Update to the 1992 Dry Creek Watershed Flood Control Plan CESI/RBF RR/KM FEMA CTP HYDROLOGY.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Flooding in the Coastal Plain National Flood Workshop October 26, 2010 Houston, Texas Thomas Mountz, P.E., D.WRE, CFM Espey Consultants, Inc Southwest.
Advertisements

STUDY OF THE STORM DRAIN SEWER OF THE URBAN CATCHMENT OF LA RIERETA, SAN BOI DE LLOBREGAT, SPAIN TEAM 3: 1. Aline Veról 2. José Rivero 3. Pedro Ramos 4.
Introduction to Surface Water Hydrology and Watersheds Lecture 1 Philip B. Bedient Rice University November, 2000.
Overview of Urban Drainage Flood Prediction Methods and Approaches J.Y. Chen1 and B.J. Adams2 1. Water Survey Division, Environment Canada 2. Department.
Suzanne M. Fortin National Weather Service Pleasant Hill/Kansas City
Continuous Hydrologic Simulation of Johnson Creek Basin and Assuming Watershed Stationarity Rick Shimota, P.E. Hans Hadley, P.E., P.G. The Oregon Water.
Upper Brushy Creek Flood Study – Flood mapping and management Rainfall depths were derived using USGS SIR , Atlas of Depth Duration Frequency.
Regional Climate Change Water Supply Planning Tools for Central Puget Sound Austin Polebitski and Richard Palmer Department of Civil and Environmental.
Texas A&M University Department of Civil Engineering Cven689 – CE Applications of GIS Instructor: Dr. Francisco Olivera Logan Burton April 29, 2003 Application.
Kansas City Industrial Council Hydrology and Hydraulics
ASSESSMENT OF FLOOD REMEDIATION WITH MINIMAL HISTORIC HYDROLOGIC DATA: CASE STUDY FOR A SMALL URBAN STREAM Robert R. Holmes, Jr., PhD, P.E., D.WRE U.S.
Hydrologic Models for Urban Floodplain Mapping and Damage Reduction in Brownsville, TX Philip Bedient Rice University CEE Department Houston, Texas March.
CRFS March 30, Virgin River NWS-SWS: 90 NWS-ESP: (+8-15% El Nino weighted) NRCS daily: 80 NRCS statistical: 78 Coordinated: 80 / 195% median.
Tropical Storm Allison & its impact on Harris County
CARPE DIEM Centre for Water Resources Research NUID-UCD Contribution to Area-3 Dusseldorf meeting 26th to 28th May 2003.
Northwest hydraulic consultants 2NDNATURE Geosyntec Consultants September 11, 2007 Urban Upland / Groundwater Source Category Group (UGSCG) Overview Presentation.
Comprehensive Basinwide Protection Recommendations 13 Primary Principals: 1.Serve as framework moving forward 2.Establish acceptable levels of protection.
El Vado Dam Hydrologic Evaluation Joseph Wright, P.E. Bureau of Reclamation Technical Services Center Flood Hydrology and Meteorology Group.
Upper Brushy Creek Water Control & Improvement District
WinTR-20 SensitivityMarch WinTR-20 Sensitivity to Input Parameters.
HEC-HMS Simulation Adding a detention pond at the outlet
Rush River Assessment Project Hydrologic Flow Study Sibley County SWCD Presentation to the Minnesota River Research Forum March 10, 2005.
Project Our group collaborated with students at the University of Zacatecas (UAZ) to accomplish the following: 1- Create an accurate hydrologic model which.
Discussion of Proposed MS4 Permit Design Standards Language.
Hydraulic and Hydrologic Considerations in Planning Course FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT Chuck Shadie Mississippi Valley Division.
Presented by George Doubleday 1. What is The Woodlands Purpose of this Research Build and Calibrate Vflo TM model for The Woodlands Compare storms with.
CLIMATE CHANGE AND WATER MAKING RIVER BASIN MANAGEMENT PLANS “CLIMATE PROOF” IN SPAIN.
Assessment of Economic Benefits of the North Carolina Floodplain Mapping Program Hydrologic and Hydraulic Case Studies Adapted from a Presentation to NRC.
Why Single-Event Modeling Doesn’t Work for LIDs presented at Stormcon 2009 Anaheim, CA August 2009 Doug Beyerlein, P.E. Clear Creek Solutions, Inc.
Watershed Modeling using HEC-HMS and EPA-SWMM ©T. G. Cleveland, Ph.D., P.E. 10 July 2012 Lesson 1.
Review of SWRCB Water Availability Analysis Emphasis on Dry Creek Water Availability Analysis.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Cooperative Efforts in Nashville Flood Preparedness Jamie G. James, P.E. Water Resources Section Nashville.
Development of a Geographic Framework for an Integrated Flood Modeling System Oscar Robayo Tim Whiteaker August 10, 2004 University of Texas at Austin.
Description of WMS Watershed Modeling System. What Model Does Integrates GIS and hydrologic models Uses digital terrain data to define watershed and sub.
1 Status of AC Input from Last Meeting. 2 Overview  Input received on Strategic Planning Elements (Mission, Vision, Guiding Principles) & the 7 Key Content.
Long Valley Creek: A Rainfall-Runoff Modeling Story Rob Thompson Hydrologist U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Sacramento District
Martin Rule Curve Study Ashley McVicar, APC Maurice James, Water Resources Consulting LLC.
1 Lake Ballinger and McAleer Creek Watershed Strategic Action Plan Forum Briefing #2 January 27, 2009.
Christie Beeman and Jeff Haltiner Philip Williams & Associates Hydrograph Modification: An Introduction and.
Rebuilding the System Reducing the Risk California Water Plan Plenary Session October 22-23, 2007.
Basic Hydrology: Rainfall-Runoff – I
Introduction to Urban Hydrology
Andrea Ryan April 22,2010. Increased imperviousness on the Texas A&M West Campus is damaging the watershed.
El Nino / Flood Preparedness Montecito Association October 26, 2015.
Clear Creek Solutions, Inc. LID Hydrology and Hydraulics Doug Beyerlein, P.E. Clear Creek Solutions, Inc.
1 TR-55 Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds. 2 Simplified methods for estimating runoff and peak discharge for small urban/urbanizing watersheds Ch 1.
HEC-HMS Simulation Developing a Unit Hydrograph
Water Management Options Analysis Sonoma Valley Model Results Sonoma Valley Technical Work Group October 8, /08/2007.
Regional Flood Awareness Workshop December 3, 2009 Jeff Graschel Service Coordination Hydrologist Lower Mississippi River Forecast Center.
DES 606 Watershed Modeling with HEC- HMS Advanced Topics.
Hydrologic Calibration: October 2010 U PDATE OF E FFECTIVE H YDROLOGY FOR M ARYS C REEK.
USDA – Natural Resources Conservation Service An Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer USDA - NRCS Implementation of NOAA Atlas 14 Annette Humpal, P.E.
Update to the 1992 Dry Creek Watershed Flood Control Plan CESI/RBF RR/KM.
Update to the 1992 Dry Creek Watershed Flood Control Plan CESI/RBF RR/KM.
City Council March 4, Introduction The UCRA recommends the development of a storm water storage basin just to the east of FM 1223, south of Avenue.
Queenston Manor Apartments -
Rainfall-Runoff modeling
Welcome to the Libertyville Stormwater Master Plan Open House
Integrating ArcHydro and HEC Models by David R
HEC-HMS Simulation Adding a detention pond at the outlet
TR-55 Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds
Guidance on Homework Report Tc and R for each watershed
Update to the 1992 Dry Creek Watershed Flood Control Plan
CEVE 412/512 Dr. Phil Bedient Jan 2016
Quantifying Flow Reduction Benefit of the Miners Ravine Off-Channel Detention Basin Using HEC-HMS
SCS Dimensionless Unit Hydrograph
Northern California LID Hydrology and Hydraulics
SCS Dimensionless Unit Hydrograph
Love Field Modernization Program
SHOAL CREEK WATERSHED ACTION PLAN
Presentation transcript:

Update to the 1992 Dry Creek Watershed Flood Control Plan CESI/RBF RR/KM FEMA CTP HYDROLOGY

Purpose of the Plan Update To develop updated hydrologic model that can adequately evaluate the flood damage reduction potential of achievable projects, Asses the impact of the development that has occurred with realistic consideration of the effectiveness of local developer installed detention basins, Identify plausible multiple objective regional flood reduction and/or mitigation measures that could be expected to be met with broad support, Provide a list of local, cost effective, flood damage reduction projects, and Prepare a funding plan consistent with Plan Update project recommendations and current development projections Update to the 1992 Dry Creek Watershed Flood Control Plan

New Modeling Major Revisions to the Previous (1992) Plan Model –Watershed Boundary Changes Finding Mitigation in the Urbanized Dry Creek Watershed

New Modeling Major Revisions to the Previous (1992) Plan Model Watershed Detail Substantially Increased. 170 watersheds became 1,250+ watersheds. Finding Mitigation in the Urbanized Dry Creek Watershed

New Modeling Major Revisions to the Previous (1992) Plan Model –HEC-HMS replaces HEC-1 for individual hydrograph development portion of modeling. Integrated GIS functionality Adds greater Flexibility in Future –DRY CREEK TOOLBOX Update to the 1992 Dry Creek Watershed Flood Control Plan

Baseline Comparison 1992 Estimated Imperviousness of the Watershed = 17.8%. Dry Creek Watershed Imperviousness 1992 Finding Mitigation in the Urbanized Dry Creek Watershed

Baseline Comparison Current Estimated Imperviousness of the Watershed = 22.0%. Dry Creek Watershed Imperviousness Current Finding Mitigation in the Urbanized Dry Creek Watershed

Baseline Comparison Future General Plan Build-out Estimated Imperviousness = 27.0%. Dry Creek Watershed Imperviousness Future GP Build-out Finding Mitigation in the Urbanized Dry Creek Watershed

Baseline Comparison The development area of the watershed has increased from 35,900 acres to 44,400 acres, and will increase to 58,700 acres at General Plan build-out. Timeline ConditionAcreage of Development (acres) Rural Residential Portion (acres) ,9009,000 Current44,40012,300 General Plan Build-out 58,70017,200 Finding Mitigation in the Urbanized Dry Creek Watershed

Historical Flooding in the Watershed Documented Recent Major Floods: Feb 1986 ( yr) Jan 1995 (200-yr) Dec 1995 (2-yr) Jan 1997 (10-yr) Feb 1998 (10-yr) Dec (10-yr) Finding Mitigation in the Urbanized Dry Creek Watershed

Historical Flooding in the Watershed JAN 1995 –2-day event – 358 Structures Flooded within Roseville. –Rainfall Matched 200-year intensities for a 6-hour and 24-hour storm event. –Between 3.9 inches and 7.6 inches of rain in Dry Creek Watershed –End of strong (5-year) El Nino/beginning of weak La Nina event Finding Mitigation in the Urbanized Dry Creek Watershed

Historical Flooding in the Watershed What to Avoid! Update to the 1992 Dry Creek Watershed Flood Control Plan

Historical Flooding in the Watershed Comparison of Pacific Pressure (El Nino effect) Update to the 1992 Dry Creek Watershed Flood Control Plan 1986JAN 1997 JAN 1995 DEC 2005 DEC 1995 JAN 2010

New Modeling Major Revisions to the Previous (1992) Plan Model –Hydraulic Routing Model as a Hydrologic Component (HEC- RAS) Update to the 1992 Dry Creek Watershed Flood Control Plan

Dry Creek Watershed Study Update Calibration

Dry Creek Watershed Study Update Technical Analysis Status Raw Precipitation Values published in SWMM

Dry Creek Watershed Study Update Technical Analysis Status Raw Precipitation Values published in SWMM

Dry Creek Watershed Study Update Calibration

New Modeling Major Revisions to the Previous (1992) Plan Model –Storm Centering: Analysis of all storm centers and 4 different potential storm angles at each storm centering location, yielded 7 storm combinations that can control peak flows for the various locations in the watershed. DRY CREEK TOOLBOX

Dry Creek Watershed Study Update Technical Analysis Status Raw Precipitation Values published in SWMM

Dry Creek Watershed Study Update Technical Analysis Status Raw Precipitation Values published in SWMM