Total Loads and Water Quality in the Corpus Christi Bay System Presented by: Ann Quenzer and Dr. David Maidment Special Thanks: Corpus Christi Bay National.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Phosphorus Loads from Streambank Erosion to Surface Waters in the Minnesota River Basin D. J. Mulla Professor, Dept. Soil, Water, Climate University of.
Advertisements

Team Meeting #5, Great Lakes Protection Fund Grant A Phosphorus Soil Test Metric To Reduce Dissolved Phosphorus Loading to Lake Erie Heidelberg University.
Developing Modeling Tools in Support of Nutrient Reduction Policies Randy Mentz Adam Freihoefer, Trip Hook, & Theresa Nelson Water Quality Modeling Technical.
LTHIA – Upgrades and Training Bernard A. Engel Tong Zhai Larry Theller Agricultural and Biological Department Purdue University In conjunction.
IMPERVIOUS SURFACES Imperviousness values were assigned to each land use based on the literature. An average was calculated from a range of values for.
The World of GIS Hydro ‘98 David R. Maidment University of Texas at Austin Presented by:
Land Use Change and Its Effect on Water Quality: A Watershed Level BASINS-SWAT Model in West Georgia Gandhi Raj Bhattarai Diane Hite Upton Hatch Prepared.
CEE 795 Water Resources Modeling and GIS Learning Objectives: Perform raster based network delineation from digital elevation models Perform raster based.
TEXAS COASTAL WETLANDS Surface Water and its link to coastal wetlands loss Christine Otto.
Using a Coupled Groundwater-Flow and Nitrate-Balance-Regression Model to Explain Trends, Forecast Loads, and Target Future Reclamation Ward Sanford, USGS,
City of Austin Water Quality Master Planning - GIS Model David Maidment Francisco Olivera Mike Barrett Christine Dartiguenave Ann Quenzer CRWR - University.
Modeling Water Quality. Special reference of this work to….
MAST602: Advection, transports, budgets Flux, transport Radiation, Advection, Diffusion Conservation of volume Continuity Conservation of salt Freshwater.
N ON- P OINT S OURCE P OLLUTION Analysis and Prediction in ArcView David Munn Texas A&M University/Dept. of Civil Engineering CVEN 689 Applications of.
Real-Time Water Quality Monitoring for Investigating the Strengths and Weaknesses of Existing Monitoring Techniques Little Bear River Basin Jeffery S.
Non-Point Source Pollutant Modeling Analysis and Prediction David Munn.
Water Quality Modeling in GIS Application of Schematic Network Processing Schema Links and Nodes have unique behaviors based on their type A framework.
Engineering Hydrology (ECIV 4323)
St. Johns River Water Supply Impact Study by Getachew Belaineh Ph. D., P.H. 1 Brian McGurk P.G. 1 Louis Motz Ph. D., P.E 2 Follow up Review meeting March,
A Water Quality Loading Model for Tillamook Bay Patrice A. Melancon Thanks to: Dr. David Maidment Dr. Michael Barrett Dr. Francisco Olivera Dr. Maidment’s.
Brian Haggard Arkansas Water Resources Center UA Division of Agriculture Arkansas Water Resources Center.
Bacteria Loadings Watershed Model Copano Bay watershed Copano Bay watershed Copano Bay Carrie Gibson CE 394K.2 Surface Water Hydrology Spring Semester.
Sediment Quality in the Corpus Christi Bay Sediment Quality in the Corpus Christi Bay Natalie Bartosh GIS in Water Resources, Fall 2003 Dr. Maidment, The.
Other Issues in Water Pollution Urbanization General Population Growth Increased Run-off and Pollution Non-point Pollution Sources (eg Agriculture) Pesticide.
Nonpoint Source Pollution u Some basic principles u Example study of total pollution loads in the Corpus Christi Bay System –rainfall-runoff relationship.
Modified SWAT Model for Cold Climate of Canada Rouge River Modified SWAT Model for Cold Climate of Canada Application: Rouge River Watershed Masoud Asadzadeh.
GIS-Hydro Database for Tres Palacios Bay Stephanie Johnson GIS in Water Resources Class Presentation November 21, 2006 Dr. David Maidment – Advisor UT.
Estimating Pollutant Loads Caroni River Bolivar, Venezuela Global Applications of GIS Technology Lee Sherman.
al-weather-gang/wp/2014/10/28/hawaii- lava-flow-advances-now-less-than-100- yards-from-nearest-home-in- pahoa/?hpid=z3http://
Water Quality Monitoring and Constituent Load Estimation in the Kings River near Berryville, Arkansas 2009 Brian E. Haggard Arkansas Water Resources Center.
Monte Carlo analysis of the Copano Bay fecal coliform model Prepared by, Ernest To.
CE 424 HYDROLOGY 1 Instructor: Dr. Saleh A. AlHassoun.
David Maidment & Lynn E. Katz & Imane Mrini Center for Research in Water Resources The University of Texas at Austin Total Maximum Daily Load for Zinc.
Water Quality Modeling of Bonnet Carré Freshwater Flows in the Pontchartrain Estuary Rachel Roblin Alex McCorquodale Ioannis Georgiou.
Engineering Hydrology (ECIV 4323)
The University of Mississippi Geoinformatics Center NASA MRC RPC – 11 July 2007 Modeling Non-Point Source Pollution and Erosion into Gulf Coast Bays and.
Role of the Texas Water Development Board in Environmental Flow studies Barney Austin Surface Water Resources Division Texas Water Development Board May.
BASINS 2.0 and The Trinity River Basin By Jóna Finndís Jónsdóttir.
Description of WMS Watershed Modeling System. What Model Does Integrates GIS and hydrologic models Uses digital terrain data to define watershed and sub.
Building an OpenNSPECT Database for Your Watershed Shan Burkhalter and Dave Eslinger National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Office for.
LAKE D.AREA (km 2 ) NPS loadings (kg/yr) sewage (kg/yr) precipitation (kg/yr) residential (kg/yr) Pload Int (kg/yr) cleared % Moose
The World of GIS Hydro ‘98 David R. Maidment University of Texas at Austin Presented by:
Chatfield Reservoir Phosphorus Budget Jim Saunders and Jamie Anthony WQCD, Standards Unit 13 Dec 2007.
Integrating the NAWQA approach to assessments in rivers and streams By Donna Myers, Bill Wilber, Anne Hoos, and Charlie Crawford U.S. Geological Survey,
Nonpoint Source Pollution Some basic principles Example study of total pollution loads in the Corpus Christi Bay System (Ann Quenzer’s research) –rainfall-runoff.
GIS for Atmospheric Sciences and Hydrology By David R. Maidment University of Texas at Austin National Center for Atmospheric Research, 6 July 2005.
Modeling Stream Flow of Clear Creek Watershed-Emory River Basin Modeling Stream Flow of Clear Creek Watershed-Emory River Basin Presented by Divya Sharon.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Scenario generation for long-term water budget.
Watershed Monitoring and Modeling in Switzer, Chollas, and Paleta Creek Watersheds Kenneth Schiff Southern California Coastal Water Research Project
Phosphorus Stressor in Lake Champlain Basin Alison Nord, Anna Speed, Ashley Murphy.
Load Estimation Using Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT)
Bacterial TMDL Model for Copano Bay Research performed by Carrie Gibson at Center for Research in Water Resources Schematic processor tool developed by.
Freshwater flows to bays and estuaries Paul Montagna George Ward University of Texas at Austin.
Water-Surface Evaporation in Reservoir
L-THIA Online and LID Larry Theller
Advisor: Dr. Tom Brikowski
Engineering Hydrology (ECIV 4323)
Conclusions & Future Work
Estimation of Runoff & nonpoint source pollution using GIS techniques
Approaches to Continental Scale River Flow Routing
Nonpoint Source Pollution
GIS FOR HYDROLOGIC DATA DEVELOPMENT FOR DESIGN OF HIGHWAY DRAINAGE FACILITIES by Francisco Olivera and David Maidment Center for Research in Water Resources.
Nitrogen Transport Estimates in the San Antonio River Basin
Bacteria Loadings Watershed Model:
Relating Actual Runoff to Potential Runoff
Ward Sanford, USGS, Reston, Virginia
Water Quality Modeling
Engineering Hydrology (ECIV 4323)
WATER RESEARCH OF PINEVIEW RESERVOIR
Engineering Hydrology (ECIV 4323)
Presentation transcript:

Total Loads and Water Quality in the Corpus Christi Bay System Presented by: Ann Quenzer and Dr. David Maidment Special Thanks: Corpus Christi Bay National Estuary Program Ferdinand Hellweger Dr. Nabil Eid Dr. George Ward Dr. Neal Armstrong

Purpose u To determine the rainfall/runoff relationship u To estimate the point and non-point source loads to the bay system u To quantify the relationship between the total loads and the bay system water quality

Basic Concept Point and Non-point Estimation Total Loads Routing Water Quality Calculate Flow and Total Loads Linkage of the Two Models Steady-State Model

Purpose u To determine the rainfall/runoff relationship

Watershed Delineation Sub-Watersheds

Precipitation + = Precipitation Trend over Bay System Merged Precipitation Files Oregon State University Precipitation Data

Regression Inputs and Outputs

Surface Water Runoff

Mean Annual Runoff (mm/yr) Land Use + Precipitation

Precipitation and Runoff Gradient Precipitation and Runoff Gradient from South (A) to North (B) along the Bay System Precipitation and Runoff Gradient Locations in the South (A) and North (B)

Runoff Into Each Bay System Middle Bay System 24.5 m 3 /s 34% of total flow Entire Bay System = 72 m 3 /s North Bay System 40.5 m 3 /s 56% of total flow South Bay System 7 m 3 /s 10% of total flow

Bay System Water Balance Entire Bay System

Bay System Water Balance North Bay System Middle Bay System South Bay System

Purpose u To estimate the point and non-point source loads to the bay system

Total Constituent Loading Land Surface Load Point Source Load Atmospheric Load ? Sediment Load ?

Land Surface Constituent Loading Load [Mass/Time] = Runoff [Vol/Time] x Concentration [Mass/Vol]

Land Use USGS Land Use (1970’s) Addition of Missing Land Use

Percent Land Use Total Study Area Legend

EMC Table

Point Sources Texas Natural Resources Conservation Commission (TNRCC) Water Quality Segmentation

Loads Routing

Elevation Grid Modification Methodology

Model Connection Methodology

Load Routing Methodology

Total Constituent Loads Input for Water Quality Model Connection of Both Models Bay Water Quality

Total Load to Bay System

Load Sources

Load Contribution

Atmospheric Contribution Total Nitrogen Atmospheric Load to Land Surface = 2,700 Kg/d which is 35% of Land Surface Load from agricultural land use. This calculation is made assuming the EMC of 4.4 mg/l for agriculture and a Nitrogen concentration of 1.1 mg/l in precipitation

Purpose u To quantify the relationship between the total loads and the bay system water quality

Bay System Segmentation Segmentation Used in the CCBNEP Project Clipped Segmentation from Drs. Armstrong and Ward

Bay System Model Methodology.

Water Quality Analysis Salinity Concentration and Mass Fluxes in Corpus Christi Bay. Fluxes Flow of water Advection Dispersion Loads Transport of Constituents Finite Segment Analysis

Observed vs. Expected Total Phosphorus (mg/l) Total Nitrogen (mg/l)

Observed vs. Expected Oil and Grease (mg/l)Copper (µg/l)

Observed vs. Expected Zinc (µg/l)Chromium (µg/l)

T-Test Results

Decay Rates (using three segment model)

Provisional EMC Data Original EMC Values from USGS Study (Baird, 1996) Total Nitrogen= 4.40 mg/l Total Phosphorus= 1.30 mg/l Provisional EMC Values from Agricultural Runoff Studies at King Ranch and Agricultural Field Near Edroy, TX (Mean Values Obtained from Okerman of USGS) Total Nitrogen= 1.49 mg/l Total Phosphorus= 0.47 mg/l

Provisional EMC Values Total Nitrogen and Total Phosphorus from Land Surface Sources to Bay System Using Original and Provisional EMC Values. Total Nitrogen Reduction = 54% Total Phosphorus Reduction = 60%

Provisional EMC Values Total Nitrogen and Total Phosphorus from All Sources to Bay System Using Original and Provisional EMC Values. Total Nitrogen Reduction = 27% Total Phosphorus Reduction = 38%

Provisional EMC Values

Conclusions u Strong South-North gradient in runoff from the land surface u Nearly all water evaporates from bays, little exchange with the Gulf u Nonpoint sources are main loading source for most constituents u Nitrogen, phosphorus, oil & grease loads are consistent with observed concentrations in the bays u Metals loads from land account for only a small part of observed concentrations in bays - a reservoir of metals in the bay sediments?