Habitat Mapping of High Level Indicators at Multiple Scales for Fish and Wildlife.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Washington Department
Advertisements

Implement Actions to Reduce Water Temperatures in the Teanaway Basin BPA FY 2002 Columbia Plateau Province Proposal Project ID #
Restore and Protect Red River Watershed Nez Perce Tribe Fisheries Watershed Program.
Lawyer Creek Steelhead Trout Habitat Improvement Project presented by: Lewis Soil Conservation District.
Upper Toppenish Watershed Restoration Project ( ) Yakama Nation Division of Natural Resources.
Information Needs for the Integrated F&W Program (ESA and Power Act) Jim Geiselman - BPA.
LENTIC SYSTEMS ASSESSING FUNCTIONALITY LENTIC SYSTEMS.
Stream Corridors Christine Hall Natural Resources Conservation Service North Jersey RC&D Slides 1-12.
Riparian Zone Habitat Assessment Vegetation and More.
Uses of Plants Plant Biology Mr. Dotson. Uses of Plants Food – Although some 3,000 species of plants have been used as food by humans, 90 percent of the.
Rapid and Torch Rivers August 2013 ESLA. Issue: Increasing Sediment 1993 – Aarwood to Torch River.
Watershed System Physical Properties Stream flow (cfs) Stream Channel Pattern Substrate Chemical Properties pH Dissolved Oxygen Temperature Nutrients Turbidity.
Watershed Introduction. What is a Watershed? An area of land, from ridge top to ridge top, that collects, stores, and releases water to a common point,
Getting the Big Picture How to Look at Your Watershed Indiana Watershed Planning Guide,
FOR 272 Forested Watershed Management: Water and aquatic resources as the wave of the future for forest management.
Watersheds Capture, Store And Safely Release Water.
Restoration of Chamberlain Creek Amy Clinefelter Riparian Wetland Research Program Restoration of Chamberlain Creek Amy Clinefelter Riparian Wetland Research.
LIVING SYSTEMS WATERSHEDS
FOR 272 Forested Watershed Management: Water and aquatic resources as the wave of the future for forest management.
Biological Objectives Tied to Physical Processes Dr. William Trush Scott McBain Arcata, CA.
Department of Forestry 2004 Stream Habitat Restoration Guidelines
Fundamentals of River Restoration and Salmonid Fisheries OWEB, 1999, Fundamentals of River Restoration and Salmonid Fisheries OWEB, 1999, Fundamentals.
Most Common Conservation Practices Forestry Illinois.
A Review of Stream Restoration Techniques and a Hierarchical Strategy for Prioritizing Restoration in Pacific Northwest Watersheds North American Journal.
Dylan Castle Earth and Physical Science Department Western Oregon University Monmouth, Oregon
Short Course on Gullies and Streams Tom Millard, Vancouver Forest Region.
Watershed Assessment and River Restoration Strategies
S e s s i o n 5 Managing riparian land for terrestrial wildlife.
IMPACTS OF LAND DEVELOPMENT ON OREGON’S WATERS 2001 This slide show was borrowed from the internet but we added our own research when we presented it.
Ryan Johnson Earth and Physical Science Department Western Oregon University Monmouth, Oregon
Applications of habitat data to fishery management Distribution and abundance of habitat for different life stages Barriers to migration; Waterfalls /
Impacts of Land Development on Oregon’s Waters 2001.
Suggested Guidelines for Geomorphic aspects of Anadromous Salmonid Habitat Restoration proposals G. Mathias Kondolf.
Project Activity: Riparian Zone Restoration Scott Compton, Watershed Program Manager Valles Caldera National Preserve.
Chumstick Creek Salmon Habitat Conditions* Land development, road construction, and other human activities have affected channel migration and sediment.
Icicle Creek Salmon Habitat Conditions* Land Development has affected stream channel movement, off channel habitat, and LWD recruitment. Barriers to migration.
Stream Processes and Habitat Ryan Johnson. Overview Watershed Processes – Factors and their effects on the watershed as a whole Stream Processes – Factors.
Oregon Case Studies Ryan Johnson. Studies  The response of impounded sediment to a culvert replacement project on Sutter Creek, a tributary of Honey.
How do humans affect watersheds and the hydrologic cycle ?
PNAMP Habitat Status and Trends Monitoring Management Question: Are the Primary Habitat Factors Limiting the Status of the Salmon and Steelhead Populations.
Claytor Lake Debris Study. Hydro Environmental Services of Kleinschmidt Associates  Shoreline Management Plans (SMP)  Aquatic & Terrestrial Habitat.
Mission, Brender, and Yaksum Creeks Habitat Conditions Low flows and associated high temperatures affect distribution and abundance of native species.
Climate Change Impacts in the Interior Columbia Basin.
Dry Creek Fish Habitat Enhancement Feasibility Study Current Conditions Summary.
ES407 Senior Seminar Working Group Earth and Physical Science Department Western Oregon University Monmouth, Oregon.
Importance of the Lower Wenatchee River in Salmon Recovery* The Lower Wenatchee is a critical migration corridor for all ESA listed species Of the total.
Flowing water.  vitally important geologically, biologically, historically and culturally.  contain only 0.001% of the total amount of the worlds water.
Coos Watershed Association Watershed Restoration Projects.
Conceptual Modeling as a Tool for Developing a Watershed Management Plan An aid to understanding linkages Barbara Washburn California Watershed Assessment.
Presented by Kristin Montauredes Riparian Zone. Riparian Zone- The transition between the aquatic environment of a river or stream and the upland terrestrial.
The Estuary vs. the Watershed: Which Matters More for Anadromous Salmonids? Blake Feist (NWFSC) Richard Hicks (NWFSC) Jonathan Hoekstra (NWFSC) Charles.
Riparian Areas: Functions and Conditions Authors: Gene Surber, MSU Extension Natural Resources Specialist Bob Ehrhart, Research Specialist, RWRP, Univ.
Population - 44,301 18% - Aged 65+ Household Median Income- $29,530 Jan.-March 2004 unemployment 14 % Demographics.
Nason Creek Salmon Habitat Conditions* Development, and road building have affected riparian (streamside) habitat, large woody debris and gravel recruitment.
Landscape Analysis Project: Craig Mountain Wildlife Management Area For/Range 527 Landscape Ecology.
15 Feet : Minimum Width for Zone 1 Zone 1 Functions: Bank Stabilization Shading (water temperature control) Flood Protection Stream Inputs: Structural.
Surface Water Ecosystems
University of Kentucky College of Agriculture Landscape Architecture Franklin-Simpson County Riparian Land Management Riparian Opportunities in Simpson.
PNAMP Monitoring Terminology Data Dictionary The meta data file provides a better explanation of the project’s intent. The estuary work group is still.
Riparian Buffers for Water Resource Protection Michael R. Burchell II Associate Professor and Extension Specialist Department of Biological and Agricultural.
Restoration of the Swan Pond Embayment Michelle Cagley, Tennessee Valley Authority.
Where critical areas & agriculture meet
FUNCTIONALITY of LENTIC SYSTEMS
Department of Forestry 2004 Stream Habitat Restoration Guidelines
An Overview of the Flathead Subbasin Planning Process
Fundamentals of River Restoration and Salmonid Fisheries OWEB, 1999, Fundamentals of River Restoration and Salmonid Fisheries Dylan Castle.
A Review of Stream Restoration Techniques and a Hierarchical Strategy for Prioritizing Restoration in Pacific Northwest Watersheds North American Journal.
Forested Watershed Management:
Challenges Facing Riparian Ecosystems
Water Testing Project for the North Fork River
Presentation transcript:

Habitat Mapping of High Level Indicators at Multiple Scales for Fish and Wildlife

Multi-Scale Approach LEVEL 1: Map area of focus  Floodplain + adjacent upland LEVEL 2: Map projects collecting habitat variables LEVEL 3: Map surrogates for habitat variables LEVEL 4: Focal habitats and focal species

What habitat data to map? LEVEL 1  Map FLOODPLAIN plus adjacent upland habitat in subbasins GIS maps to include: Stream channels FEMA flood plain data layer (100 & 500 year) Riparian Wetlands Roads Upland habitats adjacent ( 1/2 to 3 miles ) to floodplain

Digital Elevation Model Channel data Soils (NRCS hydric soils data) National Wetlands Inventory Other pertinent data How to map floodplain habitat? USE: Current habitat types using existing fish and wildlife habitat mapping protocols MAP: PRODUCT: GIS map with multiple data layers Floodplain delineated (using above data) Habitat types mapped within floodplain and adjacent upland areas

Soil data layer including: Erosion potential Compaction Floodplain gradient Grazing (may have to be surrogate for soil compaction) Agricultural practices/tillage (may have to be another surrogate for soil compaction) Point-Source Pollution sites Additional habitat measures Potential data layers to add to LEVEL 1 map:

LEVEL 2  Map Projects that collect specific Habitat Variables and Enhancements in subbasins Projects that collect or conduct: Water temperature Sedimentation Large Woody Debris (LWD) Fence Installation/Removal Vegetation Plantings Invasive species Control Instream flow Nutrient inputs What habitat data to map? Wildlife Managers should be the leader here!

What habitat data to map? LEVEL 3  Map Surrogates for specific Habitat Variables subbasins Variables – Surrogates: Sedimentation – areas susceptible to landslides, mining locations, recent logged areas Large Woody Debris (LWD) – recent logged areas, and riparian areas with medium to large trees Nutrients – salmon carcass/spawning areas, agricultural land use

Why were these LEVEL 2 habitat variables chosen? Large Woody Debris –Found often in habitat classification systems –Influences other instream elements with high occurrence in classification systems (e.g. pools, riffles) –Included in Lower Columbia Salmon Recovery and Subbasin Plan (Dec 2004) –Included as habitat actions in NOAA report Temperature –Although not occurring frequently in classification systems (likely this is captured in water quality assessments), a critical habitat element for salmonids and wildlife –Influences other water quality variables, and strongly associated with riparian habitat –Included in Lower Columbia Salmon Recovery and Subbasin Plan (Dec 2004) Sedimentation –Although not occurring frequently in classification systems (likely this is captured in water quality assessments), a critical habitat element for salmonids and wildlife –Acts as surrogate for turbidity and embeddedness –Strongly associated with riparian and upland habitat and land-use practices –Included in Lower Columbia Salmon Recovery and Subbasin Plan (Dec 2004) –Included as habitat actions in NOAA report

Instream Flow –Included in Lower Columbia Salmon Recovery and Subbasin Plan (Dec 2004) –Included as habitat actions in NOAA report Nutrient Inputs –Included in Lower Columbia Salmon Recovery and Subbasin Plan (Dec 2004) –Included as habitat actions in NOAA report –Associated with riparian and upland habitat and land-use practices Habitat Enhancements –These are part of recorded projects, therefore would be fairly easy to map (i.e. should already be recorded) Why were these LEVEL 2 habitat variables chosen? (con’t.)

Other habitat variables could be added, such as obstructions to fish passage, including: Dams (natural and man-made) Culverts Water diversion structures Large waterfalls Channel gradient Additional LEVEL 2 habitat variables

Photo courtesy of Dr. Richard Forbes LEVEL 4  Map Focal Habitat and Species information in subbasins Components: Big Game Winter Range Focal Species Range Maps Location of Focal Habitats Link Population Information – e.g. Breeding Bird Survey What habitat data to map?

TemperatureSedimentationLarge Woody Debris Riparian Veg. Pools, Riffles, Glides Sediment Sorting Dissolved Oxygen Turbidity Embeddedness Higher Level Indicators Influencing Habitat Variables of Interest Very Fine-scale Variables Fine to Coarse- scale Variables Habitat Mapping Habitat Enhancements Riparian Veg. Upland habitat Grazing Tillage/Ag. Practices Soil erodability Soil compaction Topography/ gradient Recent logging Veg. Planting Recent logging Install / Remove Fencing Effluent (point-source pollution) Veg. Planting Invasive Species Control Recent logging Veg. Planting Invasive Species Control Water withdrawal Roads Nutrient Input Riparian Veg. Upland habitat Grazing Tillage/Ag. Practices Water Quality Recent logging Veg. Planting Install / Remove Fencing Riparian Veg. Instream flow In-stream habitat complexity Instream habitat Invasive Species Control

Upland influences Include a Buffer Strip ranging form ½ mile to 3 miles adjacent to the Floodplain to address direct and indirect influences that may be occurring Upland habitat data could be used to determine desired riparian condition in adjacent areas –E.g. Upland area with clear-cut, compacted soils, high erosion potential, steep gradient  requires greater (i.e. wider) riparian corridor to offset impact

Habitat Mapping Needs Data we have or can get: DEM FEMA flood plain Hydric soils Channels Grazing Some upland habitat types Some coarse-scale physical obstructions Habitat enhancements Data we need: Riparian habitats Wetland habitats Instream temperature Instream sedimentation Instream LWD Fine-scale physical obstructions Point-source pollution Logging Unknowns (potential gaps): Soil erodability Soil compaction Non-point source pollution

Habitat Elements occurring most frequently in Classification Systems The top 1/3 of all habitat elements in each category are: Aquatic Pools Instream coarse woody debris Riffles Channel width Runs/glides Terrestrial Down wood Anthropogenic Water diversion structures Culverts Irrigation ditches/canals Bridges Roads

Habitat Types occurring most frequently in Classification Systems Lakes, ponds, reservoirs and rivers Bays and estuaries Riparian-wetlands Herbaceous wetlands Ponderosa pine & eastside oak forests and woodlands Lodgepole pine forests and woodlands Westside oak and dry Douglas-fir forests and woodlands Westside lowland conifer- deciduous forests

PNW Habitat Classification Systems