A.Montani; COSMO-LEPS status, verification, … X COSMO meeting - Cracow - 15-19 September 2008 COSMO LEPS system: status, verification, applications Andrea.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 The COSMO-LEPS ECMWF since June 2004 d-1 d d+5 d+1d+2 d+4d+3 middle EPS youngest EPS clustering period Cluster Analysis and RM identification.
Advertisements

The COSMO-LEPS system at ECMWF
ECMWF long range forecast systems
COSMO-SREPS COSMO Priority Project C. Marsigli, A. Montani and T. Paccagnella ARPA-SIM, Bologna, Italy.
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss Improving COSMO-LEPS forecasts of extreme events with.
Ensemble activities in COSMO C. Marsigli, A. Montani, T. Paccagnella ARPA-SIM - HydroMeteorological Service of Emilia-Romagna, Bologna, Italy.
WG7 summary and Science Plan Chiara Marsigli ARPA Emilia-Romagna, SIMC.
Gridded OCF Probabilistic Forecasting For Australia For more information please contact © Commonwealth of Australia 2011 Shaun Cooper.
Ensemble Post-Processing and it’s Potential Benefits for the Operational Forecaster Michael Erickson and Brian A. Colle School of Marine and Atmospheric.
Performance of the MOGREPS Regional Ensemble
A.Montani; The COSMO-LEPS system. COSMO-LEPS: present status and developments Andrea Montani, D. Cesari, C. Marsigli, T. Paccagnella ARPA-SIMC HydroMeteoClimate.
SLEPS First Results from SLEPS A. Walser, M. Arpagaus, C. Appenzeller, J. Quiby MeteoSwiss.
COSMO GM2013.E.Astakhova,D.Alferov,A.Montani,etal The COSMO-based ensemble systems for the Sochi 2014 Winter Olympic Games: representation and use of EPS.
Eidgenössisches Departement des Innern EDI Bundesamt für Meteorologie und Klimatologie MeteoSchweiz Statistical Characteristics of High- Resolution COSMO.
A.Montani; The COSMO-LEPS system. Present status and future plans of the COSMO-LEPS system Andrea Montani, D. Cesari, T. Diomede, C. Marsigli, T. Paccagnella.
WWOSC 2014, Aug 16 – 21, Montreal 1 Impact of initial ensemble perturbations provided by convective-scale ensemble data assimilation in the COSMO-DE model.
ISDA 2014, Feb 24 – 28, Munich 1 Impact of ensemble perturbations provided by convective-scale ensemble data assimilation in the COSMO-DE model Florian.
How can LAMEPS * help you to make a better forecast for extreme weather Henrik Feddersen, DMI * LAMEPS =Limited-Area Model Ensemble Prediction.
A. Montani. - COSMO-LEPS for Sochi 2014 Development of a LAM-EPS system for Sochi Winter Olympics Andrea Montani C. Marsigli, T. Paccagnella ARPA-SIMC.
A.Montani; The COSMO-LEPS system: recent developments and plans 2nd Workshop on Short-Range EPS, Bologna, 7-8 April 2005 The COSMO-LEPS system: recent.
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss Data mining in the joint D- PHASE and COPS archive Mathias.
WORKSHOP ON SHORT-RANGE ENSEMBLE PREDICTION USING LIMITED-AREA MODELS Instituto National de Meteorologia, Madrid, 3-4 October 2002 Limited-Area Ensemble.
A.Montani; The COSMO-LEPS system: present status and outlook COSMO meeting, Offenbach, 7-11 September 2009 The COSMO-LEPS system: present status and outlook.
COSMO-SREPS Priority Project C. Marsigli ARPA-SIM - HydroMeteorological Service of Emilia-Romagna, Bologna, Italy.
A.Montani; The COSMO-LEPS system. COSMO-LEPS: present status and plans Andrea Montani, C. Marsigli, T. Paccagnella ARPA-SIMC HydroMeteoClimate Regional.
A. Montani. - COSMO-LEPS for Sochi 2014 Development of a LAM-EPS system for Sochi Winter Olympics Andrea Montani C. Marsigli, T. Paccagnella ARPA-SIMC.
COSMO WG4 Actvities Concentrated mainly on COSMO LEPS  presentation by Andrea Montani The rest of the activities have been absorbed into the advanced.
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss Cost Efficient Use of COSMO-LEPS Reforecasts Felix Fundel,
Short-Range Ensemble Prediction System at INM José A. García-Moya SMNT – INM 27th EWGLAM & 12th SRNWP Meetings Ljubljana, October 2005.
Interoperability at INM Experience with the SREPS system J. A. García-Moya NWP – Spanish Met Service INM SRNWP Interoperability Workshop ECMWF –
A.Montani; The COSMO-LEPS system. COSMO-LEPS and COSMO-S14-EPS: what is old, what is new. Andrea Montani, C. Marsigli, T. Paccagnella ARPA-SIMC HydroMeteoClimate.
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss Quantitative precipitation forecast in the Alps Verification.
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss WG 4 activities.
Development of a LAM ensemble for the 2014 Winter Olympic Games Andrea Montani, C. Marsigli, T. Paccagnella ARPA Emilia-Romagna Servizio IdroMeteoClima,
SREPS Priority Project COSMO General Meeting Cracov 2008 SREPS Priority Project: final report C. Marsigli, A. Montani, T. Paccagnella ARPA-SIM - HydroMeteorological.
Statistical Post Processing - Using Reforecast to Improve GEFS Forecast Yuejian Zhu Hong Guan and Bo Cui ECM/NCEP/NWS Dec. 3 rd 2013 Acknowledgements:
A.Montani; Performance of the COSMO-LEPS system during DOP COSMO meeting - Cracow September 2008 Performance of the COSMO-LEPS system during D-PHASE.
A.Montani; The COSMO-LEPS system. Recent developments and plans for the COSMO-LEPS system Andrea Montani, C. Marsigli, T. Paccagnella ARPA-SIMC HydroMeteoClimate.
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss WG4 activities Пьер Экер MeteoSwiss, Geneva.
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss A more reliable COSMO-LEPS F. Fundel, A. Walser, M. A.
SREPS Priority Project: final report C. Marsigli, A. Montani, T. Paccagnella ARPA-SIMC - HydroMeteorological Service of Emilia- Romagna, Bologna, Italy.
Langen, September 2003 COSMO-LEPS objective verification Chiara Marsigli, Francesco Boccanera, Andrea Montani, Fabrizio Nerozzi, Tiziana Paccagnella.
CONSENS Priority Project Status report COSMO year 2009/2010 Involved scientists: Chiara Marsigli, Andrea Montani, Tiziana Paccagnella, Tommaso Diomede.
General Meeting Moscow, 6-10 September 2010 High-Resolution verification for Temperature ( in northern Italy) Maria Stefania Tesini COSMO General Meeting.
Short-Range Ensemble Prediction System at INM García-Moya, J.A., Santos, C., Escribà, P.A., Santos, D., Callado, A., Simarro, J. (NWPD, INM, SPAIN) 2nd.
PP CONSENS Merging COSMO-LEPS and COSMO- SREPS for the short-range Chiara Marsigli, Tiziana Paccagnella, Andrea Montani ARPA-SIMC, Bologna, Italy.
VERIFICATION Highligths by WG5. 2 Outlook Some focus on Temperature with common plots and Conditional Verification Some Fuzzy verification Long trends.
A study on the spread/error relationship of the COSMO-LEPS ensemble Purpose of the work  The spread-error spatial relationship is good, especially after.
10th COSMO General Meeting, Cracow, Poland Verification of COSMOGR Over Greece 10 th COSMO General Meeting Cracow, Poland.
CONSENS Priority Project Status report COSMO year 2009/2010 Involved scientists: Chiara Marsigli, Andrea Montani, Tiziana Paccagnella, Tommaso Diomede.
DOWNSCALING GLOBAL MEDIUM RANGE METEOROLOGICAL PREDICTIONS FOR FLOOD PREDICTION Nathalie Voisin, Andy W. Wood, Dennis P. Lettenmaier University of Washington,
VERIFICATION OF A DOWNSCALING SEQUENCE APPLIED TO MEDIUM RANGE METEOROLOGICAL PREDICTIONS FOR GLOBAL FLOOD PREDICTION Nathalie Voisin, Andy W. Wood and.
A.Montani; Basin-oriented verification of COSMO-LEPS X COSMO meeting – Cracow – September 2008 Medium-range flood forecasting and warning X General.
Status of the NWP-System & based on COSMO managed by ARPA-SIM COSMO I77 kmBCs from IFSNudgingCINECA COSMO I22.8 kmBCs from COSMO I7 Interpolated from COSMO.
CONSENS Priority Project Status report COSMO year 2008/2009 Involved scientists: Chiara Marsigli, Andrea Montani, Tiziana Paccagnella, Tommaso Diomede.
A.Montani; The COSMO-LEPS system: 5-year milestone COSMO meeting, Athens, September 2007 The COSMO-LEPS system: getting close to the 5-year milestone.
A.Montani; The COSMO-LEPS suite at ECMWF: present status and developments COSMO meeting, Zurich, September 2005 The COSMO-LEPS suite at ECMWF: present.
Eidgenössisches Departement des Innern EDI Bundesamt für Meteorologie und Klimatologie MeteoSchweiz Ensemble activites and plans at MeteoSwiss André Walser.
LEPS VERIFICATION ON MAP CASES
André Walser MeteoSwiss, Zurich
A.Montani; The COSMO-LEPS system.
Nathalie Voisin, Andy W. Wood and Dennis P. Lettenmaier
Verification of COSMO-LEPS and coupling with a hydrologic model
COSMO-LEPS Verification
Preliminary test for the development of a 2.8km ensemble over Italy
The COSMO-LEPS system: present status and outlook Andrea Montani, Chiara Marsigli and Tiziana Paccagnella ARPA-SIM Hydrometeorological service of Emilia-Romagna,
Christoph Gebhardt, Zied Ben Bouallègue, Michael Buchhold
New PP: Consolidation of COSMO ensemble (CONSENS)
Short Range Ensemble Prediction System Verification over Greece
The Impact of Moist Singular Vectors and Horizontal Resolution on Short-Range Limited-Area Ensemble Forecasts for Extreme Weather Events A. Walser1) M.
Presentation transcript:

A.Montani; COSMO-LEPS status, verification, … X COSMO meeting - Cracow September 2008 COSMO LEPS system: status, verification, applications Andrea Montani, C. Marsigli, T. Paccagnella ARPA-SIM, Bologna, Italy F. Fundel, A. Walser, M. A. Liniger, C. Appenzeller Meteoswiss X General COSMO meeting Cracow, September 2008

A.Montani; COSMO-LEPS status, verification, … X COSMO meeting - Cracow September 2008 Outline Introduction Present status and recent upgrades Verification results (SYNOP on the GTS): – performance from 2002 onwards Application of COSMO-LEPS: the reforecast exercise Main results

A.Montani; COSMO-LEPS status, verification, … X COSMO meeting - Cracow September 2008 COSMO-LEPS (developed at ARPA-SIM) What is it? It is a Limited-area Ensemble Prediction System (LEPS), based on COSMO-model and implemented within COSMO (COnsortium for Small-scale MOdelling, which includes Germany, Greece, Italy, Poland, Romania, Switzerland). Why? It was developed to combine the advantages of global-model ensembles with the high-resolution details gained by the LAMs, so as to identify the possible occurrence of severe and localised weather events (heavy rainfall, strong winds, temperature anomalies, snowfall, …) generation of COSMO-LEPS to improve the Late-Short (48hr) to Early-Medium (132hr) range forecast of severe weather events.

A.Montani; COSMO-LEPS status, verification, … X COSMO meeting - Cracow September 2008 COSMO-LEPS ECMWF before and during D-PHASE Operations Period (from 1 June to 30 November 2007) d-1 dd+5 d+1d+2 d+4d+3 older EPS younger EPS clustering period Cluster Analysis and RM identification 4 variables Z U V Q 3 levels hPa 2 time steps Cluster Analysis and RM identification European area Complete Linkage COSMO- LEPS Integratio n Domain 16 Representative Members driving the 16 COSMO-model integrations (weighted according to the cluster populations) employing either Tiedtke or Kain-Fristch convection scheme (randomly choosen) COSMO- LEPS clustering area suite runs as a ”time-critical application” managed by ARPA-SIM; Δx ~ 10 km; 40 ML; COSM0 v3.20; fc length: 132h; Computer time (4.7 million BU for 2007) provided by the COSMO partners which are ECMWF member states.

A.Montani; COSMO-LEPS status, verification, … X COSMO meeting - Cracow September 2008 Recent updates Changes to the operational suite on 1 December 2007: new model version (COSMO-LM 4.0); new numerics (Runge-Kutta scheme); use of multi-layer soil model; new perturbations introduced relative to the maximal turbulent length scale (tur_len) and to the length scale of thermal surface patterns (pat_len)  to increase spread and maintain skill.  Old system and new system ran in parallel for 52 days (October and November 2007);  Larger T2m spread in new system for all forecast ranges;  Comparable skill (in terms of T2m root-mean-square error) of the two systems.

A.Montani; COSMO-LEPS status, verification, … X COSMO meeting - Cracow September 2008 COSMO-LEPS ECMWF after D-PHASE Operations Period (since December 2007) d-1 dd+5 d+1d+2 d+4d+3 older EPS younger EPS clustering period Cluster Analysis and RM identification 4 variables Z U V Q 3 levels hPa 2 time steps Cluster Analysis and RM identification European area Complete Linkage COSMO- LEPS Integratio n Domain 16 Representative Members driving the 16 COSMO-model integrations (weighted according to the cluster populations) employing either Tiedtke or Kain-Fristch convection scheme (randomly choosen) + perturbations in turbulence scheme COSMO- LEPS clustering area suite runs as a ”time-critical application” managed by ARPA- SIM; Δx ~ 10 km; 40 ML; fc+ 132h; COSM0 v4.0 since Dec07 (with RK + multi-layer); computer time (5.8 million BU for 2008) provided by the COSMO partners which are ECMWF member states.

A.Montani; COSMO-LEPS status, verification, … X COSMO meeting - Cracow September 2008 –SYNOP on the GTS Objective verification of COSMO-LEPS Main features: variable: 12h cumulated precip (18-06, UTC); period : from Dec 2002 to Aug 2008; PHASE region: 43-50N, 2-18E (MAP D-PHASE area); method: nearest grid point; no-weighted fcst; obs: synop reports (about 470 stations/day); fcst ranges: 6-18h, 18-30h, …, h, h; thresholds: 1, 5, 10, 15, 25, 50 mm/12h; system: COSMO-LEPS; scores: ROC area, RPSS, Outliers both (69) monthly and (23) seasonal scores were computed verification over the full domain (about 1400 stations/day) is underway

A.Montani; COSMO-LEPS status, verification, … X COSMO meeting - Cracow September 2008 Time series of ROC area  Area under the curve in the HIT rate vs FAR diagram.  Valuable forecast systems have ROC area values > 0.6. ROC  The positive impact of increasing the ensemble size in 2004 is evident for all thresholds and for different forecast ranges.  Poor performance of the system in Spring and Summer 2006 (both particularly dry), despite system upgrades.  Good performance during DOP  Small positive impact of 2007 system upgrades.

A.Montani; COSMO-LEPS status, verification, … X COSMO meeting - Cracow September 2008 Seasonal scores of ROC area  Performance of the system assessed for the last 5 summers (JJA) and the last 5 autumns (SON).  Consider the “event” 10 mm/12h; valuable forecast systems have ROC area values > 0.6. ROC  Need to take into account the different statistics for each season (JJA 2004 and SON 2006 less rainy than the others).  Good scores obtained throughout the full DOP in  Best performance for JJA 2008, more evident for longer ranges.

A.Montani; COSMO-LEPS status, verification, … X COSMO meeting - Cracow September 2008 Outliers: time series + seasonal scores  How many times the analysis is out of the forecast interval spanned by the ensemble members.  … the lower the better …  Performance of the system assessed as time series and for the last 5 summers (JJA). OUTL  Evident seasonal cycle (more outliers in winter), but overall reduction of outliers in the years up to  Reduction of outliers from one summer to the other, related to the increase of ensemble size (evident for the 10m to 16m increase).  Need to take into account the different statistics for each season.  Best results for the last 2 summers.

A.Montani; COSMO-LEPS status, verification, … X COSMO meeting - Cracow September 2008 COSMO-LEPS reforecasts (v 4.0) Motivations: COSMO-LEPS is often not reliable; probabilities might be wrong!  need for calibration Setup Period of 30 years ( ) 1 deterministic run of COSMO-LEPS fc+90h, 12:00 initial time (every 3rd day) ERA40 as initial/boundary conditions. Calculated and archived at ECMWF Convect. scheme = Tiedtke/Kain-Fritsch Random physics (turlen & patlen) Limitations New climatology needed with each model version change Needs time and is costly (~ 2000 KBU/yr)

A.Montani; COSMO-LEPS status, verification, … X COSMO meeting - Cracow September h Tot_Prec ( UTC) Domain: Switzerland interp. on CLEPS Grid (C.Frei) Apr06 – Aug07 (verification) (calibration) Observation Data Verification of calibrated vs raw forecasts model topography [m]

A.Montani; COSMO-LEPS status, verification, … X COSMO meeting - Cracow September 2008 calibrated raw BSS D 24h precipitation  BSS D is written as 1-BS/(BS ref +D). Useful forecast systems if BSS D > 0.  BS measures the mean squared difference between fcst and obs in probability space.  Equivalent to MSE for deterministic forecast. wintersummer

A.Montani; COSMO-LEPS status, verification, … X COSMO meeting - Cracow September 2008 Main results (1) Since November 2002, COSMO-LEPS system has been running on a daily basis. Since June 2008, COSMO-LEPS data are disseminated to JRC for the use in the European Flood Alert System (EFAS) as input to the flood forecasting system over the major European basins ==> success for COSMO both from a scientific and a visibility point of view. COSMO-LEPS products routinely used in met-ops rooms across COSMO community as well as in research Projects (e.g. COPS, D-PHASE, PREVIEW: see the poster).  increase in ROC area scores and reduction in outliers percentages;  positive impact of increasing the population from 5 to 10 members (June 2004);  some deficiency in the skill of the system can be identified after the system upgrades occurred on February 2006 (from 10 to 16 members; from 32 to 40 model levels), BUT  scores are encouraging throughout DPHASE Operations Period;  system upgrades of Dec07 (RK + multi-layer + new perturbations) brought small but positive impact. Time-series verification scores indicate the following trends:

A.Montani; COSMO-LEPS status, verification, … X COSMO meeting - Cracow September 2008 Main results (2) Calibrating with reforecasts improves the forecast skill significantly (especially in winter). Calibrated warnings without using observations are possible. Calibrating frequent precipitation events does not require a large calibration period, while calibrating extreme events does (not shown).

A.Montani; COSMO-LEPS status, verification, … X COSMO meeting - Cracow September 2008 Thank you !

A.Montani; COSMO-LEPS status, verification, … X COSMO meeting - Cracow September 2008 Present system  x = 10 km  z = 40 ML  t = 90 s ngp = 306x258x40 = fcst range = 132h cost = 640 BU x run elapsed time = 45 min Feasibility study: COSMO-LEPS at 7 km (the answer to forecasters’ dream?) New system  x = 7 km  z = 40 ML  t = s ngp = 510x405x40 = fcst range = 132h cost = 1925 BU x run elapsed time = 138 min … cosmoleps_7 is about 3 times more expensive than present configuration new computer at ECMWF being installed Computer resources for each ECMWF member state will increase by a factor of 5 (five)  and ….

A.Montani; COSMO-LEPS status, verification, … X COSMO meeting - Cracow September 2008 … the dream is possible COSMO-LEPS 10 km COSMO-LEPS 7 km  the grid of cosmoleps_7 would be almost identical to that of COSMO-EU, this making easier and cleaner the use of initial fields provided by DWD (e.g. soil moisture analysis).

A.Montani; COSMO-LEPS status, verification, … X COSMO meeting - Cracow September 2008 test the use of the Soil Moisture Analysis fields provided by DWD; run cleps_7 for ~ 40 days in autumn 2008 and assess the impact; within TIGGE-LAM, develop coding of COSMO-LEPS output files in GRIB2 format; Future plans (2008 and 2009) migration to the new machine at ECMWF; use a better snow analysis (possibly provided by DWD or Meteoswiss); extend the cluster analysis so as to consider not only ECMWF EPS, but also UKMO MOGREPS as global ensemble providing ic’s and bc’s (first tests); implement cosmoleps_7; gaining from COSMO-SREPS experience, introduce more model perturbations; test COSMO-LEPS nested on the under-development ECMWF EDA over MAP D ‑ PHASE period; optimise use of reforecasts + calibration of wind gust; support CONSENS.

A.Montani; COSMO-LEPS status, verification, … X COSMO meeting - Cracow September 2008 Feasibility study of COSMOLEPS at 7 km Motivations:  Provide a more detailed description of mesoscale processes by incresing the horizontal resolution.  Do not lose a “reasonable advantage” against ECMWF EPS, which will go to  x=25 km during  “Keep the pace” with deterministic model (  x~ 2-3 km): if the gap in resolutions between deterministic and probabilistic systems is too large, the two systems do not support each other and go for different solutions (that is, they forecast different weather!). from 10 to 7 km (plus small domain extensions) does not seem a lot

A.Montani; COSMO-LEPS status, verification, … X COSMO meeting - Cracow September 2008 but …

A.Montani; COSMO-LEPS status, verification, … X COSMO meeting - Cracow September 2008 Present methodology

A.Montani; COSMO-LEPS status, verification, … X COSMO meeting - Cracow September 2008 Operational set-up Core products:  16 perturbed COSMO-model runs (ICs and 3-hourly BCs from 16 EPS members) to generate, “via weights”, probabilistic output (start at 12UTC;  t = 132h); Additional products:  1 deterministic run (ICs and 3-hourly BCs from the high- resolution deterministic ECMWF forecast) to “join” deterministic and probabilistic approaches (start at 12UTC;  t = 132h);  1 “hindcast” run (ICs and 3-hourly BCs from ECMWF analyses) to “downscale” ECMWF information (start at 00UTC;  t = 36h).

A.Montani; COSMO-LEPS status, verification, … X COSMO meeting - Cracow September 2008 Recent updates Changes to the operational suite on 1 December 2007: new model version (COSMO-LM 4.0); new numerics (Runge-Kutta scheme); use of multi-layer soil model; new perturbations introduced relative to the maximal turbulent length scale (tur_len) and to the length scale of thermal surface patterns (pat_len)  to increase spread and maintain skill.  Old system and new system ran in parallel for 52 days (October and November 2007);  Larger T2m spread in new system for all forecast ranges;  Comparable skill (in terms of T2m root-mean-square error) of the two systems. back to plans

A.Montani; COSMO-LEPS status, verification, … X COSMO meeting - Cracow September 2008 Time series of ROC area for COSMO-LEPS (2)  Area under the curve in the FAR vs HIT diagram.  Valuable forecast systems have ROC area values > 0.6 ROC  the positive impact of increasing the ensemble size in 2004 is evident for all thresholds and for different fcst ranges.  poor performance of the system in Spring and Summer 2006, despite system upgrades. Jun04: 5m  10m Feb06: 10m  16m; 32ML  40 ML fc step: 78-90h

A.Montani; COSMO-LEPS status, verification, … X COSMO meeting - Cracow September 2008 Time series of Brier Skill Score  BSS is written as 1-BS/BS ref. Sample climate is the reference system. Useful forecast systems if BSS > 0.  BS measures the mean squared difference between forecast and observation in probability space.  Equivalent to MSE for deterministic forecast. BSS  improvement of performance detectable for all thresholds along the years;  still problems with high thresholds, but good trend in fc step: 30-42h Jun04: 5m  10m Feb06: 10m  16m; 32ML  40 ML

A.Montani; COSMO-LEPS status, verification, … X COSMO meeting - Cracow September 2008 Semi-diurnal cycle in COSMO-LEPS scores  BSS score … the higher the better …  Performance of the system assessed for 5 different Summers (JJA). BSS  Evident 12-hour cycle in BSS scores (the same holds for RPSS, while less evident for ROC area scores).  Better performance of the system for “night-time” precipitation, that is for rainfall predicted between 18Z and 6Z (ranges 30-42h, 54-66h, …).  The amplitude of the cycle is somewhat reduced throughout the years and with increasing forecast range.  The bad performance in Summer 2006 is confirmed.

A.Montani; COSMO-LEPS status, verification, … X COSMO meeting - Cracow September 2008 Score dependence on the domain size (1)  Verification of COSMO-LEPS against synop reports over the MAP D-PHASE area (~ 470 stations; MAPDOM) and the full domain (~ 1500 stations; fulldom):  different statistics of the verification samples;  up to now, performance of the system over the 2 domains assessed only for the last 6 months (March-August 2007).  difficult to draw general conclusions

A.Montani; COSMO-LEPS status, verification, … X COSMO meeting - Cracow September 2008 Score dependence on the domain size (2) RPSS  RPSS score… the higher the better… (and positive).  ROC area… the higher the better… (and above 0.6).  Smoother transitions from month to month in “fulldom” scores.  Slightly better performance of COSMO-LEPS over the MAPDOM, but the signal varies from month to month.  Higher predictability with orographic forcing?  Need to check individual regions and/or to stratify for type of stations. OUTL ROC  Outliers percentage … the lower the better.

A.Montani; COSMO-LEPS status, verification, … X COSMO meeting - Cracow September 2008 COSMO-LEPS 16-MEMBER EPS 51-MEMBER EPS tp > 1mm/24h tp > 5mm/24h Average values (boxes 0.5 x 0.5) MAM06  As regards AVERAGE precipitation above these two threshols, the 3 systems have similar performance.

A.Montani; COSMO-LEPS status, verification, … X COSMO meeting - Cracow September 2008 Main results COSMO-LEPS system runs on a daily basis since November 2002 and it has become a “member-state time-critical application” at ECMWF (  partial involvement of ECMWF operators in the suite management). Time series scores identify positive trends in the performance of the system: increase in ROC area scores and reduction in outliers percentages; positive impact of increasing the population from 5 to 10 members (June 2004); some deficiency in the skill of the system identified after the system upgrades occurred on February 2006 (from 10 to 16 members; from 32 to 40 model levels + EPS upgrade!!!)  need of further investigation. High-resolution verification shows better scores of COSMO-LEPS with respect to EPS in forecasting precipitation maxima within boxes. No clear impact of the weighting procedure as regards precipitation, BUT COSMO-LEPS ensemble mean for 2m temperature has better skill (lower standard deviation to observations) with weighting the ensemble members according to cluster populations compared to the mean with unweighted members.

A.Montani; COSMO-LEPS status, verification, … X COSMO meeting - Cracow September 2008 Time series of ROC area  Area under the curve in the HIT rate vs FAR diagram.  Valuable forecast systems have ROC area values > 0.6. ROC  the positive impact of increasing the ensemble size in 2004 is evident for all thresholds and for different forecast ranges.  poor performance of the system in Spring and Summer 2006 (both particularly dry), despite system upgrades.  good performance during DOP Jun04: 5m  10m Feb06: 10m  16m; 32ML  40 ML fc step: 30-42h DOP fc step: 78-90h Jun04: 5m  10m Feb06: 10m  16m; 32ML  40 ML DOP

A.Montani; COSMO-LEPS status, verification, … X COSMO meeting - Cracow September 2008 Seasonal scores of ROC area  Performance of the system assessed for 5 different summers (JJA) and 5 different autumns (SON).  Consider the “event” 10 mm/12h; valuable forecast systems have ROC area values > 0.6. ROC  Need to take into account the different statistics for each season (JJA 2003 and SON 2006 less rainy than the others).  Best scores obtained during DOP 2007 for either seasons.

A.Montani; COSMO-LEPS status, verification, … X COSMO meeting - Cracow September 2008 Time series of Ranked Probability Skill Score  A sort of BSS “cumulated” over all thresholds. BSS is written as 1-BS/BS ref. Sample climate is the reference system. BS measures the mean squared difference between forecast and observation in probability space.  Useful forecast system, if RPSS > 0. RPSS  the improvement of the system performance is detectable for all forecast ranges along the years;  the poor performance of the system in summer 2006 is confirmed;  RPSS always positive throughout 2007 and especially high during DOP. Jun04: 5m  10m Feb06: 10m  16m; 32ML  40 ML DOP

A.Montani; COSMO-LEPS status, verification, … X COSMO meeting - Cracow September 2008 Outliers: time series + seasonal scores  How many times the analysis is out of the forecast interval spanned by the ensemble members.  … the lower the better …  Performance of the system assessed as time series and for 5 different summers (JJA). OUTL  Evident seasonal cycle (more outliers in winter), but overall reduction of outliers in the years.  Reduction of outliers from one summer to the other, related to the increase of ensemble size (more evident for the 5 to 10 increase).  Need to take into account the different statistics for each season (JJA 2003 less rainy than the others).  Best results for D-PHASE summer! Jun04: 5m  10m Feb06: 10m  16m; 32ML  40 ML DOP

A.Montani; COSMO-LEPS status, verification, … X COSMO meeting - Cracow September 2008 Verification vs “DPHASE observations”: –assess performance over different domains (North and South of the Alps), –study individual case studies, –consider basin-by-basin performance. “Think about” increasing horizontal resolution to 7 km. Calibrate COSMO-LEPS fcsts using reforecasts (F. Fundel, Meteoswiss). Future plans Implement “seamless COSMO ensemble system” merging COSMO-LEPS and COSMO-SREPS. Develop “hybrid” clustering technique (take boundary conditions from a “grand-global” ensemble provided by mixing ECMWF-EPS and UKMO-MOGREPS).

A.Montani; COSMO-LEPS status, verification, … X COSMO meeting - Cracow September 2008 Dissemination during DOP  probabilistic products ( and )  “deterministic” products (individual 16 COSMO-LEPS runs)  derived probability products (EM, ES)  images and alerts

A.Montani; COSMO-LEPS status, verification, … X COSMO meeting - Cracow September 2008 Time series of Ranked Probability Skill Score  A sort of BSS “cumulated” over all thresholds. BSS is written as 1-BS/BS ref. Sample climate is the reference system. BS measures the mean squared difference between forecast and observation in probability space.  Useful forecast system, if RPSS > 0. RPSS  the improvement of the system performance is detectable for all forecast ranges along the years;  the poor performance of the system in summer 2006 is confirmed;  RPSS always positive throughout 2007 and especially high during DOP.  Lesser skill in 2008 (so far).

A.Montani; COSMO-LEPS status, verification, … X COSMO meeting - Cracow September 2008 Dim 2 Initial conditions Dim 1 Dim 2 Possible evolution scenarios Dim 1 Initial conditions ensemble size reduction Cluster members chosen as representative members (RMs) LAM integrations driven by RMs LAM scenario COSMO-LEPS methodology

A.Montani; COSMO-LEPS status, verification, … X COSMO meeting - Cracow September 2008 Why calibrate? OBS-CLEPS/(OBS+CLEPS)/ LT: 42h Jan Jul Q0.8Q0.95 COSMO-LEPS is not reliable, Probabilities might be wrong! Need for calibration

A.Montani; COSMO-LEPS status, verification, … X COSMO meeting - Cracow September 2008 Reliability Diagram: Verification

A.Montani; COSMO-LEPS status, verification, … X COSMO meeting - Cracow September 2008 raw forecast overconfident, very limited skill strong improvement in reliability long lead-time forecasts more reliable calibrated raw Winter 06/07 Q0.8 24h precipitation + ( 18-42h ) + (66-90h)

A.Montani; COSMO-LEPS status, verification, … X COSMO meeting - Cracow September 2008 raw forecast overconfident modest improvement of reliability long lead-time forecasts more reliable calibrated raw Summer 06 & 07 Q0.8 24h precipitation + ( 18-42h ) + (66-90h)

A.Montani; COSMO-LEPS status, verification, … X COSMO meeting - Cracow September 2008 Special case BSS: M: Ensemble size Weigel et al. 2006, Mon. Wea. Rev. The BSS debiased