1 Spring 2011 Notes 6 ECE 6345 Prof. David R. Jackson ECE Dept.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Microwave Engineering
Advertisements

Notes 12 ECE Microwave Engineering Fall Surface Waves Prof. David R. Jackson Dept. of ECE Fall 2011.
Prof. David R. Jackson ECE Dept. Spring 2014 Notes 29 ECE
EMLAB 1 Solution of Maxwell’s eqs for simple cases.
Prof. David R. Jackson Dept. of ECE Fall 2013 Notes 26 ECE 6340 Intermediate EM Waves 1.
Microwave Engineering
Prof. David R. Jackson Dept. of ECE Fall 2013 Notes 22 ECE 6340 Intermediate EM Waves 1.
Applied Electricity and Magnetism
Limitation of Pulse Basis/Delta Testing Discretization: TE-Wave EFIE difficulties lie in the behavior of fields produced by the pulse expansion functions.
Rectangular Waveguides
Prof. David R. Jackson ECE Dept. Spring 2014 Notes 3 ECE
Prof. David R. Jackson Dept. of ECE Fall 2013 Notes 25 ECE 6340 Intermediate EM Waves 1.
Prof. David R. Jackson Dept. of ECE Fall 2013 Notes 23 ECE 6340 Intermediate EM Waves 1.
Prof. David R. Jackson Dept. of ECE Fall 2013 Notes 17 ECE 6340 Intermediate EM Waves 1.
Prof. David R. Jackson Notes 19 Waveguiding Structures Waveguiding Structures ECE Spring 2013.
Prof. David R. Jackson ECE Dept. Spring 2014 Notes 10 ECE
Prof. David R. Jackson Dept. of ECE Fall 2013 Notes 13 ECE 6340 Intermediate EM Waves 1.
Notes 13 ECE Microwave Engineering
Fall 2014 Notes 23 ECE 2317 Applied Electricity and Magnetism Prof. David R. Jackson ECE Dept. 1.
Prof. David R. Jackson ECE Dept. Spring 2014 Notes 12 ECE
Prof. David R. Jackson Dept. of ECE Fall 2013 Notes 12 ECE 6340 Intermediate EM Waves 1.
1 ECE 6345 Spring 2011 Prof. David R. Jackson ECE Dept. Notes 2.
Prof. David R. Jackson Dept. of ECE Fall 2013 Notes 9 ECE 6340 Intermediate EM Waves 1.
1 Spring 2011 Notes 20 ECE 6345 Prof. David R. Jackson ECE Dept.
Rectangular Waveguides
Prof. David R. Jackson ECE Dept. Spring 2014 Notes 21 ECE
Prof. David R. Jackson ECE Dept. Spring 2016 Notes 12 ECE 3318 Applied Electricity and Magnetism 1.
Prof. David R. Jackson ECE Dept. Spring 2016 Notes 14 ECE 3318 Applied Electricity and Magnetism 1.
Spring 2015 Notes 6 ECE 6345 Prof. David R. Jackson ECE Dept. 1.
Spring 2015 Notes 1 ECE 6345 Prof. David R. Jackson ECE Dept. 1.
Prof. David R. Jackson Dept. of ECE Fall 2015 Notes 10 ECE 6340 Intermediate EM Waves 1.
Prof. David R. Jackson Dept. of ECE Fall 2015 Notes 22 ECE 6340 Intermediate EM Waves 1.
Prof. David R. Jackson ECE Dept. Spring 2016 Notes 10 ECE
Prof. David R. Jackson Dept. of ECE Notes 6 ECE Microwave Engineering Fall 2015 Waveguides Part 3: Attenuation 1.
Microwave Engineering
Spring 2016 Notes 1 ECE 6341 Prof. David R. Jackson ECE Dept. 1.
Notes 13 ECE Microwave Engineering
Spring 2015 Notes 25 ECE 6345 Prof. David R. Jackson ECE Dept. 1.
Spring 2015 Notes 32 ECE 6345 Prof. David R. Jackson ECE Dept. 1.
Notes 22 ECE 6340 Intermediate EM Waves Fall 2016
Notes 27 ECE 6340 Intermediate EM Waves Fall 2016
ECE 6341 Spring 2016 Prof. David R. Jackson ECE Dept. Notes 41.
Notes 23 ECE 6340 Intermediate EM Waves Fall 2016
ECE 6341 Spring 2016 Prof. David R. Jackson ECE Dept. Notes 17.
ECE 6345 Fall 2015 Prof. David R. Jackson ECE Dept. Notes 11.
Notes 13 ECE 6340 Intermediate EM Waves Fall 2016
Applied Electricity and Magnetism
ECE 6341 Spring 2016 Prof. David R. Jackson ECE Dept. Notes 12.
Notes 12 ECE 6340 Intermediate EM Waves Fall 2016
Applied Electricity and Magnetism
Notes 5 ECE Microwave Engineering
Notes 17 ECE 6340 Intermediate EM Waves Fall 2016
ECE 6345 Spring 2015 Prof. David R. Jackson ECE Dept. Notes 15.
Microwave Engineering
Microwave Engineering
Microwave Engineering
Notes 5 ECE 6340 Intermediate EM Waves Fall 2016
Applied Electromagnetic Waves Rectangular Waveguides
Bessel Function Examples
ECE 6341 Spring 2016 Prof. David R. Jackson ECE Dept. Notes 14.
Applied Electromagnetic Waves Waveguiding Structures
ECE 6341 Spring 2016 Prof. David R. Jackson ECE Dept. Notes 29.
ECE 6345 Spring 2015 Prof. David R. Jackson ECE Dept. Notes 4.
ECE 6345 Spring 2015 Prof. David R. Jackson ECE Dept. Notes 18.
Notes 24 ECE 6340 Intermediate EM Waves Fall 2016
ECE 6345 Spring 2015 Prof. David R. Jackson ECE Dept. Notes 3.
ECE 6345 Spring 2015 Prof. David R. Jackson ECE Dept. Notes 29.
ECE 6345 Spring 2015 Prof. David R. Jackson ECE Dept. Notes 27.
ECE 6345 Spring 2015 Prof. David R. Jackson ECE Dept. Notes 31.
ECE 6341 Spring 2016 Prof. David R. Jackson ECE Dept. Notes 16.
Presentation transcript:

1 Spring 2011 Notes 6 ECE 6345 Prof. David R. Jackson ECE Dept.

2 Overview In this set of notes we look at two different models for calculating the radiation pattern of a microstrip antenna:  Electric current model  Magnetic current model We also look at two different substrate assumptions:  Infinite substrate  Truncated substrate (truncated at the edge of the patch).

3 Review of Equivalence Principle new problem: + - original problem:

4 Review of Equivalence Principle A common choice: The electric surface current sitting on the PEC object does not radiate, and can be ignored.

Model of Patch and Feed Infinite substrate (aperture) patch probe coax feed 5

6 Model of Patch and Feed Aperture: Magnetic frill model: zero fields

7 Electric Current Model: Infinite Substrate infinite substrate Note: The direct radiation from the frill is ignored. The surface S “hugs” the metal. zero fields

8 Let Electric Current Model: Infinite Substrate (cont.) top view

9 Magnetic Current Model: Infinite Substrate Keep ground plane and substrate in the zero-field region. Remove patch, probe and frill current. zero fields (weak fields) (approximate PMC) S

10 Exact model: Approximate model: Magnetic Current Model: Infinite Substrate (cont.) Note: The magnetic currents radiate inside an infinite substrate above a ground plane.

11 Magnetic Current Model: Truncated Substrate Note: The magnetic currents radiate in free space above a ground plane. Approximate model: Now we remove the substrate inside the surface.

12 Electric Current Model: Truncated Substrate The patch and probe are replaced by surface currents, as before. Next, we replace the dielectric with polarization currents.

13 Electric Current Model: Truncated Substrate (cont.) In this model we have three separate electric currents.

14 Comments on Models Infinite Substrate  The electric current model is exact (if we neglect the frill), but it requires knowledge of the exact patch and probe currents.  The magnetic current model is approximate, but fairly simple.  For a rectangular patch, both models are fairly simple if only the (1,0) mode is assumed.  For a circular patch, the magnetic current model is much simpler (it does not involve Bessel functions).

15 Comments on Models (cont.) Truncated Substrate  The electric current model is exact (if we neglect the frill), but it requires knowledge of the exact patch and probe currents, as well as the field inside the patch cavity (to get the polarization currents). It is a complicated model.  The magnetic current model is approximate, but very simple. This is the recommended model.  For the magnetic current model the same formulation applies as for the infinite substrate – the substrate is simply taken to be air.

16 Theorem Assumptions: 1)The electric and magnetic current models are based on the fields of a single cavity mode corresponding to an ideal cavity with PMC walls. 2)The probe current is neglected in the electric current model. Then the electric and magnetic models yield identical results at the resonant frequency of the cavity mode. (This is true for either infinite or truncated substrates).

17 Electric-current model: Magnetic-current model: Theorem (cont.) ( E, H) = fields of resonant cavity mode

18 Theorem (cont.) Proof: At ideal cavity PMC PEC We start with an ideal cavity having PMC walls on the sides. This cavity will support a valid non-zero set of fields at the resonance frequency f 0 of the mode.

19 Proof Equivalence principle: Put ( 0, 0 ) outside S keep ( E, H ) inside S PEC PMC The PEC and PMC walls have been removed in the zero field region. We keep the substrate and ground plane. Infinite substrate

20 Proof (cont.) Note: The electric current on the ground is neglected (it does not radiate). Note the inward pointing normal

21 Proof (cont.) Exterior Fields: (The equivalent electric current is the same as the electric current in the electric current model.) (note the inward pointing normal) (The equivalent current is the negative of the magnetic current in the magnetic current model.)

22 Proof (cont.) Hence or

23 Proof for truncated model: Theorem for Truncated Substrate PMC PEC PMC PEC Replace the dielectric with polarization current:

24 Proof (cont.) Hence or

25 Extension of Theorem The electric and magnetic models yield identical results at any frequency if we include the probe current and the currents from the higher-order modes Electric current modelMagnetic current model

26 Extension of Theorem (cont.) Proof: PMC PEC The frill source excites fields in the ideal cavity at any frequency. In general, all (infinite) number of modes are excited.

27 Extension of Theorem (cont.) The probe is then replaced by its surface current: These currents now account for all modes.

28 Electric current modelMagnetic current model Extension of Theorem (cont.) Hence, we have

29 Rectangular Patch Ideal cavity model: Let PMC C L W x y Divide by X(x)Y(y): so

30 Rectangular Patch (cont.) Hence Choose General solution: Boundary condition:

31 Rectangular Patch (cont.) so Returning to the Helmholtz equation, Following the same procedure as for the X ( x ) function, we have Hence

32 Rectangular Patch (cont.) where Using we have Hence

33 Rectangular Patch (cont.) Current: so

34 Rectangular Patch (cont.) Hence Dominant (1,0) Mode:

35 Rectangular Patch (cont.) Static (0,0) mode: This is a “static capacitor” mode. A patch operating in this mode can be made resonant if the patch is fed by an inductive probe (a good way to make a miniaturized patch).

36 Radiation Model for (1,0) Mode Electric-current model: L W x y

37 Radiation Model for (1,0) Mode (cont.) Magnetic-current model: L W

38 Hence radiating edges L W x y Radiation Model for (1,0) Mode (cont.) The non-radiating edges do not contribute to the far-field pattern in the principal planes.

39 Circular Patch set PMC

40 Circular Patch (cont.) Note: cos  and sin  modes are degenerate (same resonance frequency). Choose cos  :

41 Circular Patch (cont.) Hence so Dominant mode (lowest frequency)

42 Circular Patch (cont.) Electric current model: set Very complicated!

43 Circular Patch (cont.) Magnetic current model: so set

44 Circular Patch (cont.) Note: At so Hence

45 Circular Patch (cont.) Ring approximation: