Polk County Crash Data Overview Source: MnCMAT Crash Data, 2007-2011 -- Severe is fatal and serious injury crashes (K+A). 6/1/2012 5 Year Crashes Polk.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Driving in Urban Traffic
Advertisements

Speed Limits 25 Speed Limits 35 Speed Limits 50 Speed Limits 55 Speed Limits 65.
County Road Safety Plans Experiences with Development and Implementation Richard (Rick) West, PE Otter Tail County Public Works Director/County Engineer.
Safety at Signalized Intersections. Signalized Intersections FHWA Safety Focus Areas 2.
Jurisdictionally Blind Safety Roadway Departure Crash
Project Development – High Priority Segments 1/24/2011 Rumble StripE Lane Width? Rumble Strip 2 ft. shoulder paving* (up to 6 miles/year**) + rumble stripE.
Hardin County Engineering Department September 12, 2006.
Carver County Crash Data Overview Source: MnCMAT Crash Data, Severe is fatal and serious injury crashes (K+A). 6/15/ Year Crashes Carver.
Red-Light Running. 2 Traffic Signals Red-Light Running 3 Intersection Fatalities There were 8,657 intersection fatalities in 2007.
City of Evansville and Vanderburgh County Intersection Crash Analysis.
HSM Applications to Two-Lane Rural Highways Predicting Crash Frequency and Applying CMF’s for Two-Lane Rural Highway Intersections - Session #6 6-1.
Pedal Cyclist Accidents in Leeds Dave Sherborne Road Casualty Manager Leeds City Council July 2007.
Everyday Driving Skills
The Green Cross Code Nottinghamshire County Council.
TRAFFIC SIGN BY kru Somjai Triratsuk Warning Signs School Signs Slipper Road Turn left Curve Right.
All Roads Transportation Safety (ARTS) Program Kevin J. Haas, P.E. Traffic Investigations Engineer, ODOT February 26, 2015.
Safety and Design National Technical Services Team 1 Systematic Approach to Intersection Safety May 11, st Annual Missouri Traffic and Safety Conference.
1 MnDOT County Roadway Safety Plans Review Meeting 1 Metro June 21, 2012.
IDAHO’S CRASH PROBLEM & PROGRAMS. Mission - Zero traffic deaths on Idaho roads Fewer than 200 annual traffic deaths by 2012 Goals.
Chapter 15 Driving in Rural Areas.
Project Development – High Priority Segments -- ATP 2 10/29/2012 Road Surface? Paved Gravel Segment received Stars for Lane Departure Crash Density & Critical.
A Systemic Approach to Safety Management NLTAPA Annual Conference July 30, 2012 Hillary Isebrands, P.E., PhD.
City of Henderson Citizens Traffic Advisory Board NDOT SAFETY UPDATE.
Timothy E. Barnett, P.E., PTOE State Safety Operations Engineer Alabama Department of Transportation.
1 Ramsey County Review Meeting 1 June 21, Metro* County Crash Data Overview 2 Source: MnCMAT Crash Data, Severe is fatal and serious injury.
1 Washington County Review Meeting 1 June 21, 2012.
1 MnDOT County Roadway Safety Plans Review Meeting #1 - ATP 2 June 25, 2012.
1 Element 1: The Systemic Safety Project Selection Process Element 1: 4-Step Project Selection Process.
1 September 28, 2011 Safety Strategies Workshop Brown County Faribault County Martin County Watonwan County.
All Roads Transportation Safety (ARTS) Program Doug Bish Traffic Services Engineer Oregon Department of Transportation November 2014.
All Roads Transportation Safety (ARTS) Program Angela Kargel Region 2 Traffic Manager Oregon Department of Transportation January 2015.
How to negotiate Cardington Roundabout by Three Shires Driving Centre® Three Shires Driving Centre® G Ritchie-Copyright©1.
University of Minnesota Intersection Decision Support Research - Results of Crash Analysis University of Minnesota Intersection Decision Support Research.
Unsignalized Intersections Safety at Unsignalized Intersections.
1 Update Update MnDOT’s County Roadway Safety Plans CTS Transportation Research Conference May 23, 2012 CH2M HILL, SRF Consulting Group, P.E. Services.
1 Watonwan County Review Meeting 1 August 31, 2011 CH2M HILL, SRF Consulting Group, P.E. Services.
Name Agency Date, Year Understanding Younger Drivers.
Jurisdictionally Blind Safety Doug Bish OTCDC March 8th.
1 Marshall County Review Meeting 1 June 25, 2012.
1 Red Lake County Review Meeting 1 June 25, 2012.
ATP 2 Crash Data Overview Source: MnCMAT Crash Data, Severe is fatal and serious injury crashes (K+A). 6/1/ Year Crashes ATP 2 7,072.
Intersection Analysis March / Intersection Crash Collection Years = Remove animal crashes (TYPE= 08 and 09) Influence areas = 150’
Slower vehicle speeds (under 30 mph) means less severe crashes 90% reduction in fatalities, 76% reduction in injury crashes 75% fewer vehicle conflict.
2011 National Association of County Engineers Conference Mn/DOT County Roadway Safety Plans April 20, 2011 CH2M HILL, SRF Consulting Group, P.E. Services.
ATP 1 County Road Safety Plan 1 Brad Estochen MnDOT Office of Traffic, Safety and Technology
Iihs.org Automated enforcement. Number of U.S. communities with speed cameras and red light cameras January 2016 Automated enforcement uses technology.
Traffic Signs Part Two. What do these 2 signs tell you?
Rural Intersection Decision Support - Crash Analysis Rural Intersection Decision Support - Crash Analysis Presented at Pooled Fund Meeting April 19, 2004.
Test Site Spirio Rd Left Turn #1 Scored Right Turn #1 Scored Right Turn #2 Scored Right Turn #3 at Stop Light, Scored.
1 Faribault County Review Meeting 1 August 31, 2011 CH2M HILL, SRF Consulting Group, P.E. Services.
1 Polk County Review Meeting 1 June 25, ATP 2 County Crash Data Overview 06/25/2012 Source: MnCMAT Crash Data, Severe is fatal and serious.
1 St. Louis County Review Meeting 1 August 29, 2011 CH2M HILL, SRF Consulting Group, P.E. Services.
Unit 5 VEHICLE HANDLING SAFE VEHICLE CONTROL
District 6 – Safety Applications
Intersection Crash Analysis in the State of Oregon
Florida Department of Transportation
'. \s\s I. '.. '... · \ \ \,, I.
What factors lead to older drivers’ crashes?
Highway Safety Team Staff Meeting SMART Portal HSIP Application Demonstration Systemic Safety Improvement (SSI) November 21,2017.
Chapter 15: Driving in Rural Areas
Managing Time and Space Vehicle Positioning
Minnesota Driver’s Manual – Chapter 3
D R I V E R S E D G E USA Curriculum Use mouse to advance slides.
2018 Summit of the National Association of State Motorcycle Safety
' '· \ ·' ,,,,
Crash Severity for Lane Departures Crashes
HSM Applications to Multilane Urban Suburban Multilane Intersections
HSM Applications to Multilane Urban Suburban Multilane Intersections
Managing Time and Space Vehicle Positioning
Contributing Factors for Focus Crash Types and Facility Types Raghavan Srinivasan University of North Carolina Highway Safety Research Center (UNC HSRC)
Presentation transcript:

Polk County Crash Data Overview Source: MnCMAT Crash Data, Severe is fatal and serious injury crashes (K+A). 6/1/ Year Crashes Polk 1, Year Crashes Polk 1, State System 763 – 50% 30 – 42% State System 763 – 50% 30 – 42% CSAH/CR 247 – 16% 31 – 44% CSAH/CR 247 – 16% 31 – 44% Rural 184 – 74% 30 – 97% Rural 184 – 74% 30 – 97% Urban 63 – 26% 1 – 3% Urban 63 – 26% 1 – 3% All Way Stop 0 – 0% All Way Stop 0 – 0% Run off Road 67 – 68% 7 – 54% Run off Road 67 – 68% 7 – 54% On Curve 16 – 24% 2 – 29% On Curve 16 – 24% 2 – 29% Example All – % Severe – % Example All – % Severe – % Right Angle – 7 (33%), 0 (0%) Head On/SS Opp – 5 (24%), 0 (0%) Rear End – 3 (14%), 0 (0%) Right Angle – 7 (33%), 0 (0%) Head On/SS Opp – 5 (24%), 0 (0%) Rear End – 3 (14%), 0 (0%) Thru-Stop 21 – 68% 0 – 0% Thru-Stop 21 – 68% 0 – 0% Rear End – 2 (33%), 0 (0%) Left Turn – 2 (33%), 0 (0%) Rear End – 2 (33%), 0 (0%) Left Turn – 2 (33%), 0 (0%) Signalized 4 – 13% 0 – 0% Signalized 4 – 13% 0 – 0% Inters-Related 47 – 28% 10 – 36% Inters-Related 47 – 28% 10 – 36% City, Twnshp, Other 525 – 34% 10 – 14% City, Twnshp, Other 525 – 34% 10 – 14% Inters-Related 31 – 49% 0 – 0% Inters-Related 31 – 49% 0 – 0% Not Inters-Related 23 – 37% 1 – 100% Not Inters-Related 23 – 37% 1 – 100% Run Off Road – 7 (30%), 1 (100%) SS Pass – 3 (13%), 0 (0%) Rear End – 3 (13%), 0 (0%) Run Off Road – 7 (30%), 1 (100%) SS Pass – 3 (13%), 0 (0%) Rear End – 3 (13%), 0 (0%) Animal 14 – 8% 2 – 7% Animal 14 – 8% 2 – 7% Not Inters-Related 99 – 58% 13 – 46% Not Inters-Related 99 – 58% 13 – 46% Head On, SS Opp 8 – 8% 6 – 46% Head On, SS Opp 8 – 8% 6 – 46% On Curve 2 – 25% 1 – 17% On Curve 2 – 25% 1 – 17% Unknown/Other 9 – 14% 0 – 0% Unknown/Other 9 – 14% 0 – 0% Unknown/Other 24 – % 5 – % Unknown/Other 24 – % 5 – % Other/Unknown 6 – 19% 0 – 0% Other/Unknown 6 – 19% 0 – 0% Right Angle – 8 (38%), 4 (50%) “Other” – 5 (24%), 3 (37%) Head On – 2 (10%), 1 (13%) Right Angle – 8 (38%), 4 (50%) “Other” – 5 (24%), 3 (37%) Head On – 2 (10%), 1 (13%) Thru-Stop 21 – 45% 8 – 80% Thru-Stop 21 – 45% 8 – 80% Run Off Road – 8 (32%), 1 (50%) SS Opp – 2 (8%), 1 (50%) Rear End – 3 (12%), 0 (0%) Run Off Road – 8 (32%), 1 (50%) SS Opp – 2 (8%), 1 (50%) Rear End – 3 (12%), 0 (0%) Other/Unknown 25 – 53% 2 – 20% Other/Unknown 25 – 53% 2 – 20% Not Animal 170 – 92% 28 – 93% Not Animal 170 – 92% 28 – 93% All Way Stop 1 – 2% 0 – 0% All Way Stop 1 – 2% 0 – 0% Signalized 0 – 0% Signalized 0 – 0% Ped/Bike 0 – 0% Ped/Bike 0 – 0% Non Ped/Bike 63 – % 1 – % Non Ped/Bike 63 – % 1 – %

Animal, ACCTYPE=08,09 Rear End, DIAG=01 Left Turn, DIAG=03 Right Angle, DIAG=05 Run off Road, DIAG=04, 07 (Road departure) Head On, SS Opp, DIAG=08, 09 (Lane departure) Curve-Related, ROAD CHAR=05-08 State, SYS=01, 02, 03 CSAH/CR, SYS=04, 07 City, Twnshp, Other, SYS=NOT 01-03, 04 or 07 Urban, City coded Rural, City not coded (0000) Intersection-Related, JUNC=2-7, Not Intersection-Related, JUNC=1, 8-11 Other/Unknown, JUNC=90, 98, 99, 00 Signalized, TCD=01 All-Way Stop, TCD=02, 03 Thru-Stop/Yield, TCD=04, 05 Other/Unknown, TCD=>06 and 00 Code Guide 4/11/2012