Introduction to the training dataset Alexander Mack.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Date: in 12 pts 28 th Meeting EQF Advisory Group Brussels 2 -3 December 2014.
Advertisements

Successful policy mixes to tackle the impact of rising inequality on children - an EU-wide comparison - András Gábos TÁRKI Social Research Institute Changing.
1 Survey Data in ECA : Frequency, Coverage, Consistency and Access By Victor Sulla ECS-PE.
Successful policy mixes to tackle the impact of rising inequalities on children: an EU-wide comparison - early draft - András Gábos TÁRKI Social Research.
Lessons from the Eurobarometer 2007 Additional analysis from the Belgian perspective Sergio Perelman CREPP, HEC-Ecole de Gestion, Université de Liège.
Germany Social Protection System Chelsea Ralston Thursday, November 27th.
European Union The Gay Perspective SCOREBOARD V 2.0.
Session 1: Child poverty outcomes and main factors behind International benchmarking and key challenges for Member States András Gábos TARKI Social Research.
EUROPEAN COMMISSION - EUROSTAT ESSnet on Consistency of Concepts and Methods of business-related Statistics 2010 project on statistical units n°
Session 1: Child poverty outcomes and main factors behind International benchmarking and key challenges for Member States András Gábos TARKI Social Research.
ESS Slide 1 Quality assessment of MEHM in SILC Eurostat Unit F5 “Health and Food Safety Statistics” 4 th meeting of the Task Force on Health Expectancies.
EDIT validation tool item 8 of the agenda Structural Business Statistics Working Group 14 April 2015, Luxembourg Arlind Dobërdolani.
Eurostat Ag.no "Annex 2" supplement to Eurostat Annual Report, October 2015 Working Group on Article 64 and Article 65 of the Staff Regulations Meeting.
Gender Equality is key towards the eradication of Violence against Women.
All Roads Lead to Rome Km 923 Km 489 Km 0 Km 989 Km 518 Km 898 Km 811
Economic benefits of gender equality in the EU
Eurojust cases involving crimes against children
Weighting issues in EU-LFS
GÉANT Planned Topology
Phasing out the use of lead shot in wetlands (1)
Update on the UOE 2012 data collection
Statistical indicators for the Bologna implementation report
Working Party “Cooperation on Land Cover/Use Statistics”
Ag.no. 15 Lessons from the 2015 A65 exercise
No document Ag 08 ESA2010 (SNA 2008)
Natura 2000 – SCI Union Lists
Education and Training Statistics Working Group, May 2011
State of legal transposition (1)
Bovine Movements within EU/EFTA
Ag.no.16 A65 country manuals and country assessments
3C. Update of Summary of WISE electronic delivery
Update on the status of RBMP reporting
Report on WISE Art.8 and GIS issues
Habides update (May 2011).
State of play Article 5 reports
MISSOC NETWORK MEETING Amsterdam, 6-7 June 2016
Education and Training Statistics Working Group
REGIO's 2014 communication priorities
Strengthening the social dimension of the EMU COM (2013) 690 ESF Informal Technical Working Group Brussels, 5 December 2013 Carola BOUTON DG Employment,
LAMAS October 2016 Agenda Item 2.1
Representative sampling questionnaire
ECONOMIC BENEFITS OF GENDER EQUALITY IN THE EUROPEAN UNION
LAMAS Working Group 29 June-1 July 2016
Rural Urban classification based on Grids following OECD Definition
State of progress with transition to new Standard Data Form
Reporting – Art 17 of HD and Art 12 of BD
Item 8.1 Implementation of the 2016 Adult Education Survey
2b. Status of WFD reporting
Programme adoptions Cohesion Policy:
Item 7.1 – Overview of 2012 UOE data collection
ETS Working Group meeting 24-25/9/2007 Agenda point 7 CVTS3 brief update /09/ 2007 ETS working group.
State of play: data transmission, validation and dissemination
Proposal for granting access to HOUSEHOLD BUDGET SURVEYS (HBS)
Natura 2000 – SCI Union Lists
LAMAS Working Group 7 – 8 December 2016
3.6. Impact of population and housing census results on population stocks and on LFS and SILC–follow-up DSS Meeting September 2012.
2015 Update of Union Lists of Sites of Community Interest
Urban Audit Results of the quality project
State of Play RBMPs and WISE reporting (9/07/10)
FISIM State of play Agenda Item 3.
Update on implementation WG F 27 April 2010 Maria Brättemark
Update on legal issues Strategic Coordination Group 23 February 2010
Item 3 Observed consistency and revisions
Update on status of reporting and validation process
LAMAS Working Group 6-7 December 2017
LAMAS Working Group June 2018
LAMAS Working Group 7-8 December 2016
LAMAS Working Group June 2015
LAMAS Working Group June 2018
DG Environment, Unit C.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
Presentation transcript:

Introduction to the training dataset Alexander Mack

Overview 1. Overview of EU-SILC data 2. Comparison UDB and training data 3. Technical details for training session

1. Overview of EU-SILC The EU-SILC consist of four sub datasets: Personal Data (udb_c10p_silc_course) 305 variables; demographics; income; work and unemployment; health Personal Register (udb_c10r_silc_course) 51 variables; includes persons under age 16; demographic information; childcare; immigration; work intensity; person weights; information on proxy interviews Household Data (udb_c10h_silc_course) 218 variables; Income; subjective economic situation; household assets; housing situation Household Register (udb_c10d_silc_course) 10 variables; HH-weight; sampling; NUTS, degree of urbanisation

1.Overview of EU-SILC data UDB 2010 includes the following 30 countries: AT, BE, BG, CY, CZ, DE, DK, EE, ES, FI, FR, GR, HU, IE, IS, IT, LT, LU, LV, MT, NL, NO, PL, PT, RO, SE, SI, SK, UK UDB 2010 covers a total of person records Sample Sizes for individual countries range from 8840 (MT) to (IT)

2. Differences between UDB and training data Training data contains only the following countries 14 countries: AT, BG, CY, CZ, DK, EE, ES, FI, FR, GR, HU, LT, MT, PL For each country a subsample of 1500 households was drawn (exception MT: 1141) Dropped variables: PSU-1; PSU-2; order of selection of PSU; Furthermore the training data contain only households with a maximum of 5 persons  Training data is not a representative sample and thus cannot be used for scientific analysis

2. Comparison UDB and training data HouseholdsIndividuals UDBTraining DataUDBTraining Data AT6,1881,50014,0853,305 BG6,1711,50016,3563,617 CY3,7801,50011,0883,116 CZ9,0981,50021,3793,442 DK5,8671,50014,7573,686 EE4,9721,50013,4743,761 ES13,5971,50037,0263,917 FI10,9891,50027,0093,522 FR11,0471,50026,5313,404 GR7,0051,50017,6113,715 HU9,8131,50024,7513,627 LT5,3141,50013,2353,603 MT3,7811,14110,3843,034 PL12,9301,50037,3793,940

2. Comparison UDB and training data WomenAverage Age UDBTraining DataUDBTraining Data AT51.89%52.38% BG52.20%52.81% CY52.04%51.70% CZ52.06%52.21% DK50.23%51.41% EE52.87%53.26% ES51.33%51.26% FI49.34%50.23% FR51.74%51.67% GR51.41%51.58% HU54.11%54.34% LT53.00%53.51% MT50.99%50.63% PL52.23%52.84%

2. Comparison UDB and training data Average HH sizeEquivalized HH income in € UDBTraining DataUDBTraining Data AT BG CY CZ DK EE ES FI FR GR HU LT MT PL

3. Technical details for training session With SPSS: FILE HANDLE data_path / NAME=D:\DWB- Training\SILC\Data\SPSS files'. GET FILE='data_path/filename.sav‘ will open your dataset With Stata: CD "D:\DWB-Training\SILC\Data\Stata files“ use filename.dta, replace will open your dataset