The Allen Telescope Array Douglas Bock Radio Astronomy Laboratory University of California, Berkeley Socorro, August 23, 2001.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SKADSMTAvA A. van Ardenne SKADS Coördinator ASTRON, P.O. Box 2, 7990 AA Dwingeloo The Netherlands SKADS; The.
Advertisements

Arecibo 40th Anniversary Workshop--R. L. Brown The Arecibo Astrometric/Timing Array Robert L. Brown.
NAIC-NRAO School on Single-Dish Radio Astronomy. Arecibo, July 2005
Optimization of Compact Array Configurations to Minimize Side-Lobes for Two Cases: The New E-configuration for the EVLA and Phased Array for the LWA Station.
SKAMP - the Molonglo SKA Demonstrator M.J. Kesteven CSIRO ATNF, T. J. Adams, D. Campbell-Wilson, A.J. Green E.M. Sadler University of Sydney, J.D. Bunton,
SKA Specifications and Reflector Antennas P. Dewdney Mar 31, 2008.
ASKAP and DVP David DeBoer ASKAP Project Director 15 April 2010 Arlington, VA.
Transient Science with the Allen Telescope Array Geoff Bower Berkeley.
BDT Radio – 2b – CMV 2009/10/09 Basic Detection Techniques 2b (2009/10/09): Focal Plane Arrays Case study: WSRT System overview Receiver and.
The Future of the Past Harvard University Astronomy 218 Concluding Lecture, May 4, 2000.
The Transient Universe: AY 250 Spring 2007 New Radio Telescopes Geoff Bower.
Sascha D-PAD Sparse Aperture Array.
The Murchison Widefield Array: an SKA Precursor Shep Doeleman - MIT Haystack For the MWA Project.
Project status and specifications Douglas Bock Project Manager 1.
ATA Antennas Feeds and Systems NSF Review 8/05/08 Jack Welch.
Panorama of the Universe: Daily all-sky surveys with the SKA John D. Bunton, CSIRO TIP, Ronald D. Ekers, CSIRO ATNF and Elaine M. Sadler, University of.
CARMA (Combined Array for Research in Millimeter Astronomy) Capabilities and Future Prospects Dick Plambeck SF/ISM Seminar, 9/5/2006.
July 2001SKA Technologies at Molonglo1 Prototype SKA technologies at Molonglo – 1. Overview & Science Goals Joint project between the University of Sydney,
Current mm interferometers Sébastien Muller Nordic ARC Onsala Space Observatory Sweden Turku Summer School – June 2009.
Array Design David Woody Owens Valley Radio Observatory presented at NRAO summer school 2002.
Name1 SKA(DS) System Design Aspects 4 th SKADS Workshop, Lisbon, 2-3 October 2008 SKA(DS) System Design Aspects: building a system Laurens Bakker.
Star Formation Research Now & With ALMA Debra Shepherd National Radio Astronomy Observatory ALMA Specifications: Today’s (sub)millimeter interferometers.
SKA AA-Low Station Configurations and Trade-off Analysis Nima Razavi-Ghods, Ahmed El-Makadema AAVP 2011, ASTRON, Dwingeloo Dec
EVLA Early Science: Shared Risk Observing EVLA Advisory Committee Meeting, March 19-20, 2009 Claire Chandler Deputy AD for Science, NM Ops.
Phased Array Feeds John O’Sullivan SKANZ 2012 CSIRO Astronomy and Space Science,
November 2009, Lunch talk The most compact E configuration for the EVLA. L. Kogan, G. Stanzione, J. Ott, F. Owen National Radio Astronomy Observatory Socorro,
Tenth Summer Synthesis Imaging Workshop University of New Mexico, June 13-20, 2006 Array Configuration Aaron Cohen Naval Research Laboratory.
SKA Introduction Jan Geralt Bij de Vaate Andrew Faulkner, Andre Gunst, Peter Hall.
An RFI Mitigation Strategy for the Allen Telescope Array Geoffrey C. Bower UC Berkeley.
Stability of Maximum S/N Beams CSIRO ASTRONOMY AND SPACE SCIENCE Aidan Hotan | ASKAP Deputy Project Scientist 4 th March 2014 SKA Workshop on Calibration.
10 January 2006AAS EVLA Town Hall Meeting1 The EVLA: A North American Partnership The EVLA Project on the Web
Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array Expanded Very Large Array Robert C. Byrd Green Bank Telescope Very Long Baseline Array New VLBA capabilities.
The Murchison Wide Field Array Murchison, ~300 km from Geraldton.
School of something FACULTY OF OTHER School of Physics & Astronomy FACULTY OF MATHEMATICS & PHYSICAL SCIENCES The Cornish Survey Workshop.
Which dipoles to use to optimize survey speed? –What tapering? –Trade-off between sensitivity, FOV and low side-lobe levels –Station beam stability, pointing.
The Expanded Very Large Array: Phase I Science and Technical Requirements Rick Perley NRAO - Socorro.
Primary Beam Shape Calibration from Mosaicked, Interferometric Observations Chat Hull Collaborators : Geoff Bower, Steve Croft, Peter Williams, Casey Law,
THE MURCHISON WIDEFIELD ARRAY: FROM COMMISSIONING TO OBSERVING D. Oberoi 1,2, I. H. Cairns 3, L. D. Matthews 2 and L. Benkevitch 2 on behalf of the MWA.
1wnb Synthesis Imaging Workshop ALMA The Atacama Large Millimeter Array.
Arecibo Frontiers – 12 Sep Beyond the Frontiers: The Road From Arecibo to The Radio Synoptic Survey Telescope (RSST) Steven T. Myers National Radio.
ASKAP Capabilities John Reynolds on behalf of the SEIC and ASKAP team.
Murchison Widefield Array (MWA) : Design and Status Divya Oberoi, Lenoid Benkevitch MIT Haystack Observatory doberoi, On behalf.
The Very Small Array Angela Taylor & Anze Slosar Cavendish Astrophysics University of Cambridge.
Answers from the Working Group on AGN and jets G. Moellenbrock, J. Romney, H. Schmitt, V. Altunin, J. Anderson, K. Kellermann, D. Jones, J. Machalski,
Observing Strategies at cm wavelengths Making good decisions Jessica Chapman Synthesis Workshop May 2003.
Large Area Surveys - I Large area surveys can answer fundamental questions about the distribution of gas in galaxy clusters, how gas cycles in and out.
ASKAP Update David DeBoer ASKAP Project Director 26 May 2010.
A llen A rray T elescope Low Hanging Fruit in The New Radio Sky or Radio Surveys and Transients with the Allen Telescope Array or The Same Road Twice Geoffrey.
Summary of the Paris SKA Meeting 4-8 September 2006 R. T. Schilizzi.
A real-time software backend for the GMRT : towards hybrid backends CASPER meeting Capetown 30th September 2009 Collaborators : Jayanta Roy (NCRA) Yashwant.
SKA: Configurations and Simulations Ramesh Bhat Colin Lonsdale Roger Cappallo Shep Doeleman Divya Oberoi Joanne Attridge MIT Haystack Observatory.
The SKA: Next Week, the Next 3 Years & Beyond Jim Cordes, Cornell University 24 August 01  Concepts  Science Goals & Payoffs  Configurations, Modes.
K-Band Focal Plane Array Project Engineering Overview Matt Morgan National Radio Astronomy Observatory 2/27/2008.
Update On The Square Kilometer Array World Space Congress October 15, 2002 Jill Tarter.
Effectiveness of the Correlator Field of View Weighting Technique in Source Attenuation Dylan R. Nelson 1, S. S. Doeleman 2, C.J. Lonsdale 2, D. Oberoi.
10 January 2006AAS EVLA Town Hall Meeting1 The EVLA: A North American Partnership The EVLA Project on the Web
Astrochemistry with the Upgraded Combined Array for Research in Millimeter-wave Astronomy D. N. Friedel Department of Astronomy University of Illinois.
Single Dish Summer School, Green Bank 2007 Things to do with Single Dish: VLBI Tapasi Ghosh NAIC/Arecibo Observatory Outline: Interferometry Basic.
WVU Astronomy / Engineering and The Green Bank Observatory Richard Prestage Scientist, NRAO.
SAGE meeting Socorro, May 22-23, 2007 WIDAR Correlator Overview Michael P. Rupen Project Scientist for WIDAR & Software.
Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array Karl G. Jansky Very Large Array Robert C. Byrd Green Bank Telescope Very Long Baseline Array ngVLA: Reconfigurability.
Multi-beaming & Wide Field Surveys
Mid Frequency Aperture Arrays
Phased Array Feeds Wim van Cappellen
Imaging and Calibration Challenges
Pulsar Timing with ASKAP Simon Johnston ATNF, CSIRO
HERA Imaging and Closure
Radio Astronomy Spectrum Management in practice – Australia (ATNF)
Some Illustrative Use Cases
Rick Perley NRAO - Socorro
Presentation transcript:

The Allen Telescope Array Douglas Bock Radio Astronomy Laboratory University of California, Berkeley Socorro, August 23, 2001

Outline: System description Science goals Antenna configuration The Allen Telescope Array

ATA: What is It? Massively parallel array of small dishes – 350 elements each 6.1 m in diameter – total collecting area larger than 100 m dish – 0.5 – 11.2 GHz simultaneously – multiple beams Must be much cheaper than existing arrays Must be much cheaper than existing arrays Joint project of SETI Institute and UC Berkeley Funded by private donations Access to the community determined by NSF contribution (but collaborative projects also possible)

ATA System Overview

IF Processing Tradeoffs to be madeLikely to achieve # RF tunings (LO1’s)4 # Beams (dual poln.) per RF tuning4 BW per beam100 MHz Constraints on beam locationsprimary beam? Image and alias rejection30–40 dB Only 5 K$ per antenna Total of 16 dual polarization beams

Correlator Image entire primary field of view Large number of antennas is a challenge Achievable BW will be set by funding F/X design looks best for large N Potential for using industry terabit switching Likely 1024 channels in maximum BW 100 MHz

Beamformers  Backends Multiple beams speed up SETI searches – More than 1 star per field of view – Run in anticoincidence to identify RFI – Enables simultaneous SETI and radio astronomy Pulsar research will be a major use RA spectrometer in addition to correlator? Active RFI suppression Active RFI suppression

ATA Performance Number of Elements350 Element Diameter6.10m Total Geometric Area1.02E+04m^2 Aperture Efficiency63% Effective Area6.44E+03m^2 2.33K/Jy System Temperature43K System Eqiv. Flux Density18Jy Ae/Tsys150m^2/K Effective Array Diameter687mNatural Weighting Frequency110GHz Primary FoV3.50.4degree Synthesized Beam Size10811arc sec Number of Beams>4 Continuum Sensitivity BW0.2GHzConfusion Flux Limit in 10 sec0.41mJy0.1 mJy at 1.4 GHz Spectral Line Resolution10km/s Frequency110GHz BW3.E+043.E+05Hz Integration Time1000 sec RMS brightness K

Unique features of the ATA Wide field of view 1.4 GHz) Large-N design (N=350, D=6.1 m) Broad instantaneous frequency coverage (0.5–11.2 GHz) Ability to conduct several simultaneous observing programs

Key ATA science drivers HI – All sky HI, z < 0.03, Milky Way at 100  – 25% of northern sky to z ~ 0.2 – Zeeman Magnetic Fields Temporal Variables – Pulsar Timing Array – Pulsar survey follow-ups – Extreme Scattering Events – Transients SETI – 100,000 FGK stars – Galactic plane survey (2nd generation DSP)

Configuration Requirements SETI and pulsars/transients – low sidelobes – minimum shadowing – image southern sources – minimum confusion Imaging projects — snapshots! – low sidelobes – sufficient resolution but good sensitivity to extended structure (for H I, best resolution which matches T b sensitivity to z-sensitivity)

Hat Creek Observatory N 41° N, 121° W (Far northern California)

Optimizing uv Coverage Fit uv coverage to a Gaussian model (F. Boone 2001a,b; A&A submitted and in prep.) Model minimizes near sidelobes and forces a round beam (at chosen declination) Maintains ‘complete’ uv coverage (to 440 m baselines) Far sidelobes 1/N (rms)

Filling factor: ~ Shadowing: 14% (2-hr,  =  29°)

Nat. weighted beam 78   78  at  = 5° ( = 1.4 GHz) Sidelobes: near 0.9% peak; far 0.3% rms Contours: 0.3, 0.5, 0.9 … %

Shadowing: 18% (2-hr,  =  29°) Filling factor: ~ 0.035

Nat. weighted beam 78   78  at  = 23° ( = 1.4 GHz) Sidelobes: near 0.7% peak; far 0.3% rms Contours: 0.3, 0.5, 0.9 … %

Nat. weighted beam 78   78  at  = 23° ( = 1.4 GHz) Sidelobes: near 0.7% peak; far 0.3% rms Contours: 0.3, 0.5, 0.9 … % Re-weight for rounder beam and sidelobes < 0.1%  < 10% loss in sensitivity Put antennas in the road  sidelobes 0.5% Lose 10% of antennas  sidelobes  2% Truncate at B max = 440 m (limit of complete uv coverage)  84  beam, sidelobes 1.5% Random position error (1 m)  no effect

cf. the most compact configuration possible Antennas within 280 m diameter (filling factor 0.15) [0.039] Antennas still random (0.3% rms far sidelobes) Uniform distribution (5% near sidelobes [0.7%]) Transit beam 150  [78  ] Shadowing 59% (2-hr,  =  29°) [18%]

Mosaicing faint, extended structure ATA 350VLA E-array ND (mosaicing speed) F (filling factor) NDF84124 Shortest baseline11 m35 m Spatial dynamic range Snapshot near sidelobes0.7 %7 %

– Begin construction – First use of partial array – First hectare complete – Feed into SKA technology decision point Timeline for ATA – R&D phase – Rapid Prototyping Array – Site selection – Preliminary design reviews – Design phase – Critical design reviews – Production Test Array – Plan construction phase