TALENT DEVELOPMENT IN AN RTI FRAMEWORK Kristin Schlingman Hannah Coburn School District of Cudahy.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Consensus Building Infrastructure Developing Implementation Doing & Refining Guiding Principles of RtI Provide working knowledge & understanding of: -
Advertisements

Morris Community High School Systematic Approach to Implementing RtI (Response to Intervention)
Gifted Education and Response to Intervention Update on Gifted Education Workshop August 2013 Toddie Adams, Marshall County Schools.
CIP Part IV: Culture Strategies to Address School Safety/Classroom Management/Discipline/RTI Framework/Building Supportive Learning Environments.
What is RTI? RTI is a general education initiative aimed at improving student performance through the use of effective scientific research-based instructional.
PAYS FOR: Literacy Coach, Power Hour Aides, LTM's, Literacy Trainings, Kindergarten Teacher Training, Materials.
Wethersfield High School Thomas R. Moore, Principal Andrew Komar, Assistant Principal Holly Herzman, Assistant Principal Michael Maltese, Assistant Principal.
Dr. Denise P. Gibbs, Director Alabama Scottish Rite Foundation Learning Centers PST RtI STUDENT SUCCESS Christine R. Spear, Education Administrator Alabama.
Response to Intervention: What is it?. RtI is… A process for achieving higher levels of academic and behavioral success for all students through: High.
0 From TN Department of Education Presentation RTII: Response to Instruction and Intervention.
Beyond the Core Curriculum: Gifted Education in an RtI Framework
Hale Community School’s Talent Development Presentation.
North East School Division An Introduction to Response to Intervention (RTI)2009.
RTI Response to Instruction A View of the Ascension Experience.
Self Assessment and Implementation Tool for Multi- Tiered Systems of Support (RtI)
Response to Intervention: Multi- Tiered Systems for Student Success Janet Graden, PhD University of Cincinnati October, 2011.
Presented by Margaret Shandorf
Creating an RTI Culture at the District Level in order to make Sound Eligibility Decisions Oak Hills Local School District Cincinnati, Ohio UC Summer Institute.
DRIVING INSTRUCTION THROUGH DATA WITHOUT DATA IT IS JUST AN OPINION.
RTI OPTIONS FOR GIFTED AND TALENTED STUDENTS Please sit with you CESA Schools.
Webinar: Leadership Teams October 2013: Idaho RTI.
Horizon Middle School June 2013 Balanced Scorecard In a safe, collaborative environment we provide educational opportunities that empower all students.
Wisconsin’s New Kindergarten Screener A training for the administration and scoring of the Phonological Awareness Literacy Screener.
Arshall Public Schools Walking the Talk: The Role of Leadership in Implementing an RtI Framework Presented By: Barb Sramek, District Administrator Barb.
Data Sharing Meetings Shoreline School District April 2, 2010.
AdvancEd Standard 4: Documenting and Using Results The district maintains an assessment system to monitor and document results to improve student performance.
Unified Support Services Workgroup recommendations August 2012.
Professional Learning Communities: Supporting RtI Through a Collaborative School Framework Blazing a Trail from Cedar Lane Elementary to Discovery Elementary.
Response to Intervention RTI September 2014 STAT Training.
Standards-based Elementary Report Card August 2013.
Guidance from the CSDE on SRBI Implementation May 14, 2010 CAPSS Assistant Superintendents’ Meeting Mary Anne Butler, Education Consultant Iris White,
What do you think of when you hear RtI? RtI Psychological Test.
Developing Professional Learning Communities To Promote Response to Intervention Linda Campbell Melissa Nantais.
Arlington Public Schools Gifted Services Allie Weber Resource Teacher for the Gifted Kenmore Middle School
Response to Intervention (RTI) at Mary Lin Elementary Principal’s Coffee August 30, 2013.
Back to School Night Annual Meeting for Parents of Academically Gifted Students.
Parent Information Presentation. To nurture potential in all students. To challenge those with advanced learning capabilities through differentiation.
Title I Parent Meeting at Back-to-School Night Tri-Community Elementary School September 2, 2015.
Effective Grade Level Teams Minnesota RtI Center Conference March 26, 2009 Kerry Bollman St Croix River Education District.
Parent Information Meeting Gifted & Talented Education Pam Cernocky Gifted Education Coordinator Eau Claire Area School District
RTI Response to Intervention A View of the Ascension Experience.
1 RESPONSE TO INSTRUCTION ________________________________ RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION New Opportunities for Students and Reading Professionals.
John Fuller Elementary School Pine Tree Elementary School &
RTI Response To Intervention. What is RTI ? Response to intervention is a multi – tier approach to the early identification and support of students with.
Welcome to the Gifted Services Information Night.
RtII Response to Instruction and Intervention paTTAN.
RtI 2 /ExCEL Update RtI 2 /ExCEL Update Cambrian School District February 9,
Response to Intervention – Data Teams March 5, :00 am Our session will start momentarily. While you are waiting, please do the following: Enter/edit.
Data Report July Collect and analyze RtI data Determine effectiveness of RtI in South Dakota in Guide.
A Short Overview Melcher-Dallas K-12 Gifted and Talented.
Northwest ISD Target Improvement Plan Seven Hills Elementary
RTI at Fort Logan Elementary By name. By need. Day 1.
MacArthur Elementary School Curriculum Night September 17, 2015 September 21, 2015.
NOTE: To change the image on this slide, select the picture and delete it. Then click the Pictures icon in the placeholder to insert your own image. THE.
DATA POINTS For Boards to Measure Success!. Our Mission Statement The School District of Fort Atkinson is committed to delivering the quality opportunities.
RtI Response to Instruction and Intervention Understanding RtI in Thomspon School District Understanding RtI in Thomspon School District.
The Highly Capable Learner Program Report to the Parent Advisory Susan Peterson, Director of Special Programs.
Welcome to the Gifted Services Information Night  Swanson Middle School  Ms. Sharen Humann  Resource Teacher for the Gifted.
Learning Resource Team: Aligning Systems To Support All Learners What does this look like in our school? 3/9/20161.
The True RtI: Teacher-Led Learning Groups Presented by: Kirk Elementary B uilding L eadership T eam Millington, MI Andrea Lahnanen, KDGMelissa Trato, 1.
Response to Intervention Instruction. Agenda Ultimate Purpose Components of RtI Expectations Break Problem Solving Teams Homework.
Note: In 2009, this survey replaced the NCA/Baldrige Quality Standards Assessment that was administered from Also, 2010 was the first time.
MTSS MULTI-TIERED SYSTEMS OF SUPPORT A LOOK AT THE SYSTEMS TODAY IN CALIFORNIA GAIL LANCASTER –ASSOCIATE FACULTY NATIONAL UNIVERSITY/FRESNO CAMPUS RESOURCE.
DPI Javits Grant: Expanding Excellence Initiative State Leadership Cadre March 2016.
Refining & Aligning: Recommendations for preparation policy to support rti2 and Special Education in Tennessee Kim Paulsen, vanderbilt university Blake.
Program Evaluation Leading & Learning Spring 2016
TAG and the Law
What is does it mean to be a Title I School?
Beyond the Core Curriculum: Gifted Education in an RtI Framework
ABC Unified School District
Presentation transcript:

TALENT DEVELOPMENT IN AN RTI FRAMEWORK Kristin Schlingman Hannah Coburn School District of Cudahy

Introductions… ● About Us... ● Name ● District ● Role ● Explain your district’s level of alignment of G/T within an RtI framework

Objective for today: To share our story and explain how the School District of Cudahy aligns the Talent Development program within an RtI framework.

Agenda ● Demographics ● Past Practices ● Current Beliefs ● Principles of RtI and Talent Development ● Identification process in Cudahy ● Communication/Documentation ● Continuing Growth

FACTS ABOUT CUDAHY ● Population: Approximately 18,000 ● Ethnicity: 88% Caucasian, 10% Hispanic, also a small percentage of Serbian and Albanian residents ● Number of Schools: 5 elementary, 1 middle school, 1 high school ● Free/Reduced Population: 60%+ ● Number of Talent Development Support Personnel: 1.5 FTE

PREVIOUS GIFTED AND TALENTED SERVICES IN CUDAHY ● Looked at WKCE solely ● Used SAGES 2 for K-2 identification or as a confirming assessment ● Kids were in or out of the program ● Projects not necessarily aligned to curriculum ● 3rd-6th grade focus ● Provided enrichment for many students, but didn’t necessarily address specific needs of advanced students. ● Limited communication with teachers and parents

Flaws we believed existed in our Gifted and Talented Program/Process: ● Limited data used ● Progress monitoring non-existent ● Lack of parent/teacher communication ● Lack of tracking information regarding services previously provided ● No specific goals identified ● Not tied to standards

OUR BELIEFS ● Intelligences are dynamic ● Giftedness is inclusive ● Educational systems are responsive *These three beliefs align with RtI (Response to Intervention/Instruction)

PRINCIPLES OF RtI ● Addresses both academic and behavioral domains ● Systematic process for instruction and intervention/enrichment ● Provides a process for decision making based on clear data for every student ● Requires continuous progress monitoring and formative assessments to drive instruction ● Responds to learner’s needs

Gifted Students, Gifted Services, and Response to Intervention (RtI) RtI handout

What we did next…(over 4 years) ● Established working relationship with RtI district team ● Developed a Gifted and Talented district leadership team (consisted of administrators and teacher reps from each elementary building) ● Developed criteria for various programming ● Researched and purchased resources for advanced programming for both in and out of school opportunities ● Created a flowchart for identification of advanced students ● Networked with other districts within CESA 1 ● Determined screeners to be used for identification for services ● Created documentation forms ● Developed a resource handbook for both teachers and parents ● Changed title of services from Gifted and Talented to Talent Development ● Scheduled meetings with classroom teachers regularly to discuss individual student needs and review data ● Began having family nights to share information about our services and to bring families together

RtI FOR TALENT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES

IDENTIFICATION PROCESS FLOWCHART ● Determining students need of Talent Development Services ● Analyze data...STAR, PALS, AIMSweb ● Data documentation Data documentation ● Meet with classroom teachers of students that fit criteria to discuss student needs. ● Oct and Jan. ● Discussion includes…how is this student performing in class? Do you believe they need additional opportunities/challenges? ● We do not exclude students because they are not performing in class…these can be our underachievers and these kids still need to be challenged. The underachievement may be from not feeling challenged by the core curriculum

● Determine what appropriate opportunities to provide for students and when they will be provided ● Most services will be provided by TD coordinator during the student’s Intervention/Enrichment time 45 min. each). ● Some of these opportunities include ● Jr. Great books ● Center for Gifted Education Lang. Arts ● Future Problem Solvers ● Contexts for learning ● WCATY Courses ● Update the list with Tier of service needed for each studentlist ● Any student determined to need Tier 3 services would then go through our Student Service Team for further review. (See information on Flowchart) (See information on Flowchart)

COMMUNICATION/DOCUMENTATION ● Student Plans ● Student Support Profile (Tier 2) ● Advanced Learning Plan (Tier 3) ● Sent home with report cards ● Update progress after 2nd and 4th quarters ● Use of mail merge to complete plans with ease Use of mail merge ● Parent Information night held in October to share information about services offered in our district.

CONTINUING OUR GROWTH...things we need to keep doing/improving... ● Continuing to improve our communication with teachers/parents ● Aligning specific goals with specific opportunities ● Develop progress monitoring to align with goals. ● Identification of Kindergarten (outliers) ● Locating additional resources for services ● Evaluating our services