform to support district-wide change. - Higher standards focused on college/career readiness. - Students empowered to drive their own learning. -Students have well-rounded 21 st century education. -More students are ready for current industry careers with the capacity to succeed in college. -Higher student engagement, lower dropout rates, higher graduation rates -Comprehensive online K-12 curriculum fully aligned to Texas math/literacy standards. -Access to college-readiness courses at all levels. - Established industry partnerships. -Students capable of using technology for collaborative critical inquiry. -Teachers literate in technology. -A strong first cohort and scalable model. -Programs offered that are aligned with labor market and student interest/need. -High-quality methods of instructional delivery. -Comprehensive career development programs. - Strong recruiting/staffing policies and practices. - Rigorous & fair teacher & principal appraisal systems. - Safe environment standards. - Robust leadership development. Goal 5 (end of project): -60% of all college-going students, 75% of Hispanic college-going students and 75% of African American college-going students will have attained a postsecondary degree within 6 years. Goal 4 (end of project): - At least 55% of all parents (from elementary, middle and high schools combined) will participate in college admissions process info sessions. - 95% of participants will aspire to pursue college [GPRA]. - 18% increase in participants on track to CCR within 4 years of the project [GPRA]. - 25% of participants on track to CCR post grant [GPRA]. Goal 4: Increase enrollment in post- secondary education (each year). - 4% increase in the number of students participating in an AP/dual credit course. - 5% increase in the number of students participating in an Advanced Technical Credit course. - 6% increase in the % of participating students aspiring to pursue college education [GPRA]. - 2% increase in the % of students graduating who attend college within at least one year of graduation. Goal 2: Decrease achievement gaps of students (each year). -5% increase in teachers and principals rated as effective/highly effective [GPRA]. -Campuses will decrease achievement gap of those meeting state standards by half between lowest and highest achieving special population group. Goal 2 (end of project): -Campuses will decrease the achievement gap of those meeting the state standards by half between the lowest achieving ethnic group in the cohort and the highest achieving ethnic group in the district on all math and reading tests taken as measured by the most recent state assessment. - 90% of teachers will integrate linked learning into classrooms. - 95% of students will integrate technology into PBL activities. Goal 3 (end of project): - 5% increase in HS graduation rate - 0.3% increase in avg. daily attendance to reach 96.5%. - Close opportunity gaps - Assigned Data person in the District Provide equity and opportunity for all students and use data to drive accountability Goal 1: Increase student achievement (each year). -10% Differentiated instructional strategies. -95% of teachers in the cohort trained in differentiated instruction. Improved program management/ reporting progress towards achievement of goals. Sustainable structures, practices and policies that will help districts to continue strategies independently. R ACE TO THE T OP —D ISTRICT H OUSTON I NDEPENDENT S CHOOL D ISTRICT Goal 3: Increase the rate of high school graduation (each year). - 98% of students will be promoted to the next grade level [GPRA]. Goal 1 (end of project): - 3% increase in elem. reading/language arts and math [GPRA]. - 2% increase in 8 th grade reading/language arts, math, science, and social studies [GPRA]. - 3% increase in high school Algebra 1, Biology, English 1 [GPRA]. - By the end of the grant period, 75% or more of teachers will use differentiated instruction at least 40% of the time. ASSUMPTIONS: HISD can prepare all children to enter college and/or careers of their choice; Partners will fulfill their commitments to HISD; HISD is committed to continuing its efforts once funding ends; Cohort model is an effective approach for fulfilling overall program goals; HISD will roll-out a systemic and system-wide project. INPUTS: Resources that go into the RTT-D project Texas state standards as context for academic standards. Leadership & expertise in the district. Mechanisms in place for seeking and acting upon community and stakeholder feedback. PowerUp Initiative 1-1 laptops for all high school students. $1.89 billion Bond Program to replace & repair 40 schools across the district, including 29 high schools over the next 6-8 years & technology upgrades. Engage parents and increase their capacity to ensure their children are college and career ready. Communicate internally and externally the goals, objectives, and progress of the program. - More engaged families. -Parents become informed teaching partners. -Parents become advocates and ensure quality and sustainability in the district. - Higher accountability of program fidelity. - Higher engagement of all stakeholders. Additional parent workshops related to college/career readiness will occur (at least 2 above baseline per high school and per middle school, and at least 1 above baseline per elementary). Baseline – Parents and advocates will be more engaged and empowered to support students in college and career readiness. Create Secondary Transformation Leadership Team to drive project. 4 annual cohorts of high schools and “feeder” schools with at least 40% free and reduced lunch students. Goal 5: Increase postsecondary degree attainment (no short term). Key: Student Teachers/Admin System