2006 HURRICANE NAMES AnalyzeIn-service BasalJ-Curve CRISSKagan DIBELSLee EducateMarzano FCATNorm GainsOrder HistogramPareto Looks Like Another Challenging.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Citrus County 21 st CCLC Progress Report Larry Parman External Evaluator.
Advertisements

Leon County Schools Performance Feedback Process August 2006 For more information
Using Data Effectively or Why Weigh the Hog If You Aren’t Going To Feed It? Presented by Ronni Ephraim, Chief Instructional Officer Los Angeles Unified.
NCLB Basics From “What Parents of Students with Disabilities Need to Know & Do” National Center on Educational Outcomes University of Minnesota
Changes To Florida’s School Grades Calculations Adopted By The State Board Of Education On February 28, 2012 Prepared by Research, Evaluation & Accountability.
VALUE – ADDED 101 Ken Bernacki and Denise Brewster.
Universal Screening: Answers to District Leaders Questions Are you uncertain about the practical matters of Response to Intervention?
1 Prepared by: Research Services and Student Assessment & School Performance School Accountability in Florida: Grading Schools and Measuring Adequate Yearly.
LCFF & LCAP PTO Presentation April, 2014 TEAM Charter School.
Trigg County Collaboration Roundtable Discussion “ March 17, 2009.
Title I Annual Parent Meeting
Lee County’s Just Read, Florida! District Plan K-12 Comprehensive Research-Based Plan Dianne Johnson, Ali Conant C. Keith Woodfin, John Scheller.
WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT TITLE I PARENT MEETING PRESENTATION.
1 Prepared by: Student Assessment & School Performance School Accountability in Florida: Grading Schools and Measuring Adequate Yearly Progress.
Bluebonnet Elementary School Celebrations and Recommendations for Continuous School Improvement Round Rock Independent School District Module 7 Assignment.
ABSTRACT Key Terms: Parent involvement, Common Core State Standards, Homework, K – 2 Mathematics In this study, the 2015 REU mathematics team from Elizabeth.
Using Data to Improve Student Achievement Summer 2006 Preschool CSDC.
5-Step Process Clarification The 5-Step Process is for a unit, topic, or “chunk” of information. One form should be used for the unit, topic, etc. The.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Academic Performance Index (API) and Assessing California Standards Test (CST) Data.
1 School Grades & AMO Overview Paul Houchens Director Student Assessment & Research.
Know the Rules Nancy E. Brito, NBCT, Accountability Specialist Department of Educational Data Warehouse, Accountability, and School Improvement
Using Data to Improve Student Achievement Secondary Mathematics Preschool Inservice 2006.
Classroom Assessments Checklists, Rating Scales, and Rubrics
What is Title I and How Can I be Involved? Annual Parent Meeting Sequoyah Elementary School August 7, 2014.
SLOs for Students on GAA February 20, GAA SLO Submissions January 17, 2014 Thank you for coming today. The purpose of the session today.
DataDirector: Using Customized Reports for School Improvement Fall 2010 Jennifer DeGrie and Stan Masters Lenawee ISD.
1 School Grades Paul Houchens Director Student Assessment & Research.
What is Title I and How Can I be Involved? Annual Parent Meeting Cherokee Elementary December 2, 2013.
GETTING HIGH SCHOOL STUDENT’S BUY-IN: Target Language Only Mandarin Chinese Classes.
Program Improvement/ Title I Parent Involvement Meeting October 9, :00 p.m. Redwood City School District.
A ccountability R esearch and M easurement Florida Department of Education Accountability Research and Measurement Florida’s School Grading System Rule.
Growth. 10/17/2015Free Template from 2 Objectives Understand the Growth Model Understand how the model can be used to improve student.
Lee County Math Teachers. The Ten Root Causes of Educational Frustration Information brought to you by Lee Jenkins, Ph. D.
TAP Expansion, Impact and Outcomes Lewis C. Solmon President Teacher Advancement Program Foundation April 27, 2006 TAP Expansion, Impact and Outcomes Lewis.
Adolescent Literacy – Professional Development
1 Student Assessment Update Research, Evaluation & Accountability Angela Marino Coordinator Research, Evaluation & Accountability.
1 No Child Left Behind for Indian Groups 2004 Eva M. Kubinski Comprehensive Center – Region VI January 29, 2004 Home/School Coordinators’ Conference UW-Stout.
Growth. Growth Understand the Growth Model Understand how the model can be used to improve student achievement and equity. Objectives.
No Child Left Behind Tecumseh Local Schools. No Child Left Behind OR... 4 No Educator Left Unconfused 4 No Lawyer Left Unemployed 4 No Child Left Untested.
No Child Left Behind Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Know the Rules Division of Performance Accountability Dr. Marc Baron, Chief Nancy E. Brito, Instructional.
1  Jennifer Nehl Kemmerer. Outcomes To discuss district report card status. To examine PAWS data reports. To analyze reading and math standards at individual.
PUSD Teacher Evaluation SY 14/15 Governing Board Presentation May 13, 2014 Dr. Heather Cruz, Deputy Superintendent.
Using Common Core State Standards of Seventh Grade Mathematics in the Application of NXT LEGO® Robotics for CReSIS Middle School Students.
AYP and Report Card. AYP/RC –Understand the purpose and role of AYP in Oregon Assessments. –Understand the purpose and role of the Report Card in Oregon.
Using Data to Improve Student Achievement Summer 2006 Preschool CSDC.
Science Fair Parent Workshop
The PLC Team Learning Process Review Step One: Identify essential (key) learning standards that all students must learn in each content area during each.
Using Data to Improve Student Achievement Summer 2006 Preschool CSDC.
Using Data to Improve Student Achievement Summer 2006 Preschool CSDC.
Evaluation Results Missouri Reading Initiative.
What is Title I and How Can I be Involved? Annual Parent Meeting Pierce Elementary
DVAS Training Find out how Battelle for Kids can help Presentation Outcomes Learn rationale for value-added progress measures Receive conceptual.
Capacity Development and School Reform Accountability The School District Of Palm Beach County Adequate Yearly Progress, Differentiated Accountability.
Changes in Professional licensure Teacher evaluation system Training at Coastal Carolina University.
Evaluating Impacts of MSP Grants Ellen Bobronnikov January 6, 2009 Common Issues and Potential Solutions.
1 NCEXTEND1 Alternate Assessment with Alternate Achievement Standards Conference on Exceptional Children November 17-18, 2008 NCDPI Division of Accountability.
AYP and Report Card. Big Picture Objectives – Understand the purpose and role of AYP in Oregon Assessments. – Understand the purpose and role of the Report.
©2007 Dr. Karl Squier Data Is Our Friend The Need for a School Counseling Data Management System.
C R E S S T / CU University of Colorado at Boulder National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing Measuring Adequate Yearly.
1 SCHOOL SITE COUNCIL. 2 Purpose: School Site Council The organization by which the school community comes together to chart the school’s path to improvement.
MID-YEAR STAKEHOLDER’S ASSESSMENT REVIEW TWIN LAKES ACADEMY ELEMENTARY JANUARY 23, 2014.
Technology Help or Hinderance? DOMINIQUE JOHNSON EDU671: FUNDAMENTALS OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH INSTRUCTOR: FREDERICK ANSOFF 2 JUNE 2014.
School Improvement Needs Assessment – © Iowa Association of School Boards Assessment Conducted by the Iowa Association of School Boards.
Discussion of W-APT, ACCESS Testing, Adequate Yearly Progress and Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives.
Falls-Lenox Primary School Wall to Wall Data 1. Background ➢ Intervention based Assessment Team, IAT, serves over 750 students ➢ Need to provide intervention.
Using Data to Improve Student Achievement Summer 2006 Preschool CSDC.
Merit & Incentive Pay Based on High Stakes Testing
Courtney Mills Principal, Midlands Middle College
Teacher Evaluation “SLO 101”
Growth Last updated: 08/20/09.
Presentation transcript:

2006 HURRICANE NAMES AnalyzeIn-service BasalJ-Curve CRISSKagan DIBELSLee EducateMarzano FCATNorm GainsOrder HistogramPareto Looks Like Another Challenging Year

Learning Gains Outcomes: Understand what constitutes a learning gain. Understand what constitutes a learning gain. Understand why “learning” is the focus of data. Understand why “learning” is the focus of data. Assist teachers in identifying needs. Assist teachers in identifying needs. Improve student achievement. Improve student achievement. Increase instructional effectiveness. Increase instructional effectiveness.

No Clear Aim One reason why the proverbial “report card committee” poses such difficulty is that we have not agreed upon the aim of the reporting system. One reason why the proverbial “report card committee” poses such difficulty is that we have not agreed upon the aim of the reporting system. What is the aim of history instruction? What is the aim of history instruction? What do you believe is the aim in your own classroom?

The primary aim of a school system is to increase success and decrease failure. The primary aim of a school system is to increase success and decrease failure. A clear aim unifies people and practices. What unifies your school? Classroom? AIM

According to Piaget, children are most like adults in their feelings and least like adults in their thinking. It is not the responsibility of educators to motivate students, but to determine what is causing them to lose their motivation and stop such practices.

Wrong Definition of “Fair” Fair is not everyone using the same method. Fair is not everyone using the same method. Fair is everyone meeting the same standards. Fair is everyone meeting the same standards. If the pieces don’t fit, don’t force them. If the pieces don’t fit, don’t force them.

Change, But No Improvement Most often we experience change without the foggiest notion whether or not improvement occurred. Most often we experience change without the foggiest notion whether or not improvement occurred. Sometimes, change is like a rocking horse; movement occurs, but when all is said and done, we’ve gone nowhere. Sometimes, change is like a rocking horse; movement occurs, but when all is said and done, we’ve gone nowhere.

Gain Scores Commonly referred to as “Learning Gains” The amount of progress a student makes in one school year.

Learning Gains: Who Qualifies?   All students with a pre- and post-test, including all subgroups (ESE, LEP, etc.).   All students with matched, consecutive year (i.e & 2006) FCAT SSS results, grades 4-10, who were enrolled in the same school surveys 2 & 3 (FTE).

Learning Gains: Which Scores? Gains apply in reading and math, not writing or science. Pre-test may be from same school, same district, or anywhere in the state.

Learning Gains: What equals Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)? A. Improve FCAT Achievement Levels from 2005 to 2006 (e.g. 1-2, 2-3, 3-4, 4-5) OR B. Maintain “satisfactory” Achievement Levels from (e.g. 3-3, 4-4, 5-5) OR C. Demonstrate more than one year’s growth within Level 1 or Level 2 - determined by DSS Cut Points (not applicable for retained students)

Learning Gains: Retainees A retained student can only be counted as making adequate progress if he/she: Moves up one level. (e.g. 1-2, 2-3, 3-4, 4-5) Maintains a level 3, 4, or 5.

Developmental Scale Score Gains Table (DSS Cut Points) Students achieving within Level 1 (or within Level 2) for two consecutive years must gain at least one point more than those listed in the table in order to satisfy the “making annual learning gains” component of the school accountability system. Grade Level ChangeReadingMathematics 3 to to to to to to to

Learning Gains: Activity Using the data on the following table, determine:   which students made a learning gain   what percentage of the students made a learning gain

Data Display for FCAT Reading Results Student04/05 Grade Level 05/06 Grade Level Pre-test Achievement Level Pre- test DSS Post-test Achievement Level Post- test DSS Learning Gain Determination A78Level 1Level 2Yes or No Reason: A, B, or C B78Level 4 Yes or No Reason: A, B, or C C78Level 21598Level 21743Yes or No Reason: A, B, or C D88Level 1Level 2Yes or No Reason: A, B, or C E88Level 3 Yes or No Reason: A, B, or C F88Level 11486Level 11653Yes or No Reason: A, B, or C G78Level 5Level 4Yes or No Reason: A, B, or C

Teacher Learning Gains Based on Data Display 5 out of 7 students made learning gains. 71% of this teacher’s students made learning gains and add points towards the school’s grade. No points are given to the school for Student F because he was retained and stayed within level 1 – even though he made significant gains in DSS points. No points are given to Student G because he decreased a level. Total Number of Students with a Pre and Post-test who qualify for learning gain calculations: Reason A Increased 1 or more Achievement Levels Reason B Maintains “satisfactory” levels (3, 4, or 5) Reason C DSS Target Gain (More than a year’s growth) 7221

Class Record Sheet for Learning Gains FCAT Data Inquiry website:

Learning is the Constant We say “you can lead a horse to water, but cannot make him drink,” which means I teach but have little impact upon learning. Teaching is the constant in classrooms; learning is the variable. Learning should be the constant; teaching the variable.

Learning Sequence How would you use data to drive your learning environment?

Gather Data Graph Data Analyze Data Generate Hypothesis using Insight Allow insight to drive instruction Assess individual students’ learning gains Learning Sequence Utilize on PDP

Conclusion Utilizing and analyzing data allows educators to do a fair job of leading the vast majority of students to meet grade-level standards. Utilizing and analyzing data allows educators to do a fair job of leading the vast majority of students to meet grade-level standards. The key is using the statistical tools to create teams (teacher & students, teachers and principals, site staff and district office staff) that are working together to create all-time-bests in every aspect of schooling. The key is using the statistical tools to create teams (teacher & students, teachers and principals, site staff and district office staff) that are working together to create all-time-bests in every aspect of schooling.

References Bernhardt, Victoria L. Data Analysis for Comprehensive School Improvement, Eye on Education, Inc., Bernhardt, Victoria L. Data Analysis for Comprehensive School Improvement, Eye on Education, Inc., Wahlstrom, D. Using Data to Improve Student Achievement, Successline: Virginia Beach, Wahlstrom, D. Using Data to Improve Student Achievement, Successline: Virginia Beach, 1999.