PIXEL Slow Simulation Xin Li 3/16/2008. CMOS Active Pixel Sensor (APS) Epitaxy is a kind of interface between a thin film and a substrate. The term epitaxy.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Random Telegraph Signal (RTS) in CMOS Monolithic Active Pixel Sensors (MAPS) for charged particle tracking. Outline Reminder: The operation principle of.
Advertisements

Development of an Active Pixel Sensor Vertex Detector H. Matis, F. Bieser, G. Rai, F. Retiere, S. Wurzel, H. Wieman, E. Yamamato, LBNL S. Kleinfelder,
Geant4 simulations for the calorimeter prototypes D. Di Julio, J. Cederkäll, P. Golubev, B. Jakobsson Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Solar Cell Operation Key aim is to generate power by:
Mar 31, 2005Steve Kahn -- Ckov and Tof Detector Simulation 1 Ckov1, Ckov2, Tof2 MICE Pid Tele-Meeting Steve Kahn 31 March 2005.
Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments.
November 30th, 2006MAPS meeting - Anne-Marie Magnan - Imperial College London 1 MAPS simulation Application of charge diffusion on Geant4 simulation and.
Main detector types Multi Pixel Photon Counter (MPPC) and Charge Coupled Devices (CCDs) How does it work? 1. Photon hits a pixel producing electron hole.
Jianchun Wang Marina Artuso Syracuse University 11/06/00 MC Simulation of Silicon Pixel Detector.
Neutron Background Simulation R. Wilkinson. 2 Neutron Background Simulation Long-lived neutrons created, diffuse around collision hall They get captured.
Techniques for detecting X-rays and gamma-rays Pair production Creation of elementary particle and its antiparticle from a photon. Occurs only if enough.
Main detector types Scintillation Detector Spectrum.
Event Analysis for the Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope Robin Morris, RIACS Johann Cohen-Tanugi INFN, Pisa.
Tracker Reconstruction SoftwarePerformance Review, Oct 16, 2002 Summary of Core “Performance Review” for TkrRecon How do we know the Tracking is working?
TOF at 10ps with SiGe BJT Amplifiers
Stopping Power The linear stopping power S for charged particles in a given absorber is simply defined as the differential energy loss for that particle.
Measure Tracks decay from heavy flavor mesons. Primary tracks From D0 decays.
A new idea of the vertex detector for ILC Y. Sugimoto Nov
SPiDeR  First beam test results of the FORTIS sensor FORTIS 4T MAPS Deep PWell Testbeam results CHERWELL Summary J.J. Velthuis.
1 Semiconductor Detectors  It may be that when this class is taught 10 years on, we may only study semiconductor detectors  In general, silicon provides.
I have made the second half of the poster, first half which is made by tarak will have neutrino information. A patch between the two, telling why we do.
Device simulation of CMOS Pixel Sensors with synopsys
1 Alessandra Casale Università degli Studi di Genova INFN Sezione Genova FT-Cal Prototype Simulations.
Implementing a dual readout calorimeter in SLIC and testing Geant4 Physics Hans Wenzel Fermilab Friday, 2 nd October 2009 ALCPG 2009.
Simulation of GOSSIP/GridPix Nominal Detector, and GOSSIP in ATLAS.
Effects of Surrounding Materials on Proton-Induced Energy Deposition in Large Silicon Diode Arrays Christina L. Howe 1, Robert A. Weller 1, Robert A. Reed.
NA62 Gigatracker Working Group 28 July 2009 Massimiliano Fiorini CERN.
Technology Overview or Challenges of Future High Energy Particle Detection Tomasz Hemperek
26 Apr 2009Paul Dauncey1 Digital ECAL: Lecture 2 Paul Dauncey Imperial College London.
26 Apr 2009Paul Dauncey1 Digital ECAL: Lecture 3 Paul Dauncey, Imperial College London.
STEIN Analysis for CINEMA Using GEANT4 Seongha Park Kyung Hee University KHU/SSR,
Event Analysis for the Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope Robin Morris, RIACS Johann Cohen-Tanugi SLAC.
1 Nick Sinev, ALCPG March 2011, Eugene, Oregon Investigation into Vertex Detector Resolution N. B. Sinev University of Oregon, Eugene.
T. Lari – INFN Milan Status of ATLAS Pixel Test beam simulation Status of the validation studies with test-beam data of the Geant4 simulation and Pixel.
-1-CERN (11/24/2010)P. Valerio Noise performances of MAPS and Hybrid Detector technology Pierpaolo Valerio.
Lecture 14 OUTLINE pn Junction Diodes (cont’d)
Oct Monolithic pixel detector Update  One chip combining both sensor and read-out – source of ionization e- : epitaxial layer of chip – e- collected.
General detectors. CCDs Charge Coupled Devices invented in the 1970s Sensitive to light from optical to X-rays In practice, best use in optical and X-rays.
J. Brau LCWS 2006 March, J. Brau LCWS Bangalore March, 2006 C. Baltay, W. Emmet, H. Neal, D. Rabinowitz Yale University Jim Brau, O. Igonkina,
TPC Detector Simulators TPC Fast Simulator & TPC Response Simulator April 9, 2000 ALICE-STAR Joint Meeting.
18 Sep 2008Paul Dauncey 1 DECAL: Motivation Hence, number of charged particles is an intrinsically better measure than the energy deposited Clearest with.
10/25/2007Nick Sinev, ALCPG07, FNAL, October Simulation of charge collection in chronopixel device Nick Sinev, University of Oregon.
Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments.
Timing capabilities of Ultra-Fast Silicon Detector 1 A parameterization of time resolution A program to calculate Time resolution UFSD Timing capabilities.
FP-CCD GLD VERTEX GROUP Presenting by Tadashi Nagamine Tohoku University ILC VTX Ringberg Castle, May 2006.
MOHAMAD KHALIL APC LABORATORY PARIS 17/06/2013 DSSD and SSD Simulation with Silvaco.
Making Tracks at DØ Satish Desai – Fermilab. Making Tracks at D-Zero 2 What Does a Tracker Do? ● It finds tracks (well, duh!) ● Particle ID (e/ separation,
Multiple choise questions related to lecture PV2
An extension of Ramo's theorem to include resistive elements
Lecture 14 OUTLINE pn Junction Diodes (cont’d)
PixSim package to simulate pixel detectors digitization
Design and Characterization of a Novel, Radiation-Resistant Active Pixel Sensor in a Standard 0.25 m CMOS Technology P.P. Allport, G. Casse, A. Evans,
Min FU (co-PhD student of IPHC, Strasbourg, France
Stanislav Pospíšil et al, Brightness Vidyo meeting
Huagen Xu IKP: T. Randriamalala, J. Ritman and T. Stockmanns
Update on GEp GEM Background Rates
N. Stoffle University of Houston
Monte Carlo studies of the configuration of the charge identifier
Lecture 5 OUTLINE Semiconductor Fundamentals (cont’d)
Simulation on the Response of the STAR HFT Pixel Detector
Time-sensitive CMOS MAPS
Deviations from the Ideal I-V Behavior
Semiconductor devices and physics
GEANT Simulations and Track Reconstruction
Measure Tracks decay from heavy flavor mesons
Simulation on the Response of the STAR HFT Pixel Detector
PIXEL Slow Simulation Status Report
Beam Test Results for the CMS Forward Pixel Detector
Enhanced Lateral Drift (ELAD) sensors
Presentation transcript:

PIXEL Slow Simulation Xin Li 3/16/2008

CMOS Active Pixel Sensor (APS) Epitaxy is a kind of interface between a thin film and a substrate. The term epitaxy (Greek; epi "above" and taxis "in ordered manner") describes an ordered crystalline growth on a monocrystalline substrate. Can use the standard Integrate Circuit production process for the production. Rely on charge diffusion instead of drifting.

Simulation Process Input from GEANT3 PIXEL Geometry PIXEL response simulation Output Reference: “Modeling, Design, and Analysis of Monolithic Charged particle Image Sensors” by Shengdong Li, Univ. of California, Irvine Thank Howard Matis for birdging the communications with Shengdong Li

Input for the Simulator Track directions and inject locations at PIXEL Number of ionized pairs –For the charged particles: The number of ionized electrons/hole pairs. There are two options: Energy deposition in the detector volume from Geant. –StMcTrack->dE(). H. Matis: for thin layer of material better use the Bichsel distribution, as –H. Bichsel, "Straggling in Thin Silicon Detectors," Review in Modern Physics, vol. 60, pp. 663, 1988 Will use the Bichsel distribution as input since it’s tested with the experiment. –For neutral particles including photons (see next slides)

PIXEL Response Simulation For charged track –the ionized electron/hole pairs originate randomly along the track. –Number of ionized electrons is E/3.6eV where E is the energy deposition from the Bichsel distribution. For high energy photons and neutral particles –No good reference to our knowledge. –possible way to deal with it: For high energy photons (E>1MeV) where pair production and Compton scattering dominant: –Use Bischsel distribution if we know the pair production vertex or the Compton scattering origin for high energy photons and the electron tracks direction (need to check it). –For low energy gamma-rays below 1MeV where p.e. effect dominant, »use the energy deposition from GEANT. »1MeV may be below the lower threshold of GEANT tracking. And may have negligible effect. Need to check it. –Neglect contribution from other neutral particles since they are rare.

When electrons hit the n-well/p-epi depletion region, has very little chance to be reflected but pass through. Consequently, the n-well/p-epi interface can be recognized as a boundary with total absorption. p Well When the electron fall into the depletion region between N-Well and P-Well or the N-well region, it will be fully collected into the readout electronics. Electrons in the p-well region will be neglected. when the p-epi electron hit p-epi/p+ substrate, because p+ substracte is more heavily doped, interface is recognized as a boundary with total reflection for electrons in the epitaxial silicon. when the p+ substrate electron hit p-epi/p+ substrate interface, the interface is totally transparent. N Well p Well p-epi layer p+ substrate p Well PIXEL Response simulation - Boundary conditions When electron hits the p-epi and p- well interface, the p-well/p-epi interface can be recognized as a boundary with total reflection for electrons in the epitaxial silicon because pWell are more heavily doped and electric field in the depletion region will reflect the electron away.

PIXEL geometry questions What’s the gap between pWell and nWell? Are they fully depleted? If the gap is zero, what are the depletion thickness? What’s the thickness of p- epi layer? What’s the substrate thichness? What’s the size of the p- well and n-well? What’s the shape? Is the cubic shape reasonable approximation? N Well p Well p- epi layer p+ substrate

Question on interface between pixels N Well p Well p- epi layer p+ substrate p Well N Well p Well p- epi layer p+ substrate p Well Will the boundary be total transparent to the electrons going across the pixel boundaries?

Simulation Diagram Total integration time is 200us. If there’re still electron diffusion after this time. We will keep it and add it to the simulation for the next track hit the same pixel. This might have an impact for pileup. But according to Shengdong’s thesis, this effect is very small.

Output – PIXEL hits collection Output of each event is a collection of hits –Each hits corresponds to an object of fired pixel Each pixel object contains –PIXEL ID –Number of electrons –First 3 or more geant tracks information contribute most to the signal. Injecting location and direction of each track Contribution to the fraction of signal from each track. –Fraction of signal from p-epi layer for each track –Fraction of signal from p-substrate for each track –Fraction of signal from p-epi layer for all signals –Fraction of signal from the p-substrate for all signals –Fraction of signal from previous 200us cycle. Pileup effect?

Summary Geometry: Detailed sizes of different layers, depletion region and boundaries. Input: Deposition energy, incident angle and inject location PIXEL response simulation: How do ionized electron/hole pairs originate from charged and neutral particles? Recombination Action when crossing boundaries Output: Collection of HITS.