1 Milwaukee Mathematics Partnership Using Social Network Analysis to Understand Links Between Teacher Leader Roles and Student Achievement Carl Hanssen.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Seizing An Opportunity To Build Teacher Content Knowledge: Lessons Learned From a Mathematician Who Learned Lessons From Teachers! Beth SchefelkerJulie.
Advertisements

April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
Mathematics and Science Partnership Grant Title IIB Bidder’s Conference March 15, 2008.
This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation Grant No Building, Supporting, and Sustaining Professional Growth.
Mathematics for Elementary School Teaching:What Is It and How Do Teachers Learn It? Raven McCrory, Michigan State University Deborah Ball, University of.
A Coaching Model in the Transformation of Math Teachers to Math Teacher Leaders Presented at NCSM, San Diego, CA April 19, 2010 by Mathematics Teaching.
Maximizing Evaluation Impact by Maximizing Methods: Social Network Analysis Combined with Traditional Methods for Measuring Collaboration Carl Hanssen,
Milwaukee Math Partnership Year 1 External Evaluation Lizanne DeStefano, Director Dean Grosshandler, Project Coordinator University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
This work was supported in part by MSP grant # through the National Science Foundation. Opinions expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily.
Sharon Walpole University of Delaware Michael C. McKenna University of Virginia Literacy Coaches in Action: Strategies for Crafting Building- Level Support.
Mathematics Learning Walks: Focused Observations, Collaborative Conversations, and Effective Feedback Leading to School Improvement Beth SchefelkerLee.
Milwaukee Mathematics Partnership Sharing in Leadership for Student Success Lead Partner:University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee (UWM) Core Partners:Milwaukee.
How Do You Know Students Learned What You Just Taught? Lee Ann PruskeRosann Hollinger Bernard Rahming Mathematics Teaching Specialists, Milwaukee Public.
1 Milwaukee Mathematics Partnership Program Evaluation Year 4 Results Carl Hanssen Hanssen Consulting, LLC Cindy Walker University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.
Milwaukee Mathematics Partnership Program Evaluation MSP Regional Conference November
Central Kentucky Partnership in Mathematics and Science (CKPIMS) Central Kentucky Partnership in Mathematics and Science (CKPIMS) Central Kentucky Education.
Milwaukee Mathematics Partnership Sharing in Leadership for Student Success National Science Foundation Site Visit, 8–10 June 2005.
DeAnn Huinker & Kevin McLeod University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Designing High Quality Professional Development Knowledge, Management, & Dissemination Conference.
Social Network Analysis for Evaluation: Open and Closed Approaches Carl Hanssen November 6, 2008 American Evaluation Association The Milwaukee Mathematics.
Southern Regional Education Board HSTW An Integrated and Embedded Approach to Professional Development and School Improvement Using the Six-Step Process.
Cindy M. Walker & Kevin McLeod University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee Based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation Grant No
Louisiana Math & Science Teacher Institute (LaMSTI) Overview of External Evaluation and Development of Self-Report Measures of Instructional Leadership.
Improving Teaching and Learning: One District’s Journey Curriculum and Instruction Leadership Symposium February 18-20, 2009  Pacific Grove, CA Chula.
1 Milwaukee Mathematics Partnership Program Evaluation Update & Next Steps Carl Hanssen Hanssen Consulting, LLC April 2/3, 2009 The Milwaukee Mathematics.
Leading Change Through Differentiated PD Approaches and Structures University-District partnerships for Strengthening Instructional Leadership In Mathematics.
EVOLUTION OF A CONTINUUM OF MATHEMATICS LEADERSHIP
From Compliance to Commitment: Implementing a District- wide Portfolio Initiative Astrid Fossum, Mathematics Teaching Specialist,
Charting the Course for Mathematics Leadership Continuum of Professional Work in a Large Urban District DeAnn Huinker Kevin McLeod University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.
Sharing in Leadership for Student Success DeAnn Huinker & Kevin McLeod, UWM Beth Schefelker, MPS 18 April 2008.
1 Milwaukee Mathematics Partnership Program Evaluation Year 4 Results Carl Hanssen Hanssen Consulting, LLC Cindy Walker University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.
The Impact of the MMP on Student Achievement Cindy M. Walker, PhD Jacqueline Gosz, MS University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee.
Welcome To The November MTL Meeting Please move as close to the center of the auditorium when selecting your seats.
DeAnn Huinker, UW-Milwaukee MMP Principal Investigator 26 August 2008 This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under.
Distributed Leadership for Mathematics Bringing Together District, School, & University Leadership to Support Highly Qualified Teachers University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.
1 Milwaukee Mathematics Partnership Program Evaluation Year 6 Results Carl Hanssen Hanssen Consulting, LLC Cindy Walker University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.
Where on the World Are You? Supporting & Developing School Based Math Teacher Leaders NCSM Conference, Washington DC April 21, 2009 Astrid Fossum, Mathematics.
Collaboration for Mathematical Preparation and Development at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee DeAnn Huinker, Mathematics Education Kevin McLeod,
1 Milwaukee Mathematics Partnership School Based Partnerships: Using Social Network Analysis to Measure Progress Towards Distributed Leadership Carl Hanssen.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Milwaukee Mathematics Partnership A Path Model for Evaluating Teacher and Student Effects MSP Evaluation Summit II Carl E. Hanssen MMP External Evaluator.
Classroom Assessments Based On Standards (CABS) New Wisconsin Promise Conference Madison, Wisconsin January 14, 2009 Beth Schefelker, MTSMary Mooney, MTS.
Milwaukee Mathematics Partnership External Evaluation Schools and School Leadership Report by Tanya Suarez, Suarez & Associates June 9, 2005.
Mathematics and Science Partnerships: Summary of the Performance Period 2008 Annual Reports U.S. Department of Education.
Milwaukee Mathematics Partnership High School Labs Kevin McLeod and DeAnn Huinker University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Designing High Quality Professional.
Mathematical Preparation and Development of Teachers at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee DeAnn Huinker, Mathematics Education Kevin McLeod, Mathematics.
1 Milwaukee Mathematics Partnership Program Evaluation Year 5 Results Carl Hanssen Hanssen Consulting, LLC Cindy Walker University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.
Engage, Inquire and Inspire IMSS Leadership Institute Fall 2012.
1 Milwaukee Mathematics Partnership The Relationship between MMP Involvement and Student Achievement MPS Research Brief Carl Hanssen Hanssen Consulting,
Math and Science Partnership (MSP) Program A Research and Development Effort in K-16 Teaching and Learning James E. Hamos Directorate for Education & Human.
Charting a Course for the Future: A Wisconsin Perspective Kevin McLeod University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Department of Mathematical Sciences MSP STEM Summit.
Mathematics and Science Partnerships: Summary of the Performance Period 2008 Annual Reports U.S. Department of Education.
A Formative Assessment System That Really Works Lee Ann Pruske, MTS Kim O’Brien, MTL Milwaukee.
Sharing in Leadership for Student Success MPS Principal Breakfast Milwaukee Public Schools 23 April 2008.
Milwaukee Mathematics Partnership External Evaluation Partnership & Institutionalization Carl Hanssen The Evaluation Center Western Michigan University.
SD Math Partnership Project An Overview Marcia Torgrude and Karen Taylor.
Southern Regional Education Board High Schools That Work Jo Kister, SREB Consultant Archived Information.
Amy Alexander. Analyzing Effectiveness Participants’ Reactions Participants’ Learning Organization Support and Change Participants’ Use of New Knowledge.
1 Milwaukee Mathematics Partnership Changes in School Learning Networks from 2006 to 2009 Carl Hanssen Hanssen Consulting, LLC DeAnn Huinker University.
Alliance for Teaching Mathematics to Special Education Learners Strengthening Content Knowledge and Collaboration of General and Special Education Teachers.
Internal Evaluation of MMP Cindy M. Walker Jacqueline Gosz Razia Azen University of Wisconsin Milwaukee.
Iowa Administrators Association and PLS 3 rd Learning A conversation with Steve Barkley Facilitators: Dana Schon, School Administrators of Iowa Margaret.
Deepening Teacher Math Content Knowledge MMP Key Components of High Quality Professional Development DeAnn Huinker & Kevin McLeod University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.
The Work of the Milwaukee Mathematics Partnership DeAnn Huinker Kevin McLeod UW-Milwaukee Ningbo University (China) Delegation Higher Education Workshop.
Building Effective Relationships That Lead to Instructional Change in Mathematics Classrooms National Council of Supervisors of Mathematics San Diego,
EVALUATING A MIDDLE SCHOOL MATH M.ED. PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM. Knowledge, Pedagogy, Practice or Student Achievement:
Board on science education
Our Leadership Journey
Milwaukee Public Schools University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
Continuous Assessment Establishing Checkpoints
Team Goal Setting Karen Meyers, Director and
Presentation transcript:

1 Milwaukee Mathematics Partnership Using Social Network Analysis to Understand Links Between Teacher Leader Roles and Student Achievement Carl Hanssen Hanssen Consulting, LLC DeAnn Huinker University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee MSP Learning Network Conference Washington, DC January 2009 The Milwaukee Mathematics Partnership (MMP) is supported with funding from the National Science Foundation.

2 Agenda  Context  Methods  Review Sociograms  Results  Conclusions & Discussion

3 MMP Goals  Comprehensive mathematics framework  Distributed leadership  Teacher learning continuum  Student learning continuum

4 MMP Status  Currently in 6 th year of funding under original award  Received a Phase II MSP award  Sustaining funding for the MTL position received from Governor of Wisconsin

5 Evaluation Goals  Help the MMP better serve its constituents and improve its effectiveness  Serve the broader mathematics education community through documentation and dissemination of MMP activities

6 MMP Evaluation Logic Model Student Achievement Teacher Content & Pedagogical Knowledge Math Faculty Involvement Learning Team Effort School Buy-in Teacher Involvement New Courses District Buy-in MPA Ownership MATC Buy-In UWM Buy-In Classroom Practice MMP Activities Proximal Outcomes Distal Outcomes

7 Focus for this study Student Achievement Learning Team Efforts School Buy-in Teacher Involvement Classroom Practice Distributed Leadership

8 Method  Data collected from 29 schools from  Purposefully selected for diversity in School Type Geography Student Achievement MMP Involvement

9 SNA Survey  Open survey approach Teachers & administrators Provide names of individuals with whom you communicated with about mathematics Demographics  Other data School staff lists Student achievement results in terms of % proficient on WKCE

10 Analysis  Maps identify MTL MTS or Teachers Principal Literacy Coach Others in school Others outside  Statistics Network density (%) In-Degree (z-score)

13 MMP Distributed Leadership Continuum LowHigh Tight Network MTL Central Many Links to MTL MTS Inside Many Links to MTS Leadership is shared among many Loose Network MTL Not Central Few Links to MTL MTS Outside Few Links to MTS Leadership responsibility of few

14 Sociograms Review  Work in groups of 2-3  Evaluate the sociogram for distributed leadership characteristics (10 minutes)  Make a judgment about student achievement in that school  Report back

15 A

16 A Student Achievement: 2007: 66% Proficient 3-year trend: -9%

17 B

18 B Student Achievement: 2007: 47% Proficient 3-year trend: +15%

19 C

20 C Student Achievement: 2007: 53% Proficient 3-year trend: +3%

21 Hypotheses  The Math Teacher Leader and Math Teaching Specialist roles within a school are related to student achievement.  The strength of the communication network, as measured by network density, is related to student achievement.

22 MTL Role & Student Achievement

23 MTS Role & Student Achievement

24 Network Density & Student Achievement

25 MTL Role & Network Density

26 Evolution of Distributed Leadership 1. MTL is active within the school 2. Teachers begin extensive collaboration 3. MTL & Teacher collaboration extends outside school (MTS may become heavily involved in the school) 4. MTL is used primarily as a resource 5. Teachers assume math leadership

27 Discussion  What are the implications of distributed leadership for teacher professional development?  How can Social Network Analysis support planning for, and measurement of, pd efforts?

28 Next Steps  Phase II Work More schools Longitudinal Comparison of released and non- released MTL models  Recommendations?