Wake Fest 07 - ILC wakefield workshop at SLAC Dec. 11-13, 2007 Shilun Pei with Chris Adolphsen, Zenghai Li, Karl L. Bane, et al. SLAC, Dec. 12, 2007 TTF.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Cockcroft Institute P. Goudket Cockcroft All Hands Meeting - March 2007 ILC Crab Cavity Collaboration Amplitude and Phase Control Development Cockcroft.
Advertisements

Beam-based Measurements of HOMs in the HTC Adam Bartnik for ERL Team, Daniel Hall, John Dobbins, Mike Billing, Matthias Liepe, Ivan Bazarov.
Update of EXT Stripline BPM Electronics with LCLS-style Digital BPM Processors Glen White, with slides by Steve Smith 15 December 2009 ATF2.
Performance Analysis Using Genesis 1.3 Sven Reiche LCLS Undulator Parameter Workshop Argonne National Laboratory 10/24/03.
Preliminary Results from HOM Measurements at the Tesla Test Facility (SLAC) Josef Frisch, Kirsten Hacker, Linda Hendrickson, Justin May, Douglas McCormick,
01/07/2005 SN 1 of 16 Esti mation of HOM Power in the Interaction Region of ILC Sasha Novokhatski Session “Beam RF Effects” ILC MDI Workshop SLAC January.
OPTIMISATION OF BEAM INJECTION INTO THE FIRST ACCELERATING MODULE AT TTF2 WITH CAVITY DIPOLE MODE SIGNALS N. Baboi, H. Schlarb, M. Wendt, G. Kreps, DESY,
PEDM Review 12/7/091 Beam Position Monitors William Morse.
Analysis of ATF EXT/FF Orbit Jitter and extrapolation to IP (Data of ) ATF2 Project Meeting K. Kubo.
High Resolution Cavity BPM for ILC final focal system (IP-BPM) ILC2007/LCWS 2007 BDS, 2007/6/1 The University of Tokyo, KEK, Tohoku Gakuin University,
Direct Wakefield measurement of CLIC accelerating structure in FACET Hao Zha, Andrea Latina, Alexej Grudiev (CERN) 28-Jan
___________________ Jürgen Schreiber, ECFA/DESY LC workshop, Amsterdam, April 1-4, 2003 BEAM ENERGY SPECTROMETER DESY – Dubna – TU Berlin Machine physicists,
Status of ATF2 Cavity BPM Project Sep 29, 2005 Project Scope: Instrument both couplers ATF2 cavity BPM’s (35) Produce prototype for December cavity test.
BPMs and HOM-BPMs for the XFEL Linac N. Baboi for the BPM and the HOM teams (DESY, CEA-Saclay, SLAC, FNAL, Cockroft/Daresbury) XFEL Linac Review Meeting,
Influence of the Third Harmonic Module on the Beam Size Maria Kuhn University of Hamburg Bachelor Thesis Presentation.
HOM Studies at the FLASH(TTF2) Linac Nathan Eddy, Ron Rechenmacher, Luciano Piccoli, Marc Ross FNAL Josef Frisch, Stephen Molloy SLAC Nicoleta Baboi, Olaf.
NanoBPM Signals Second Mini-Workshop on Nano Project at ATF December 11-12, 2004 Toyoko Orimoto Yury Kolomensky Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory & University.
Task 12.4: SRF HOM Beam Diagnostics R.M. Jones, U. van Rienen, T. Flisgen, N. Baboi (UMAN, UROS, DESY)
SRF CAVITY GEOMETRY OPTIMIZATION FOR THE ILC WITH MINIMIZED SURFACE E.M. FIELDS AND SUPERIOR BANDWIDTH The Cockcroft Institute of Accelerator Science and.
Tohoku university Daisuke Okamoto TILC09 1. Motivation 2. Principle 3. Design 4. Expected performance 5. Conclusion contents.
Study of absorber effectiveness in ILC cavities K. Bane, C. Nantista, C. Adolphsen 12 October 2010.
July 19-22, 2006, Vancouver KIRTI RANJAN1 ILC Curved Linac Simulation Kirti Ranjan, Francois Ostiguy, Nikolay Solyak Fermilab + Peter Tenenbaum (PT) SLAC.
FONT Hardware Processing electronics and current beam tests Stephen Molloy Queen Mary, University of London.
Production and Installation Policy of IP-BPM ATF2 Project Meeting, 2006/12/18 Y. Honda, Y. Inoue, T. Hino, T. Nakamura.
S. Molloy, P. Emma, J. Frisch, R. Iverson, M. Ross, D. McCormick, M. Woods, SLAC, CA, USA S. Walston, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, CA, USA V.
Aaron Farricker 107/07/2014Aaron Farricker Beam Dynamics in the ESS Linac Under the Influence of Monopole and Dipole HOMs.
Cavity Alignment Using Beam Induced Higher Order Mode Signals in the TTF LINAC Olivier Napoly, Rita Paparella CEA/DSM/DAPNIA, Gif-sur-Yvette Marc Ross,
1 Data Analysis of LLRF Measurements at FLASH Shilun Pei and Chris Adolphsen Nov. 16 – Nov. 20, 2008.
BPM for FF test (ATF2) Vladimir Vogel KEK 2nd Nano Workshop, KEK, December 12, 2004.
SLAC ESA T-474 ILC BPM energy spectrometer prototype Bino Maiheu University College London on behalf of T-474 Vancouver Linear Collider.
Coupler Short-Range Wakefield Kicks Karl Bane and Igor Zagorodnov Wake Fest 07, 11 December 2007 Thanks to M. Dohlus; and to Z. Li, and other participants.
CARE Steering Committee, Paris, 5 septembre 2005O. Napoly, CEA/Saclay 1 SRF Work Packages 2 Improved Standard Cavity Fabrication 2.1 Reliability analysis.
P I T Z Photo Injector Test Facility Zeuthen Design consideration of the RF deflector to optimize the photo injector at PITZ S.Korepanov.
BEAMLINE HOM ABSORBER O. Nezhevenko, S. Nagaitsev, N. Solyak, V. Yakovlev Fermi National Laboratory December 11, 2007 Wake Fest 07 - ILC wakefield workshop.
Cavity BPM: Multi-bunch analysis N Joshi, S Boogert, A Lyapin, F. Cullinan, et al. Royal Holloway University of London,
Cold BPM development in KEK H. Hayano, March 2011 Jung Keun Ahn (PNU), Sun young Ryu (PNU), Eun San Kim (KNU), Young Im Kim (KNU), Jin yeong Ryu (KNU),
Instrumentation at ATF / TTF Accelerator Test Facility (KEK) Tesla Test Facility – FLASH (DESY) ESA / LCLS (SLAC) Marc Ross, SLAC.
Overview of long pulse experiments at NML Nikolay Solyak PXIE Program Review January 16-17, PXIE Review, N.Solyak E.Harms, S. Nagaitsev, B. Chase,
LCLS Digital BPM Processor for ATF2 Extraction Line BPMs Steve Smith 26 August 2009.
RF Modeling of the LHC Crab Cavity Zenghai Li SLAC Zenghai Li LARP CM20 April 8-10, 2013.
Wakefield effect in ATF2 Kiyoshi Kubo
Direct Wakefield measurement of CLIC accelerating structure in FACET Hao Zha, Andrea Latina, Alexej Grudiev (CERN) 18/06/2015 High Gradient work shop 2015.
1CEA/ Saclay/ SACM CARE/SRF/WP11 Development of a new Beam Position Monitor for FLASH, XFEL and ILC Cryomodules Claire Simon, Michel Luong, Stéphane Chel,
CLIC Workshop 18 th -22 nd January 2016, CERN 1 Alfonso Benot Morell Manfred Wendt.
HOMs in the TESLA 9-cell cavity HOMs in the XFEL and ILC Rainer Wanzenberg SPL HOM workshop CERN, June 25 – 26, 2009.
Progress in CLIC DFS studies Juergen Pfingstner University of Oslo CLIC Workshop January.
Sub-Task HOM-BPM HOM based Beam Position Monitors – Planned and Extant Measurements N. Baboi, DESY, Hamburg EuCARD WP 10: SRF, Annual Review Meeting.
Coupler RF kick simulations.
Wakefield & Cavity based Monitors: Fermilab BPM Development Plans
NanoBPM Progress January 12, 2005 Steve Smith.
For Discussion Possible Beam Dynamics Issues in ILC downstream of Damping Ring LCWS2015 K. Kubo.
CLIC Workshop 2016: Main Beam Cavity BPM
Data Taking and Samples
Wakefield simulations for ILC cavity
FPC Coupler RF Dipole Kick
Update on PS Longitudinal Impedance Model
Update of CLIC accelerating structure design
The SPS 800 MHz RF system E. Shaposhnikova for BE/RF
Overview Multi Bunch Beam Dynamics at XFEL
Summary of MLI Studies Chris Adolphsen
Bunch Tiltmeter Steve Smith SLAC Snowmass July 16, 2001 Update date
SLAC - End Station A ILC testrun – April '06 ...
Beam Position Measurements in TTF Cavities
Study of Fast Ions in CESR
HOM Based Beam Diagnostics in TESLA Superconducting Cavities at FLASH
High Precision SC Cavity Alignment Diagnostics with HOM Measurements
Report on ATF2 Third Project Meeting ATF2 Magnet Movers ATF2 Q-BPM Electronics Is SLAC ILC Instrumentation Group a good name?
Linac Diagnostics Patrick Krejcik, SLAC April 24, 2002
Breakout Session SC3 – Undulator
Recent Measurements in ACC1 (12.9. & )
Presentation transcript:

Wake Fest 07 - ILC wakefield workshop at SLAC Dec , 2007 Shilun Pei with Chris Adolphsen, Zenghai Li, Karl L. Bane, et al. SLAC, Dec. 12, 2007 TTF HOM measurement analysis with curve fitting method

2 Wake Fest 07 - ILC wakefield workshop at SLAC Dec , 2007 Overview Quick review of FLASH facility Dipole mode related theory Model used and curve fitting method Analysis results (mainly focus on narrowband data) –CAV2 in ACC4 –CAV1 in ACC4 –CAV5/CAV6/CAV8 in ACC4 –24 cavities in ACC3/ACC4/ACC5 –Comparison with broadband data Summary

3 Wake Fest 07 - ILC wakefield workshop at SLAC Dec , 2007 Flash facility Schematic of Flash facility Schematic of the mix-down electronics for measurement of the TE111-6 Mode (S. Molloy et al)

4 Wake Fest 07 - ILC wakefield workshop at SLAC Dec , ×9.0275MHz = MHz 186×9.0275MHz = MHz Output signal = Cal. signal + HOM signal Detailed schematic of the mix-down electronics (S. Molloy et al) Detailed mix-down electronics

5 Wake Fest 07 - ILC wakefield workshop at SLAC Dec , 2007 Time domain HOM signal T mat (S. Molloy et al) TE111-6 Mode Up. coupler TE111-6 Mode Down. coupler

6 Wake Fest 07 - ILC wakefield workshop at SLAC Dec , 2007 Steering setup for the experiment BPM17 BPM T mat (Stephen Molloy et al) Module ACC4

7 Wake Fest 07 - ILC wakefield workshop at SLAC Dec , 2007 Frequency domain HOM signal (1) Calibration mode overlaps with the HOM mode (ACC4, CAV1, Upstream, T mat) HOM mode Cal. mode

8 Wake Fest 07 - ILC wakefield workshop at SLAC Dec , 2007 Frequency domain HOM signal (2) Calibration mode overlaps with the HOM mode (ACC4, CAV1, Downstream, T mat) HOM mode Cal. mode

9 Wake Fest 07 - ILC wakefield workshop at SLAC Dec , 2007 Calibration mode splits with the HOM mode (ACC4, CAV2, Upstream, T mat) Frequency domain HOM signal (3) HOM mode Cal. mode

10 Wake Fest 07 - ILC wakefield workshop at SLAC Dec , 2007 Frequency domain HOM signal (4) Calibration mode splits with the HOM mode (ACC4, CAV2, Downstream, T mat) HOM mode Cal. mode

11 Wake Fest 07 - ILC wakefield workshop at SLAC Dec , 2007 Dipole mode response (1) For 9-cell cavity, their relation can be roughly estimated as Mode axis along the cavity, a little different from cavity axis.

12 Wake Fest 07 - ILC wakefield workshop at SLAC Dec , 2007 Dipole mode response (2) Due to the very short bunch length in TTF, bunch tilt angle caused dipole signal can be ignored. While for dipole signal excited by bunch trajectory obliquity angle, sometimes it can also be ignored, sometimes not (bunch offset relative to the mode axis is not so large). The signal at HOM coupler will be While if there are many dipole modes, we have

13 Wake Fest 07 - ILC wakefield workshop at SLAC Dec , 2007 Dipole mode phase If HOM signal is excited by beam with constant offset at region 1 (similar for beam at other regions), the phase difference of the two polarization modes will be 0 o at HOM coupler 1 and 180 o at HOM coupler 2. while if the beam trajectory has some angle of obliquity θ, the phase difference of the two polarization modes will deviate from 0 o or 180 o. Region 1Region 2 Region 3 Region 4 HOM coupler 1HOM coupler 2

14 Wake Fest 07 - ILC wakefield workshop at SLAC Dec , 2007 Model used HOM signal in time domain HOM signal in frequency domain Complex Lorentzian

15 Wake Fest 07 - ILC wakefield workshop at SLAC Dec , 2007 Fitting method (1)

16 Wake Fest 07 - ILC wakefield workshop at SLAC Dec , 2007 Fitting method (2) For later analysis, we will use this method. With VBA (Visual Basic for Application) language, we wrote some macros to do the fitting automatically.

17 Wake Fest 07 - ILC wakefield workshop at SLAC Dec , 2007 Dipole mode frequency Up Mode 1: ±0.0009MHz Down Mode 1: ±0.0011MHz Up Mode 2: ±0.0013MHz Down Mode 2: ±0.0032MHz Fitting error of the frequency is about several kHz.

18 Wake Fest 07 - ILC wakefield workshop at SLAC Dec , 2007 Dipole mode Q Up Mode 1: 14972±289 Down Mode 1: 15779±381 Up Mode 2: 7502±227 Down Mode 2: 8817±131

19 Wake Fest 07 - ILC wakefield workshop at SLAC Dec , 2007 Dipole mode amplitude At both upstream and downstream coupler, the amplitude of the two polarization modes have similar shape. In order to reduce the systematic error, we do the fitting with same dipole mode frequency and Q, while different initial phase and amplitude for the 36 pulses. So there will be 36×4+2+2=148 parameters need to be fit at the same time.

20 Wake Fest 07 - ILC wakefield workshop at SLAC Dec , 2007 Dipole mode phase difference ~10 deg ~9 deg Variation is mostly caused by nonzero beam trajectory obliquity angle relative to mode axis along cavity. Similar shape! Mode phase difference between two polarization modes. Close to 0 o Close to 180 o

21 Wake Fest 07 - ILC wakefield workshop at SLAC Dec , 2007 Dipole mode initial phase variation Initial phase variation means that we cut off the from part of the raw data, fit the dipole mode and cal. mode phase at the cut off point, then got the mode initial phase variation relative to the cal. mode (the phase of the cal. mode for the 36 pulses is almost constant). The initial phase variations at both couplers for each mode are similar, and not so large, which means the HOM signal excited by nonzero beam trajectory obliquity angle is relatively small and can be ignored. ~11 deg ~14 deg

22 Wake Fest 07 - ILC wakefield workshop at SLAC Dec , 2007 Dipole mode characteristics (1) For CAV2 in ACC4, with data set T091106, if we ignore the HOM signal excited by beam trajectory angle (not always true, which will be shown later), the dipole mode center and polarization axis can be roughly determined by further fitting the fitted HOM signal’s amplitude.

23 Wake Fest 07 - ILC wakefield workshop at SLAC Dec , 2007 Dipole mode characteristics(2) From the fitted mode amplitude at upstream coupler, the dipole mode center can be determined to be (-2.888mm, mm), the polarization angles of mode 1 and 2 are o and o. Similar, from the fitted mode amplitude at downstream coupler, these values are (-2.906mm, mm), o and o. To determine the mode center and polarization angle precisely, and also determine the mode axis along cavity, timing information need to be considered to separate the HOM signals excited by beam offset and trajectory obliquity angle (More measurement need to be done).

24 Wake Fest 07 - ILC wakefield workshop at SLAC Dec , 2007 Analysis on CAV1 in ACC4 Mode 1Mode 2Cal. Mode FreqQ Q Up. Coupler ± ± ± ± ± Down. Coupler ± ± ± ± ± ×6+3+3=222 parameters need to be fit at the same time.

25 Wake Fest 07 - ILC wakefield workshop at SLAC Dec , 2007 Analysis on CAV5 in ACC4 (1) ~17 deg ~126 deg

26 Wake Fest 07 - ILC wakefield workshop at SLAC Dec , 2007 Analysis on CAV5 in ACC4(2) ~125 deg ~105 deg

27 Wake Fest 07 - ILC wakefield workshop at SLAC Dec , 2007 Analysis on CAV6 in ACC4 (1) ~160 deg ~16 deg

28 Wake Fest 07 - ILC wakefield workshop at SLAC Dec , 2007 Analysis on CAV6 in ACC4 (2) ~155 deg ~145 deg

29 Wake Fest 07 - ILC wakefield workshop at SLAC Dec , 2007 Analysis on CAV8 in ACC4 (1) ~150 deg ~300 deg~190 deg

30 Wake Fest 07 - ILC wakefield workshop at SLAC Dec , 2007 Analysis on CAV8 in ACC4 (2) ~180 deg ~150 deg ~330 deg

31 Wake Fest 07 - ILC wakefield workshop at SLAC Dec , 2007 Cavities in ACC3/ACC4/ACC5 (1) ACC3ACC5ACC T Two cavities with largest mode splitting

32 Wake Fest 07 - ILC wakefield workshop at SLAC Dec , 2007 Cavities in ACC3/ACC4/ACC5 (2) ACC3ACC5ACC T091106

33 Wake Fest 07 - ILC wakefield workshop at SLAC Dec , 2007 Comparison with broadband data NB data and BB data have almost the same Q. NB data and BB data have some difference on frequency, which is because of the frequency resolution difference(~0.03MHz for NB, 0.05MHz for BB). BB data is more irregular than NB data due to much noise and many spurious modes existence. Narrow bandBroad band Upstream coupler Mode 1 Freq Mode 2 Freq Downstream coupler Mode 1 Freq Mode 2 Freq Upstream coupler Mode 1 Q9672 Mode 2 Q Downstream coupler Mode 1 Q Mode 2 Q T091106, ACC4, CAV1

34 Wake Fest 07 - ILC wakefield workshop at SLAC Dec , 2007 Summary(1) We have investigated one new method to analyze the HOM signal data, and some results have been obtained. The new method can be used to extract the HOM mode frequency, Q and relative phase from the HOM signal data. On the other hand, this method can also be used to find the HOM mode center, polarization axis, mode axis along the cavity, while careful handling of beam timing information need to be considered both in measurement and analysis. Comparing with SVD, this method is more physical, and can also be used in the beam diagnostic data analysis to obtain the beam position and beam trajectory obliquity.

35 Wake Fest 07 - ILC wakefield workshop at SLAC Dec , 2007 More measurements need to be done to get better understanding of HOM mode characteristics. –Sampling time or sampling frequency need to be increased to increase frequency resolution. –Do the measurements when the beam travel through the cavity along a circle with pure beam offset or the beam travel through the cavity along different beam trajectory with different obliquity angle while the initial beam position is fixed. –Try to get the absolute initial angle of the HOM signal in the measurements to separate the HOM signal caused by different sources. –…… Summary(2)