School Improvement through Data and Best Practices Anytown Middle School Best Practice Audit Report.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Effective Self Evaluation – writing a good SEF
Advertisements

PERSONAL LITERACY PLANS AT THE SECONDARY LEVEL December 12, 2003.
WV High Quality Standards for Schools
Building Leadership Team October Agenda Big Picture Formative Overview PLC Overview SMART Goal and Action Plan Plan.
When Students Can’t Read…
Professional Growth and
North Carolina Educator Evaluation System. Future-Ready Students For the 21st Century The guiding mission of the North Carolina State Board of Education.
PORTFOLIO.
Building Effective Leadership Teams: A Practitioner’s Look
Heather Zavadsky, Ph.D. Bringing School Reform to Scale: Moving From Islands of Greatness to Successful Systems.
1 Lodi Unified School District Monitoring and Accountability A District Program Improvement Update Board of Education Study Session August 19, 2008.
Delta Sierra Middle School Napa/Solano County Office of Education School Assistance and Intervention Team Monitoring Report #8 – July 2008 Mary Camezon,
Professional Growth and
Georgia School Standards District Strategic Plan School Strategic Plan (SSP) Heavy focus on CRCT, ITBS, Perceptual Surveys Teacher Evaluation Instrument.
Managing Change Principal Leadership Academy November 2012.
The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Training Module 5: Gathering Evidence August
High Quality High Schools Education Commission of the States 2006 National Forum on Education Policy Dr. Jimmy Neitzel National Center.
PRIDE Professional Rubrics Investing & Developing Educator Excellence
Professional Learning Communities in Schools Online Workshop.
What should be the basis of
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
Professional Growth= Teacher Growth
1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.
Australian Teacher Performance and Development Framework
Session Materials  Wiki
Administrator’s Academy July 2015 Instruction & Accountability Division.
Webinar: Leadership Teams October 2013: Idaho RTI.
Leveraging Educator Evaluation to Support Improvement Planning Reading Public Schools Craig Martin
The Quality Review A Reflection.
CIV 1 Lincoln County Administrators Total Instructional Alignment.
Leadership Development Presentation to the School Board Patrick Bryan Principal on Special Assignment April 19, 2011 ACHIEVEMENT + ALIGNMENT + SUSTAINABILITY.
Math Liaison Meeting September 2014 Presenter: Simi Minhas, Math Achievement Coach Network 204.
Jackson Public School District Holistic Accountability in Action.
“Just can’t live that negative way… Make way for the positive day.” -Bob Marley Positive Vibration.
1 The Leader’s Role in School Change and Improvement GEDA 561 Leadership by Collaboration Weekend 2 November 19-20, 2010 GEDA 561 Leadership by Collaboration.
Citywide Instructional Expectations, Teacher Teams and the QR—Implications for Mary Barton SATIF CFN 204 May 17, 2013.
CFN 609 Principals’ Summer Institute Citywide Instructional Expectations Teacher Development Schools will select competencies relevant.
Setting purposeful goals Douglas County Schools July 2011.
Every Student READY. North Carolina Educator Evaluation A process for professional growth.
Effective Instructional Feedback Mike Miles July 2009.
CommendationsRecommendations Curriculum The Lakeside Middle School teachers demonstrate a strong desire and commitment to plan collaboratively and develop.
To Test or Not to Test?...that is the question! By: Sandy Church and Linda Lerch.
Instructional Leadership Team April 28, Guiding Theme for
The Olmsted Falls Continuous Improvement Process From District Leadership to Building Leadership.
Agenda Introductions Objectives and Agenda Review Research Review Taking Stock Collect evidence Principal Practices & the Rubric End-of-the-Year Looking.
Leading at All Levels to Support MDC Implementation
IMPROVING SCHOOL LEADERSHIP: LESSONS FROM OECD COUNTRIES UNESCO MEETING, 12 JANUARY 2013 Beatriz Pont, Sr. Policy Analyst Policy Advice and Implementation.
Gathering Evidence to Achieve Results.  ALL CSD students and educators are part of ONE proactive educational system.  Evidence-based instruction and.
The A.I.M. Team Canton Area Elementary School Prereferral Intervention Process.
Maine Department of Education Maine Reading First Course Session #1 Introduction to Reading First.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
Unpacking the Australian Professional Standard for Principals and the Leadership Profiles “If you don’t have a powerful point of view about what high quality.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation Sugar Grove Elementary September 29, 2010.
CFN 609 Principals’ Meeting December 6, 2012 Providing Effective Feedback Domain 1: Planning and Preparation Component 1e: Designing Coherent Instruction.
Overview of Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) for
Instructional Leadership: Planning Rigorous Curriculum (What is Rigorous Curriculum?)
EVAAS for Teachers: Overview and Teacher Reports Every Student READY.
0 ©2015 U.S. Education Delivery Institute Focus groups conducted: ▪ Teachers ▪ Board of education members ▪ Principals ▪ Union leaders ▪ Parents ▪ BPS.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
PENFIELD CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT: K-5 LITERACY CURRICULUM AUDIT Presented by: Dr. Marijo Pearson Assistant Superintendent for Curriculum, Instruction,
Indicator 5.4 Create and implement a documented continuous improvement process that describes the gathering, analysis, and use of student achievement.
Teaching and Learning Cycle and Differentiated Instruction A Perfect Fit Rigor Relevance Quality Learning Environment Differentiation.
Nevada Plan to Ensure Equitable Access to Excellent Educators A Systemic Approach to Educator Equity: Carson City School District’s Aligned “Learner-Centered”
Richard Woods, Georgia’s School Superintendent “Educating Georgia’s Future” gadoe.org Quality Comprehensive Improvement System Key School Performance Standards.
Using the Snyder Student Rubric Presentation Link:
How to Grow Administrative Leadership Through Effective Leadership
How Adults Can Work Together Presentation
SGM Mid-Year Conference Gina Graham
Presentation transcript:

School Improvement through Data and Best Practices Anytown Middle School Best Practice Audit Report

Approximately 3 Admin level people and 13 teachers took the audits. This is the summary report.

Observations and Themes There were multiple areas where practices at Anytown appear strong including collaboration, sharing strategies and a culture of using data. There were a number of “Don’t Know” answers both at the administrator level and classroom which could mean new people to the school or a signal of needing to improve communication. This school has a strong foundation. The opportunity lies in fine-tuning your practices to take them to the next level of performance. Themes for improvement include: 1.Vertical planning & instructional alignment -- shared ownership of all students and instructional coordination across grades and even feeder schools. 2.Validating instructional materials and interventions through data, proven results in other schools and revising those that are not working. 3.More frequent classroom observation with structured feedback by school leaders, as well as peer-to-peer to improve instruction and to replicate best practices. 4.Collaborative work to “unpack” the standards for better clarity on objectives and to facilitate better pacing and more instructional time. Also more focus on student work exemplars and rubrics to create common understanding of what meeting standards looks like. 5.Focus collaborative time on results, by student and objective, with clear goals and observable changes to instruction to meet each student’s needs.

Student Learning Goals & Objectives Principal Teachers Yes No

Student Learning Goals & Objectives Principal Teachers NEXT SLIDE

Student Learning Goals & Objectives Teachers

Student Learning Goals & Objectives Principal Teachers

Student Learning Goals & Objectives Principal Teachers

Thoughts and Observations?

Staff, Leadership and Professional Development Principal Teachers

Staff, Leadership and Professional Development Principal Teachers

Staff, Leadership and Professional Development Principal Teachers

Staff, Leadership and Professional Development Principal Teachers

Staff, Leadership and Professional Development Principal Teachers

Staff, Leadership and Professional Development Principal Teachers

Staff, Leadership and Professional Development Principal Teachers NEXT SLIDE

Staff, Leadership and Professional Development Teachers

Staff, Leadership and Professional Development Teachers

Thoughts and Observations?

Instructional Program and Arrangements Principal

Instructional Program and Arrangements Principal Teachers

Instructional Program and Arrangements Teachers

Instructional Program and Arrangements Principal Teachers

Instructional Program and Arrangements Principal Teachers Yes No

Instructional Program and Arrangements Principal Teachers

Thoughts and Observations?

Monitoring and Data Use Principal Teachers

Monitoring and Data Use Teachers

Monitoring and Data Use Teachers

Monitoring and Data Use Principal NEXT SLIDE Teachers

Monitoring and Data Use Teachers Yes No

Monitoring and Data Use Teachers Principal

Monitoring and Data Use Teachers Principal

Thoughts and Observations?

Recognition, Intervention and Adjustment Principal Teachers

Recognition, Intervention and Adjustment Principal Teachers

Recognition, Intervention and Adjustment Principal

Recognition, Intervention and Adjustment Teachers

Recognition, Intervention and Adjustment Principal Teachers

Recognition, Intervention and Adjustment Principal Teachers

Recognition, Intervention and Adjustment Principal Teachers

Thoughts and Observations?

Where should we focus? 1) 2) 3)

Possible Areas of Focus -- JFTK-CA This self audit of practices provides insights into several areas of strength and several areas for strategic improvement. Trying to change all of the practices highlighted in the audit may prove unmanageable, particularly within one year. Below are suggestions for three possible areas of focus: 1) Monitoring and Observation -- this is an area where the school is doing many of the same things as higher performing schools. However, there seems to be some inconsistency as well as opportunities for more peer-to-peer observation in the classroom. Rethinking the “systems” of observation and a “process” for taking action based upon constructive feedback may contribute greatly to outcomes. The principal is also key in this role. Also, monitoring can be improved for evaluating and even changing materials, programs and interventions -- do more of what works. 2) Grade-Level Meetings -- Clearly there is a lot of collaboration and sharing. It appears that you can strengthen the conversations and outcomes of grade level meetings by focusing more on data, student work and individual student progress, as well as reflection on effective practice. 3) Vertical Collaboration and Planning -- vertical conversations, planning and goal setting are a key practice for high performing schools. This will lead to a better “shared” ownership of the success of all students and more honest conversations about gaps, continuous improvement and expectations. Transparent data sharing, particularly with formative assessments by student and teacher, is key to make this work.