E-NABLE Hand Test Rig P16061 David Schwartz, Tia Parks, Shannon Barry, Samantha Mason, Charles Rumfola.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Todays Agenda 1. Review Project Management Principles 2. Project Management Institute (PMI) Framework 3. PMI Processes 4. Break into Project Teams and.
Advertisements

Position Sensing Glove Barbara Tuday Nathan Schreppler Lauren McIlwain Michael Nolan Team 6:
Team Members Industry Contact Academic Advisor Dr. Faryar Etesami.
Power System for the Better Water Maker ● Introduce Team ● Project Background ● Problem Objectives and Statement ● Use Scenarios ● Prioritized.
P11310: Parabolic Dish Autopoint Solution Project Family Team Leader: Trae Rogers (ME) Project Engineer: Pat Ryan (EE) Kyle Norlin (ME) Chris Reed (CE)
Web 2.0 Web 2.0 is the term given to describe a second generation of the World Wide Web (WWW) that is focused on the ability for people to collaborate.
Pertemuan Matakuliah: A0214/Audit Sistem Informasi Tahun: 2007.
Applied Software Project Management Andrew Stellman & Jennifer Greene Applied Software Project Management Applied Software.
LABVIEW INTERFACE CONTROL LOGIC DESIGN FEATURES Pneumatic power source encapsulated by single connection Opposable muscles for full range of motion Independent.
Ergonomic Ultrasound Probe
Safe Spot ME 4182 Final Presentation April 26 th, 2006 J.J. Couvillion - Elisha Mellitz - Manish Patel - Nick Roberts - Drew Bartlett.
Motorized Pediatric Stander P15045 Sarah Hill Jon Greene Candice Matthews Courtney Getman Chris Wendel Peter Sevich George Day Snug Seat Rabbit Product.
S/W Project Management
P14416: CONCRETE Arborloo base Evan Burley Anthony Deleo Mackenzie Keehfus Joe Omilanowicz Victoria Snell.
Intravascular Foreign Body Retrieval System Nathan Luibrand, Nicholas Luibrand, Lukas Richards, and Elise Adcock-Hinojosa Advised by Dr. Michael Barnett.
Advanced Topics in Requirement Engineering. Requirements Elicitation Elicit means to gather, acquire, extract, and obtain, etc. Requirements elicitation.
CEN rd Lecture CEN 4021 Software Engineering II Instructor: Masoud Sadjadi Phases of Software.
Somerset Berkley Regional High School Robotics Engineering with LabView Mobile Burger King.
Motor Assisted Wheelchair Design Review 09/10/15.
Digital Microfluidics Control System II P Agenda ● Introduce Team ● Background ● Problem Statement ● Stakeholders ● Use Scenario ● Customer Requirements.
Advisor: Dr. Edwin Jones 1 Client: Paul Jewell ISU Engineering Distance Learning Facility May01-13 Design Team: David DouglasCprE Matt EngelbartEE Hank.
Welcome to the SEED Briefing for Volunteers Khafji, Saudi Arabia April 22, 2006 Tom Lough.
P16415: Human Powered Centrifuge Amanda Johnson Nathan Corr Pieter Werner Joanna Jayawickrema Laura Pratt.
SPX Data Acquisition PROBLEM DEFINITION REVIEW John Dong David Haller Adam Johnson Thomas Klaben Luke Kranz.
Software Architecture Evaluation Methodologies Presented By: Anthony Register.
P16453 Problem Definition Review Kris Kidder | John Dolan | Shay Stanistreet | Anthony Miuccio.
Tethered Glider - Base Station Group P16462 Sarah Collmus Laura Arciniegas Kevin Collins Aleksandr Kim Michael Ostaszewski Kevin Larkin Sukmin Lee Design.
Dog Grooming tool Team 17 Justin Proctor, Roy Mason, Jordan Chupp, Dennis Pugh Sponsor: Engineering To Go.
Hybrid Dynamics Processor Group P14345 Jeffrey Auclair Bryan Beatrez Michael Ferry William Sender.
MSD1 Group P Introductions NameMajor/Role Corey RothfussTeam Leader Kayla KingMechanical Engineer Josh HornerMechanical Engineer Ryan DunnElectrical.
Somerset Berkley Regional High School Robotics Engineering with LabView.
P16453 Subsystem Design Loading, Measurement, Control, and Test of a Journal Bearing Test Platform Kris Kidder | John Dolan | Shay Stanistreet | Anthony.
P16221 – FSAE Shock Dynamometer Problem Definition Review.
E-NABLE Hand Test Rig P16061 David Schwartz, Tia Parks, Shannon Barry, Samantha Mason, Charles Rumfola.
P16452: Active Reciprocating Compressor Valve Assembly Week 9: Subsystem Design Review.
P16680: AATech Universal Oil and Bag System System Design Review 9/29/15.
Touch Bionics I-Limb ™ Active Prosthetic Limbs Alexander Batrakov.
Electrophotographic Cascade Development Apparatus Team 15503:Zach Foggetti (ME) Dalton Mead (ME) Bridget Kearney (EE) Ruishi Shen (ISE) Tom Wossner (ME)
Automated Microfluidic Cell Separator Project Group:
Electrophotographic Cascade Development Apparatus Zachary FoggettiBridget Kearney Dalton MeadRuishi Shen Michael WarrenThomas Wossner.
INFO 638Lecture #91 Software Project Management Conclude Adaptive Project Framework INFO 638 Glenn Booker.
Smart Cane – P14043 Lauren Bell, Jessica Davila, Jake Luckman, William McIntyre, Aaron Vogel.
1 Requirements Elicitation – 2 Lecture # Requirements Engineering Process Requirements Elicitation Requirements Analysis and Negotiation Requirements.
Team Lit Week 15 Deliverables: Prototype Final Review Justin Ballenger Brian Barker Greg Hahn Chow He Jon Klopf Vi-Vi Nguyen.
DESIGN OF POLE CLIMBER FIRST MODE ENGINEERING: DAVID BRUNEAU – MICAH BROWN – LIAM ARSENAULT – JUNWEI CHENPENG
Rob Connatser NSS Instrument Work Packages and XLPM.
MGT 437 Week 2 Learning Team Project Proposal Paper and Presentation To purchase this material click below link
P16512 – 3D Printing Ink Development Test Rig
The Four-legged Water Walker
Potency of the Production Preparation Process (3P)
Wegmans Swirl Cake Automation
Multidisciplinary Senior Design I: Problem Definition Review
P17082 Biomechanical Elbow Model Preliminary Detailed Design
CAPTURING OF MOVEMENT DURING MUSIC PERFORMANCE
Leveraging Role Play to Explore Software and Game Development Process
P17082 Biomechanical Elbow Model Detailed Design
HEMODYNAMIC SIMULATOR II P09026
P17082 Biomechanical Elbow Model Build and Test Review
Software Cost estimation
P17082 Biomechanical Elbow Model Final Presentation
Kris Kidder | John Dolan | Shay Stanistreet | Anthony Miuccio
Tub Lift Rev. 2 Dom Group
P17082 Biomechanical Elbow Model Build and Test Prep
Project Readiness Review P10029 – Air Muscle Artificial Limb
P08024 AIR MUSCLE ARTIFICIAL LIMB
Tub Lift Rev. 2 Dom Group
P17082 Integrated System Build & Test Review
Somerset Berkley Regional High School
Final Status Update P09006 – Upper Extremity Exerciser
Detailed Design Review: P18001
Presentation transcript:

e-NABLE Hand Test Rig P16061 David Schwartz, Tia Parks, Shannon Barry, Samantha Mason, Charles Rumfola

Agenda - Introduce Team - Project Background - Problem Statement - Use Scenarios - Customer Requirements - Engineering Requirements - Risks - Project Plan (Draft)

Team

e-NABLE Global group of volunteers that collaborate to design and assemble 3D printed prosthetic hands and arms for children in need Jon Schull o Saw a Youtube video of a prop maker giving a 3D printed prosthetic hand to a child from South Africa o Founder of the movement

Project Background Previously worked on by David Schwartz as an Independent Study Input force to make the hand grip Output force determined when fingers begin to move when pulled Data manually collected Designed for only one hand design and size Input Force Output Force

Problem Statement Two years ago, a research scientist and the director of the MAGIC ACT initiative at RIT, Jon Schull, saw a Youtube video of two men that connected to make a 3D prosthetic hand for a little boy in South Africa. The Google+ community, called e-NABLE, was born from Schull’s idea that many people would benefit from and/or become aware of the movement of creating 3D printed prosthetic hands for people in need. Fast forward two years and most of the focus had been on the different hand designs themselves. As an Independent Study, David Schwartz developed a prototype of a grip strength testing apparatus that is to be used to compare models and methods of the hands. The prototype functions, but lacks some of the amenities that are desired for the final design. The goal of this project is to improve upon the prototype Schwartz created during his Independent Study. The expected end result should be able to be replicated, most importantly because of the nature of the e-NABLE community; being made up of volunteers around the globe. Other improvements include automation, continuous data acquisition, “sweep” of angles and forces being tested, adaptable to other types/models of hands, and can measure grip force as a function of input force and of finger position. Ideally, the resulting apparatus needs to be easy to use, portable and cost effective enough to be replicated by different e-NABLE volunteers.

Problem Statement Current State o David Schwartz developed a prototype for measuring grip strength. It functions, but lacks the amenities desired for the final design. Desired State o A functioning prototype that can be used to test different types of e-NABLE devices. o Device should be able to be replicated because e-NABLE is a global and open source community. Project Goals o Analyze the current accepted methods of testing grip strength. o The apparatus must be:  Easy to Use  Portable  Cost Effective  Repeatable Constraints o Can’t disassemble the hand or break the hand in the process of measuring Grip Strength. o Cost of end product should cost under $200 to produce.

Use Scenario Chart

Customer Requirements Inexpensive, $200 should be the maximum for construction Portable Repeatable Adaptable to other prosthetic models Easy to use Continuous Data Acquisition Does not alter prosthetics or or remove any pieces Test the full hand strength. Need a slippage test and an overall grip strength test versus the angle of the wrist flexion.

Engineering Requirements

House of Quality

Possible Risks (Risk Management) Compatibility issues with current/future e-NABLE designs. Inadequate funding. Time constraints force design trade-offs. Data isn’t processed properly. Sensors aren’t properly calibrated. Prosthetic incorrectly made causing inaccurate data collection and/or damage to prosthetic during testing. Acquiring devices to test, printing multiple hands and arms, could take away time and money from apparatus.

Project Plan (Draft)

Moving Forward… Decide on a final test(s) We need to brainstorm how we would like to actuate the hand/arm. o Discuss finding an Industrial Design student to help with this. Come up with a mock budget. Draft a contract describing the scope of our project moving forward.