Utah State University Logan Utah. Founded 1888 as a Land Grant Institution Host City – Logan, Utah (48,ooo+ population) ~ 15,000 Students (~ 28,700 students.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
New Technology Improves Efficiency of Universitys Energy Infrastructure Frank Brewer Associate Vice President for Facilities Management University of Maryland.
Advertisements

California Energy Commission 1 Energy Workshops for W&WW Agencies UTILITY STRATEGIES FOR SHIFTING PEAK DEMAND PERIOD WATER & ENERGY USE REGIONAL STRATEGIES:
Installation of New CHP system at the Old Aberdeen Campus.
Pentagon Washington, D.C. UMCS contract for modernization of the Pentagon Scope includes: Design, engineering and commissioning of the Building Operations.
Financial Model.
Platinum Energy, Inc. Slide No. 1 PROJECT EVALUATION Joseph A. Orlando, Ph.D, PE Platinum Energy, Inc. Springfield, Virginia
Becoming DEEP Green with Just One Project: Cogen  Tom Davies – Director Design & Construction, Amherst College  Todd Holland – Energy Manager, Amherst,
NARUC 2015 Winter Meeting February 16, 2015 Combined Heat and Power and the Clean Power Plan Bruce Hedman Institute for Industrial Productivity.
NJ SmartStart Buildings New Jersey Higher Education Partnership for Sustainability (HEPS) January 20, 2012 Presenter: BPU President Robert Hanna.
Branford Board of Education Conservation Report Efforts and Results 2001-Present Mark Deming Facilities Director Branford Board of Education November 19,
Cogeneration. Is the simultaneous production of electrical and thermal energy from a single fuel source.
Co-generation Cogeneration is an attractive option for facilities with high electric rates and buildings that consume large amounts of hot water and electricity.
Tenth Annual Midwest Energy Conference March 7, 2007 How Best Satisfy Midwest Electric Load Growth? Thomas R. Casten Chairman Recycled Energy Development.
ENERGY EFFICIENCY FOR END USERS With a Case Study of Energy Progress at Rowan University AJL RESOURCES LLC – CLEAN ENERGY SYMPOSIUM.
Paul A. Weghorst Executive Director of Water Policy
ENERGY EFFICIENCY FOR END-USERS.  CSU Chancellors office coordinates the efforts to accomplish the goals established by Assembly Bill 32 for green house.
COMBINED HEAT & POWER J.R. Simplot Mountain Home, Idaho.
UTSW Thermal Energy Plants, Power Generation and Electrical System What do we do to meet the Emission Reduction, Energy usage Reduction and Electrical.
Engineer Fahad Hasan Associate Yousuf Hasan Associates, Consulting engineers District cooling.
1 EERMC Public Meeting on Combined Heat and Power September 17, 2013.
FIFTH ANNUAL FEDERAL ENERGY WORKSHOP & DEFENSE ENERGY PARTNERSHIP FORUM | PAGE 2 Bruce Hedman, Institute for Industrial Productivity September 16, 2014.
Connecticut’s Energy Future Removing Barriers to Promote Energy Sustainability: Public Policy and Financing December 2, 2004 Legislative Office Building.
State Incentives for Energy Efficiency Commercial and Industrial New Jersey Board of Public Utilities Office of Clean Energy Mona L. Mosser Bureau of Energy.
COGENERATION Allison M. Selk 12/8/04 CBE 562.
Katrina Pielli U.S. Environmental Protection Agency CHP Partnership
UTSW Thermal Energy Plants, Power Generation and Electrical System What do we do to meet the Emission Reduction, Energy usage Reduction and Electrical.
Cogeneration.
Physical Plant Department Physical Plant Department Salvatore Chiarelli Director Of Physical Plant UVM 284 East Avenue, Burlington VT 05405
Department of Facilities Management Maintenance & Operations.
Proprietary work product, not for reproduction 1 BIOMASS GASIFIER 20 MW POWERPLANT Energy & Environmental Integrators Note! This system can be scaled from.
Upstate Energy Expo 2010 NYSERDA Program Overview March 30, 2010 Cheryl Glanton, Project Manager.
Fremont County – Green Spring 2012 Research Team: Jacob Tolman, Justin Andersen, Thresia Mouritsen, Joseph Huckbody, John Beck Feasibility Study.
Siemens sans siemens sans bold siemens sans italic siemens sans italic bold siemens sans black siemens black italic Siemens Building Technologies.
GREATER LAWRENCE SANITARY DISTRICT ENERGY EFFICIENCY PROGRAM.
Cogeneration at UC July 18, Welcome 3 Transformation of the Power Plant POWER PLANT CENTER OF CAMPUS CENTRAL UTILITY PLANT 2007.
UVM UTILITY SYSTEM MASTER PLANNING IDEA CONFERENCE International District Energy Association Sal Chiarelli, Director of Physical Plant, UVM February 2006.
1 Steam to Hot Water Conversion The University of British Columbia Paul Holt Director, Generation & Distribution.
Steam to Hot Water Conversion
Energy Trends. 2 Trift bridge 560’ long 333’ high.
Rural Development’s Rural Energy for America Program (REAP) Grants and Loans Guarantees & Renewable Energy Feasibility Studies June 5, 2009.
Lansing Board of Water & Light REO Town Headquarters & Cogeneration Plant REO Town Cogeneration: Concept to Commercial Operation.
Freeport Generating Project Project Description Modernization projects at Power Plant #2 Developers – Freeport Electric and Selected Development Company.
March 30, 2010 Michael Kelleher SUNY College of Environmental Science and Forestry Energy Use, Renewable Energy and SUNY ESF Climate Action Plan.
Name of Building(s) or Project Speaker(s) Organization(s)
CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION Status Report Demand Responsive Building Program William J. Keese California Energy Commission March 30, 2001.
FOR SIXTY YEARS WE HAVE BEEN TAKING THE POWER FROM WATER AND HANDING IT OVER TO NATIONS LINKING THE DOTS Bucharest, February 20, 2014.
Conversions: Rural Alaska Energy Supply Chains presented to Rural Alaska Energy Conference September 2002 Steve Colt Institute of Social and Economic Research.
Alaska Municipal League 59th Annual Local Government Conference The Programs of the Alaska Energy Authority Energy and Empowerment for Your Communities.
Copyright, CEERE, University of Massachusetts at Amherst Combined Heat and Power Solutions Beka Kosanovic, PhD. Northeast CHP Application Center.
Demand Side Energy Management & Conservation Lighting Retrofits The University of Texas at Austin.
Show Me the Measures: Performance Measures for Environmental Services City of San Diego, CA Elmer Heap, Director Environmental Services Department.
Campus Energy Use Intelligent Infrastructure for Energy Efficiency May 25, 2007 Peter Cooper Dept of Facilities, Manager of Sustainable Engineering and.
CHP Project Costs Screening Public Utility Commission of Ohio Public Utility Commission of Ohio Combined Heat and Power: Financial.
Global construction consultants SPENDING WISELY Laurence Brett Partner Davis Langdon LLP.
Water System Master Plan & Rate Study City of DeKalb, Illinois City Council Presentation May 16, 2015.
Sustainability Makes Financial Sen$e Sameer Kapileshwari, P.E., LEED AP, FMP, SFP Executive Director Avinash Rahurkar, MS, MBA, FMP, SFP Interim Associate.
Turning Energy Data into Operations Intelligence Presented to: FMA September 17, 2013.
Biodiesel Production from Grease Waste February 3, 2011 IBR & Infrastructure Platform Tony Pack Eastern Municipal Water District.
Electricity Basket Price & 2013 Power Policy Hammad Hashmi Advisor Technical (USAID) MWP.
Cogeneration at UC March 09, Welcome Central Utility Plant.
Creating A Greener Energy Future For the Commonwealth Clean Heat & Power in Massachusetts John Ballam, P.E. Manager of Engineering & the CHP Program MA.
The Energy Efficiency and Solar Nexus:
APTA Sustainability Workshop 2016
UMCP Learning Objectives
APTA Sustainability Workshop 2016
Presentation on Cogeneration and District Cooling Plant
Improving Energy Reliability & Performance
Improving Energy Reliability & Performance
Energy Conservation CERD /12/2017
Anna Garcia Air Innovations Conference August 2004
Presentation transcript:

Utah State University Logan Utah

Founded 1888 as a Land Grant Institution Host City – Logan, Utah (48,ooo+ population) ~ 15,000 Students (~ 28,700 students system-wide) 430 Acres of Maintained Grounds 75+ Major Buildings Utah State University – Logan Campus

4.5 MW Cogen (installed 2004) 50,000 #/hr. HRSG 300 kW Hydro 46 kV North and South Electrical Sub Stations ~ 18 Miles - 12,470 volt Distribution System 240,000 #/hr. Nominal Steam Capacity ~ 12 Miles - Steam Distribution System 5,200 Tons Central Plant Chilled Water Capacity ~ 5 Miles of Distribution Piping ~ 2.5 Miles of Walk-through Tunnels Utah State Utility Assets

1.2 MW Emergency Generator Culinary Water Production, Storage & Distribution Canal & Culinary Irrigation System Storm Water Refuse Collection Recycling & Surplus Operation Utah State Utility Assets

Procured Natural Gas ~ 545,000 $3,000,000 / yr. (2008 – 2012) Procured Electric (Logan Light & Power) *** Energy 34,844,000 $2.1 million / yr. (2008 – 2012) Energy Cost - 49% (2011 & 2012) Demand Cost - 51% (2011 & 2012) USU Produced Power ~ 55% USU Procured Power ~ 45% < 10% (WAPA / CRSP) < 5% Innovation Campus N. Logan) *** rate study currently underway by LL&P USU Energy Usage & Cost Profile

Natural Gas Strategies for Utah State University Transportation CNG busses provide efficient movement of people Reduces environmental impacts Transportation Master Planning Cogeneration (CHP) Produce and deliver 55% of USU’s electrical energy Provides ~ 40% of USU’s thermal heating requirements Future combined cycle or chilled water production? Energy Management Construct efficient buildings HVAC commissioning Install lighting retrofits Utilize alternate energy sources

Transportation Systems

Transportation Natural Gas Fired Busses Emits virtually no visible particulate matter (PM) CNG has 90% less particulate mass than diesel CNG produces less total greenhouse gas emissions than diesel At a $0.25 /gal fuel savings = 3 year payback on CNG busses CNG offers emission benefits over diesel/hybrids (1) Department of Energy’s National Clean Cities Program

Cogeneration (CHP) Combined heat & power

USU Cogen (commissioned in 2004) 4.5 MW NG fired Solar Turbine produces ~ 55% kWh Meets ~ 1/3 maximum kW demand Or, ~ 1/2 of average kW demand HRSG produces steam heat for much of main campus $14 M project including centralized chilled water ~ $1 M annual combined savings Vs. conventional iversity.pdf

USU Energy Management Strategies

Energy Management A managed energy program can reduce Energy Utilization by 30% to 35% USU estimates that 15% has already been achieved from prior energy projects Energy Utilization is measured and tracked as an index, or ratio of energy use over a measure of building area and time (EUI is normalized for growth) Energy Utilization Index (EUI) = MBTU (energy) / SQFT (area) / YR (time) Energy cost savings are treated as “avoided costs” due to non-uniform inflation and volatility in energy markets Avoided costs savings may not always be realized as a positive cash flow, but will measure the extent that budgets would have increased Some efficiency measures like lighting upgrades are static. Others require proactive management to be sustainable I.E. Commissioning, Education and Awareness, Building Scheduling

Energy Management Program Components Continuous Commissioning of HVAC Systems Metering & Data Analysis Energy Procurement Management & Oversight Provides Assistance and Consultation to USU Auxiliaries Capital Project Design Review New Facility Commissioning Campus–wide Education & Awareness Auditing & Facility Scheduling Energy Efficiency Projects Monitoring of Grant & Alternate Funding Environments Report on Accomplishments

Projected Avoided Cost and Expenses for Ongoing Building Commissioning Annual Expenses for USU Energy Management (Labor + 43% Benefits) 2 HVAC Technicians $ 115 k (one new HVAC Tech) 1 Energy Engineers $ 72 k (one new Energy Engineer) 1 Energy Auditor / Educator $ 50 k (one new position) 1 Energy Manager $ 93 k (internal and/or one new position) O&M, Material, & Equipment $ 100 k annually Total Expenses $ 430 k / Yr. Projected Energy Avoided Cost Savings $ 765 k / Yr. (Estimated at 15% of Average Variable Energy Costs) Net Avoided Cost Savings = $ 335 k / Yr. after Expenses ($ 500 k / Yr. at Higher Energy Procurement Costs)

Energy Management Accomplishments Cogeneration & HRSG Decommissioning Coal / NG Boiler Rebuilds LED Lighting Retrofits Centralized Chilled Water All New LEED Constructed Facilities Ongoing HVAC Commissioning Ongoing HVAC Controls Upgrades ~$200K Year Demand Side Management Strategies Initiating E.M. Support for Statewide System Campuses

2 Million Gallon Chilled Water Storage Tank – Inside Piping

Off Peak – On Peak Operation

Demand Savings Profile ~ 1 ~ $12,500 / Mo.

Exterior of Storage Tank

Below Grade - 2 Million Gallon Capacity 30’ Ht. x 115’ Diameter $2.5 Million 40+ Year Service Life $100,000 Yr. Est. Current kW Demand Current Estimated Saving Rate $50,000 - $75,000 Yr. Provides “firm Capacity” for 1 - 1,800 Ton Chiller ~ $1.25 Million Payback is well within expected economic service life Design & Performance Characteristics

Energy Efficiency = Environmental Sustainability

Questions & Answers