Copyright © Los Angeles Unified School District 2011 Introduction to the LAUSD Teaching and Learning Framework Module 1: The LAUSD Teaching & Learning.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ELA Common Core – What We Know So Far….
Advertisements

CAC NOVEMBER 13, 2014 Common Core State Standards and Universal Design for Learning.
Understanding the Common Core Standards and Planning Lessons to Address The Standards.
Explicit Instruction: when, where, and how?
Teacher Professional Growth & Effectiveness System (TPGES) Laying the Groundwork ISLN September 2012.
Module 2 Text Comprehension
Primary Reading Focus Group
1 © 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH 1 Using the content-focused Coaching® Model to Support Early childhood Literacy and Language Development How to Teach.
Across the Curriculum West Jacksonville Elementary A. Bright and L. Derby.
September 2013 The Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 2: Student Learning Objectives.
The ELA Common Core Journey... Claire Wick Yvonne Harness Sept. 19, 2013.
Bridges New ELA: Supporting SIFE with Low Literacy in the Home Language Session 1, March 19, 2015.
Common Core Planning for Content & Practice Preparing Los Angeles Students for College and Career.
© 2012 Common Core, Inc. All rights reserved. commoncore.org NYS COMMON CORE MATHEMATICS CURRICULUM A Story of Units Module Focus Grade 2- Module 4.
Activity 3 Systems of Professional Learning Module 1 Grades 6–12: Focus on Instructional Shifts.
EVIDENCE BASED WRITING LEARN HOW TO WRITE A DETAILED RESPONSE TO A CONSTRUCTIVE RESPONSE QUESTION!! 5 th Grade ReadingMs. Nelson EDU 643Instructional.
Close Reading. What is close reading? Also known as “analytic reading” Reading to uncover layers of meaning that lead to deep comprehension An instructional.
Welcome to the Home of the Bilingual Bobcats!
1 Let’s Meet! October 13,  All four people have to run.  The baton has to be held and passed by all participants.  You can have world class speed.
Denise Wright, BCPS Elementary Instructional Coach.
1 Investigating the Standards: K-12 English Language Arts Bruce Bufe, Ann Craig, Kathy Learn, Leigh McEwen, Nicole Peterson, Pat Upchurch, Martha Yerington.
California’s Common Core Content Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy in History/Social Studies, Science, and Technical Subjects.
Rigorous Curriculum Design
© 2008 by PACT PACT Scorer Training Pilot.
Science Fiction Flowers for Algernon Drill 1 11/7 Homework: Final paper due 11/12 Objective: Students will with some guidance and support from.
Close and Critical Reading
Framework for Diagnostic Teaching. Framework The framework for diagnostic teaching places a premium on tailoring programs that specifically fit all readers.
Launching the Common Core State Standards Embrace Initiative Presented by Brittany Austin Literacy Interventionist.
Module 2 Planning an Integrated Common Core Literature Lesson.
LAUSD BTSA Induction FACT Day 1 Training.
Introduction to the LAUSD Teaching and Learning Framework
Compass: Module 2 Compass Requirements: Teachers’ Overall Evaluation Rating Student Growth Student Learning Targets (SLTs) Value-added Score (VAM) where.
CLOSE READ LESSON: NON-FICTION MIDDLE SCHOOL ELA LESSON GUIDE Beginning of the Lesson.
Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts and Literacy in History/ Social Studies, Science, and Technical Subjects.
A Closer Look I6: Differentiation to Support Content Language Objectives.
2010 Arizona English Language Arts Standards 10/18/20151.
Arizona's Common Core English Language Arts Standards 10/18/20151 Claudia Gaxiola.
ISLN Network Meeting KEDC SUPERINTENDENT UPDATE. Why we are here--Purpose of ISLN network New academic standards  Deconstruct and disseminate Content.
K-2 FOUNDATIONAL LITERACY MODULE October 9, 2014.
 Common Core catches up with the International Baccalaureate.
LAUSD Student Data ELD Implementation Report 2006.
First Lessons 2.2 Essential Concepts & Practices for Building a Community of Readers The 1st Lessons.
Tools for Teachers: Close Reading –What is it? Why do it? Implementing Key Shifts in the CCSS Level 2 – Session 1.
COUNCIL OF CHIEF STATE SCHOOL OFFICERS (CCSSO) & NATIONAL GOVERNORS ASSOCIATION CENTER FOR BEST PRACTICES (NGA CENTER) JUNE 2010.
Work Sample Seminar1 Developing a Pretest & Posttest for the Literacy Work Sample Portland State University.
By: Mrs. Abdallah. The way we taught students in the past simply does not prepare them for the higher demands of college and careers today and in the.
Candidate Assessment of Performance Conducting Observations and Providing Meaningful Feedback Workshop for Program Supervisors and Supervising Practitioners.
EXAMINING THE MODULES: Instructional practices related to finding and using evidence LT 2a. I can describe the impact of content-rich curriculum on students’
The CCSS and Critical Reading Advancement Via Individual Determination.
Digging Deep into Reading Informational Text CCSS Standards 1-3.
Implementing a Writer’s Workshop
Thinking Through Your Lesson Plan Assignment. Objectives 11-11:15 Three book talks 11:15-11:20 Review where think-aloud modeling and metacognitive framework.
Implementing the Professional Growth Process Session 3 Observing Teaching and Professional Conversations American International School-Riyadh Saturday,
The Common Core August 14, 2012 Unpacking. Goals and Objectives of this Training Participants will:  Become more familiar with the Common Core Standards.
Last Updated: 5/12/2016 Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System (T-TESS) Teacher Overview.
COMPREHENSION STRATEGIES
Our Mission: To provide a foundation which motivates and prepares individuals to be college and career ready.
Framing Success with Effective Lesson Objectives and Demonstrations of Learning Introductions, logistics/housekeeping.
Interactive Read Aloud & Shared Reading
Saskatchewan Reads for Middle Years
Saskatchewan Reads for Middle Years
Your Standards TODAY’S FLOW MORNING: Standards & 1st Unit Curriculum
Do nows & Exit Tickets.
Building Academic Language
Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System (T-TESS)
K–8 Session 1: Exploring the Critical Areas
SUPPORTING THE Progress Report in MATH
Building Academic Language
Unpacking the Common Core August 14, 2012.
Presentation transcript:

Copyright © Los Angeles Unified School District 2011 Introduction to the LAUSD Teaching and Learning Framework Module 1: The LAUSD Teaching & Learning Framework

Copyright © Los Angeles Unified School District 2011 Teaching and Learning Framework Modules Overview Module 1: The LAUSD Teaching & Learning Framework Module 2: The LAUSD Teaching & Learning Framework Rubric Module 3: The Self-Assessment and Individual Growth Plan

Copyright © Los Angeles Unified School District 2011 Objectives To become familiar with the content and structure of the Teaching and Learning Framework To reflect on Highly Effective Teaching Practices To identify the benefits of using the LAUSD Teaching and Learning Framework

Copyright © Los Angeles Unified School District 2011 A Message from Dr. Deasy

Copyright © Los Angeles Unified School District 2011 Context for the LAUSD Framework Based on Enhancing Professional Practice: A Framework for Teaching – Created in 1996 Validated in recent national studies

Copyright © Los Angeles Unified School District 2011 College Prepared and Career Ready Students Common Core (The What) Master Plan (The Who) Teaching & Learning Framework (The How)

Copyright © Los Angeles Unified School District 2011 Think-Pair-Share: Journey from Novice to Expert Think of a time when you improved your skills in any area. What strategies did you use?

Copyright © Los Angeles Unified School District 2011 Reading Activity: Say Something Handout #1 – Excerpt from Enhancing Professional Practice: A Framework for Teaching – A Road Map for Novices A Road Map for Novices

Copyright © Los Angeles Unified School District 2011 Reading Activity: Say Something Create groups of four and number yourselves accordingly. Read Handout #1 – A Road Map for Novices Person #1 - Reads the 1 st paragraph aloud and #2 responds with one idea heard from the text. Person #2 - Reads the 2 nd paragraph aloud and #3 responds with one idea heard from the text. Person #3 - Reads the 3 rd paragraph aloud and #4 responds with one idea heard from the text. Person #4 - Reads the 4 th paragraph aloud and #1 responds with one idea heard from the text.

Copyright © Los Angeles Unified School District 2011 Highly Effective Practices 1.Think about various practices that signal expert or highly effective teaching. 2.With a partner, come up with the 3-5 practices you identified as essential. (5 min)

Copyright © Los Angeles Unified School District 2011 Elements 2b3: Student Ownership of Their Work LAUSD Teaching and Learning Framework Vocabulary 11 Standards #2: Classroom Environment Components 2b: Establishing a Culture for Learning LAUSD Teaching & Learning Framework

Copyright © Los Angeles Unified School District 2011 Handout #2 - Teaching and Learning Framework Placemat 1: Planning & Preparation 2: Classroom Environment 3: Delivery of Instruction 4: Additional Professional Responsibilities 5: Professional Growth

ElementIneffectiveDevelopingEffectiveHighly Effective 3b1. Quality and Purpose of Questions Questions are designed to challenge students and elicit high-level thinking Teacher’s questions do not invite a thoughtful response or are not relevant. Questions do not reveal student understanding about the content/concept or text under discussion, or are not comprehensible to most students. Teacher’s questions are a combination of both high and low quality, or delivered in rapid succession. Only some questions invite a thoughtful response that reveals student understanding about the content/concept or text under discussion. Teacher differentiates questions to make them comprehensible for some students. Teacher’s questions require rigorous student thinking. Most questions invite and reveal student understanding about the content/concept or text under discussion. Teacher differentiates questions to make learning comprehensible for student subgroups. Teacher’s questions require rigorous student thinking and invite students to demonstrate understanding through reasoning. Students themselves formulate questions to advance their understanding about the content/concept or text under discussion. Teacher differentiates questions to make learning comprehensible for all students in the class. HANDOUT # 3 Rubric Sample Standard 3 Component 3b: Using Questioning and Discussion Techniques Effective teachers design questions that provide cognitive challenge and engineer discussions among students to ensure all students participation. The highly effective teacher designs instruction that provides opportunities for students to develop their own cognitively challenging questions and to engage in various types of student-to-student discussions. Standard 3: Delivery of Instruction Note: This content is taken directly from the working draft of the Teaching and Learning Framework, which was developed with our stakeholders, but does not substitute for current language in the LAUSD-UTLA Collective Bargaining Agreement.

Copyright © Los Angeles Unified School District 2011 Why A Framework? Silently, read Handout # 4 - Excerpt from Enhancing Professional Practice: A Framework for Teaching Response to Text Activity – As you read: Put a next to something you agree with Put an next to something that surprised you Put a next to something you are wondering about !

Copyright © Los Angeles Unified School District 2011 Small Group Discussion: Why A Framework? Share your findings with the whole group. (2 minutes)

Copyright © Los Angeles Unified School District 2011 Video Clip: Experience From the Field From LAUSD teachers and administrators

Copyright © Los Angeles Unified School District 2011 Objectives ✔ ✔ ✔ To become familiar with the content and structure of the Teaching and Learning Framework To reflect on Highly Effective Teaching Practices To identify benefits of using the LAUSD Teaching and Learning Framework

Copyright © Los Angeles Unified School District 2011 Table Talk Activity: Rubric Matching Quiz Directions: Handout # 1 – Rubric Matching Quiz Working in table groups, complete the quiz. Read each descriptor to determine the corresponding performance level. Come to a consensus for a group response. Everyone should be prepared to respond.

Copyright © Los Angeles Unified School District 2011 ElementIneffectiveDevelopingEffectiveHighly Effective 3b1.Quality and Purpose of Questions Questions are designed to challenge students and elicit high-level thinking CO HANDOUT # 1 Standard 3: Delivery of Instruction Component 3b: Using Questioning and Discussion Techniques D. Teacher’s questions do not invite a thoughtful response or are not relevant. Questions do not reveal student understanding about the content/concept or text under discussion, or are not comprehensible to most students. A. Teacher’s questions are a combination of both high and low quality, or delivered in rapid succession. Only some questions invite a thoughtful response that reveals student understanding about the content/concept or text under discussion. Teacher differentiates questions to make them comprehensible for some students. C. Teacher’s questions require rigorous student thinking. Most questions invite and reveal student understanding about the content/concept or text under discussion. Teacher differentiates questions to make learning comprehensible for student subgroups. B. Teacher’s questions require rigorous student thinking and invite students to demonstrate understanding through reasoning. Students themselves formulate questions to advance their understanding about the content/concept or text under discussion. Teacher differentiates questions to make learning comprehensible for all students in the class.

Copyright © Los Angeles Unified School District 2011 HANDOUT # 1 Standard 3: Delivery of Instruction Component 3b: Using Questioning and Discussion Techniques ElementIneffectiveDevelopingEffectiveHighly Effective 3b1. Quality and Purpose of Questions Questions are designed to challenge students and elicit high-level thinking Teacher’s questions do not invite a thoughtful response or are not relevant. Questions do not reveal student understanding about the content/concept or text under discussion, or are not comprehensible to most students. Teacher’s questions are a combination of both high and low quality, or delivered in rapid succession. Only some questions invite a thoughtful response that reveals student understanding about the content/concept or text under discussion. Teacher differentiates questions to make them comprehensible for some students. Teacher’s questions require rigorous student thinking. Most questions invite and reveal student understanding about the content/concept or text under discussion. Teacher differentiates questions to make learning comprehensible for student subgroups. Teacher’s questions require rigorous student thinking and invite students to demonstrate understanding through reasoning. Students themselves formulate questions to advance their understanding about the content/concept or text under discussion. Teacher differentiates questions to make learning comprehensible for all students in the class. What are key distinctions between each level of the rubric?

Copyright © Los Angeles Unified School District 2011 Video Activity – Part 1 Common Core State Standard – ELA /Grade 8 Key Ideas and Details RL Cite the textual evidence that most strongly supports an analysis of what the text says explicitly as well as inferences drawn from the text. Range of Reading and Level of Text Complexity RL By the end of the year, read and comprehend literature, including stories, dramas, and poems, at the high end of grades 6–8 text complexity band independently and proficiently.

Copyright © Los Angeles Unified School District 2011 Video Activity – Part 1 Let us view the entire video segment of Mr. Foster’s Lesson

Copyright © Los Angeles Unified School District 2011 Video Activity – Part 2 Directions: Using Handout # 2 – Video Activity, you will assume the role of an observer and record what you see and hear from the students and teacher. Pay close attention to the questions and answers from the teacher and students. Record what you see and hear from the students and teacher in this section.

Copyright © Los Angeles Unified School District 2011 Video Activity – Part 2 We will watch the first minute of the same video segment

Copyright © Los Angeles Unified School District 2011 Video Activity: Turn and Talk Now turn to a partner and compare notes.

Copyright © Los Angeles Unified School District 2011 Sample Observation Notes Standard 3: Delivery of Instruction Component 3b: Using Questioning and Discussion Techniques T: Like I said we are going to have this summary. R. and C. are going to be keeping track of your responses. …used this last minute to confer with your group.. and to figure out what the attached emotion was. … Ronald who is keeping track of the emotion and C. who is keeping track of the happened. … as a class we all try to label them as it as an explicit emotion. That is in the text. It says what the characters were thinking or feeling. …Or implicit meaning. you … figure it out like you guys did in the poem. You had to look at mountains and at street and come up with sad. ….So if the last line of this (pointed to chart)… she was so sad. That would it have been explicit or implicit? S: Explicit T: Thank you Bobby. I wish……with a chorus. Let’s try that again. Would it have been implicit or explicit? S: (total class in unison) Explicit! T: T.Y again. Turn and Talk Activity Now turn to your partner and compare your notes to this observer’s notes.

Copyright © Los Angeles Unified School District 2011 Video Activity – Part 3 We will watch the rest of the same video segment.

Copyright © Los Angeles Unified School District 2011 Small Group Discussion: Rubric as a Tool How would Mr. Foster use this rubric to reflect on his practice for this element? ElementIneffectiveDevelopingEffectiveHighly Effective 3b1. Quality and Purpose of Questions Questions are designed to challenge students and elicit high-level thinking CO Teacher’s questions do not invite a thoughtful response or are not relevant. Questions do not reveal student understanding about the content/concept or text under discussion, or are not comprehensible to most students. Teacher’s questions are a combination of both high and low quality, or delivered in rapid succession. Only some questions invite a thoughtful response that reveals student understanding about the content/concept or text under discussion. Teacher differentiates questions to make them comprehensible for some students. Teacher’s questions require rigorous student thinking. Most questions invite and reveal student understanding about the content/concept or text under discussion. Teacher differentiates questions to make learning comprehensible for sub-groups of students. Teacher’s questions require rigorous student thinking and invite students to demonstrate understanding through reasoning. Students themselves formulate questions to advance their understanding about the content/concept or text under discussion. Teacher differentiates questions to make learning comprehensible for all students in the class.

Copyright © Los Angeles Unified School District 2011 Unpacking the Rubric: “Find the GIST” Directions: Preview the rubric for the elements under Standard 3 Restate the most important idea for any of the Elements – Consider key nouns and verbs Discuss and share your findings in triads

Copyright © Los Angeles Unified School District 2011 “Find the GIST” Reading Strategy: Here’s an example Standard 3: Delivery of Instruction Component 3b: Using Questioning and Discussion Techniques ElementIneffectiveDevelopingEffectiveHighly Effective 3b1.Quality and Purpose of Questions Questions are designed to challenge students and elicit high-level thinking Teacher’s questions do not invite a thoughtful response or are not relevant. Questions do not reveal student understanding about the content/concept or text under discussion, or are not comprehensible to most students. Teacher’s questions are a combination of both high and low quality, or delivered in rapid succession. Only some questions invite a thoughtful response that reveals student understanding about the content/concept or text under discussion. Teacher differentiates questions to make them comprehensible for some students. Teacher’s questions require rigorous student thinking. Most questions invite and reveal student understanding about the content/concept or text under discussion. Teacher differentiates questions to make learning comprehensible for sub-groups of students. Teacher’s questions require rigorous student thinking and invite students to demonstrate understanding through reasoning. Students themselves formulate questions to advance their understanding about the content/concept or text under discussion. Teacher differentiates questions to make learning comprehensible for all students in the class.

Copyright © Los Angeles Unified School District 2011 Unpacking the Rubric: “Find the GIST” Directions: Preview the rubric for the elements under Standard 3 Restate the most important idea for any of the Elements – Consider key nouns and verbs Discuss and share your findings in triads

Copyright © Los Angeles Unified School District 2011 Next Steps: Reflection of Practice Review the rubric for Element 3b1 – “Quality and Purpose of Questions” and reflect on your own practice: What questions do I design to challenge and elicit higher level thinking from my students?

Copyright © Los Angeles Unified School District 2011 Objectives To develop an understanding of the LAUSD Teaching and Learning Framework Rubric To reflect on teaching practice To connect instructional practices to the Teaching and Learning Framework