Warsaw August 14-25, 1920 Strategic Context Poland takes advantage of the turmoil in Russia during its Civil War to occupy large areas of mixed Polish-Russian.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
World War I Modern History Mr.Vernon.  Was the German General Staff's early 20th century overall strategic plan for victory in a possible future war.
Advertisements

The North African Campaign June 10,1940 – May 16, 1943.
THE SOVIET RECONQUEST OF WESTERN RUSSIA JULY, 1943.
Russian Tactics.
The Schlieffen Plan.
Operation Barbarossa LTC Oakland McCulloch. Outline Non-Aggression Pact and Polish Deal Operational Goal of the German Invasion Plans and Preparation.
Rise of the Alliances: Rise of the Alliances: Britain and France VS The Axis Powers.
WORLD WAR II THE EASTERN FRONT THE WAR ENDS IN EUROPE.
The End of the War in Europe June 1944 May June 1944 While the huge invasion force from D-Day is fighting against the German defenders, on the Eastern.
Discussion According to this quotation, how did Hitler want to put Lebensraum into effect with the German invasion of Poland? According to this quotation,
Marathon August [?], 490 BC Strategic Context After the failures of an expedition in 492 BC and diplomacy the following year, Darius of Persia invades.
Kosovo June 20, 1389 Strategic Context The Ottoman Empire is growing steadily at the expense of neighbouring powers in the Balkans where Murad I wishes.
Ulm Sep. 25-Oct. 17, 1805 Strategic Context After failing to negate the Royal Navy and invade England, Napoleon Bonaparte instead leads his Grande Armée.
Cowpens January 17, 1781 Strategic Context The overall strategic situation of the American Revolutionary War is already decidedly in the American favour.
Leuthen December 5, 1757 Strategic Context The Seven Years’ War begins! Backed only by Britain after attacking Saxony, Prussia finds itself surrounded.
Grunwald July 15, 1410 Strategic Context Founded in 1190 in Acre, the Teutonic Knights are unable to expand against the Saracens, and eventually accept.
Pydna June 22, 168 BC Strategic Context Following the death of Philip V of Macedon in 179 BC, Perseus of Macedon hopes to renew his father’s ambition of.
Gate Pa April 29, 1864 Strategic Context The British land at Tauranga to establish a defensive base. In response, the Ngatirangi also move into the area.
Adrianople August 9, 378 Strategic Context The Visigoths and Ostrigoths conspire to assassinate Roman Emperor Valens but fail; the Romans consequently.
Maling 342 BC Strategic Context Of the Seven Warring States in China, Wei finds itself particularly vulnerable following its defeat at the Battle of Kuei-ling.
Praga November 4, 1794 Strategic Context Inspired by the American and French Revolutions, and knowing its enemies too preoccupied with other major wars.
Fornovo July 6, 1495 Strategic Context In February 1495, Charles VIII of France is able to conquer Naples with the help of Milan, following a long march.
WORLD WAR II THE EASTERN FRONT THE WAR ENDS IN EUROPE.
Ayacucho December 9, 1824 Strategic Context Stakes
Damascus March-September, 635 Strategic Context The Rashidun Caliph Abu Bakr seeks to expand the newly established Muslim state by sending Khalid ibn al-Walid.
Saratoga October 7, 1777 Strategic Context The British look to strangle the American Revolution in 1777 by cutting off the more troublesome northeastern.
The Marne September 5-9, 1914 Strategic Context As more states join the growing European conflict, Germany seeks to avoid a simultaneous, two-front war.
Blenheim August 13, 1704 Strategic Context England, as part of its commitment to the Grand Alliance with Holland, Austria and Prussia, sends then-Earl.
Raphia June 22, 217 BC Strategic Context Antiochus III the Great inherits the Seleucid throne in 223 BC and undertakes a quest to restore the lands lost.
Torvioll June 29, 1444 Strategic Context The Ottoman Empire recovers from its decade-long civil war in 1415, and subsequently seeks to reestablish control.
Bannockburn June 24, 1314 Strategic Context Edward I of England defeats William Wallace at the Battle of Falkirk in 1298, crushing the Scottish uprising.
Thymbra [?], 546 BC Strategic Context In 559 BC, Cyrus deposes Astyages of Media and begins to consolidate his new Persian state, which he accomplishes.
Mohi Heath April 11, 1241 Strategic Context The Mongol hordes are invading Eastern Europe. Kaidu crushes the Germans outside of Liegnitz so now only the.
Ankara July 28, 1402 Strategic Context The clash between the Timurid and Ottoman Empires is somewhat inevitable in the early 1400s. Tamerlane’s Tatars.
Zama October 19, 202 BC Strategic Context In 218 BC, Hannibal Barca leads a Carthaginian army from Spain across the Alps to invade attack the Roman Empire.
The Korean War Conflict in Korea Before WWII, the Korean peninsula had been conquered by ________. Before WWII, the Korean peninsula had been.
The Marne September 5-9, 1914 Strategic Context As more states join the growing European conflict, Germany seeks to avoid a simultaneous, two-front war.
Section 1: From Bull Run to Antietam.  The first shots fired on Fort Sumter, South Carolina, in April 1861 signaled the start of the nation’s ________.
Ilipa [?], 206 BC Strategic Context In 218 BC, Hannibal Barca leads a Carthaginian army from Spain across the Alps to invade the Roman Empire. Despite.
Kulikovo September 8, 1380 Strategic Context The Golden Horde is deteriorating due to internal and external power struggles. The khan’s authority falls.
Kulikovo September 8, 1380 Strategic Context The Mongol-Tatar Golden Horde is deteriorating due to internal and external power struggles. The Khan’s authority.
Cowpens January 17, 1781 Strategic Context Britain’s American colonies revolt in 1775, provoking a large military response from Britain. The overall strategic.
Saratoga October 7, 1777 Strategic Context The British look to strangle the American Revolution in 1777 by cutting off the more troublesome northeastern.
David Cao and Jennifer DeJong
To view animation on PC: hit F5
Ad Decimum September 13, 533 Strategic Context Stakes No Image
Varna November 10, 1444 Strategic Context Stakes
Ilipa [?], 206 BC Strategic Context Stakes No Image Available
To view animation on PC: hit F5
To view animation on PC: hit F5
To view animation on PC: hit F5
To view animation on PC: hit F5
To view animation on PC: hit F5
To view animation on PC: hit F5
To view animation on PC: hit F5
To view animation on PC: hit F5
To view animation on PC: hit F5
To view animation on PC: hit F5
To view animation on PC: hit F5
Operation Citadel and the Red Army’s Western Advance
The Trebia December [?], 218 BC
To view animation on PC: hit F5
To view animation on PC: hit F5
To view animation on PC: hit F5
To view animation on PC: hit F5
Daras [?], 530 Strategic Context Stakes
Strasbourg August [?], 357 Strategic Context Stakes No Image Available
Zama October 19, 202 BC Strategic Context Stakes
Ruspina January 4, 46 BC Strategic Context Stakes
Ipsus [?], 301 BC Strategic Context Stakes
Presentation transcript:

Warsaw August 14-25, 1920 Strategic Context Poland takes advantage of the turmoil in Russia during its Civil War to occupy large areas of mixed Polish-Russian ethnicity. When the Soviets win control of Russia, they dispute Jozef Pilsudski’s ambitions for a greater Poland but are nonetheless caught off guard by his offensive towards Kiev in April-May. The offensive is been brought down by logistical shortcomings and so Mikhail Tukhachevski launches his own offensive which brings the Soviets to the gates of Warsaw itself. The Soviets survive mostly off the land thus far so any halt is dangerous but the Poles are struggling to find ammunition for their multicultural weaponry, received from many cautious vendors. Stakes + A Polish victory would create chaos in the Soviet supply system and force a withdrawal, saving Warsaw and Poland from Soviet ambitions. + A Soviet victory would overthrow the Polish government and reveal Germany to Soviet pressure and possibly conquest. By Jonathan Webb, 2009 ©

Warsaw, 1920 Strength  Polish Army  Well  Soviet Army  Well  Jozef Pilsudski  130,000  133,000  Mikhail Tukhachevsky By Jonathan Webb, 2009 ©

Polish Army (Pilsudski) Soviet Army (Tukhachevsky) 5. Army (Sikorski) 1. Army (Latinik) 2. Army (Roja) 3. Army (Zillinski) 16. Army (Sollohub) 15. Army (Kork) 3. Army (Lazarievich) 4. Army (Shuvayev) 12. Army (Yegorov) Mozyr Group Pilsudski deploys his force in four armies along strong river lines in defence of the Polish capital; 3. Army is also shown but is officially placed under the Polish southern sector which also includes two more armies even further south. Tukhachevsky also deploys his force in four armies; 12. Army is also shown but is officially placed under direct command of Yegorov along with two other Soviet armies further south. A weak detachment, Mozyr Group, seperates the two army groups. However, Tukhacevsky and Yegorov conflict when it comes to overall strategy of the war and so 12. Army does not cooperate with Tukhachevsky. Although Pilsudski does not realize how weak the Mozyr Group opposing his 2. Army really is, he resolves to attack the Soviet left wing and roll up the Soviet line.. His staff sternly advise an attack on the Soviet right flank to remove the threat to Warsaw by the bulk of the Soviet force. Tukhachevsky meanwhile attempts to suddenly overwhelm Warsaw with attacks by 3., 4. and 15. Army. The Soviet 3. and 15. Armies force the Polish back to their final defences while the Soviet 15. Army is repelled. Pilsudski’s staff urges him to launch his offensive prematurely but he compromises: he still reinforces 4. Army with units from 3. Army but promises to launch his offensive slightly earlier. The Soviet Mozyr Group disintegrates as the Polish 4. Army advances aggressively under the personal direction of Pilsudski. When it encounters no resistance, Pilsudski senses a terrible trap and advances cautiously until he finds the Soviet 16. Army – in rout. The Soviet 16. Army is retreating in disarray out of fear for their left flank before the attack even comes. Tukhachevsky’s headquarters is 480km away in Minsk so he is unable to comprehend the irreversible rout of his 16. Army. Nonetheless, he issues intelligible orders that are received either never or late and ignored altogether. Meanwhile, Pilsudski arrives in Warsaw to personally direct the counteroffensive to remove the threat to the capital. The Polish 3. and 2. Armies move towards each other to form a defensive line against any action by Yegorov which never occurs anyways. The Polish 4. Army continues its drive north while the 1. Army thrusts northeast. The Polish 5. Army uses its handful of armoured and motorized vehicles to cut off the Soviet 4. Army from the 15. Army. Shuvayev allows this to happen when he finally receives Tukhachevsky’s orders, thinks them to be outdated and attacks the Polish 5. Army’s flank before realizing the mistake and retreating northwest. The entire Soviet Army continues to flee with the Polish Army close behind which captures stragglers and the vast majority of Soviet equipment. Meanwhile, the Soviet 4. Army is unable to escape east and instead flees north into Prussia where the entire army is interned and disarmed shortly after. Soviet Army (Mikhail Tukhachevsky) 130,000 Polish Army (Jozef Pilsudski) 133, Army (Skierski)

Warsaw, 1920 Casualties & Aftermath Polish Army:Soviet Army: 21,000 or 16% 81,000 or 62% By Jonathan Webb, 2009 © The Polish pursuit of the Soviet mass ended halfway to Minsk when Tukhachevski rallied them to defend a long front stretching north-south. Although the Battle of Warsaw was a decisive check to Soviet advances, the Poles still had to defeat them in three more major battles in a two-month offensive that was ended only by an armistice. The Treaty of Riga in 1921 allowed Poland to annex all territorial claims from Russia.

The Art of Battle: Animated Battle Maps By Jonathan Webb, 2009 ©