Planning for Clean Air: An Introduction to the “SIP Process” SIP 101.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 SAFETEA-LU Changes to the Transportation Conformity Rule February 21, 2008.
Advertisements

EDDIE TERRILL AIR QUALITY DIVISION DEPT. OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY AUGUST 21, 2014 EPA’s 111(d) Clean Power Plan Rule: A DEQ Perspective.
Rider 8 Technical Workgroup Development. Introduction - Rider 8 Program for Ozone 74 th State Legislative Session authorized and budgeted to assist areas.
Air Quality Legislations in OR and WA Pius Ndegwa Animal Waste Nutrients and Air Quality Specialist, Biological Systems Engineering Washington State University.
Transportation Conformity and Development of Emission Budgets.
Chapter 56 Workgroup Orientation Session The Road to Chapter 60 June 30, 2007.
Update: National Ambient Air Quality Standards Association of California Airports September 15, 2010 Phil DeVita.
What options do states have? What is Georgia planning to do? What are some of the other states doing? What are the possible implications to permit fees?
Planning for Clean Air:
New Source Review (NSR) Program Basics and Highlights of the Proposed Tribal Major Nonattainment and Minor NSR Rules Laura McKelvey, Jessica Montañez,
Overview of the Tribal New Source Review (NSR) Rule U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards (OAQPS) Research.
New Source Review Reform Vera S. Kornylak, Associate Regional Counsel EPA Region 4 Office of Regional Counsel and Gregg Worley, Chief, Air Permits Section,
Air Quality 101: Clean Air Act Overview/ Update. 2 Origins of the Clean Air Act Historic air pollution Donora, Pennsylvania, – PSD, tribes.
Air Pollution Control Board October 1, 2008 Thomas W. Easterly, P.E., DEE, QEP Commissioner, Indiana Department of Environmental Management We Protect.
Air Quality Beyond Ozone and PM2.5 Sheila Holman North Carolina Division of Air Quality 6 th Annual Unifour Air Quality Conference June 15, 2012.
Tribal Benefits from State Implementation Plan (SIP) Process Involvement Rosanne Sanchez New Mexico Environment Department Air Quality Bureau.
Criteria Pollutants Criteria pollutants selected because they are ubiquitous, have multiple sources, and "may reasonably be anticipated to endanger public.
A&WMA Georgia Regulatory Update Conference Current State of the Air in GA Jac Capp, GA EPD, Branch Chief, Air Protection Branch April 16, 2013.
Minnesota Air Quality and Attainment Status Frank Kohlasch Kari Palmer Statewide Travel Demand Coordinating Committee Meeting October 14, 2010.
AIR QUALITY for the Interagency Wilderness Fire Resource Advisor 2011 SOUTHERN AREA ADVANCED FIRE AND AVIATION ACADEMY Discussion Topics: Very Brief Overview.
EPA Update- Bob Judge Maine Air Quality Monitoring Committee April 18, ) NAAQS schedule 2) Budget 3) Technical Systems Audit.
2015 FTIP/FSTIP Workshop Transportation Conformity Wade Hobbs FHWA CADO January 15, 2014.
Update on EPA Oil and Gas Activities Greg Green, Outreach and Information Division, OAQPS.
Air Quality Management China City Mobilization Workshop Joseph Paisie USEPA Beijing, China.
SIP Development and Implementation in New Mexico - and Why it Matters to Tribes Rita Bates Planning Section Chief Air Quality Bureau New Mexico Environment.
Restoring and protecting Louisiana’s coast David Peterson – La. AG’s Office – Asst. Attorney General - AG Designee to CPRA Ken Ortego – Vilar and Elliott.
Presentation for Air Quality Coalitions The 2015 Proposed Ozone Standard.
Transportation Conformity in North Carolina. Transportation Planning Framework Required by NCGS §136 ‑ In MPOs, includes 20 year fiscally constrained.
Summary of Rulemaking in California for the Forensic Alcohol Laboratories Regulation Review Committee Cathy L. Ruebusch, RN, MSN Office of Regulations.
Distinguishing: Clean Air Act, EPA Rules, Regulations and Guidance David Cole U.S. EPA, OAQPS Research Triangle Park, NC.
Sound solutions delivered uncommonly well Understanding the Permitting Impacts of the Proposed Ozone NAAQS Pine Mountain, GA ♦ August 20, 2015 Courtney.
1 National Ambient Air Quality Standards and State Implementation Plans North Carolina Division of Air Quality National Ambient Air Quality Standards and.
Clean Air Act and New Source Review Permits EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Research Triangle Park NC March
1 SJVAPCD DRAFT SCHEDULES May 2, Hr OZONE ATTAINMENT DEMONSTRATION PLAN PM10 ATTAINMENT DEMONSTRATION PLAN.
Designations for 24-Hour PM2.5 NAAQS: Overview and Guidance Amy Vasu PM2.5 Workshop June 20-21, 2007.
Final Clean Air Fine Particle Implementation Rule Briefing for NTAA EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards April 17, 2007.
Jessica Montanez Environmental Protection Agency NEW SOURCE REVIEW (NSR) PROGRAM.
1 Mississippi Air Quality Update Mississippi Dept. of Environmental Quality Air Division August 5, 2011.
Administrative Law The Enactment of Rules and Regulations.
NAAQS and Criteria Pollutant Trends Update US EPA Region 10.
Clean Air Act SAFE 210. Purpose Protect public health and regulate air emissions Addresses both stationary and mobile sources.
Carrie Paige – EPA Region 6, Dallas David Cole – EPA OAQPS, RTP, NC Introduction to Air Permits Introduction to Air Permits.
TRIBAL DECISION ON IMPLEMENTATION TAS/DELEGATION/TIP TIP/TAS Training December 3, 2012.
1 Special Information Session on USEPA’s Carbon Rules & Clean Air Act Section 111 North Carolina Division of Air Quality Special Information Session on.
TAS and TIP Swinomish Tribe and the Incremental Approach.
Applying for Treatment in the Same Manner as a State for Sections of the Clean Air Act National Tribal Forum May 12, 2014.
Nonattainment New Source Review (NA NSR) Program Raj Rao US Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards ,
Air Quality, Transportation Conformity, and the FSTIP FTIP/FSTIP Workshop February 9, 2016.
OAQPS Update WESTAR April 3,  On March 12, 2008, EPA significantly strengthened the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for ground-level.
Perspective on Contingency Mitigation Options Presented by John Annicchiarico, Senior Engineer August 17, 2015.
SIP 101 Kristin Patton SIP Project Manager, Air Quality Division Presented to Environmental Trade Fair and Conference May 3, 2016.
New Ozone NAAQS Impacts: What Happens Next with a Lower O3 Standard? Nonattainment Designation and Industry’s Opportunity to Participate New Ozone NAAQS.
Environmental Quality Board May 16, 2007
TRANSPORTATION CONFORMITY
Developing a Tribal Implementation Plan
HB 328 SITING OF SOLID WASTE MANAGEMNT FACILITIES
Submittal And Review Of New And Revised Water Quality Standards
National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS)
New Source Review (NSR) Program Basics
Water Quality Standards Submittal & Review Process
Clean Air Act Glossary.
Final Rulemaking Nonattainment Source Review 25 Pa. Code, Chapter 121
Clean Air Act (CAA) Purpose
Overview of New Source Review (NSR)
Tribal Authority Rule (TAR) Overview
Clean Air Act of 1963 By: Brian Bae Period 4.
Exceptional and Natural Events Rulemaking
Sulfur Dioxide 1-Hour NAAQS Implementation
CAIR Update WESTAR October 2, 2008.
Uinta Basin General Conformity
Presentation transcript:

Planning for Clean Air: An Introduction to the “SIP Process” SIP 101

The many faces of Air Pollution!

Clean Air Act (CAA) ► Under this law EPA sets limits on how much of a pollutant can be in the air anywhere in the U.S. ► Gives EPA enforcement powers (EPA can fine a company for violating the CAA). ► States do much of the work to carry out the Act (pollution control problems are unique to the different industries and geography areas). ► Allows the public to participate in the process and request EPA or states to take action against violators.

What is the “Air Quality Management” Process ? Air Quality Management (AQM) … the process to relate National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) air quality measurements to emissions data … determine the reductions & control measures needed to meet the NAAQS. AQM is the approach, or pathway to translate measured air quality problems into a regulatory clean air plan, or State Implementation Plan (SIP). SIPs are the framework to provide for control measures that “clean the air” and achieve or maintain the standards.

What is the “air quality management” process ? Enforce Action Attain/ Maintain Violate NAAQS New/Revised New Violation Designations Maintain AttainmentNonattainment SIP Revised Attain Demo Fed/Local Measures PSD SIP Action Violate Attain/ Maintain Monitor ENF New Violation EI

What is the “Air Quality Management” process ? Emission inventories, monitoring and air quality models are central to air quality management, they are tools that help to: – understand cause of an air quality standard violation – develop control strategies to reach attainment – demonstrate that selected strategies will lead to attainment – assess whether progress is made toward reaching standard

What Are The NAAQS? National Ambient Air Quality Standard set for “Criteria Pollutants”. Criteria Pollutant: A group of six widespread and common air pollutants regulated by EPA to protect health and the environment. Two NAAQS Standards Primary and Secondary: – NAAQS primary standard is to protect human health – NAAQS secondary standard, to protect public welfare and the environment

What Are The NAAQS? (continued) NAAQS set for ground level Ozone (smog), Particulate Matter, Carbon Monoxide, Lead, Nitrogen Dioxide and Sulfur Dioxide. The Act requires EPA to review these standards every five years.

What are EPA’s National Ambient Air Quality Standards? PollutantPrimary Stds.Averaging TimesSecondary Stds. Carbon Monoxide9 ppm (10 mg/m 3 )8-hour 1 1 None 35 ppm (40 mg/m 3 ) 1-hour 1 1 None Lead1.5 µg/m 3 Quarterly AverageSame as Primary Nitrogen Dioxide0.053 ppm (100 µg/m 3 ) Annual (Arithmetic Mean)Same as Primary Particulate Matter (PM 10 )50 µg/m 3 Annual 2 (Arith. Mean) 2Same as Primary 150 ug/m 3 24-hour 1 1 Particulate Matter (PM 2.5 )15.0 µg/m 3 Annual 3 (Arith. Mean) 3Same as Primary 65 ug/m 3 24-hour 4 4 Ozone0.08 ppm8-hour 5 5 Same as Primary Sulfur Oxides0.03 ppmAnnual (Arith. Mean) ppm24-hour hour ppm (1300 ug/m 3 )

What is a State Implementation Plan (SIP)? It’s a plan for “clean air!” Clean Air Act requires a general plan to achieve the NAAQS in all areas of the country and a specific plan for each nonattainment area. Each state is responsible for developing plans to demonstrate how standards will be achieved, maintained, and enforced. These enforceable plans, SIPs are developed by States (and locals).

SIPs and associated control measures are enforceable at both the state and national levels. Plans are the framework (states recipe for success) for each state's program to protect the air. States must regularly update SIPs What is a SIP? (continued)

What is a Tribal Implementation Plan (TIP)? The CAA allows tribes to obtain the authority to run CAA programs for the regulation of air resources within its boundaries. In order to be treated in the same manner as a state under the CAA, tribes must demonstrate that they meet the eligibility criteria. Tribal Authority Rule (TAR), outlines the eligibility criteria.

What is a Tribal Implementation Plan (TIP)? Tribes are not required to adopt and implement all CAA programs, or any at all. EPA determines a tribes eligibility to implement CAA programs. Tribes are not required to comply with implementation plan submittal deadlines (one of several exemptions under 40 CFR Part 49.

110(h) Requirement Not later than 5 years after the date of enactment of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, and every three years thereafter, the Administrator shall assemble and publish a comprehensive document for each State setting forth all requirements of the applicable implementation plan for such State and shall publish notice in the Federal Register of the availability of such documents.

Components of a SIP

Who is Required to Have a SIP? Each State, required and approved by EPA pursuant to Section 110 of the Clean Air Act

o Revised by State as necessary o Addresses unique air pollution problems in State o Keeping SIP updated is a continuous process o Number of submittals vary o The different terms of SIP The SIP, a Living Document

What Must a SIP Revision Do? Makes adjustments to state/local air quality rules to provide for attainment and/or maintenance of the NAAQS (section 110 of Clean Air Act)

Who is Responsible for Developing the SIP? Governor or his designee. Generally delegated to Environmental Secretary or equivalent. Local or regional agencies in some states delegated some authority, but usually not SIP adoption. –Usually limited to inspections, monitoring, etc.

 CAA or court case mandates plan revision or State/Local decide to revise its own plan.  EPA reviews SIP for completeness/approvability… propose in Federal Register.  State submits changes to EPA Regional Office.  Once approved, plan becomes Federally enforceable. How does the SIP Process Work?

What are the Steps Followed to Prepare a SIP? Determine emissions Develop strategy Determine emission changes Model to determine air quality changes Compare to NAAQS Adjust strategy as necessary and reanalyze Draft rules to implement strategy Adopt rules using state process and minimum federal public participation requirements (40 CFR Part 51) Submit to EPA EPA rulemaking

What is the State Process? Although not required, SIP revisions usually go through an environmental board (designated by environmental secretary). 30-day comment period. Public hearing/availability of SIP revision announced in state public forum (local newspapers). Public hearing. Response to comments. Legislative review (State requirement). Formal adoption. SIP submittal.

Statutory Regulatory Policy and Guidelines Court decisions EPA Policy memos What guidance exists for SIP preparation?

 Federal, State and Local Governments  Tribes  Regulated Community  Others Stakeholders

Other Organizations involved in SIP Process Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs) Other state agencies (transportation, energy) Ozone Transport Commission (OTC) Center for Clean Air Policy (CCAP) STAPPA/ALAPCO

What is the “air quality management” process ? Enforce Action Attain/ Maintain Violate NAAQS New/Revised New Violation Designations Maintain AttainmentNonattainment SIP Revised Attain Demo Fed/Local Measures PSD SIP Action Violate Attain/ Maintain Monitor ENF New Violation EI

How Long Does A SIP Revision Typically Take? State Evaluation6 months to 1 year State Rulemaking6 months to 2 years EPA Approval6 months to 18 months

Types of Submittals Drafts (not required) Prehearings Finals (official Submittal) Request for parallel processing

Types of Submittals Continued Drafts: Allows Region to review complicated or controversial revisions and resolve issues prior to prehearing. Parallel Processing: Region will publish proposed approval while State is holding its public hearing and comment period. Region can publish final approval upon receipt of final submittal if no major revisions. Drafts: Are very advantages when requesting parallel processing.

Review Time ∂ Drafts (30 days or more) ∂ Prehearings (at least 30 days, required by law) ∂ Finals (6 months to determine complete, 12 months after to act on) ∂ Request for parallel processing (same as prehearing)

Completeness Determination Appendix V of 40 CFR Part 51 sets the minimum criteria for determining whether a State submittal is an official submittal for purposes of review. Inform State within 60 days of receipt but no later than 6 months of completeness determination. Completeness determination is not a determination of approvability.

Completeness Determination Continued A submittal determined incomplete is not an official submittal. 2 parts of a completeness determination: Administrative Materials Technical Support

SIP APPROVAL SIP submittals come from State to EPA Regional Offices. EPA Regional Administrators have been delegated authority to approve most SIPs. EPA determines whether a SIP meets the requirements of the CAA and EPA regulations … approve or disapprove in Federal Register. What is the SIP approval process?

Consistency When a Region pursues an action the requires a change in the way a regulation or policy has been applied in the past, or has not been developed. Develop a Consistency Issue Paper (Region should work with their OAQPS Desk Officer). Desk Officer determines if there is an applicable work group to address the issue.

What are the steps in EPA’s Rulemaking Process? Review state submittal (EPA Regions) –“Complete” findings –Partial approval –Limited approval/disapproval –Conditional approval –Approval –Disapproval

What are the steps in EPA’s Rulemaking Process? (continued) Prepare technical support document Propose action in Federal Register Allow for comment period Respond to comments Publish final action in Federal Register

Federal Register Requirements The SIP Processing Workgroup will post new requirements on EPA’s On-Line SIP Processing Manual and incorporate all new requirements into their Regional Templates. Check with your Regional SIP Processing Workgroup Contact regarding the location of Regional Templates and Boilerplate Language. Federal Register Daily Index and Documents (1998 – Now). EPA Air Federal Register Monthly Index (appendix to EPA’s On-Line SIP Processing Manual). Federal Register Public Inspection Page, one day prior to publication. Federal Registers (HeinOnLine through EPA’s Desktop). “Federal Register Do’s and Don’ts” (EPA’s On-Line SIP Processing Manual SIP Message Board). “Federal Register Document Drafting Resources.” Action Development Process Library (ADP Library). Regional Material in eDocket (RME) and Federal eRulemaking Portal (Agency internal and public sites).

Problems Impacting the Approval of SIPs Plans that do not meet CAA or EPA rules and Guidelines … or not consistent with court case Regulations that are vague, missing test methods, or technical justification … incomplete Regulatory relaxation without justification X

What Happens if a SIP Revision is Not Submitted/Disapproval? New Source Review permitting sanctions: –After 18 months sanctions clock –2 to 1 offset Highway funding sanctions: –After 24 months sanctions clock Federal Implementation Plan (FIP): –Within 24 month sanction clock –Not permanent

How Do Sanctions Work? SIP revision required by a set date. EPA finding of failure to submit starts 18-month clock. After 18 months New Source permitting sanctions imposed. After 24 months FHWA is required to impose funding moratorium for all but exempt projects (safety, mass transit). State air grants are subject to moratorium also. Within 24 months EPA to promulgate federal rules to correct SIP deficiency.

Section 110(l) “The Administrator shall not approve a revision to a Plan if the revision would interfere with any applicable requirement concerning attainment and reasonable further progress (as defined in section 171), or any other applicable requirement of this Act.” What the CAA says about backsliding….

Summary …How the SIP process works State/Local prepares and adopts plan after public hearing State submits SIP to EPA Regional office EPA reviews SIP for completeness … if complete … propose in FR EPA approves/disapproves plan after considering public comments After SIP approval, the plan becomes Federally enforceable If SIP Federally mandated and disapproved … then FIP promulgated CAA or court case mandates plan submittal, or State/Local decides to revise its own SIP

Where can I get more Information?

The End ….