Risk Management Conclusions BE-AWARE II Final Conference, November, Ronneby, Sweden Co-financed by the EU – Civil Protection Financial Instrument

BE-AWARE Sub-Regions

Relatively low traffic density Oceanic conditions Wind farm developments in Irish Sea Vulnerability highest in island groups and mudflats Sub-Region 1: Irish Sea and Atlantic Ireland and UK

Ranking of scenarios based on cost effectiveness in reducing damage impact Sub-Region 1: Irish Sea and Atlantic

1.AIS alarms/guard rings around wind farms 2.TSS Extension beyond what is expected to be in place by % increase in counter pollution equipment Sub-Region 1: Risk Management Conclusions

Medium traffic density Extensive oil and gas developments Renewable developments Islands groups and fjords most vulnerable Sub-Region 2: Northern North Sea Norway and UK

Ranking of scenarios based on cost effectiveness in reducing damage impact Sub-Region 2: Northern North Sea

1.Extended Traffic Separation Schemes (TSS) 2.50 % increase in response equipment 3.AIS alarms around wind farms 4.Improved night detection/visibility equipment Sub-Region 2: Northern North Sea

High traffic density to and from Baltic oil and gas developments further offshore Wind farm development Coastal archipelago and Wadden sea areas most vulnerable Sub-Region 3: Eastern North Sea/Skagerrak Denmark, Germany, Norway and Sweden

Ranking of scenarios based on cost effectiveness in reducing damage impact Sub-Region 3: Eastern North Sea/Skagerrak

1.Extended TSS routes from the coast of Norway and the Skaw towards the Netherlands 2.VTS close to the North Western Jutland coast 3.AIS alarms around wind farms Sub-Region 3: Eastern North Sea/Skagerrak

High traffic density oil and gas developments Extensive wind farm developments Wadden Sea and Scheldt estuary are most vulnerable Sub-Region 4: Southern North Sea Belgium, France, Germany, Netherlands and UK

Ranking of scenarios based on cost effectiveness in reducing damage impact Sub-Region 4: Southern North Sea

1.AIS alarms around wind farms 2.Improved night detection/visibility equipment 3.Extended Traffic Separation Schemes 4. E-navigation Sub-Region 4: Southern North Sea

High traffic density Limited wind farm developments Vulnerability highest along coastal areas Sub-Region 5: Channel France and UK

Ranking of scenarios based on cost effectiveness in reducing damage impact Sub-Region 5: Channel

1.AIS alarms around wind farms 2.Improved night detection/visibility equipment 3.Extended Vessel Traffic Service (VTS) 4.E-navigation Sub-Region 5: Channel

Regional Risk Management Conclusions

Extended TSS and VTS in North Sea

International Risk Management Conclusions E-Navigation

Questions? Thank you beaware.bonnagreement.org