Radiation Protection aspects for SHIP Doris Forkel-Wirth, Stefan Roesler, Helmut Vincke, Heinz Vincke CERN Radiation Protection Group 1 st SHIP workshop,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Simulations des niveaux de radiations en arrêt machine M. Brugger, D. Forkel-Wirth, S. Roesler (SC/RP)
Advertisements

EDMS November th LHC Radiation Day RAMSES Induced Activity Monitors 5 th LHC Radiation Day CERN - 29 November 2005 RAMSES Induced Activity.
1 Activation problems S.Agosteo (1), M.Magistris (1,2), Th.Otto (2), M.Silari (2) (1) Politecnico di Milano; (2) CERN.
HIRADMAT IN THE WANF TUNNEL I. E FTHYMIOPOULOS, EN/MEF  HIRADMAT-Exp.Area Working Group  EN/MEF : I. Efthymiopoulos, A. Pardons, M.Lazzaroni, N. Gilbert.
UCN Phase 2 Design Status September 10, Design Components Bulk Shielding Target Crypt Cryogenic Insert Target Insert UCN Port Beam Window Cooling.
Activation of equipment - overview Chris Theis, Helmut Vincke - DGS/RP.
ATC/ABOC Days 21-23/1/2008 Heinz Vincke for SC-RP 1.
H IGH L UMINOSITY LHC WP1 - CERN S AFETY R EQUIREMENTS Stefan Roesler - Phillip Santos Silva – Ralf Trant EDMS# HSE Unit April 2011.
Christophe Delamare EDMS Accelerator Consolidation Workshop GS/ASE activities.
1 Induced radioactivity in the target station and in the decay tunnel from a 4 MW proton beam S.Agosteo (1), M.Magistris (1,2), Th.Otto (2), M.Silari (2)
1 Radiation Safety Aspects of the Linear Collider B. Racky, A. Leuschner, N. Tesch Radiation Protection Group TeV Superconducting Linear Accelerator.
Radiological Aspects of ILC Hee-Seock Lee Pohang Accelerator Laboratory 2 nd Workshop of Korean ILC at PAL.
Handling Electronics from Radiation Areas N. Conan, D. Forkel-Wirth, T. Otto, S. Roesler, C. Theis, C. Tromel, V. Tromel, Heinz Vincke, L. Ulrici R2E,
Vacuum Interventions in Radioactive Environments J.M. Jimenez AT Department / Vacuum Group.
WP2 Superbeam Work Breakdown Structure Version 2 Chris Densham (after Marco Zito version 1 )
Radiation Protection for the Beam Line 4 Schools project Robert Froeschl (DGS/RP)
Radiation Protection considerations concerning a future SPS dump design Helmut Vincke DGS-RP.
First AWAKE dump calculations Helmut Vincke. Beam on dump Muon axis inside and outside CERN Distances: Beam impact point to end of West hall: ~300 m Beam.
MG - IEFC meeting 22/01/20101 Linac 3 shielding S. Gilardoni, M. Giovannozzi, S. Baird, R. Brown, S. Damjanovic, T. Otto, M. Widorski, Acknowledgements:
Highlights of RP activities in support of ISOLDE operation and projects Joachim Vollaire, Alexandre Dorsival and Christelle Saury with material from others.
General RP guidelines for CENF CENF secondary beam study group H. Vincke07/05/
1 Target Station Design Dan Wilcox High Power Targets Group, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory EuroNu Annual Meeting 2012.
Update for muon studies Helmut Vincke. Additional dump calculations Two options were studied: Option 1: beam is bend by 2 degree towards soil and beam.
Beam loads & dump concepts T. Kramer, B. Goddard, M. Benedikt, Hel. Vincke.
First radiological estimates for the HIRADMAT project H. Vincke and N. Conan 1.
Secondary beam production facility layout discussions SBLNF meeting 5 th Dec M. Calviani, A. Ferrari, R. Losito (EN/STI) H. Vincke (DGS/RP)
7 November 2003 Status of CNGS NBI presented by K. Elsener 1 Status of CNGS Konrad Elsener CERN – Accelerators+Beams Division.
Activation around dump shielding, and design of beam line mask Mathieu Baudin, RP Genevieve Steele, EN-STI Helmut Vincke, RP.
LIU external beam dump review External beam dump option A: branching off from LSS6 J.L. Abelleira Thanks to: F. Velotti, B. Goddard, M. Meddahi, H. Vincke,
Radiation Protection info update C. Adorisio (DGS/RP) 17 th LTEX Meeting
ADO-PO Section Meeting Safety Group LS1 Shutdown Safety Organization.
Session 2 of ATC/ABOC Days 2008 Doris Forkel-Wirth, SC-RP Pierre Bonnal, AB-SU 1.
Recent Studies on ILC BDS and MERIT S. Striganov APD meeting, January 24.
CNGS Operation Summary Edda Gschwendtner, CERN. Outline Introduction CNGS Performance Highlights since last NBI 2010 in Japan Issues Summary 2E. Gschwendtner,
Risk Analysis P. Cennini AB-ATB on behalf of the n_TOF Team  Procedure  Documents in preparation  Conclusions Second n_TOF External Panel Review, CERN,
Considerations for an SPL-Beamdump Thomas Otto CERN in collaboration with Elias Lebbos, Vasilis Vlachoudis (CERN) and Ekaterina Kozlova (GSI) Partly supported.
Radiation Protection at the LHC Lessons Learned D. Forkel-Wirth, D. Perrin, S. Roesler, C. Theis, Heinz Vincke, Helmut Vincke, J. Vollaire CERN-SC-RP-SL.
HL-LHC Standards and Best Practices Workshop CERN, June 13, 2014 Best Practices for ALARA C. Adorisio and S. Roesler on behalf of DGS-RP.
New SPS scraping system: preliminary RP remarks Helmut Vincke DGS-RP.
EUROnu Costing Workshop May 2011 Beta-Beam Costing Exercise Elena Wildner, CERN 25/05/11 1 EUROnu Costing Workshop, CERN May 2011.
Integration and Installation Status for Collaboration Meeting Ans Pardons, 29/9/2015.
WP2 progress on safety E. Baussan EUROnu CB Meeting Monday 10th & Tuesday 11th June 2011 CERN, Geneva, Switzerland.
1 Radiation Monitoring at CTF3 CTF3 Buildings – weak spots Radiation Monitoring system Monitoring results – First Lessons Idelette Floret, Thomas Otto,
Radiation Protection Considerations for the CDR Helmut Vincke DGS-RP.
Characterization of the nTOF Radioactive Waste M. Brugger, P. Cennini, A. Ferrari, V. Vlachoudis CERN AB/ATB/EET.
R ADIATION P ROTECTION ASPECTS LSS1 LHC f RE - INSTALLATION Cristina Adorisio (CERN - DGS/RP) LTEX Meeting – May 10 th, 2012.
1 July 2004 Radiation Protection Issues 1 M.Brugger, D.Forkel-Wirth, S.Roesler, H.Vincke SC/RP Review of the LHC Collimation Project 30 June – 2 July 2004.
Lau Gatignon, Catania,  Introduction  COMPASS  NA62  SHIP L.Gatignon, SPS fixed target physics at CERN.
How to access CNGS Heinz Vincke for DG-SCR-SL RADWG3/4/
Status of the FAIR pbar target: Target handling study (M. Helmecke)
Fermilab Limited Scope Accelerator Readiness Review (ARR) October 1 -3, 2013 Technical Breakout Session 2A Radiological Safety for 700 kW Operations.
Procedure for Removal of Material and Waste from LHC P. Bonnal, N. Conan, I. Brunner, D. Forkel-Wirth, H. Menzel, S. Roesler, C. Tromel, L. Ulrici, with.
1 How Many Protons can we afford to loose in the PS ? Thomas Otto SC-RP.
J. Bauer, V. Bharadwaj, H. Brogonia, A. Fasso, M. Kerimbaev, J. Liu, S
Heating and radiological
S. Roesler (on behalf of DGS-RP)
Radiation Protection Issues After 20 Years of LHC Operation
Beam Loss and Radiation Working Group: Conclusions
The SHiP Facility Lau Gatignon / EN-MEF
Studies on Energy Deposition and Radiation for the 4horn system
News and brief overview of Beamline plans for the next few months
CATIA users meeting 07/06/2012 Material guidelines project – radiological hazard classification Helmut Vincke, Chris Theis on behalf of DGS/RP RSO committee.
Radiation protection of Linac4 M. Silari Radiation Protection Group
Accelerator and Experiment Interface Session: LS2, LS3
M. Calviani, A. Ferrari (EN/STI), P. Sala (INFN)
BG - SPS BDF - PBC WS March 2017
Fassò, N. Nakao, H. Vincke Aug. 2, 2005
C. Adorisio Extracted from the presentation given at
T-489: Induced Activity and Residual Dose Rates
CEPC Radiation and Shielding
Presentation transcript:

Radiation Protection aspects for SHIP Doris Forkel-Wirth, Stefan Roesler, Helmut Vincke, Heinz Vincke CERN Radiation Protection Group 1 st SHIP workshop, June 2014 Universität Zürich

Content General info Radiation issues at the SPS extraction area and in TDC2 Required shielding around SHIP target Residual dose rate of the SHIP target Dose rate in detector hall (only passive shielding) Activation of muon shielding 2

General info Similar number of protons on target than CNGS (but SHIP facility is close to surface) o 4×10 19 pot/year o in total (in 5 years) ~2×10 20 pot RP design is done for 7×10 13 protons (400 GeV) per pulse (every 8.4 s) i.e. 530kW ! Main Radiation Protection issues of SHIP, o Beam losses in the SPS accelerator and extraction area towards SHIP o High prompt dose around SHIP target  sufficient shielding is needed o High residual dose rate after beam stop  only remote handling possible in target area o Air activation  reduce air volume to a minimum, use He (or vacuum) in target area o Target station is located close to surface  environmental impact due to possible activation of soil and ground water. 3

RP aspects for the SPS machine Beam losses will cause: 1.Air activation 2.Residual dose rate increase 3.Dose to equipment (magnets, cables, etc..) “Estimated beam losses from high intensity beam (7×10 13 protons per extraction) are about a factor 7 higher than for CNGS beams“. (Quotation from collimator LIU review minutes) Already at nominal beam intensity the dose levels will be a factor 3-6 higher than in previous years. Without mitigation, this could lead to dose levels of 12 mSv/hr after a month of cool-down. Ways to reduce beam losses have to be investgated. 4

Beam extraction area TT20 5 ……. high dose rate levels at work places will be present to personnel during installation/modification of beam line elements. Courtesy: B. Goddard H*(10) at first splitter region … about 10 months after beam stop. Dose rate at 40cm of the element (unit : µSv/h) Dose rate on contact of the element (unit : µSv/h)

Beam extraction area TT20 6 A careful planning of these activities combined with an optimized work and dose planning will be essential. Work needs approval from CERNs ALARA committee. The concrete wall of TDC2 tunnel and the soil close to TDC2 tunnel are activated. The CE workers need to be classified as Radiation Worker, have to receive all required safety trainings and need to be individually monitored. In order to quantify the amount of activation as well as the lateral distribution (volume) of activated soil it is advised to take soil samples close to the TDC2 area. Removal of existing beam line components has to be foreseen before civil engineering work in TDC2 can start. A waiting time has to be respected before beam line equipment can be removed. SHIP provides an opportunity to improve the present situation at high beam loss points.

Benefits of radiation decay in TDC2 PMI 25 Date Dose rate at PMI 25 [mSv/h] 03/12/2012 BS + 2h /12/2012 BS + 24h /12/2012 BS + 30h /12/2012 BS + 15 days /04/2013 BS days /07/2013 BS days /09/2013 BS days0.041 In red marked zone: ~1mSv/h (at 40cm distance) after 10 months of cool down time.

o FLUKA MC code has been used to estimate the shielding requirments o No gaps or feedthroughs (for services like cooling) in the shielding; will decrease the efficiency of the target shielding. 8 Shielding around SHIP target Muon shield An absorber downstream of the last primary beam tunnel element might be needed to shield the beam line elements and to reduce their activation. Units in m Side view Front view

Residual dose rate around the SHIP target 9 Residual dose rate (in uSv/h) at the SHIP target after one operational year and different cooling times as a function of radial distance from the target center Residual dose rate (in uSv/h) around the SHIP target after one operational year at ultimate intensity and 1 month of cooling time. Target exchange will be a very delicate and demanding intervention …… and further studies and optimisation of such an intervention are necessary. Remote handling only!

Radiation level in detector hall Detector hall will be classified as a Radiation Area (during beam operation) 10 ~ 10 uSv/h ~ uSv/h concrete lead tungsten detector hall SHIP target moraine ~ 1 uSv/h

Activation of tungsten muon shield 11 Isotope production in tungsten shield Ambient dose equivalent in the tungsten shielding as a function of cooling time (after 180 days of operation, averaged (0<r<20cm) Muon shield will become slightly activated especially the upstream part

Summary & conclusion The performance of the ZS septa magnet and the induced radioactivity in the SPS extraction region requires further studies. Ways to reduce beam losses have to be investgated. Work in TDC2 requires a detailed work and dose planning. It will be an ALARA level 3 intervention which requires prior approval from the ALARA committee. Concrete in TDC2 and soil close to TDC2/TCC2 tunnel are activated. Soil samples close to extraction area would be needed to quantify the activation level of the soil. Target shielding design – massive iron/concrete shielding needed. Detector hall will be classified as a Radiation Area Muon shielding will become slightly activated. Some other RP studies (like production of radioactive waste, waste disposal, dismantling of the facility, etc. ) and environmental issues (releases of radioactivity via air or water pathways, activation of soil, etc.) are not studied yet. This will however be needed at a later stage of the project. 12

Spare slides

CERN’s Area Classification