A continuum of services for ALL children Response to Intervention: Guidance for Federal Funds Office of Consolidated Planning & Monitoring.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Response to Intervention Funding Issues. The Question Is… Can RTI be an allowable part of a federally funded program? NOT Can federal funds pay for RTI?
Advertisements

Implementing RTI Using Title I, Title III, and CEIS Funds Key Issues for Decision-makers U.S. Department of Education 1.
RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION Policy & Practice Institute June 25, 2008 Mike Stetter and Lori Duerr Delaware Department of Education.
Implementing RTI Using Title I, Title III, and CEIS Funds
Title I, Part A and Section 31a At Risk 101
Title I, Part A Targeted Assistance 101 Field Services Unit Office of School Improvement.
RtI and Title I in Wisconsin
April 2009 Copyright © 2008 Mississippi Department of Education Instructional Programs and Services Coordinated Early Intervening Services (CEIS) April.
Implementing RTI Using Title I, Title III, and CEIS Funds Key Issues for Decision-makers.
CHANGING ROLES OF THE DIAGNOSTICIAN Consultants to being part of an Early Intervention Team.
Today’s Objectives What is RtI and why it is here – Consensus-building Preparation for 2010 Implementation: – Three Tiers of Services – Data Analysis.
1 Visions of Community 2011 March 12, 2011 The Massachusetts Tiered System of Support Madeline Levine - Shawn Connelly.
Consolidated Planning & Monitoring August 2014
Demonstrating Comparability School Year October 2014October 2014.
Office of Special Education Fall Forum 2013 General Initiatives and the Role of Special Education.
District Planning in ePlan July Consolidated Planning & Monitoring Eve Carney Executive Director Renee Palakovic Director of Planning
Serving English Language Learners with ESEA Title III, Part A Funds.
Provided by Education Service Center Region XI 1 Title I, Part A Overview Provided by Education Service Center Region XI
RESPONSE TO INSTRUCTION AND INTERVENTION (RtII) Adapted from School District of Philadelphia Rtii Materials.
0 1 1 TDOE’s accountability system has two overarching objectives and Growth for all students, every year Faster growth for those students who are furthest.
School-wide Consolidation 2015 ESEA Directors Institute August 26, 2015.
Coordinated Early Intervening Services (CEIS). 34 CFR § : An LEA may not use more than 15 percent of the amount the LEA receives under Part B of.
Federal Programs Fall Conference Title I and the ACIP Logan Searcy and Beth Joseph.
2015 ESEA Directors Institute
Overview of Title I Part A Farwell ISD. The Intent of Title I Part A The intent is to help all children to have the opportunity to obtain a high quality.
Response to Intervention: Guidance for Federal Funds ESEA Directors InstituteESEA Directors Institute October 6-9, 2014October 6-9, 2014.
Virginia Department of Education Division Leadership Liaison Meeting January 7, 2013.
Consolidated Funding ApplicationConsolidated Funding Application ESEA Directors InstituteESEA Directors Institute October 6-9, 2014October 6-9, 2014.
NCLB Federal Funding Planning Meeting Private Non Profit Schools LEA Date.
Fiscal Topics 2015 ESEA Directors Institute August 2015.
ESEA Directors Institute 2014ESEA Directors Institute 2014 ESEA DirectorsESEA Directors Wednesday, October 8, 2014Wednesday, October 8, 2014.
Providing Effective Equitable Title I Services to Non-Public School Students ESEA Directors InstituteESEA Directors Institute October 2014October 2014.
Winston/Salem Forsyth County Schools RESPONSIVENESS TO INSTRUCTION (RTI)
Overview of Title I Part A Prepared by: Title I Staff - Office of Superintendent of Instruction OSPI Dr. Bill Wadlington, Superintendent/Principal and.
Implementing School Plans in ePlan
Title I, Part A Improving Basic Programs Program Requirements and Guidelines.
1 RESPONSE TO INSTRUCTION ________________________________ RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION New Opportunities for Students and Reading Professionals.
ESEA - Non-public Equitable Services Annual Consultation Meeting for Participating Schools Office of Consolidated Planning & MonitoringOffice of Consolidated.
Lori Wolfe October 9, Definition of RTI according to NCRTI ( National Center on Response to Intervention) Response to intervention integrates assessment.
Schoolwide Programs – New Guidance Karen Seay, Director Federal Policy and ESEA Research Division New Directors’ Training September 17-18, 2015
1 46th Annual PAFPC Conference May 5, 2015 MARIA GARCIA Schoolwide Program Manager DIVISION OF FEDERAL PROGRAMS Title I Schoolwide Programs.
TARGETED ASSISTANCE SCHOOLS 2010 Title I Administrative Meeting Maryland State Department of Education Julia B. Keleher, Ed. D, PMP April 13, 2010.
SUPPLEMENT, NOT SUPPLANT SUPPLEMENT, NOT SUPPLANT TESTS District Level: Maintenance of Effort School Level: Comparability of Services Child Level: Educational.
RtI Response to Instruction and Intervention Understanding RtI in Thomspon School District Understanding RtI in Thomspon School District.
What are the Differences Between Targeted and Schoolwide Title I Programs?
Winter  The RTI.2 framework integrates Common Core State Standards, assessment, early intervention, and accountability for at-risk students in.
Focus Schools Grant Monitoring and Support Consolidated Planning and Monitoring September 2015.
Teaming/Data/Interventions RtI Infrastructure: Teaming RtI Partnership Coaches meeting January 6, 2011 Terry Schuster, RtI Partnership Lead Coach.
Department of Exceptional Student Education The School District of Palm Beach County.
RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION (RTI) MASFPS LANSING, MICHIGAN NOVEMBER, 2008 Leigh Manasevit Brustein & Manasevit 3105 South Street NW Washington, DC (202)
Understanding the Title I Program. Renee Palakovic Director of Planning Division of Consolidated Planning & Monitoring (615)
Title I: Ranking, Serving, and Allocating Funds to Schools 2016 ESEA Directors Institute August 23, 2016.
Source: The National Council of State Title III Directors
School-wide Consolidation: LEA Panel
ESSA Updates: Non-public / Private Schools Equitable Services
Equitable Services to Private Schools Series
2016 ESEA Directors Institute Title III Directors
End of Year Report and Renewal Process
Private School Consultation
Private School Consultation
Winding Your Way through Program Details: Titles II-A & VI
Title III Fiscal Requirements and ESSA changes
Title III of the No Child Left Behind Act
Response to Intervention R. E. A. C. H
The Role a Charter School Plays in its Charter Authorizer’s Submission of the Consolidated Federal Programs Application Joey Willett, Unit of Federal Programs.
Studio School Title I Annual Meeting Title I Program Overview for Schoolwide Program (SWP) Schools Federal and State Education Programs Branch.
ANNUAL TITLE I MEETING NOBLE ACADEMY COLUMBUS.
Response to Intervention in Illinois
Title I Program Overview for SWP
Maintenance of Effort, Comparability & Supplement, Not Supplant
Presentation transcript:

A continuum of services for ALL children Response to Intervention: Guidance for Federal Funds Office of Consolidated Planning & Monitoring

Who’s in the room? ► Teachers ► School Principals ► Other school personnel ► District personnel ► State personnel ► Others ► Title I School-wide Schools ► Involved in school improvement planning team ► Involved in district strategic planning team 2

What made you choose this session? On the note card provided, explain why you chose this session. Specific questions Topics of interest Areas of concern 3

A continuum of services for ALL children Objectives & Overview 4

Session Objectives ► Provide overview of RTI 2 and how ED grants can support ► Review RTI 2 guidance document ► Discuss RTI 2 programs in other districts ► Answer questions you may have 5

Overview ► Response to Instruction and Intervention (RTI 2 ): a framework for addressing student needs, not a specific service or activity ► State guidelines require LEAs to use an RTI 2 process to determine whether a student has a Specific Learning Disability (SLD); however, LEAs are not limited from using ED grants to support RTI 2 activities to provide opportunities for struggling students 6

Program Definitions ► Title I ► The purpose of Title I is to ensure that all children have a fair, equal, and significant opportunity to obtain a high-quality education. Title I provides funds to improve achievement of the lowest-achieving students – those who are failing, or are most at risk of failing, to meet State academic achievement standards – enrolled in high-poverty schools. Footer 7

Program Definitions ► Title II ► Improving teacher and leader quality by providing resources for professional development (not direct services to students). Footer 8

Program Definitions ► Title III ► The purpose of Title III is to help ensure that limited English Learners (ELs) master English and meet the same challenging State academic achievement standards that all children are expected to meet. ► Provide high-quality language instruction educational programs. ► Provide high-quality professional development for classroom teachers. Footer 9

Program Definitions ► IDEA Part B ► The purpose of IDEA is to ensure that students with disabilities have access to a free appropriate public education (FAPE). ► FAPE must include special education and related services designed to meet a student’s unique needs and prepare him or her for further education, employment, and independent living. Footer 10

Program Definitions ► IDEA Part B ► Coordinated Early Intervening Services (CEIS) is a set of coordinated services for students in kindergarten through grade 12 (with a particular emphasis on students in K-3) who are not currently identified as needing special education or related services, but who need additional academic and behavioral support to succeed in a general education environment Footer 11

A continuum of services for ALL children RTI 2 TDOE Guidance for Federal Funds uments/66e43acb bbba-7b3df90ea431.pdf 12

What is RTI 2 ? ► RTI 2 : ► A process where schools use data to identify students at risk for poor learning outcomes, monitor student progress, provide evidence-based interventions- adjusting the intensity and nature of those interventions depending on a student’s responsiveness 13

What is RTI 2 ? ► Goals: ► All students have access to high-quality instruction responsive to their needs ► Early identification of struggling students ► Determining whether a student has a Specific Learning Disability (SLD) under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). 14

What is RTI 2 ? ► Tennessee RTI 2 components ► Tier I – Core Instruction 80-85% ► Tier II – Targeted Intervention 10-15% ► below 25 th percentile or district/school cutoff ► Tier III – Targeted Intervention 3-5% ► below 10 th percentile or 1.5 to 2 grade levels behind or district/school cutoff 15

What does TN require regarding RTI 2 ? ► The Tennessee State Board of Education approved Special Education Guidelines and Standards regarding Evaluations for Specific Learning Disabilities that require all districts and schools to use RTI 2 to determine the eligibility of students to receive special education services in the category of SLD, effective July 1,

What does TN require regarding RTI 2 ? ► The new Board-approved Guidelines address one facet of an RTI 2 framework: determining a student’s eligibility for special education services based on an SLD under IDEA. 17

How do the new state guidelines impact the use of ED Grant funds for RTI 2 ? ► ED’s largest grant programs – including Title I, Title II, Title III and IDEA – are governed by supplement not supplant provisions: ED grant funds must be used for services in addition to what a district or school would be expected to provide with state or local funds as part of a basic educational program. 18

A continuum of services for ALL children Exercise 19

RTI 2 Across TN ► Break into your groups ► Introduce yourselves ► Identify a note taker to share at least two items of interest ► Discuss the following: 1. How are you implementing RTI 2 in your district or school? 2. Who is responsible for progress monitoring? 3. Who is providing interventions? 4. What funds are used to support RTI 2 ? 20

A continuum of services for ALL children Funding RTI 2 21

Generally, how can you fund RTI 2 ? ► Tier I ► Typically considered core instruction and funded through the state and local resources ► Tiers II & III ► ED Grants and state and local resources ► Supplemental resources supporting eligible populations ► District Coordination of RTI 2 ► Typically funded through the state and local resources 22

Can ED Grant funds support Tier I activities? ► Title I School-wide Program ► Improving the curriculum ► Reorganizing school day and resources ► Professional development 23

Can ED Grant funds support Tier I activities? ► Title II, Part A ► Support all teachers and leaders in learning new core content and instructional strategies to implement college-and-career-ready standards ► Assist teachers in improving classroom behavior ► Assist teachers in using data to improve instruction 24

Can ED Grant funds support Tier I activities? ► IDEA, Part B ► Provide professional development to both regular and special education teachers on meeting the needs of students with disabilities in the regular education environment 25

Can ED Grant funds support Tier I universal screeners? ► Typically considered core instruction and funded through the state and local resources and ED Grant funds use is restricted because of: ► Title I regulations ► IDEA regulations ► Supplement not Supplant provision 26

Can ED Grant funds support Tier I universal screeners? ► School-wide Programs ► To be allowable, this scenario presumes each of a district’s schools is responsible for purchasing its own universal screener – not made at the district level on behalf of all schools AND ► It were part of the school’s comprehensive Title I SW plan for improving its educational program consistent with its needs ► The district must demonstrate it provided the school with all of the state and local resources it would have received if it did not participate in the Title I program (based on how the district allocates resources to schools) 27

Can ED Grant funds support Tiers II & III? ► Tiers II & III: Interventionists ► Title I, Part A ► District: could not use Title I to pay for these costs in Title I schools and then use state or local funds to pay for the same costs in non-Title I schools ► School-wide: all costs must be consistent with the school’s needs assessment and school-wide plan ► Targeted assistance: targeted to specific students ► Title II, Part A ► Provide PD to interventionists to identify appropriate interventions for the core academic subjects they teach, or ► Effective instructional methods, include managing student behavior 28

Can ED Grant funds support Tiers II & III? ► Tiers II & III: Interventionists ► Title III ► Provide resources to identified ELs ► IDEA, Part B Coordinated Early Intervening Services (CEIS) ► Hire interventionists to work with nondisabled students who have not reached grade-level proficiency 29

Can ED Grant funds support Tiers II & III? ► Tiers II & III: Intervention Tools ► Title I, Part A ► District: could not use Title I to pay for these costs in Title I schools and then use state or local funds to pay for the same costs in non-Title I schools ► School-wide: all costs must be consistent with the school’s needs assessment and school-wide plan, including materials and supplies ► Targeted assistance: targeted to specific students ► Title II, Part A ► Provide PD to assist teachers and leaders to identify appropriate interventions for the core academic subjects to support their use of high-quality intervention materials 30

Can ED Grant funds support Tiers II & III? ► Tiers II & III: Intervention Tools ► Title III ► Provide resources to identified ELs ► IDEA, Part B Coordinated Early Intervening Services (CEIS) ► Purchase supplemental materials and supplies needed for nondisabled students ► Provide PD to support the use of high-quality intervention materials 31

Can ED Grant funds support Tiers II & III? ► Tiers II & III: Progress Monitoring ► Title I, Part A ► District: could not use Title I to pay for these costs in Title I schools and then use state or local funds to pay for the same costs in non-Title I schools ► School-wide: all costs must be consistent with the school’s needs assessment and school-wide plan, including progress monitoring tools for use with individual students or an entire class ► Targeted assistance: targeted to specific students ► Title II, Part A ► Provide PD on how to implement progress monitoring and analyze data 32

Can ED Grant funds support Tiers II & III? ► Tiers II & III: Progress Monitoring ► Title III ► Progress monitoring tools for identified ELs when used to determine the response to intervention ► IDEA, Part B Coordinated Early Intervening Services (CEIS) ► Progress monitoring tools for nondisabled students ► Provide PD on how to conduct progress monitoring 33

Can the LEA or school split the cost of the same RTI 2 activity between one or more funding sources? ► Individual program eligibility requirements must be met at all times. ► ED grants can only pay for the part of an activity that benefits eligible participants. ► Title IIII may be able to support part of the activity to the extent it benefits eligible students (ELs) 34

A continuum of services for ALL children Exercise 35

A continuum of services for ALL children A sample student: Even with Core Instruction, Lisa struggled with decoding words. Like all 1 st graders, Lisa was screened in the fall and her reading rate was at the 20 th percentile. Lisa received targeted interventions specifically designed to address her weaknesses. Throughout the interventions, Lisa’s progress was monitored and by mid-winter her reading rate had increased to the 55 th percentile. Lisa now functions successfully with only Core Instruction. A spring rescreening of all students found that Lisa did not require any additional interventions. 36

Can the LEA or school split the cost of the same RTI 2 activity between one or more funding sources? ► Break into your groups ► Answer the question above ► What are the potential funding sources? 37

Supplement not Supplant ► Title I, Title III and CEIS each has a supplement not supplant requirement that affects the use of funds to implement RTI. ► This raises questions about using ED grants due to restrictions with Supplement not Supplant. It makes the question of allowability a situation-specific decision. 38

Supplement not Supplant ► Three basic presumptions of supplanting: ► services it provided with state or local funds in the prior year ► services LEAs are required to make available under other federal, state, or local laws ► providing services to Title I students with federal funds that it provides with state or local funds to non-title students ► NOTE: there are exceptions to these presumptions with regard to IDEA part B Maintenance of Effort and school- wide programs 39

Supplement not Supplant ► In general, the supplement not supplant requirement is intended to ensure that services provided with Federal funds are in addition to, and do not replace or supplant, services that students would otherwise receive. 40

A continuum of services for ALL children QUESTIONS?

RTI2 Resources ► spx spx ► ePlan/TDOE Resources/Response to Intervention 42

WWW. TN. GOV / EDUCATION Assigned CPM Regional Consultant

A continuum of services for ALL children 44 FRAUD, WASTE or ABUSE Citizens and agencies are encouraged to report fraud, waste or abuse in State and Local government. NOTICE: This agency is a recipient of taxpayer funding. If you observe an agency director or employee engaging in any activity which you consider to be illegal, improper or wasteful, please call the state Comptroller’s toll-free Hotline: Notifications can also be submitted electronically at: